Rattle and Hum
Footballguy
Just wondering what most thought. Sorry if a honda.
Isn't almost every call a judgement call? Did the WR have possession as his feet landed in bounds, was the ball coming loose before the knee hit the ground, where exactly was forward progress stopped.You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
If they insist on making it non reviewable then they should create a major/minor rule. If there's some ticky tack minor contact for PI make it a 10 yard penalty/1st down, more like illegal contact or holding calls. A major can be spot of foul like it is now. I know that adds more judgment on it but as it is, it's pretty silly to have a 50 yard penalty on a judgment call by a ref struggling to keep up with guys that run a 4.3. It's just way too powerful a penalty to not be reviewable.You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
The call today was terrible but the call last week was the correct call.The Vikes have back to back game winning drives that were all PI. The call today was horrible.
No.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
Many of them are. PI, illegal contact, holding, off sides, lined up in the neutral zone just to name a few.No.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
Illegal contact is any contact beyond five yards. That's not a judgment call. It depends if the official sees it or not, but that's not judgment. That's black and white.Same with offsides and neutral zone infractions.Many of them are. PI, illegal contact, holding, off sides, lined up in the neutral zone just to name a few.No.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
ExplainNo.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
Nah i don't agree. The fact it's beyond 5 yards isn't the judgment part, it's the contact itself. What one ref might see as contact, another one may not. Offsides and neutral zone infractions can also be judgment calls based on how close it is or isn't to actual off sides or being in the neutral zone. One ref may call it, one may not.Illegal contact is any contact beyond five yards. That's not a judgment call. It depends if the official sees it or not, but that's not judgment. That's black and white.Same with offsides and neutral zone infractions.Many of them are. PI, illegal contact, holding, off sides, lined up in the neutral zone just to name a few.No.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.
I agree with this. It gives the refs too much game changing power to award a team a 50 yard penalty when the game is on the line on a questionable PI call.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
Exactly. You need the refs to be able to award the full length of the pass. People still do that occasionally, giving up first and goal from the one instead of giving up the TD, especially if the pass is already on first and goal.Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
Well, you could say that about a lot of penalties. This is the only one I can think of that isn't a set yardage, and does seem to put a lot of arbitrary power in the hands of the officials. 15 yards and an automatic 1st down is a lot to give up. Sure, defenders will drag a guy down and take the penalty, but they do that now if it's a sure TD in the end zone.Not sure if I 100% advocate this, was just a random thought I had when I read this thread.Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
Also got a favorable call reviewed and upheld where Calvin Johnson was stripped while down on his back. Almost like someone really wanted Minny to win.Just wondering what most thought. Sorry if a honda.
I don't think that making it 15/1st for all PI flags is the way to go. It'll kill too much of the deep ball big plays. But I don't think it's fair for an incidental or borderline PI to give the offense 50 yards in penalty yardage without being reviewed. IMO it should either be reviewable or it should be categorized into major/minor like facemasks were. Although getting rid of that probably means there's a good reason not to have major/minor categories for any penalty. So, let's make it reviewable.Well, you could say that about a lot of penalties. This is the only one I can think of that isn't a set yardage, and does seem to put a lot of arbitrary power in the hands of the officials. 15 yards and an automatic 1st down is a lot to give up. Sure, defenders will drag a guy down and take the penalty, but they do that now if it's a sure TD in the end zone.Not sure if I 100% advocate this, was just a random thought I had when I read this thread.Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
I agree. Last week it was pretty obvious that the db took the reciever out because he was beat. This weeks call was just a db running behind a reciever.The call today was terrible but the call last week was the correct call.The Vikes have back to back game winning drives that were all PI. The call today was horrible.
I have to disagree here. You cannot minimize the effects of a deep WR by only giving up 15 yards on a PI penalty.I think you make the PI penalty Challengeable and give the coaches 3 challenges per game.The Lions got jobbed today!actually it should be a 15 yard penalty and a first down. none of this 55 yard penalty crap.
this. i'm so sick of teams chucking it up at the end of games and getting rewarded with 50 yard penalties that determine the outcome of games. it's just not fair. the officiating in the Lions game today was outright atrocious and cost them their first win - which they deserved the way the defense played. toss in two ridiculous blocking in the back calls on punt returns and that incredible non-reversal on the megatron "fumble" and that crew should be fired. that PI call GAVE minny the win. that should just not happen.Just make it a 15 yd penalty like in college instead of a spot foul.
so? happens all the time with holding and other penalties. lineman get beat and deliberately drag down a rusher to prevent a sack and possible turnover. should that be a spot foul and loss of down because they did it on purpose? Simple fact is that PI is the ONLY spot foul in the books (aside from intentional grounding of course) and needs to be revised to 15 yards. awarding 50+ yards on plays designed to try and get a call is frustrating as hell for all fans and everyone gets burned by it...it needs to change.Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
The call today was terrible but the call last week was the correct call.The Vikes have back to back game winning drives that were all PI. The call today was horrible.
Maybe let the referee flagging have the option of giving a full PI (like now full distance) or 15 yarder (for less serious calls)don't like this as much as last idea.Just make it a 15 yd penalty like in college instead of a spot foul.
Yes they do but that's not as bad as hauling someone down and "saving" 35 or more yards or a TD because you know the penalty isn't as bad as getting beat. Go re-read my other posts. I'm as opposed to it being a spot foul in most instances unless it's reviewable. I just don't think that 15 yards and a 1st down for all PI calls is the way to do it. I don't want deliberate PIs to start happening more but I am sick of bad PI calls giving away massive chunks of yardage.so? happens all the time with holding and other penalties. lineman get beat and deliberately drag down a rusher to prevent a sack and possible turnover. should that be a spot foul and loss of down because they did it on purpose? Simple fact is that PI is the ONLY spot foul in the books (aside from intentional grounding of course) and needs to be revised to 15 yards. awarding 50+ yards on plays designed to try and get a call is frustrating as hell for all fans and everyone gets burned by it...it needs to change.Not entirely. If you're getting beat 50 yards down the field you can just haul down your guy and take 15 instead of a TD.I heard the theory once that, since Hochule was embarrassed nationally by every broadcaster, owner and fan alike, that the calls have magically gotten worse. I have absolutely zero data to back that up, just reporting the news.Is there anyone who thinks pass interference shouldn't be a spot of the foul penalty? Would a change to just a 15 yard penalty from the LOS help here?I don't know what's going on with the refs lately, but there have been A LOT of questionable, in fact downright horrible calls that have cost teams games. I don't remember it being even close to this bad in prior seasons. I'm not saying the fix is in yet, but how can you have instant replay that clearly shows a call should be overturned or upheld and they still manage to get it wrong? It's not like its only happened once already. Its happened several times. Odd indeed.
If only someone had mentioned this before. Then there could have been some discussion about it.How about this, just change PI to 15yds automatically.
Also got a favorable call reviewed and upheld where Calvin Johnson was stripped while down on his back. Almost like someone really wanted Minny to win.Just wondering what most thought. Sorry if a honda.
pretty sure BF showed above why this is a bad ideaactually it should be a 15 yard penalty and a first down. none of this 55 yard penalty crap.
I've always liked this idea.Maybe let the referee flagging have the option of giving a full PI (like now full distance) or 15 yarder (for less serious calls)don't like this as much as last idea.Just make it a 15 yd penalty like in college instead of a spot foul.
If only someone had mentioned this before. Then there could have been some discussion about it.How about this, just change PI to 15yds automatically.
I didn't think that was conclusive. I'm not convinced that a 15 yarder is a bad idea. I'm not convinced it's a good idea either, but I haven't read anything that's settled one way or the other in my mind. JMO.pretty sure BF showed above why this is a bad ideaactually it should be a 15 yard penalty and a first down. none of this 55 yard penalty crap.
I agree with that. It's always seemed pretty arbitrary as to what is considered "reviewable".Personally I think Instant Replay should go away except for scoring plays and turnovers which would always be reviewed by a guy in the booth. However if you are going to keep the current system I think pretty much everything should be reveiwable.
I'm a Lions homer. The refs didn't lose that game for us. Orlovsky running out of the end zone did.Also got a favorable call reviewed and upheld where Calvin Johnson was stripped while down on his back. Almost like someone really wanted Minny to win.Just wondering what most thought. Sorry if a honda.The officials handed the Vikings a win today against Detroit. I'd be furious if I were a Lions fan. Almost as furious as I was after Week 1 when Packers DBs were riding Vikings WRs like rented mules without any flags being thrown. Maybe the Vikings raising some SERIOUS cane after that Week 1 debacle got some attention? Although two wrongs don't make a right. Man oh man did the Vikings luck out today on that Calvin Johnson fumble and the pass interference call late...
![]()
I'm ok with the instant replay system as is, but what I'm not ok with is when the whistle blows early thus not allowing it to be reviewed. That's a bunch of crap. A whistle happy ref shouldn't be allowed to keep a play from being reviewed just because he blew the whistle before he should have. I'm not sure how you handle the PI calls, but clearly the officials have too much power to influence games when a team chucks it up to the endzone hoping for a PI call to give them the game. It's tough to say that should be reviewable, because it's such a judgment call and how many officials are going to go against their fellow officials and change their judgment call?I agree with that. It's always seemed pretty arbitrary as to what is considered "reviewable".Personally I think Instant Replay should go away except for scoring plays and turnovers which would always be reviewed by a guy in the booth. However if you are going to keep the current system I think pretty much everything should be reveiwable.
That certainly didn't help, but as ugly as it was the Lions played good enough against the Vikings to win yesterday.I'm a Lions homer. The refs didn't lose that game for us. Orlovsky running out of the end zone did.Also got a favorable call reviewed and upheld where Calvin Johnson was stripped while down on his back. Almost like someone really wanted Minny to win.Just wondering what most thought. Sorry if a honda.The officials handed the Vikings a win today against Detroit. I'd be furious if I were a Lions fan. Almost as furious as I was after Week 1 when Packers DBs were riding Vikings WRs like rented mules without any flags being thrown. Maybe the Vikings raising some SERIOUS cane after that Week 1 debacle got some attention? Although two wrongs don't make a right. Man oh man did the Vikings luck out today on that Calvin Johnson fumble and the pass interference call late...
![]()
Incidental contact down?No.Isn't almost every call a judgement call?You can't really review a judgement call. If anything, you should rally for them to eliminate judgement from the rules.