Is that just a simulation or did both telescopes look at the exact same part of space?Yo Mama said:
Exact same, can’t find the website I looked at yesterday that had the comparison but the new one was unbelievably more detailed and took 7.5 hours to collect the light. The Hubble took something like 14 days to take its picture.Is that just a simulation or did both telescopes look at the exact same part of space?
this is such an underrated aspect of Webb. It can collect data so much faster.Exact same, can’t find the website I looked at yesterday that had the comparison but the new one was unbelievably more detailed and took 7.5 hours to collect the light. The Hubble took something like 14 days to take its picture.
No. Two different telescopes.Is the Webb telescope part of Hubble?
Total noob question. The pics are amazing.
Yes, different telescopes. I will add that the Hubble scope was designed to primarily observe in the visible and ultraviolet range of the EM spectrum. The James Webb is primarily designed for infrared wavelengths.No. Two different telescopes.
Hubble is in orbit around the earth.
Webb has a much larger mirror and is a million miles away. It left a note on the fridge saying it "needed some space". Ba-dum-bum.![]()
I thought I read 12.5 hours compared to 23 days. We might be referring to different images though. The point is still the same.Exact same, can’t find the website I looked at yesterday that had the comparison but the new one was unbelievably more detailed and took 7.5 hours to collect the light. The Hubble took something like 14 days to take its picture.
For Webb to be able to do the visible spectrum it needs to be about an order of magnitude more precise than the current design. I hope they try that next.Yes, different telescopes. I will add that the Hubble scope was designed to primarily observe in the visible and ultraviolet range of the EM spectrum. The James Webb is primarily designed for infrared wavelengths.
Honestly, I'm a little underwhelmed this far.The pictures are mind bottling.
Not sure how that’s possible. If you watch that part of the clip above when they zoom back out you can see uncountable galaxies and that’s just a minute snapshot of one area.Honestly, I'm a little underwhelmed this far.
Pfft. Seeing things from 13 billion years ago. Meh, no biggie. Who wants to look at old stuff any way, right?Honestly, I'm a little underwhelmed this far.
Username does NOT check out.Pfft. Seeing things from 13 billion years ago. Meh, no biggie. Who wants to look at old stuff any way, right?
Why you gotta bring up old ish?Pfft. Seeing things from 13 billion years ago. Meh, no biggie. Who wants to look at old stuff any way, right?
My father does too. What's yours do?My dad worked on this project. So cool. Incredible how they did it.
Yep. The Institute is near John's Hopkins university.I think she just said Baltimore is the 'nerd center' of the operation! lol
He's an electrical engineer that's got a civilian contract. I think he designed integrated circuits for the telecommunication aspect of the camera.My father does too. What's yours do?
Meh, old news.Pfft. Seeing things from 13 billion years ago. Meh, no biggie. Who wants to look at old stuff any way, right?
Only 13%? Hmm, I would have thought that number would be higher. For the record, I disagree, but still thought the number would be higher.Article states 13% of people who were asked about the JWT feel it was/is money ill-spent.
I'm trying to not be too judgy....but geez this is some big time small mindedness going on.
That's the same % of people that have an unfavorable view of NASA overall (elsewhere in the article).Article states 13% of people who were asked about the JWT feel it was/is money ill-spent.
I'm trying to not be too judgy....but geez this is some big time small mindedness going on.
I'll be looking at it up close from KSCNo talk about the first SLS flight going up soon? Could see humans on the moon again in 2 years...
You would have to be a dummy to go up in this first flight.No talk about the first SLS flight going up soon? Could see humans on the moon again in 2 years...
Today's launch just scrubbed.Artemis 1 launch this am
Scheduled for 8:30 am et with 2 hour window. Problem with engine #3 may delay the launch. Fuel leak that appeared in Spring test fire has re-emerged.
Currently on hold at T-40 min.
There is no crew for this launch. It is just a step in the process of returning to a crewed missionYou would have to be a dummy to go up in this first flight.No talk about the first SLS flight going up soon? Could see humans on the moon again in 2 years...
I think that was the point. The only passengers are instrumented "dummy" humans.There is no crew for this launch. It is just a step in the process of returning to a crewed missionYou would have to be a dummy to go up in this first flight.No talk about the first SLS flight going up soon? Could see humans on the moon again in 2 years...
BOOOOOOOOOToday's launch just scrubbed.
Earliest next availability is Sept 2, depending on ability to resolve current issue.
I think that was the point. The only passengers are instrumented "dummy" humans.There is no crew for this launch. It is just a step in the process of returning to a crewed missionYou would have to be a dummy to go up in this first flight.No talk about the first SLS flight going up soon? Could see humans on the moon again in 2 years...
I'd hate to spoil the fun when the party is just getting started, but...
Scrubbed again.Another hydrogen leak this am. Trying to fix seal to continue toward successful launch at 2:15pm today.