What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pink Floyd or Radiohead (1 Viewer)

Who's better?

  • Pink Floyd

    Votes: 197 87.6%
  • Radiohead

    Votes: 28 12.4%

  • Total voters
    225
What brought this about was a local rock station contest. 64 "greatest albums of all time" were put head to head tournament style and voted upon via text, phone and social media. The final was PF Dark Side vs PF The Wall.

http://challonge.com/2015mmarchmadness

So I was curious if RH fans saw PF as great or just a lesser band compared to RH.
Not even the two best Floyd albums.
As great as those 2 are, I probably listen to them the least. I'll take anything pre-Dark Side plus WYWH/Animals over them.
Animals and Wish You Were Here are about as good as music gets.
Great albums. I've always like Ummagumma, even though the band hate it. I'm also a huge fan of Meddle, but I might be the only person I know who is.
meddle is great. love fearless. Echoes (live at Pompeii) is my favorite Pink Floyd song
Fantastic music. I'm a big fan of "One of These Days" too.

 
Primus and Taylor Swift would both get my vote over Radiohead

A tough one for me would be Radiohead vs Arcade Fire since they're both awful and terribly overrated

 
I picked Floyd too but I think this is a fair comparison. Radiohead is this (?) generation's Pink Floyd in the way that they embraced technology and used it to their advantage and, to some, detriment.

 
A big thank you to this thread.

Radiohead fan silliness aside, Pink Floyd had inexplicably fallen off my playlists over the last few years. A steady diet of them has now returned to the rotation.

Thanks, all :thumbup:

 
Who was born in a house full of pain.
Who was trained not to spit in the fan.
Who was told what to do by the man.
Who was broken by trained personnel.
Who was fitted with collar and chain.
Who was given a pat on the back.
Who was breaking away from the pack.
Who was only a stranger at home.
Who was ground down in the end.
Who was found dead on the phone.
Who was dragged down by the stone.

 
A big thank you to this thread.

Radiohead fan silliness aside, Pink Floyd had inexplicably fallen off my playlists over the last few years. A steady diet of them has now returned to the rotation.

Thanks, all :thumbup:
Same. I've been listening for weeks.

 
I'm 37 and I know infinitely more about Radiohead's music than Pink Floyd's. Therefore, I'm one of the those who voted for Radiohead.

For me, Radiohead opened up a new world of music. I went beyond Pearl Jam, AC/DC & RAtM into something...different. Rhythm, instrumentation and what a song actually is were blown wide open. And they were great. So many great songs that I love that a lot of you have probably never even heard of....You And Whose Army?, I Might Be Wrong, Exit Music, Everything In Its Right Place, Street Spirit...probably a couple dozen more that haven't been mentioned anywhere in this thread that I can listen to over and over and over. To me, they are the modern day Led Zepplin

Meanwhile, all I know about Pink Floyd is the songs that receive heavy radio play. And some of those are songs that I'll pass up when flipping through stations. I love Wish You Were Here and enjoy Money a lot, but sometimes they sound more like folk singers than a rock band.

Like some have said, it is probably more a generational thing, but I also don't think Radiohead will ever get the radio play that PF gets, so maybe they will never stand a chance in polls like this.

But those who say they aren't even close are likely my opposite and know too little of Radiohead to make a truly informed decision.

 
Case in point:

While typing that last post, I tried listening to PF's Animals. After a few minutes of what sounded like Simon and Garfunkel, I switched to RH's In Rainbows. I'm still enjoying every it after 23 minutes.

 
Case in point:

While typing that last post, I tried listening to PF's Animals. After a few minutes of what sounded like Simon and Garfunkel, I switched to RH's In Rainbows. I'm still enjoying every it after 23 minutes.
:lol:

So you basically gave up on Animals shortly after Pigs on the Wing 1? At least give it an honest go, man.

 
Jayrod said:
I'm 37 and I know infinitely more about Radiohead's music than Pink Floyd's. Therefore, I'm one of the those who voted for Radiohead.

For me, Radiohead opened up a new world of music. I went beyond Pearl Jam, AC/DC & RAtM into something...different. Rhythm, instrumentation and what a song actually is were blown wide open. And they were great. So many great songs that I love that a lot of you have probably never even heard of....You And Whose Army?, I Might Be Wrong, Exit Music, Everything In Its Right Place, Street Spirit...probably a couple dozen more that haven't been mentioned anywhere in this thread that I can listen to over and over and over. To me, they are the modern day Led Zepplin

Meanwhile, all I know about Pink Floyd is the songs that receive heavy radio play. And some of those are songs that I'll pass up when flipping through stations. I love Wish You Were Here and enjoy Money a lot, but sometimes they sound more like folk singers than a rock band.

Like some have said, it is probably more a generational thing, but I also don't think Radiohead will ever get the radio play that PF gets, so maybe they will never stand a chance in polls like this.

But those who say they aren't even close are likely my opposite and know too little of Radiohead to make a truly informed decision.
Interesting post for several reasons.

I think you underestimate how many Radiohead fans there are in here. They are always highly regarded when doing drafts or just talking about music. I would bet most here have heard the songs you are talking about and still voted for PF.

Also, you seem to be dismissing other's votes for doing the exact say thing you are doing with Floyd. You are basing your vote on the few Floyd songs that you have heard on the radio while basically claiming that people are voting for PF because they haven't bothered to dig a little deeper into Radiohead's catalog.

When you were describing yourself at the start, that is exactly where I was a few years ago. I am 39 now, and probably really digging into Floyd about 4 -5 years ago. It was mostly due to the movie drafts that we were doing. Albums like Animals were being talked about highly, songs I hadn't heard were popping up in the drafts, etc.. I had already been digging back into bands that it skipped over because of these drafts and discussions so I did the same with Floyd. Before that, I was like you described - listened to RH a ton. Had 40+ live bootlegs I constantly went through, saw them live, had all the B-sides, etc.. Only had heard the main radio songs from Floyd. I say without hesitation that Floyd wins this. Like I posted earlier, I think their 70s output is as good of a stretch of music that any band has put out ever, and that doesn't even count their few from the 60s that are great too.

No, they don't "rock" as hard as RH. They don't have a song like Just or other early RH rockers. BUT, for someone who seems to love all of Radiohead judging on the songs that you mention, I find it hard to believe that you couldn't listen to a few Floyd albums and appreciate the similarities - especially if you love songs like Street Spirit, Climbing Up the Walls, later Radiohead and the like. I think all the adjectives that people use to describe Radiohead apply to Floyd and vise versa: smart, experimental, ground breaking, good musicianship, blah, blah.

I don't see Radiohead as the Zeppelin of our era, they are probably closer to the Floyd of our era.

 
Case in point:

While typing that last post, I tried listening to PF's Animals. After a few minutes of what sounded like Simon and Garfunkel, I switched to RH's In Rainbows. I'm still enjoying every it after 23 minutes.
:lol:

So you basically gave up on Animals shortly after Pigs on the Wing 1? At least give it an honest go, man.
Seriously. LolZ at equating Animals to simon and Garfunkel. Poor guy, you are so so lost.

 
Sitting out on a balcony in Orlando smoking a cigar and listening to Floyd on my iPhone. A little Shine On. Good lord. A guitar has never cried like this.

This "debate" is the worst debate ever.

1970s Pink Floyd remains my favorite music ever made in all time.

 
Not many people like Pink more than me. I am forty and most of the records have special meanings to me. Animals is one of my favorites of all time. See Emily Play is heard in my house weekly. SOYCD was pretty much my theme song in college as I educated pledges. I think the LZ comparison is a good one for Radiohead. They are very underrated IMO, although I bet most of you would say they are overrated. That's how it was with LZ when I was a kid. I voted Radiohead.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I had to list my all-time 10 favorite albums, Floyd would have two (Dark Side and WYWH) in there, and maybe a third (The Wall).

Radiohead's In Rainbows would also be in there.

 
Not many people like Pink more than me. I am forty and most of the records have special meanings to me. Animals is one of my favorites of all time. See Emily Play is heard in my house weekly. SOYCD was pretty much my theme song in college as I educated pledges. I think the LZ comparison is a good one for Radiohead. They are very underrated IMO, although I bet most of you would say they are overrated. That's how it was with LZ when I was a kid. I voted Radiohead.
the vote is 181-27. Looks like there are 154 people who like Floyd more than you here. ;)

 
PIK95 said:
I think the LZ comparison is a good one for Radiohead. They are very underrated IMO, although I bet most of you would say they are overrated. That's how it was with LZ when I was a kid.
This is way off IMO. Led Zeppelin was not critically acclaimed early on, but they were hugely popular from the start.

Each of Led Zeppelin's 9 studio albums placed reached the top 10 in both the US and UK and 6 reached #1 on both charts. They released 4 live albums, in 1976, 1997, 2003, and 2012. 3 of those albums reached the top 10 in both the US and UK, and 2 of them reached #1 on one of those charts. Their greatest hits compilation album released in 2007 reached at least #7 in both charts.

In comparison, Radiohead has released 8 studio albums. 5 of them have reached the top 10 in both the US and UK, 2 of which reached #1 on both charts. They have released 1 live album, and it did not crack the top 20 on either chart. Their greatest hits compilation album reached #4 in the UK but only #26 in the US.

Let's pause for a moment to talk about some of those later release dates for Led Zeppelin.

In 2003, 34 years after their first album was released, they released a live album (How the West Was Won) of concert recordings from 1972 that reached the top 10 on both charts. It debuted on the Billboard 200 chart at number 1 and was certified gold and platinum by the RIAA within 3 weeks.

Also in 2003, they released Led Zeppelin DVD. It is the best selling music DVD of all time and is 13x Platinum in the US.

In 2007, 38 years after their first album was released, Led Zeppelin released a greatest hits compilation (Mothership) that reached the top 10 on both charts. It debuted at #7 on the Billboard 200 chart and has been certified 2x Platinum.

In 2012, 43 years after the release of their first album, Led Zeppelin released another live album (Celebration Day) of their tribute concert in 2007, so not even with John Bonham, and it also reached the top 10 on both charts.

Radiohead released their first album in 1993. Anyone think if they release live albums and/or a music DVD in 2027 and 2036, they will reach the top 10 on both charts and go platinum? How about if they release a new greatest hits compilation in 2031?

How about record sales? Led Zeppelin has sold 300 million, give or take based on the source, second in history only to the Beatles. Radiohead has sold 30 million. Led Zeppelin released their first album 24 years earlier than Radiohead, but does anyone really believe Radiohead's sales will come remotely close?

I don't know much about Radiohead's touring success, but I do know that Led Zeppelin is one of the most popular touring bands of all time, and is credited as being a driver in stadium rock.

I really don't see this comparison at all. It grossly overrates Radiohead.

 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?

This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D

 
KarmaPolice said:
PIK95 said:
Not many people like Pink more than me. I am forty and most of the records have special meanings to me. Animals is one of my favorites of all time. See Emily Play is heard in my house weekly. SOYCD was pretty much my theme song in college as I educated pledges. I think the LZ comparison is a good one for Radiohead. They are very underrated IMO, although I bet most of you would say they are overrated. That's how it was with LZ when I was a kid. I voted Radiohead.
the vote is 181-27. Looks like there are 154 people who like Floyd more than you here. ;)
Not at all. They just like Radiohead a lot less.
 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
They are both top five all time for me. When I was a kid in the mid to late 80's in R.I. LZ didn't get the respect it deserved. It was even worse when the hair bands were big. The Wall hype was crazy when I was young fwiw. I'll never forget that. I did and still think LZ is the greatest band of all time BTW.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??

Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so

 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so
Arcade Fire for one.
 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so
Arcade Fire for one.
Broken Social Scene, Muse, M83, Coldplay, any band using electronic elements in their music.
 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so
Arcade Fire for one.
Broken Social Scene, Muse, M83, Coldplay, any band using electronic elements in their music.
Muse's Matt Bellamy was pretty adament about not being influenced by Radiohead but rather one of Thom Yorke's own influences Jeff Buckley. He never mentions them as one of his 5 most influential bands. They all seem to groan at the comparison as well and have almost moves they're music away from sounding like them with each new album.

Electronic elements are not exclusive to RH.

 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so
Arcade Fire for one.
Broken Social Scene, Muse, M83, Coldplay, any band using electronic elements in their music.
Nobody worth a damn. No wonder music sux now.

 
Muse is great, and I don't care what Matt Bellamy says...Radiohead is one of their influences. He sings in that same kind of whiney falsetto that Thom Yorke does. I think Bellamy probably downplays the influence because some used to call them a more hard-rcoking Radiohead knockoff (which was a stupid comparison, since musically Muse doesn't sound that much like Radiohead).

Back to Radiohead, they are definitely one of the first rock bands to successfully not only integrate electronica into their music, but to make it a core element.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
Serious question. Exactly who is radiohead influencing??Can you say oh if it wasnt for radiohead we wouldnt have band x or band y??? I dont think so
Arcade Fire for one.
Broken Social Scene, Muse, M83, Coldplay, any band using electronic elements in their music.
Nobody worth a damn. No wonder music sux now.
:lmao:

 
I disagree with the Radiohead/LZ comparison, but I don't think he meant from a sales or popularity standpoint.
That's how I took his underrated/overrated comment. He said he thought it was a good comparison, but it's a silly comparison IMO. Led Zeppelin is among the few best rock bands of all time. Radiohead isn't.

:shrug:
Really? Maybe not if you want to view them compared to other classic rock bands, but if you want to compare them to the best bands over the last twenty five years, they're in the conversation for top three. Name a more influential band since the early 90's?

This whole conversation is a bit of a joke though. Music is highly subjective, people get butt hurt when their favorite bands are dissed, or compared to another band they can't stand. Enjoy what you like, and move on. :D
In the post you quoted, I said Led Zeppelin is among the best few bands of all time and Radiohead isn't. Even if they are among the best few bands of the past 25 years (not saying they are), that does not equate to being among the best few bands of all time.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top