TripItUp
Footballguy
Drake london if you want immediate opportunity, the other guys if you want to be a bit patient, I'm basically out on Dotson or whatever unless he fell far.
Garret Wilson could easily catch 90 balls this year.
Drake london if you want immediate opportunity, the other guys if you want to be a bit patient, I'm basically out on Dotson or whatever unless he fell far.
Still a lot of wr talent going tonight
Pickens/Watson/Skyy/Pierce/Metchie/Tolbert/Ross
Watson scares me. He’s 23 years old and didn’t breakout until age 21 and to a lesser degree played against poop competition.
several of these guys will be fantasy assets...I like Watson the most. Pickens is intriguing. Metchie could be a ppr machine.
Watson scares me. He’s 23 years old and didn’t breakout until age 21 and to a lesser degree played against poop competition.
For every Cooper Kupp you have a hundred duds. I just don’t like him for the reasons I listed.I mean, Cooper Kupp broke out when?
For every Cooper Kupp you have a hundred duds. I just don’t like him for the reasons I listed.
His age and late breakout is red flag to me.Fair enough. Difference of opinions is what makes this board great.
His age and late breakout is red flag to me.
Kinda makes his landing spot pretty interestingAnd I like his size( 6'4") speed (4.36), collegiate production and Senior Bowl performance.
I meant to multi quote you both on Watsons landing spotHis age and late breakout is red flag to me.
Cooper Kupp had 93 receptions for 1691 yards and 21 TD's as an 18 year old freshman.I mean,
Cooper Kupp
broke out when?
smallFor all those putting Dotson last, just curious is it because Wentz is his QB, because of limited upside as Terry is the entrenched #1, or you just don't think his talent measures up to everyone else picked last night?
I think you're underestimating Elijah Moore and Berrios, and overestimating Garret Wilson. Wilson is a very good athlete, but his WR skills aren't top notch.Garret Wilson could easily catch 90 balls this year.
I disagree with you. Wilson will definitely be their WR1.I think you're underestimating Elijah Moore and Berrios, and overestimating Garret Wilson. Wilson is a very good athlete, but his WR skills aren't top notch.
There you go!Whoever gets Watson is getting the SOD, he is this draft class' Jerry Rice(small school steal). He has it all. Might take him a year, but he could the best WR in this class IMHO. I'm hoping he goes third round to a team with a good QB...that will create value in fantasy.
There you go!
Perfect. He gets over drafted nowAnd my boy Watson goes to the Packers
Care to walk that back Johnny U?
FWIW, Chris Simms had Watson as his #2 overall WR. He has good moves with the ball in his hand, especially for a big guy. Checkout his 100 yard KR TD and the end arounds.I am now accepting apologies from certain individuals in this forum.
Exactly. As I mentioned above, I’m at the 1.08 in one draft and I expect both Watson and Moore are now in play for me there. Of course, the FFPC drafts start next week, so I don’t have much time to figure out who I like best….so I’ll be asking lots of questions hereWatson with Rodgers and Moore with Mahomes complicates things a tad in that 4-8 range
Nailed it!Dr. Octopus said:There's still a few very talented WRs like Pickens, Watson and Moore with teams like Green Bay, Indianapolis, Pitts and KC having openings.
Relative Athletic Score.What is RAS?
I don't think Skyy Moore will be there at 1.08 in most leagues.Exactly. As I mentioned above, I’m at the 1.08 in one draft and I expect both
Watson
and
Moore
are now in play for me there. Of course, the FFPC drafts start next week, so I don’t have much time to figure out who I like best….so I’ll be asking lots of questions here
Interesting. I guess that gives me one of the current consensus top 7 dropping to me at 8I don't think Skyy Moore will be there at 1.08 in most leagues.
Relative Athletic Score. It's a number from 1-10 that is given to a player based on how his combine measurements match up against other guys at his position throughout NFL history (a history that includes as long as combine measurements were being taken). It's a cool tool to have at one's disposal.What is RAS?
I agree. I think Skyy will more often go before Burks at 7.Interesting. I guess that gives me one of the current consensus top 7 dropping to me at 8
It is an interesting debate, Watson vs. Moore, two small-school receivers who may be just scratching the surface of what they could develop into.Exactly. As I mentioned above, I’m at the 1.08 in one draft and I expect both Watson and Moore are now in play for me there. Of course, the FFPC drafts start next week, so I don’t have much time to figure out who I like best….so I’ll be asking lots of questions here
Fixed that for you.Initial take on rd1-3 WRs
AJ Brown PHI
Drake London 8 ATL
Garrett Wilson 10 NYJ
Treylon Burks 18 TEN
Jameson Williams 12 DET
Chris Olave 11 NO
Jahan Dotson 16 WAS
Skyy Moore 54 KC
Christian Watson 34 GB
George Pickens 52 PIT
Wan'Dale Robinson 43 NYG
John Metchie 44 HOU
Alec Pierce 53 IND
Tyquan Thornton 50 NE
Jalen Tolbert 88 DAL
David Bell 99 CLE
Velus Jones 71 CHI
Danny Gray 105 SF
No, not at all. Let's see him do it on the field. I'm not crowning him because of landing spot. Why would I walk it back when I just listed my concerns about his age and breakout age and level of competition?And my boy Watson goes to the Packers
Care to walk that back Johnny U?
I would not enjoy having the 1.02 this year.Now where do we put kenneth walker in this list? I can see ahead of all the WRs or after 6 of them
I know. I have 1.1 and 1.12, and I'm like, fine.I would not enjoy having the 1.02 this year.
Two words... Justin Jefferson... He produced fine during his first year with defensive attention on RB Dalvin Cook and WR Adam Thielen. I think Olave will eat some especially with vertical passing opportunity from QB Winston.I like Olave to the Saints considerably more for real life than for fantasy production. For those of you who have Olave near the top of your fantasy draft lists, what kind of production are you projecting for him?
I think Olave is a really good fit in New Orleans as the WR2 to Michael Thomas, and I believe he can enjoy the benefits of defenses focused on Thomas and Kamara. However, I don't know that we will see WR1 production from Olave.
I have the 1.2and am taking Walker and not looking back. But I need RB help in a rebuild and everyone liked his talent before the draft, so I’ll bet on that.I would not enjoy having the 1.02 this year.
I’ll be working hard to trade back. Hopefully the two RBs gain some steam between now and the draft so I can make it happen.I know. I have 1.1 and 1.12, and I'm like, fine.
Indeed, you never know. I just think it's really hard to plant a flag in the ground for any of these guys this year. Walker is a talent that really popped to my eyes on the college level.I have the 1.2and am taking Walker and not looking back. But I need RB help in a rebuild and everyone liked his talent before the draft, so I’ll bet on that.
ETA: and who knows. Maybe the guy with the 1.1 loves walker over Hall, like a few on this board. Either way, whichever RB is there I’ll take.
This year? It’s dynasty I’m talking about, of course. if Walker is talented and most rankings had him as the 2nd overall rookie, I’m not gonna overthink it and just invest in the talent. I also have the 1.8 in that same draft and will take whichever WR is best there.Indeed, you never know. I just think it's really hard to plant a flag in the ground for any of these guys this year. Walker is a talent that really popped to my eyes on the college level.
When I said “this year” I’m referring to this class. Apologies for the confusion.This year? It’s dynasty I’m talking about, of course. if Walker is talented and most rankings had him as the 2nd overall rookie, I’m not gonna overthink it and just invest in the talent. I also have the 1.8 in that same draft and will take whichever WR is best there.
Ha. It’s me who was confused. Duh. Of course that’s what you meant.When I said “this year” I’m referring to this class. Apologies for the confusion.