What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Patriots being investigated after Colts game (7 Viewers)

Percent of NFL teams actively trying to steal play sheets?

  • 0%

    Votes: 90 33.0%
  • 25%

    Votes: 91 33.3%
  • 50%

    Votes: 19 7.0%
  • 75%

    Votes: 16 5.9%
  • 100%

    Votes: 57 20.9%

  • Total voters
    273
LMFAO at he didnt know the rule
I don't find it all that surprising if a coach didn't know the rule or the process. He may have known that someone was letting air out of the ball, but until three days ago I would guess that the majority of coached couldn't tell you how much a ball had to weigh, the PSI range, how many minutes before the game the balls were given to the ref, etc.

 
Ignorance isn't an excuse...
Which is exactly why the officials should be taking the brunt of this IMO. It's a tough talk when they have to sit in front of their boss and explain why they dont know these balls were underinflated but a LBer does as soon as he touches it.
Except that LBer says he never noticed a difference and that he didn't know where that story came from.
:confused:

haven't seen that story. link?
Jim Gray reported on Fox News a few minutes ago that the Colts were alerted to the deflated balls by the Ravens.

It was the first I heard of that wrinkle; until now I had only heard that the accusation originated with the intercepting Colts defender.
That I have heard. I have not seen a story where D'Qwell Jackson affirmatively said he did NOT notice an issue after his interception and doesn't know where the story came from.
I'm still looking for a link. I read it somewhere, but maybe it was a load of bull.

 
This is the #### that is going to make me stop watching football.

NFL is going full blown tard reality TV.

All the sheep buying into this utterly concocted controversy... why not watch Housewives of Beverly Hills and at least see some nice cleavage while you all fret over some drama over the PSI of a football.

Jesus christ. :thumbdown:

 
To reiterate, I do think the Patriot's are probably guilty of something but for discussion, what happens if it comes out the refs approved under-inflated footballs or didn't correctly check them? It's easy to point to the Patriot's lack of credibility in situations like these but it's also not like the NFL has a ton of credibility.
Atm its most likely that the Refs did approve them which completely absolves the Pats. But lets consider the most outlandish outcome.
Huh? Mortensen has already reported that the ref did approve them pre-game but they were found to be underinflated at halftime. How does that "completely absolve the Pats", much less absolve them even a bit?
The refs approving them before the game does not specifically mean the balls were weighed and the pressure was checked. Suppose the refs gave them a squeeze and an eye ball test and said they were fine?

I am not suggesting that that is what happened, but just saying the refs approved them doesn't mean they were thoroughly inspected.
Yah that's basically what I am asking... What if the refs did not thoroughly test the footballs.

Also I'm assuming his sources are correct but we are all taking Mort's report on the numbers as gospel. What if it wasn't 2PSI or something like 1 or even .2 or something. Unlikely but what level of deflation would cause people to basically not care anymore.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To reiterate, I do think the Patriot's are probably guilty of something but for discussion, what happens if it comes out the refs approved under-inflated footballs or didn't correctly check them? It's easy to point to the Patriot's lack of credibility in situations like these but it's also not like the NFL has a ton of credibility.
Atm its most likely that the Refs did approve them which completely absolves the Pats. But lets consider the most outlandish outcome.
Huh? Mortensen has already reported that the ref did approve them pre-game but they were found to be underinflated at halftime. How does that "completely absolve the Pats", much less absolve them even a bit?
The refs approving them before the game does not specifically mean the balls were weighed and the pressure was checked. Suppose the refs gave them a squeeze and an eye ball test and said they were fine?

I am not suggesting that that is what happened, but just saying the refs approved them doesn't mean they were thoroughly inspected.
http://espn.go.com/boston/nfl/story/_/id/12202450/nfl-says-new-england-patriots-had-inflated-footballs-afc-championship-game

"League sources have confirmed that the footballs were properly inspected and approved by referee Walt Anderson 2 hours and 15 minutes before kickoff, before they were returned to each team."

Squeezing/eyeballing would be "improperly" inspecting them, no?

If you don't trust the source, that's fine...but it's what he's reporting.
That came out last night, so that is updated information (at least for me).

 
To reiterate, I do think the Patriot's are probably guilty of something but for discussion, what happens if it comes out the refs approved under-inflated footballs or didn't correctly check them? It's easy to point to the Patriot's lack of credibility in situations like these but it's also not like the NFL has a ton of credibility.
Atm its most likely that the Refs did approve them which completely absolves the Pats. But lets consider the most outlandish outcome.
:lol:

The refs did not approve under-inflated balls.

 
Pats fans now looking to place blame on the refs after their previous stance of "But everyone else does it!" has been proven incorrect.

Keep clinging to those hopes guys. Belichick just threw Brady under the bus, not good.

 
Ignorance isn't an excuse...
Which is exactly why the officials should be taking the brunt of this IMO. It's a tough talk when they have to sit in front of their boss and explain why they dont know these balls were underinflated but a LBer does as soon as he touches it.
Except that LBer says he never noticed a difference and that he didn't know where that story came from.
:confused: haven't seen that story. link?
Jim Gray reported on Fox News a few minutes ago that the Colts were alerted to the deflated balls by the Ravens.

It was the first I heard of that wrinkle; until now I had only heard that the accusation originated with the intercepting Colts defender.
That I have heard. I have not seen a story where D'Qwell Jackson affirmatively said he did NOT notice an issue after his interception and doesn't know where the story came from.
I'm still looking for a link. I read it somewhere, but maybe it was a load of bull.
They would likely deny they were the source anyway.

 
Koch's punts were longer than his season average. 3 Yards on average. 5 more than his career average. Plus special team balls are shared I believe so it seems sort of unlikely. This is with cold weather where I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) kicks should travel less distance.
True about Koch, not true about Tucker.

In any event, if Jim Gray is correct and the Ravens were the ones who alerted/instructed the Colts to do this...then it came from somewhere on the Ravens side.

I'd guess Tucker, especially given Tucker's weird, Clintonian-styled denials on the whole issue.
But it doesn't really hold up to any kind of reasoning.

The Kicking balls are the same. Did they magically just deflate balls that Tucker used but not the ones Koch used? Did Koch magically kick 5 yards on average longer than he does in his career in cold weather with deflated balls? Did the Pats use deflated balls to kick with too? Why that doesn't seem like an advantage? How did they get to the balls that the refs control?

I mean rationally this is not what happened. Unless Bill Belichick or Stephen Gostkowski is a wizard. Especially when realistically the coach isn't going to be in on the deflation he has no reason to. The specialist would. But why would Gostkowski want a deflated football?
Yes, agreed...there's leaps in this line of thinking as there are in most of these scenarios; in this they're buoyed by three pieces of info:

(1) Most importantly, the report that the Ravens actually informed/encouraged the Colts.

(2) Less importantly, Tucker's kicks were short enough for regular Tucker watcher's to notice.

(3) Tucker's weird denials on Twitter. Very specific denials...he denies "talking to the media, NFL or NFL Security". And adds "anyone saying that I made any comments one way or the other regarding our experiences in NE is simply mistaken." Comments one way or the other To the NFL/NFL Security/Media? How about the Colts? How about your teammates? How about your coaching staff? How about anyone else?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's my question: After the teams select their dozen balls and submit them. How rigorous is the inspection? Do the officials stick a meter in every ball every game? I can't find that info in any reporting. Do they put a meter on them or do they just look them over and give them a squeeze?

Surely that's really important.
That's part of the unknown at this point.

Per the rule, the refs are supposed to weigh the balls and use a pressure gauge to check the inflation. The home team is supposed to supply a pump and pressure gauge to be used for the footballs from both teams. If the refs find a ball out of range, they can either toss it or inflate it to the proper level.

From talk radio and talk tv, some refs have said weighing the balls rarely happens, and another one said checking the pressure can be sporadic. Another ref I heard said each game the balls are checked for pressure before each and every game bar none (preseason, regular season, post season).

I also heard that the NFL spot checks balls by randomly pulling them out of games and tests them for condition, inflation, etc. The NFL league guy I heard said they would normally pull a single game ball from each team when they do that.
Agreed, unless there is some proof that they were deflated after the inspections, then there is nothing else to discuss. If this is the NFL's issue, they tested ball 12 that wasn't as under-inflated as the others and didn't test the other 11, then that is the officials/NFL's fault. They inspected and re-inflated them at half time.

The last thing I want is the NFL bowing to the media attention of this and doing something stupid, like they often do.
All they need to do is put pressure on the ball boy. You know, the "You will never work in this league again" treatment. He will open up like a can of Tomato Soup.

 
If the refs just did a spot check and didn't actually confirm the PSI with a device it's all on that guy.

As much as I'd like to see this all blowup for the patriots I think that's all that's going to come of this investigation.

 
Pats fans now looking to place blame on the refs after their previous stance of "But everyone else does it!" has been proven incorrect.

Keep clinging to those hopes guys. Belichick just threw Brady under the bus, not good.
Brady will likely say he likes footballs on the low side of the football range. He, too, will have no idea what happened. He will say he takes what ever football is snapped to him and doesn't control anything about live action footballs. He won't know who else came into contact with the football bag. He won't know who handles the balls post-inspection from the ref. And he will tell people to talk to the league if you want more information.

 
Way to throw Brady under the bus, Bill.
you dont think that was completely calculated by the team?

As is Brady is watching that screaming "what the #### Bill!!??"
Or maybe he didn't know about it? I guess we could assume he's lying. But what if he was telling the truth? :shrug:
I buy it. On Hasselbeck's podcast he was talking about how he was on 8 teams, and on none of them would a head coach or even offensive coach be involved in the balls or what they need to be at, etc.. it was the QB and the equipment staff to get it how they liked it. Do we expect every head coach to know every little detail about what it going on? They delegate and focus on the big things.
I agree, and now I have a sick feeling in my stomach that Tommyboy had some knowledge of it.........
I don't think so. He laughed and said he doesn't want to talk about ridiculous things like that when he was asked about it. Brady wouldn't lie.
This is fair. You can't take Brady's sarcastic dismissals in press conferences lightly. For example, remember when Brady laughed off Plaxico Burress' suggestion that the Pats would score 17 points in Super Bowl 42, and then they went out and only scored 14 even though 17 would have sent the game to OT? Now that's integrity. Guy would rather lose a Super Bowl than lie to the media.
Guy's practically a Saint.

 
Kicker balls are provided by the league and kept separate. The balls in question are not kicker balls. They were the balls used by the patriots only, and the league allows teams to manipulate their footballs before the game.

 
Here's my question: After the teams select their dozen balls and submit them. How rigorous is the inspection? Do the officials stick a meter in every ball every game? I can't find that info in any reporting. Do they put a meter on them or do they just look them over and give them a squeeze?

Surely that's really important.
That's part of the unknown at this point.

Per the rule, the refs are supposed to weigh the balls and use a pressure gauge to check the inflation. The home team is supposed to supply a pump and pressure gauge to be used for the footballs from both teams. If the refs find a ball out of range, they can either toss it or inflate it to the proper level.

From talk radio and talk tv, some refs have said weighing the balls rarely happens, and another one said checking the pressure can be sporadic. Another ref I heard said each game the balls are checked for pressure before each and every game bar none (preseason, regular season, post season).

I also heard that the NFL spot checks balls by randomly pulling them out of games and tests them for condition, inflation, etc. The NFL league guy I heard said they would normally pull a single game ball from each team when they do that.
Agreed, unless there is some proof that they were deflated after the inspections, then there is nothing else to discuss. If this is the NFL's issue, they tested ball 12 that wasn't as under-inflated as the others and didn't test the other 11, then that is the officials/NFL's fault. They inspected and re-inflated them at half time.

The last thing I want is the NFL bowing to the media attention of this and doing something stupid, like they often do.
All they need to do is put pressure on the ball boy. You know, the "You will never work in this league again" treatment. He will open up like a can of Tomato Soup.
You will never go from ball boy to ball man so fess up

 
Koch's punts were longer than his season average. 3 Yards on average. 5 more than his career average. Plus special team balls are shared I believe so it seems sort of unlikely. This is with cold weather where I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) kicks should travel less distance.
True about Koch, not true about Tucker.

In any event, if Jim Gray is correct and the Ravens were the ones who alerted/instructed the Colts to do this...then it came from somewhere on the Ravens side.

I'd guess Tucker, especially given Tucker's weird, Clintonian-styled denials on the whole issue.
But it doesn't really hold up to any kind of reasoning.

The Kicking balls are the same. Did they magically just deflate balls that Tucker used but not the ones Koch used? Did Koch magically kick 5 yards on average longer than he does in his career in cold weather with deflated balls? Did the Pats use deflated balls to kick with too? Why that doesn't seem like an advantage? How did they get to the balls that the refs control?

I mean rationally this is not what happened. Unless Bill Belichick or Stephen Gostkowski is a wizard. Especially when realistically the coach isn't going to be in on the deflation he has no reason to. The specialist would. But why would Gostkowski want a deflated football?
Yes, agreed...there's leaps in this line of thinking as there are in most of these scenarios; in this they're buoyed by three pieces of info:

(1) Most importantly, the report that the Ravens actually informed/encouraged the Colts.

(2) Less importantly, Tucker's kicks were short enough for regular Tucker watcher's to notice.

(3) Tucker's weird denials on Twitter. Very specific denials...he denies "talking to the media, NFL or NFL Security". And adds "anyone saying that I made any comments one way or the other regarding our experiences in NE is simply mistaken." Comments one way or the other To the NFL/NFL Security/Media? How about the Colts? How about your teammates? How about your coaching staff? How about anyone else?
What benefit though. The Pats are kicking with the same balls. Kicking balls are different. Why would they put Gostkowski at a big disadvantage? Don't forget this is a very cold day so filling a ball at room temperature is going to lose a few pounds of PSI just by going to the outside temp. What was it 10 degrees that day?

 
Anybody that thinks BB "threw Brady under the bus" is crazy. It's going to be a fully orchestrated passing of the buck. BB has never done anything like this before. Suddenly he's doing it to his biggest star and Brady has no knowledge it would happen? That's a more outlandish conspiracy theory than anything I've heard from the mouth breathing Pats fans calling WEEI and trying to explain away 2 PSI in every damn ball.

 
To reiterate, I do think the Patriot's are probably guilty of something but for discussion, what happens if it comes out the refs approved under-inflated footballs or didn't correctly check them? It's easy to point to the Patriot's lack of credibility in situations like these but it's also not like the NFL has a ton of credibility.
Atm its most likely that the Refs did approve them which completely absolves the Pats. But lets consider the most outlandish outcome.
:lol:

The refs did not approve under-inflated balls.
"I recall them having a pressure gauge in the locker room, but most often they just squeezed the balls, turned them over in their hands a few times each, and inspected the laces. I don't recall them ever rejecting one of our balls," he said.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/super-bowl-xlix/deflate-gate-nfl-ball-boys-perspective-preparing-footballs-n290801

 
The only rule I've seen is that the psi must be within a range at game time, and can be measured and replaced later. There is also a fine of 25000 dollars in the rules, which is one of the smallest penalties a team can receive for anything in the cba.

 
Pats fans now looking to place blame on the refs after their previous stance of "But everyone else does it!" has been proven incorrect.

Keep clinging to those hopes guys. Belichick just threw Brady under the bus, not good.
Brady will likely say he likes footballs on the low side of the football range. He, too, will have no idea what happened. He will say he takes what ever football is snapped to him and doesn't control anything about live action footballs. He won't know who else came into contact with the football bag. He won't know who handles the balls post-inspection from the ref. And he will tell people to talk to the league if you want more information.
exactly.

:lmao: at people saying he just threw Brady under the bus.

 
Pats fans now looking to place blame on the refs after their previous stance of "But everyone else does it!" has been proven incorrect.

Keep clinging to those hopes guys. Belichick just threw Brady under the bus, not good.
Brady will likely say he likes footballs on the low side of the football range. He, too, will have no idea what happened. He will say he takes what ever football is snapped to him and doesn't control anything about live action footballs. He won't know who else came into contact with the football bag. He won't know who handles the balls post-inspection from the ref. And he will tell people to talk to the league if you want more information.
He'll probably fake laugh and smirk a few times as well.

 
If the refs just did a spot check and didn't actually confirm the PSI with a device it's all on that guy.

As much as I'd like to see this all blowup for the patriots I think that's all that's going to come of this investigation.
I agree. If the league didn't check them, then it's hard to blame the Pats.

 
Jemele Hill ‏@jemelehill ·

"Tom, are you on the injury list because of the tire tracks on your back?" RT @shalisemyoung: schedule change: Tom Brady at podium, 4p today

 
If the refs just did a spot check and didn't actually confirm the PSI with a device it's all on that guy.

As much as I'd like to see this all blowup for the patriots I think that's all that's going to come of this investigation.
I agree. If the league didn't check them, then it's hard to blame the Pats.
Sounds like the balls were thoroughly and properly inspected before the game (at least according to ESPN).

 
"Another ref I heard said each game the balls are checked for pressure before each and every game bar none (preseason, regular season, post season)."

But again "checked for pressure" can mean many things. I can check the tires on my car by taking a quick look at them, or by giving them a kick, or I can put a meter on them.

I repeat, Rogers says he over inflates his footballs and then sees if they get changed or not. Doesn't that imply that some get through?

 
If the refs just did a spot check and didn't actually confirm the PSI with a device it's all on that guy.

As much as I'd like to see this all blowup for the patriots I think that's all that's going to come of this investigation.
I agree. If the league didn't check them, then it's hard to blame the Pats.
I'm guessing the refs just did a quick check and not an official measure the PSI with the device. Then what will come out of this is very strict guidelines of how the balls are supposed to be checked and then handled before game. Really can't believe the patriots would change the PSI after the refs checked it that that would just be too dumb.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Another ref I heard said each game the balls are checked for pressure before each and every game bar none (preseason, regular season, post season)."

But again "checked for pressure" can mean many things. I can check the tires on my car by taking a quick look at them, or by giving them a kick, or I can put a meter on them.

I repeat, Rogers says he over inflates his footballs and then sees if they get changed or not. Doesn't that imply that some get through?
People will argue sneaking a ball that really didn't pass through inspection is different than altering the ball AFTER it was approved. I would agree that those two are different.

 
He said they inflate the balls to the minumum requirment, correct?

If that is so wouldnt the ball deflate when spiked, or was landed on etc?
Yes. But not 2 pounds of pressure worth. BB spoke today and gave examples of 0.2 or 0.3 dips in ball pressure. 11 of the 12 balls had pressure AT LEAST 2 pounds of PSI lower. IIRC, some were 3 pounds different. Game play and weather conditions would not account for that dramatic a difference.

 
The only rule I've seen is that the psi must be within a range at game time, and can be measured and replaced later. There is also a fine of 25000 dollars in the rules, which is one of the smallest penalties a team can receive for anything in the cba.
You keep saying this but it's not just 25,000.00.

"If any individual alters the footballs, or if a non-approved ball is used in the game, the person responsible and, if appropriate, the head coach or other club personnel will be subject to discipline, including but not limited to, a fine of $25,000."

 
Koch's punts were longer than his season average. 3 Yards on average. 5 more than his career average. Plus special team balls are shared I believe so it seems sort of unlikely. This is with cold weather where I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) kicks should travel less distance.
True about Koch, not true about Tucker.

In any event, if Jim Gray is correct and the Ravens were the ones who alerted/instructed the Colts to do this...then it came from somewhere on the Ravens side.

I'd guess Tucker, especially given Tucker's weird, Clintonian-styled denials on the whole issue.
But it doesn't really hold up to any kind of reasoning.

The Kicking balls are the same. Did they magically just deflate balls that Tucker used but not the ones Koch used? Did Koch magically kick 5 yards on average longer than he does in his career in cold weather with deflated balls? Did the Pats use deflated balls to kick with too? Why that doesn't seem like an advantage? How did they get to the balls that the refs control?

I mean rationally this is not what happened. Unless Bill Belichick or Stephen Gostkowski is a wizard. Especially when realistically the coach isn't going to be in on the deflation he has no reason to. The specialist would. But why would Gostkowski want a deflated football?
Yes, agreed...there's leaps in this line of thinking as there are in most of these scenarios; in this they're buoyed by three pieces of info:

(1) Most importantly, the report that the Ravens actually informed/encouraged the Colts.

(2) Less importantly, Tucker's kicks were short enough for regular Tucker watcher's to notice.

(3) Tucker's weird denials on Twitter. Very specific denials...he denies "talking to the media, NFL or NFL Security". And adds "anyone saying that I made any comments one way or the other regarding our experiences in NE is simply mistaken." Comments one way or the other To the NFL/NFL Security/Media? How about the Colts? How about your teammates? How about your coaching staff? How about anyone else?
What benefit though. The Pats are kicking with the same balls. Kicking balls are different. Why would they put Gostkowski at a big disadvantage? Don't forget this is a very cold day so filling a ball at room temperature is going to lose a few pounds of PSI just by going to the outside temp. What was it 10 degrees that day?
Under the assumption that there's no way around the kicking ball scenario (which is, apparently, what Harbaugh assumed when the game as being played); then your statement is correct. But is there some way for someone determined to do so; to get fishy when it comes to special teams balls? Dunno...

After reading and listening to Harbaugh's interview yesterday it's now a fact that Ravens' special teams is where this came from. Harbaugh says definitively it had nothing to do with the Pats offensive balls. And he confirms the league reached out to them on this specifically.

Given that it is a fact that it came from Ravens special teams and given the stat differential and the weird denials; clearly someone traced back to Tucker (perhaps Tucker himself, perhaps someone else that was involved in the conversation that Harbaugh admits to having) is where this came from originally and it has grown from there.

 
People will argue sneaking a ball that really didn't pass through inspection is different than altering the ball AFTER it was approved. I would agree that those two are different.
Me too.

And by the way, I don't think it should reflect badly on the refs if they didn't meter the balls. It not that big a deal. It's probably entirely right that if a ball looks properly inflated and feels properly inflated that there's nothing wrong with it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I could easily build a device that could deflate a football to precisely 10.5 PSI. It would cost lest than $20 to make, would be about the size of a pack of gum, and could knock out 2 psi in maybe 15 seconds.

 
LMFAO at he didnt know the rule
I don't find it all that surprising if a coach didn't know the rule or the process. He may have known that someone was letting air out of the ball, but until three days ago I would guess that the majority of coached couldn't tell you how much a ball had to weigh, the PSI range, how many minutes before the game the balls were given to the ref, etc.
I doubt that there is any coach that is more up on the nuances of the rules that Bill Belichick -- it is one of the things he is noted for. In this case the rule isn't even nuanced:

The Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearing the signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.

The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case (natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weight shall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches; weight, 14 to 15 ounces.

The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.
I'm pretty sure a smart guy like Belichick would be able to understand that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He said they inflate the balls to the minumum requirment, correct?

If that is so wouldnt the ball deflate when spiked, or was landed on etc?
Yes. But not 2 pounds of pressure worth. BB spoke today and gave examples of 0.2 or 0.3 dips in ball pressure. 11 of the 12 balls had pressure AT LEAST 2 pounds of PSI lower. IIRC, some were 3 pounds different. Game play and weather conditions would not account for that dramatic a difference.
Interesting. I seriously wonder if they were presented that way and the officials was negligent in inspecting them. IF i understand the process they are reviewed by the officials, marked and placed in bags and than out to the appropriate sidelines. It seems like leaking them to s specific amount would take time and look very shady prior to a game.

 
If it's true that the refs were going to inspect the ball pressure at halftime as has been reported, does it not stand to reason that they would explicitly check pressure before the game too?

 
He said they inflate the balls to the minumum requirment, correct?

If that is so wouldnt the ball deflate when spiked, or was landed on etc?
In Gerry Austin's interview on Mike and Mike, he said he doesn't remember ever - in his 25 year career - checking the psi on a ball after the initial inspection, EVER. Which brings a couple points to mind;

1. Obviously no one really gave a rat's ### about ball pressure until the Patriots were accused of trying to manipulate it;

B. The league may have no real quantitative idea of how the elements and game events affect ball pressure, because they never cared until now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm predicting it ends up that Brady gets fined and suspended next season for several games, maybe even the full year.

 
According to this article from a former ball boy, the pre-game inspection isn't very thorough:

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/super-bowl-xlix/deflate-gate-nfl-ball-boys-perspective-preparing-footballs-n290801

Two hours before kickoff, he would bring the balls to the referees' locker room for inspection.

"I recall them having a pressure gauge in the locker room, but most often they just squeezed the balls, turned them over in their hands a few times each, and inspected the laces. I don't recall them ever rejecting one of our balls," he said.

"My thought process was, 'Let's get the balls exactly the way our quarterback wants them, and if the refs reject one or two before the game, no big deal. But there's no harm giving them our ideal balls and hoping they make it through inspection.'"
 
I could easily build a device that could deflate a football to precisely 10.5 PSI. It would cost lest than $20 to make, would be about the size of a pack of gum, and could knock out 2 psi in maybe 15 seconds.
In reality, you could probably use a 49 cent pump needle to do the same thing (without the exactly part). All it would take is practice. Start with a football inflated at 12.5 PSI and count off how many seconds it would take to get it down to 10.5. PSI. That would effectively be close enough.

The issue would be how on earth would someone be able to do that in a stadium with 68,000 people in attendance and cameras all over the place. The refs hold the balls until right before game time. Although not 100% sure, I believe the ball attendants are handed the ball bag on the field. Unless someone snuck into the equipment room inside the stadium and broke into where the balls are stored, one would think someone would notice someone tinkering with a dozen footballs on the sideline.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top