The hoops we have to jump through to just do constuction type work is insane. DFAS knows who gets the money.Why do they keep saying "the military" rather than DFAS? DFAS sends out the checks. It isn't like the AF is going out and buying jets and bombs and can't account for the money. DFAS is basically an accounting agency that sends out paychecks for active duty, government workers, retirees, etc. This whole article's slant that the services have lost this money is somewhat misleading or, perhaps, slanted towards an agenda.
The article seemed too biased to be trusted. The whole defense budget is around 600 million so it must have taken many years to arrive at 6.5 trillion in unaccounted funds. I like when writers shine a light on fraud, waste and abuse but this was a poor effort.Why do they keep saying "the military" rather than DFAS? DFAS sends out the checks. It isn't like the AF is going out and buying jets and bombs and can't account for the money. DFAS is basically an accounting agency that sends out paychecks for active duty, government workers, retirees, etc. This whole article's slant that the services have lost this money is somewhat misleading or, perhaps, slanted towards an agenda.
Decades. This is nothing new and has been brought up many times over the years. I think the actual number floating around now is 8.5T. Although it seems to have been debunked as mostly "accounting errors" and not real missing money.The article seemed too biased to be trusted. The whole defense budget is around 600 million so it must have taken many years to arrive at 6.5 trillion in unaccounted funds. I like when writers shine a light on fraud, waste and abuse but this was a poor effort.
Will they make it rain?Well if you want an analogy, the Pentagon are the strippers in this scenario and Congress is the NBA player. With all that money hitting the floor at once, it's hard to keep track of. Glad Congress wants them to count it now, you know...protecting us taxpayers from fraud and all. There on that wall for us.![]()
Well their wives have had them on lockdown for the past few years (sequestration) so they have to go during lunch (MRE's are yummy) when the chicks with the C-section scars and the one leg longer than the other (F-35 program) are working.Will they make it rain?Well if you want an analogy, the Pentagon are the strippers in this scenario and Congress is the NBA player. With all that money hitting the floor at once, it's hard to keep track of. Glad Congress wants them to count it now, you know...protecting us taxpayers from fraud and all. There on that wall for us.![]()
Homeland Security has better bookkeeping but that is the most wasteful government monster since Idaho's Famous Potato Posse of 1926.Never happens in any other part of the government though. So we got that going for us.
You tell them MOP! Let'em have it!For once, Americans need to not be bullied by either party into thinking it's OK to keep funding the military at the rate we have been. There has to be a better way to maintain world order without the entire budget going to military spending.
We're embarrassing ourselves.
I'm sure. It's ridiculous to think that the government spends $1 on anything and the public finds $0.50 of value.Homeland Security has better bookkeeping but that is the most wasteful government monster since Idaho's Famous Potato Posse of 1926.
When you find out let me/us know. East Europe would be Russian, China would own the south China Sea, and middle East wouldnt be pumping out any oil to allow Americans to drive their suv/truck because it looks cool.For once, Americans need to not be bullied by either party into thinking it's OK to keep funding the military at the rate we have been. There has to be a better way to maintain world order without the entire budget going to military spending.
We're embarrassing ourselves.
At a micro level government works like a business does. I have a budget every year, I identify programs and equipment 2-3 years out that need replacement, I shop for the ideal system and try to find it competitively priced. At a macro level however is wear it jumps the track. If I need IT work done and it costs $4k to fix it, I have to send to acquisitions. Then they compete it, find the best vendor for the money, and it ends up costing $6200.I'm sure. It's ridiculous to think that the government spends $1 on anything and the public finds $0.50 of value.Homeland Security has better bookkeeping but that is the most wasteful government monster since Idaho's Famous Potato Posse of 1926.
Yeah, same here. Reuters did that one as well. Or maybe it's the same report but updatedI mostly remembered this because a very similar article floated around last year and spawned a bunch of speculative bull#### articles wondering if the Government had a secret space fleet or something. Fun to read though.
Well Rove! did post it, were you expecting any different?Sensationalist defined. The author is deliberately misleading. The Pentagon hasn't had an audit in a while/ever...I can't remember when.
Difference between not accounting for funds and telling auditors to go #### themselves.
I get that. So throwing more bad money at any government program is a good thing? I'd do away with DHS in a heartbeat. Unbearably terrible spending. But so are a vast majority of the rest unless you say out loud that you just want to employ louts that couldn't elsewhere.At a micro level government works like a business does. I have a budget every year, I identify programs and equipment 2-3 years out that need replacement, I shop for the ideal system and try to find it competitively priced. At a macro level however is wear it jumps the track. If I need IT work done and it costs $4k to fix it, I have to send to acquisitions. Then they compete it, find the best vendor for the money, and it ends up costing $6200.
Contract employees are making $70k a year in salary, but it costs the government twice that to field the contract. Everything is done within the law, believe me. But the laws are from the 80s when Reagan was throwing money at anything and everything (or even older), and then again when GW Bush set up DHS. There is so much money for companies and contractors that there is no way they are gonna shut that spigot down. Taxpayers lose but business wins, the lobbies win, the rich guy wins, and most importantly the politicians win. Thing is all governments operate in similar fashions, and most of them are infinitely less efficient than we are. Chew on that nugget.
There are so many guns in this country that most people can protect themselves for the next 20 years while we rebuild America from the inside out and then when our military is finally not holding a 27 game lead in the NL West, we(America) will be in prime position to reload the military with our new infrastructure leading the way and making it even easier to manufacture and stockpile the military at a fraction of its current costs.When you find out let me/us know. East Europe would be Russian, China would own the south China Sea, and middle East wouldnt be pumping out any oil to allow Americans to drive their suv/truck because it looks cool.
Nope, but the guys who make the laws prevent things like that from happening. All these guys want to slash government programs, unless of course that program is a part of their district then they are vehemently against it. Then that guy gets 30 fed jobs delivered to his district the next go round after he assists in getting legislation passed. Then the other politician he supported slips $20 million in pork into a bill, and so on. Congress creates the laws, government follows them.I get that. So throwing more bad money at any government program is a good thing? I'd do away with DHS in a heartbeat. Unbearably terrible spending. But so are a vast majority of the rest unless you say out loud that you just want to employ louts that couldn't elsewhere.
And just to spell it out to the slow people in the vack of the class shutting it down would cost a few jobs which would mean the politician doesn't get reelected because he made the gravy train go awayNope, but the guys who make the laws prevent things like that from happening. All these guys want to slash government programs, unless of course that program is a part of their district then they are vehemently against it. Then that guy gets 30 fed jobs delivered to his district the next go round after he assists in getting legislation passed. Then the other politician he supported slips $20 million in pork into a bill, and so on. Congress creates the laws, government follows them.
Never happens in any other part of the government though. So we got that going for us.