Photographer Takes Picture of Man in Costume (1 Viewer)

[Scoresman]

http://i.imgur.com/UYf8jP8.jpg

[Edited thread title - MT.]

 

[Dan Lambskin]

Shut it down

 

[joffer]

Strange?

 

[grateful zed]

who's alias is this?

 

[Scoresman]

I'm really disappointed in the lot of you.

 

[17seconds]

I have a feeling the original title was better

 

[Scoresman]

I have a feeling the original title was better

It was until a bunch of old farts came along who never heard of anything star trek related after the 1960s. As I said, disappointing.

 

[Insein]

I don't get what a picture of Quark has to do with anything.

 

[belljr]

You like Star Trek....haha

 

[Scoresman]

I don't get what a picture of Quark has to do with anything.

The original title was "Scientists Take Picture of Quark" leading a potential reader to believe that scientists have taken a photo of one of the most elementary particles of matter. Upon clicking and viewing the picture, the reader realizes he has been fooled and the picture is actually that of the famed Star Trek character named Quark, hence the "punchline" of the joke.

For some reason, the original title of the thread was deemed inappropriate enough to be changed, ruining the joke and leading to confusion amongst the masses.

 

[Baloney Sandwich]

Yeah, not sure the title change ruined the joke

 

[Insein]

I don't get what a picture of Quark has to do with anything.

The original title was "Scientists Take Picture of Quark" leading a potential reader to believe that scientists have taken a photo of one of the most elementary particles of matter. Upon clicking and viewing the picture, the reader realizes he has been fooled and the picture is actually that of the famed Star Trek character named Quark, hence the "punchline" of the joke.

For some reason, the original title of the thread was deemed inappropriate enough to be changed, ruining the joke and leading to confusion amongst the masses.

Oh I get it. I'm not laughing but I get it.

 

[Scoresman]

I don't get what a picture of Quark has to do with anything.

The original title was "Scientists Take Picture of Quark" leading a potential reader to believe that scientists have taken a photo of one of the most elementary particles of matter. Upon clicking and viewing the picture, the reader realizes he has been fooled and the picture is actually that of the famed Star Trek character named Quark, hence the "punchline" of the joke.

For some reason, the original title of the thread was deemed inappropriate enough to be changed, ruining the joke and leading to confusion amongst the masses.

Oh I get it. I'm not laughing but I get it.

It loses something after needing to be explained, I know.

 

[Dan Lambskin]

No it just wasn't funny

 

[sdp1226]

Threads that crash and burn are funny.

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Might as well edit in a new pic now.

 

[Scoresman]

you guys are rough

 

[Ignoramus]

The original title was "Scientists Take Picture of Quark"...

Whoa, whoa, whoa guy. Let's keep it PG-13 around here. There are plenty of boards on the internet where you can talk about #####s.

 

[northern exposure]

I don't get what a picture of Quark has to do with anything.

The original title was "Scientists Take Picture of Quark" leading a potential reader to believe that scientists have taken a photo of one of the most elementary particles of matter. Upon clicking and viewing the picture, the reader realizes he has been fooled and the picture is actually that of the famed Star Trek character named Quark, hence the "punchline" of the joke.

For some reason, the original title of the thread was deemed inappropriate enough to be changed, ruining the joke and leading to confusion amongst the masses.

Not funny then, not funny now. So at least you are consistent.

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

Not funny then, not funny now.

I actually think the OP is at least somewhat funny now. Sort of along the lines of the literal joke thread.

I changed the original thread title because I always try to change thread titles designed to get people to click on threads without knowing what's in them. It's an extension of Shick!'s vendetta against ellipses.

 

[DiStefano]

Not funny then, not funny now.

I actually think the OP is at least somewhat funny now. Sort of along the lines of the literal joke thread.

I changed the original thread title because I always try to change thread titles designed to get people to click on threads without knowing what's in them. It's an extension of Shick!'s vendetta against ellipses.

That was Shick! for you. He was always arguing about natural phenomena, which the ancients used to think presaged doom and disaster.