Written by the fake black guy Shaun King. How ironic.
Regardless, pretty disgusting story if true
Probably jealous, guy sucked on the buccaneers. Just some light tea bagging, let's not get crazy
I know it's hard for some of you, but do try to read this thing in full. It's not all about the teabagging...it's the deliberate intent by Archie and Peyton to ruin this lady's life starting with a ghost written boom smearing her in the early aughts. Cost her her job at Southern Florida.

calm down man, I don't care about manning. I'm pretty sure you can find me taking him for task for this in game threads here. But this is old news that this dope of a writer had never heard of. I don't know it's possible to follow sports and not be aware of this.
This writer is pretty agenda driven with his comments and his history and here he details one side of a very old story that has been settled on the civil side and is outside the statute of limitations anyway.
News flash: elite athletes are often buoyed by privilege and are jerkoffs. And more breaking news, colleges and parents seek to protect kids.
If this guy wants to make a meal out of this, he can knock himself out but he already has lost credibility with me for his ignorance and agenda.
And yet, armed with all this "old news" you still missed the point. Good job, MOP.
Because your point sucks. How this remedial idiot is a writer a major American paper is an issue for another day, but given the shoddy writing I don't doubt the failing of the reporting.
This matter is neither an active criminal nor an active civil matter.
So we have character testimony in a settled civil matter as the basis of the reporting. Prosecution witnesses who shared their testimony, with no mention of defense witness testimony. But it's a settled matter. I have seen no denials of this and I'm loathe to defend manning but do you really think that 6 years into his nfl career he's sending dr vulgar whitehead stuff to her next job? Now, I don't rule it or anything out. But I would find it far more likely some zealot booster sent it to defend Pey Pey.
As for the point, is this reporting or a column? Because in reporting you typically seek a quote from the other party and if you are unsuccessful obtaining one you cite that.
The point, as the author lays out, is that hey, Peyton isn't all his public perception puts on and cam shouldn't be taken to task because of this. The author is aghast that USA today "sat" on this when the more likely scenario is that USA today couldn't find corroborating sources to forge and move forward with a story.
But if you've followed the daily news in the last 6-9 months they are circling the drain with click bait stories that probably are looser with journalistic standards as they speed toward oblivion as who cares about a lawsuit when they'll probably be out of business in a year.
I can tell by employing a guy who writes "put on blast" in a news story they're bottom scraping already