What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Pink invasion (1 Viewer)

Not Sleeping

Footballguy
Just a heads-up. It's October. Prepare to see a whole lot of pink on the field for the next 4 weeks. Last year introduced pink flags...maybe we'll get pink footballs this year? That would go well with the new "no hitting anybody hard" rules.

 
10 minutes into the first October game and I am "pinked out" already. Now they are using pink for the first down line.

Great cause but the NFL should dedicate the first week of October for pink out week in the NFL.

 
10 minutes into the first October game and I am "pinked out" already. Now they are using pink for the first down line.

Great cause but the NFL should dedicate the first week of October for pink out week in the NFL.
I agree 100%. This is over-the-top pink, as if we are so dumb we cannot figure out pink awareness/breast cancer awareness with all the pink that the players are wearing?

Pink flags - dumb. They are harder to see and change my perception in watching the game.

Four weeks of this? GAG

 
Heart disease kills more woman than breast cancer, but it's not as 'sexy' to sell awareness for it. Pretty embarrassing what the NFL is doing but it makes perfect sense with the $$$ it generates.

 
Breast cancer awareness is a big business. Everyone is cashing in. It's about the $, not awareness.
There was a meeting in Detroit with some Big 3 ad people..it was called "The Business of Pink" it has nothing to do with breast cancer..but how to use pink to help market your business. I do work for all the Big 3 and Johnson Controls so I attended. Not once was the word "cancer or cancer cure" mentioned. Only how to use pink and the cause to market to women and gain market share.

 
Breast cancer awareness is a big business. Everyone is cashing in. It's about the $, not awareness.
There was a meeting in Detroit with some Big 3 ad people..it was called "The Business of Pink" it has nothing to do with breast cancer..but how to use pink to help market your business. I do work for all the Big 3 and Johnson Controls so I attended. Not once was the word "cancer or cancer cure" mentioned. Only how to use pink and the cause to market to women and gain market share.
That's exactly what this is about. This is marketed as "awareness". This isn't raising $ to fund breast cancer research or finding a cure.

 
Point being, you wanna really donate to the cause, just donate directly to a research fund. Don't understand why anybody would donate through the NFL when they'll pocket a certain percentage for themselves.

 
Point being, you wanna really donate to the cause, just donate directly to a research fund. Don't understand why anybody would donate through the NFL when they'll pocket a certain percentage for themselves.
Is this true?
No, the NFL does not take a cut of the donations, however, they do make a ton of money off of all the pink jerseys and memorabilia they sell, as well as future ticket and merchandise they get from converting women into becoming NFL fans with their pink marketing campaign.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I won't let my son watch football during October. If he sees football players wearing pink he's probably going to turn out gay.

 
NFL has no shame

Even my wife turns to me and says is this just to get me to be interested in football??

 
What next, a pink second base during the MLB playoffs?

 
Point being, you wanna really donate to the cause, just donate directly to a research fund. Don't understand why anybody would donate through the NFL when they'll pocket a certain percentage for themselves.
Is this true?
Of course. The league benefits indirectly by increasing their market share among their most sought after demographic - women. More viewers, more advertising dollars, and more money. However the league also benefits directly - from merchandise sales of all those pink products you see on TV, which of course are available on NFL.com. Not all of the profit from that merchandise goes to "awareness" -- which itself is a somewhat dubious goal when it comes to combatting cancer.

The NFL donates a certain percentage of profits for the pink gear they sell on their website, but I've never heard it stated what percent. So I tried to do some research to find out. Here's what I found:

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/

While all proceeds from auctioned game-worn items go to breast cancer causes, the league declines to say what portion of the apparel sales do. Inquiring minds can estimate, however. Ticketmaster limited its 2012 A Crucial Catch contribution to 10 cents for every ticket sold last October (up to $40,000 total), and The New York Times reported that Old Navy donated only five percent of revenues to a foundation via a similar 2011 campaign featuring the Dallas Cowboys. Charlotte Jones Anderson, the daughter of Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, supervised this campaign, and Anderson in December was appointed chairwoman of a new NFL foundation that will direct league community efforts.

The bottom line: The league hardly donates much to "fight" breast cancer. You'd need to use scientific notation with negative exponents to express what percentage of the NFL's annual revenues it contributes via A Crucial Catch. The campaign raised a combined $4.5 million during its first four years (2009-2012), including $1.5 million last year. League-wide revenues approached $8 billion in 2009, when NFL teams earned a median profit of $28.6 million, according to The Economics of the National Football League, a 2012 book edited by Kevin G. Quinn. (The NFL says it plans to donate $23 million to all community causes this year -- less than one percent of its likely revenues.)
Aside from the fact that the NFL and the Pink foundation (actually called the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer foundation) are getting rich(er) off of the pink campaign, the whole goal of "awareness" is questionable, for two reasons:

(1) As mentioned above, 'who hasn't heard of breast cancer?' But really, the goal is not to tell people/women, "Newsflash: there is breast cancer" -- it's to encourage them to engage in early exams and detect it earlier so it can more easily be treated. I think most people have some vague idea in their head that when they give money "to combat cancer," some scientist somewhere is getting funding to conduct trials and come up with a cure, a medicine, a vaccine, etc. "Awareness" itself as a goal can be a good thing - but it isn't going to change the status quo and vault us into the medical future.

(2) Related to the "awareness" issue -- think about who benefits from this sort of campaign/system, aside from the NFL. As a cancer foundation, Susan Komen et. al. simply have to try to educate people and encourage them to get exams annually. They don't have to give large chunks of money to scientists to conduct expensive trials and develop an actual cure. This allows the foundation itself to retain a larger percentage of profits/revenue/donations whatever you want to call it.

There are also indirect beneficiaries. Think about all the physicians with more business walking in their door, the drug companies with more prospective customers, and most of all -- the insurance companies that save money by treating patients in a more cost effective way by catching the cancer earlier. Of course those are all admirable goals - we want those with cancer to be treated, and to be treated more effectively. But I think what people really want when they decide to give money "to fight cancer" is to advance the status quo and develop a future world without cancer. That is explicitly not the goal of this foundation. Physicians, Drug and Insurance companies can be thought of sort of like lobbyist in the political arena - they contribute as well to the coffers of the Kommen foundation, the NFL's campaign, and the whole corporate complex, because they benefit from it.

In any case, "Awareness" is actually fairly appropriate for breast cancer in particular because it's one of the more treatable forms of cancer, especially if detected early. But as someone pointed out above, there are other more deadly forms of cancer that are harder to detect. Breast cancer is a fairly convenient cause if you decided to start a charity foundation and weren't interested in giving away all of your money. More lives could certainly be saved per dollar donated if the $$$ that goes to PINK went instead to say, heart disease.

Every year this topic comes up in this forum, and I wage my own "awareness campaign" to educate people about what all this Pink is really about. And it's really about making many people very rich -- and, without a doubt, saving some lives by detecting breast cancer at an earlier stage in the process. Admirable, but clearly tainted.

Further reading:

http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?page_id=13

/rant

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's sad they're trying to gain awareness on cancer with a mcdonalds or Burger King commercial following it. It's like uhhhhhh what do you think is causing cancer? Pretty much every sponsor the NFL has contributes to giving you cancer. We don't want you to stop getting cancer, we just want you to give us your money

 
Pretty fri kin horrible. One week should suffice, a whole month is atrocious.
Agreed about # of weeks -- it shouldn't be more than two in the pink. Balanced, of course, by one in the stink.

Love it or hate it, you have to give props to Susan G. Komen and peeps. This is the most visibility a cause has received in an entertainment medium since Bob Geldoff and the Ethiopian famines.

 
NFL has no shame

Even my wife turns to me and says is this just to get me to be interested in football??
First year she has watched? This has been going on for 3-4 years now.
I don't remember this much pink in years past. People think it's ridiculous to complain, but it really is aesthetically grating.
The flags and the onscreen first down line are new this season, but the rest is as prevalent as it has been at least the last 3 or 4 seasons. I think the whole month being pink started 5 years ago. In a once-in-a-billion-years color catastrophe, the Moron Jr led Seahawks played the Bears during pink month in their godawful, worst uniforms ever, lime green jerseys. That game is burned into my mind for a few reasons, but the color clash I remember and I'm pretty sure that was the first year of a whole month.

 
It's sad they're trying to gain awareness on cancer with a mcdonalds or Burger King commercial following it. It's like uhhhhhh what do you think is causing cancer? Pretty much every sponsor the NFL has contributes to giving you cancer. We don't want you to stop getting cancer, we just want you to give us your money
It's even worse than that -- many of the Pink products actually contain cancer-causing carcinogens themselves:

4. Does this purchase put you or someone you love at risk for exposure to toxins linked to breast cancer? What is the company doing to ensure that its products are not contributing to the breast cancer epidemic? Many companies have sold pink ribbon products that are linked to increased risk of breast cancer. We believe that companies that are profiting from building a reputation based on their concern about breast cancer have a responsibility to protect the public from possible harms when scientific research indicates that there is a risk or plausible reason for concern. Some of the earliest cause-marketing companies were well-known cosmetics companies that continue to sell cosmetics containing chemicals that have been linked to breast cancer. Even car companies have gotten in on the action and sell cars that emit toxic air pollutants in the name of breast cancer. In considering a pink ribbon purchase, does the product contain toxins or otherwise increase our risk of breast cancer?
EXAMPLE: In 2011, Susan G. Komen for the Cure commissioned a perfume called Promise Me that contains unlisted chemicals that are regulated as toxic and hazardous, have not been adequately evaluated for human safety, and have demonstrated negative health effects. Although Komen said they would reformulate future versions of the perfume, without official adoption of the precautionary principle, there is no guarantee that future versions would be better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's sad they're trying to gain awareness on cancer with a mcdonalds or Burger King commercial following it. It's like uhhhhhh what do you think is causing cancer? Pretty much every sponsor the NFL has contributes to giving you cancer. We don't want you to stop getting cancer, we just want you to give us your money
Science!Id step away from your cell phone though.

 
Its a little disappointing the NFl doesnt give equal time and effort to prostate cancer which is just as deadly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love watching old highlights of **** Butkus and Jack Tatum and the Doomsday Defense and Lombardi's Packers. None of them are wearing PINK. When we look back 20, 30 years from now at all the players running around in pink, it will look so stupid. I wanted to puke when Charles Woodson stained the proud Raiders uniform with high pink socks the other night. STOP THE MADNESS!

Oh my God, I had no idea breast cancer existed until I saw Haloti Ngata's pink jockstrap!!!

 
Its a little disappointing the NFl doesnt give equal time and effort to prostate cancer which is just as deadly.
Prostate cancer isn't anywhere close to being as deadly as breast cancer. Most men who die naturally of old age also have prostate cancer, which tends to be slow in metastasizing or spreading to other parts of the body. Most men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer do not die from it. See your doctor once a year and get a PSA test regularly and you'll likely be OK, genetics aside. Meanwhile breast cancer is the #3 killer of women behind only heart disease and stroke. Aesthetically I dislike the pink towels and pink shoes and I question the NFL's motivation but facts are facts. Prostate cancer isn't comparable to breast cancer. I say we shut up and think of our wives and mothers and put up with the pink crap for a month. It's for a good cause.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Such a weird thing to complain about.
:goodposting:
Apparently, it was a valid complaint, as the pink flags are being taken away, which is a shame, because now so many more women are going to die from breast cancer.
Terrible comment. By the way, the guy who campaigned for the players to be able to wear pink in October just lost his mother to breast cancer. DeAngelo Williams fought to have the players be able to wear pink during breast cancer awareness month. His four aunts all died of breast cancer, and his mother just became the 5th, and last, sister to die of breast cancer. She died last Friday. She was the only sister to live past 50.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top