Cuckoo!Trade them both for Tomlinson and sit back and laugh as you win season after season.
Greene by far IMO.Thomas is a nice back, but seems very replaceable. Even Lynell Hamilton looks good in that potent offense.Greene is clearly the future for a running-oriented offense alongside a top-notch defense.
I wouldn't say replaceable, but certain RBs will be used in the New Orleans offense for certain plays.I agree, Thomas would be a stud with 20 touches a game but that will never happen in NO. Too many weapons and a pass happy offense. Mike Bell would be a stud with 20 touches a game in that offense.Greene by far IMO.Thomas is a nice back, but seems very replaceable. Even Lynell Hamilton looks good in that potent offense.Greene is clearly the future for a running-oriented offense alongside a top-notch defense.I wouldn't say replaceable, but certain RBs will be used in the New Orleans offense for certain plays.
you think the saints sit idle all offseason if they let bush go and go into 2010 with thomas and bell? no way. maybe they bring in a FA or a high draft pick who they like better than thomas. they clearly don't think thomas is a no. 1 back. does he put up good fantasy numbers? sure. but not elite. part of that is the offense, but part of that is because they clearly don't trust him to carry even 65 percent of the load.fyi 2009 regular season touches:thomas 147, 39bell 172, 4bush 70, 47that's 389 carries and 90 receptions. a total of 479 touches for the 3 RBs. thomas had 186, bell had 176 and bush had 117. that's about 40 percent each for thomas and bell.I'd go with Pierre Thomas here. Unless Bush really goes nuts for the rest of the postseason and the Saints win the Superbowl, they are probably going to cut ties with him in the offseason. I like Bush, think he's valuable, but he's not 8 million dollars valuable, or whatever he is scheduled to make next year.That puts Pierre in a tandem with Bell where he will be getting at least 60% of the carries and practically all of the receptions.
I could go with "replaceable" in the sense that I could see the Saints drafting a 2nd-round or later back either this year or next. Sean Payton's backfield could see a steady churn as long as Brees is productive.Greene by far IMO.Thomas is a nice back, but seems very replaceable. Even Lynell Hamilton looks good in that potent offense.Greene is clearly the future for a running-oriented offense alongside a top-notch defense.I wouldn't say replaceable, but certain RBs will be used in the New Orleans offense for certain plays.
Uncapped year is throwing a monkey wrench into these kinds of analyses league-wide. Bush's esteem in New Orleans is changing rapidly ... IMHO he's a lot more likely to stay than go now. I couldn't have said that two months ago.I wouldn't be so quick to give this to Greene. 2010 could be a career year for PT if the Saints decide not to pay Reggie Bush the 8 million they owe him.