What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

PFT reporting Mora Jr. offered Phins Job (1 Viewer)

pinda

Footballguy
MORA OFFERED FINS' GIG?

An industry source has advised us that the Miami Dolphins offered on Monday its head-coaching job to former Falcons coach Jim Mora on Monday, during a second interview for the job.

Mora, per the source, didn't accept the job on the spot (he'd apparently only do that if the University of Washington came calling).

Actually, there's a chance that Mora would like to wait a day or two to see what happens with the other high-profile job in Seattle. There's a suspicion that Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren could call it quits if his decision to return in 2006 was a one-more-time shot at the Super Bowl win that the team didn't get in 2005.

Per the flightaware.com site, the plane that brought Mora to Miami from Atlanta was scheduled to depart at 2:45 p.m. EST on Monday, but didn't leave on time. Or, as of this posting, at all.

The Dolphins supposedly narrowed their list of candidates to five after an initial round of 12 interviews. The five finalists, per published reports, were Mora, Georgia Tech coach Chan Gailey, Chargers offensive coordinator Cam Cameron, Vikings defensive coordinator Mike Tomlin, and Jets offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer. On Monday, Schottenheimer pulled his name from consideration.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
 
Unless of course Marty is fired today in San Diego. Then Mora is out and Marty's is in.

Just my opinion.

 
ooofffaaa said:
Ugh.So the Dolphins are left with . . . Jim Mora Jr. :popcorn: Chan Gailey :cry: What an ugly ugly situation.
Well, As long as it isn't Schott Jr......And you still have the HOT Cheerleaders. As Jet fan, I'm real happy with how this is playing out but, then again, we all thought Saban was a slam dunk.
 
mcjc4 said:
Unless of course Marty is fired today in San Diego. Then Mora is out and Marty's is in.Just my opinion.
This is what John Clayton is saying is going to happen. He said that this morning on the Mike and Mike show.
 
ooofffaaa said:
Ugh.So the Dolphins are left with . . . Jim Mora Jr. :popcorn: Chan Gailey :cry: What an ugly ugly situation.
Well, As long as it isn't Schott Jr......And you still have the HOT Cheerleaders. As Jet fan, I'm real happy with how this is playing out but, then again, we all thought Saban was a slam dunk.
I was very happy when they hired Saban - and we all know how that turned out.Choosing between Mora or Gailey feels like having to choose between death by hanging or death by firing squad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone have any insight into why Brian Shottenheimer withdrew from the Miami job?

As a JETS fan, I'm delighted with this development. I had heard that he was the front runner and that was why Capers had been signed on as a high priced D-coodinator.

 
Does anyone have any insight into why Brian Shottenheimer withdrew from the Miami job?As a JETS fan, I'm delighted with this development. I had heard that he was the front runner and that was why Capers had been signed on as a high priced D-coodinator.
JETS Fan here,It was reported in the Newark Star Ledger that B. Shott didn't think he was getting the job and speculated that he wasn't sure he was ready to take over a franchise yet.So those two factors caused him to w/draw his name.
 
I would probably take them in this order:

Marty (credibility and experience)

Mora (don't know anything about his philosophy, etc.)

Gailey (too much Wannstadt-ish which still leaves a bitter taste)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would probably take them in this order:

Marty (credibility and experience)

Mora (don't know anything about his philosophy, etc.)

Gailey (too much Wannstadt-ish which still leaves a bitter taste)
Not sure I understand why 11-5 would leave a bad taste in your mouth, Gailey did pretty good with what he was given.
Under Gailey, the Dolphins were 11-5 in both seasons and made the playoffs each time. They haven't been back since. His blocking schemes helped journeyman running back Lamar Smith gain 2,107 yards in those two seasons. Also, the Dolphins averaged 21.5 points in 2001, compared to 16.2 this year.
 
Does anyone have any insight into why Brian Shottenheimer withdrew from the Miami job?As a JETS fan, I'm delighted with this development. I had heard that he was the front runner and that was why Capers had been signed on as a high priced D-coodinator.
As a Dolphins fan I am also delighted, IMHO he isn't ready yet, and his 1 year as coordinator of an average at best Jets offense didn't do anything for me. I think you have yourselves a great young coach in Mangini, but I'm not sure much of their success was sue to Schotty.
 
lions327 said:
I hope PFT does better on this story than they did on the Sherman to Arizona one.
Agreed - these guys have become the National Enquirer of the NFL, so I'm not buying it yet.
 
What about Cam Cameron?

He is on the Final-5 list, but no one here is mentioning him as a possibility :banned:

He would be my 1st choice at this point..

Has he already indicated that he is not interested in the Phins job?

Is it a given that he will be San Diego's new head coach if/when Marty gets fired in the next few days?

 
If you watched the Jets offense this year, every week, I think Schotty lite was very good. Three new starters on the O line, including two rookies. Not much of a running game, yet he took chances and got pretty creative at times. I'm not sure he was comfortable with the idea of having a coach with as much experience as Capers has working for him. He'll get more offers down the road.

I happen to thing Mora Jr may be a very good choice. I'd like to see how he does without Vick chained to his ankle..... not that Miami has a very promising QB situation either, but that's the norm when most coaches leave or get fired, isn't it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now PFT is reporting this:

POSTED 2:44 p.m. EST, January 16, 2007

SON OF SHULA ENTERS FINS' FRAY

The bad news for Fins fans is that a son of legendary Miami Dolphins coach Don Shula is a candidate to take over the team to which the elder Shula led to a 17-0 perfect season in 1972.

The good news is that his name isn't David.

Armando Salguero reports that former Alabama coach Mike Shula has emerged as a candidate for the position that was vacated by former Fins coach Nick Saban, who is now the head coach at Alabama.

Mike Shula reportedly was interviewed on Saturday.

Seems they'll report anthing they hear. And some of us wonder why people doubt them so often. I'm beginning to think they like to make themselves the news rather than report on it.

 
Here is the Herald article on Mike Shula:

Mike Shula enters the Dolphins coaching hunt

BY ARMANDO SALGUERO

asalguero@MiamiHerald.com

The Dolphins' search for a coach may be making a bold and nostalgic reach toward the past with the team interviewing Mike Shula, son of Don Shula, over the weekend.

Shula spent Saturday talking with Dolphins owner Wayne Huizenga and his staff about the possibility of succeeding Nick Saban.

Ironically, Saban left the Dolphins to become coach at Alabama after Shula was fired by the Crimson Tide.

The idea of bringing Shula back to the franchise has been kept under wraps because the team wanted to gauge if he was indeed a legitimate candidate for the job. Having had two interviews, he apparently is.

The Dolphins have also interviewed Jim Mora and Chan Gailey twice.

People familiar with the search told The Miami Herald today that no decision has been made on a coach and no offer has been made.

Shula posted a 26-23 record during four seasons at Alabama, taking the team to a bowl each of his final three seasons. He spent three seasons as the offensive coordinator with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers from 1996-99.

Shula, 41, grew up around the Dolphins. He was a ball boy during his youth and returned later to serve as an assistant coach under his father before heading briefly to the Chicago Bears as an assistant.

Shula is close friends with Dolphins president Bryan Wiedmeier.

Reaching out to Shula might be a good move for the Dolphins as the franchise is seeking someone with head coaching experience but also someone who will invigorate the fan base after five seasons without a playoff appearance.

The Shula name remains the standard by which coaching excellence is measured. Don Shula won 347 games during his career, the most by any NFL coach.
 
Here is the Herald article on Mike Shula:

Mike Shula enters the Dolphins coaching hunt

BY ARMANDO SALGUERO

asalguero@MiamiHerald.com

The Dolphins' search for a coach may be making a bold and nostalgic reach toward the past with the team interviewing Mike Shula, son of Don Shula, over the weekend.

Shula spent Saturday talking with Dolphins owner Wayne Huizenga and his staff about the possibility of succeeding Nick Saban.

Ironically, Saban left the Dolphins to become coach at Alabama after Shula was fired by the Crimson Tide.

The idea of bringing Shula back to the franchise has been kept under wraps because the team wanted to gauge if he was indeed a legitimate candidate for the job. Having had two interviews, he apparently is.

The Dolphins have also interviewed Jim Mora and Chan Gailey twice.

People familiar with the search told The Miami Herald today that no decision has been made on a coach and no offer has been made.

Shula posted a 26-23 record during four seasons at Alabama, taking the team to a bowl each of his final three seasons. He spent three seasons as the offensive coordinator with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers from 1996-99.

Shula, 41, grew up around the Dolphins. He was a ball boy during his youth and returned later to serve as an assistant coach under his father before heading briefly to the Chicago Bears as an assistant.

Shula is close friends with Dolphins president Bryan Wiedmeier.

Reaching out to Shula might be a good move for the Dolphins as the franchise is seeking someone with head coaching experience but also someone who will invigorate the fan base after five seasons without a playoff appearance.

The Shula name remains the standard by which coaching excellence is measured. Don Shula won 347 games during his career, the most by any NFL coach.
even better. :angry:

:shrug:

 
lions327 said:
I hope PFT does better on this story than they did on the Sherman to Arizona one.
Agreed - these guys have become the National Enquirer of the NFL, so I'm not buying it yet.
Actually PFT reported Sherman was being offered the job, then later reported he was offered the job, but the Cardinals balked when Sherman wanted $4M a year. PFT said the Cardinals blew it because they should have known Sherman's price range before bringing him back for a 2nd interview. Does anyone have info that disputes any of this?
 
lions327 said:
I hope PFT does better on this story than they did on the Sherman to Arizona one.
Agreed - these guys have become the National Enquirer of the NFL, so I'm not buying it yet.
Actually PFT reported Sherman was being offered the job, then later reported he was offered the job, but the Cardinals balked when Sherman wanted $4M a year. PFT said the Cardinals blew it because they should have known Sherman's price range before bringing him back for a 2nd interview. Does anyone have info that disputes any of this?
You can go to PFT yourself, scroll down, and dispute this.Foxsports.com reported the salary dispute. PFT assured their readers, twice, that Sherman had the job. Not that it was his to lose, or that the Cards were negotiating salary. PFT never mentioned anything about salary until someone else reported it.
 
abrecher said:
Family Matters said:
Seems they'll report anthing they hear. And some of us wonder why people doubt them so often.
Isn't that why the column is call "The Rumor Mill"?
True. But keep in mind that they love to take credit for anything they get right. When they're wrong you don't hear from them. And they love to criticize others when they're wrong.
 
abrecher said:
Family Matters said:
Seems they'll report anthing they hear. And some of us wonder why people doubt them so often.
Isn't that why the column is call "The Rumor Mill"?
True. But keep in mind that they love to take credit for anything they get right. When they're wrong you don't hear from them. And they love to criticize others when they're wrong.
actually you are 100% wrong, they are always saying that they were wrong. they will also give people they don't like credit like Pastabelly when he does report something right......problem is that the guys that say they don't accept the blame when they are wrong, are the guys that go there once in a while, they don't keep track of it everyday to read each post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
abrecher said:
Family Matters said:
Seems they'll report anthing they hear. And some of us wonder why people doubt them so often.
Isn't that why the column is call "The Rumor Mill"?
True. But keep in mind that they love to take credit for anything they get right. When they're wrong you don't hear from them. And they love to criticize others when they're wrong.
actually you are 100% wrong, they are always saying that they were wrong. they will also give people they don't like credit like Pastabelly when he does report something right......problem is that the guys that say they don't accept the blame when they are wrong, are the guys that go there once in a while, they don't keep track of it everyday to read each post.
I'm there almost everyday. There have been times they've given others credit but they do not always admit when they were wrong. Yet even though they were wrong about their reporting of Mora, they haven't retracted anything.The fact is they mostly criticize others and make fun of them by mocking them. It really takes away from what good they do.
 
The fact is they mostly criticize others and make fun of them by mocking them. It really takes away from what good they do.
That's the biggest thing. They've broken stories in the past. We know this because they tell us, repeatedly.

And Florio's overall tone is why their detractors delight in their mistakes. My favorite was the Brett Favre retirement scoop last year. Whoops! :pics:

They are really good about telling their readers when something is a rumor. But they screwed the pooch on the Sherman thing. If you disagree, fine, but the posts there after Sherman left town are the very definition of 'spin'. And their coverage of the offseason has been spotty at best. They've had no insight into the coaching searches, but have covered themselves by taking the shotgun approach to rumors.

"Lombardi is out in Oakland! Well, Lombardi may stay............we heard is is angling for another job, so he wants out, so our first story wasn't inaccurate, per se.........."

Try and imagine what they would write if Mort, Clayton or Len P had some of that crap in their archive.

I love reading PFT, but sure aren't gonna defend them when they have to eat a ####burger.

 
The fact is they mostly criticize others and make fun of them by mocking them. It really takes away from what good they do.
That's the biggest thing. They've broken stories in the past. We know this because they tell us, repeatedly.

And Florio's overall tone is why their detractors delight in their mistakes. My favorite was the Brett Favre retirement scoop last year. Whoops! :pics:

They are really good about telling their readers when something is a rumor. But they screwed the pooch on the Sherman thing. If you disagree, fine, but the posts there after Sherman left town are the very definition of 'spin'. And their coverage of the offseason has been spotty at best. They've had no insight into the coaching searches, but have covered themselves by taking the shotgun approach to rumors.

"Lombardi is out in Oakland! Well, Lombardi may stay............we heard is is angling for another job, so he wants out, so our first story wasn't inaccurate, per se.........."

Try and imagine what they would write if Mort, Clayton or Len P had some of that crap in their archive.

I love reading PFT, but sure aren't gonna defend them when they have to eat a ####burger.
I guess it's perception here. I don't go there to get a final word on things. I go there to get rumors. They were not the only ones that said Sherman wanted 4 million and that's why it fell through. It was on an AZ radio. I don't look at that as a spin, it's just telling you other rumors they hear. But that's exactly it, its a rumor mill. There's no need to post when they are wrong, although they do post when they didn't get the report right.

Right now they are reporting that Lofton is in negotiations with Oakland. A minute before that they said the USC guy Sarkisian was the man. But they went on and pointed out that there are other reports now coming out. Do they say, "We were wrong...." no they don't. However, they do point out that "contrary to our previous post", or "against what we reported earlier." To me, that's semantics, don't need to worry about somebody saying "I'm wrong" as long as they correct the post. I'm not that anal or self absorbed about hearing somebody else make a mistake.

As for Len, Mort, and anybody else posting on the big websites. They don't come out and say they are rumors. They say this is what it is. Let's not even get into how many times Len has been wrong. And Mort saying Cutler was going to start the next week for 6 straight weeks. They finally change to Cutler, and he takes credit. Well even I could have reported that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. They didn't say Sherman was a rumor, they said it was done. Twice.

2. The salary demand was reported by someone else, not them. They then used that to explain why they were wrong.

3. All those guys deal in rumors. But it doesn't matter. Wouldn't change my point anyways.

4. Anal and self-absorbed? Huh? Are you describing me? Where on earth do you get 'self-absorbed'? Is PFT writing about me? :bye:

 
1. They didn't say Sherman was a rumor, they said it was done. Twice.2. The salary demand was reported by someone else, not them. They then used that to explain why they were wrong. 3. All those guys deal in rumors. But it doesn't matter. Wouldn't change my point anyways. 4. Anal and self-absorbed? Huh? Are you describing me? Where on earth do you get 'self-absorbed'? Is PFT writing about me? :rolleyes:
nah, didn't mean it to you at all, don't take it personal, i just meant it that I'm not one to care if somebody admits they are wrong to me or not.as for #2, the fact they printed it is enough for me to admit their mistake on the situation. #3, that's all that I'm saying as well, that their word shouldn't be taken as gold since they themselves admit they are rumors. They report the rumors they hear from credible sources. PFT takes a lot of heat, but I never hear guys rip apart PFW Whispers which are usually dead wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top