What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Post the guys that could possibly take Daynes job. (1 Viewer)

First off, let me start by saying that I absolutely DO NOT believe that Dayne will be losing his job at this point. Just getting that out in the open.

If Dayne *DOES* lose primary RB role, here are the people who I think he will lose it to, listed in order of likelihood.

1. Tatum Bell

2. T.J. Duckett

3. Cedric Cobbs

4. Mike Bell

5. Cecil Sapp

6. Everyone else

...

...

...

999 (from the "it ain't gonna happen" files). Kevan Barlow

 
Michael Bennett

any Jags RB

shipp or arrington

It would be suhweeeeeet if they could trade for Chris Perry, but not likely

 
Tiki Barber.

Okay, seriously. Tatum Bell, Cedrick Cobbs, Thomas Jones, Michael Bennett, TJ Duckett, Mike Bell, Cecil Sapp, Marty Johnson, Brandon Miree, Kevan Barlow, William Green.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tiki Barber.

Okay, seriously. Tatum Bell, Cedrick Cobbs, Thomas Jones, Michael Bennett, TJ Duckett, Mike Bell, Cecil Sapp, Marty Johnson, Brandon Miree, Kevan Barlow, William Green.
I wonder if William Green will ever get another serious shot. I always felt some nice skills were being overlooked there.
 
Suggs too(saw Maurile's W Green post)
Suggs has some skills, but the only reason the Browns are looking to get rid of him is because he can't stay healthy.i doubt anyone is going to trade for him at this point, much less bring him in to be a primary RB.

 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.

 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
:goodposting: The likelihood of any of those trades is very slim IMO. This is just more of fantasy football players wondering "what if" more than anything else. I think that the Broncos feel just fine going to war with Dayne and Bell. I think that they'll split time and whatever back has the hot hand will continue to get the ball. Denver has managed to take loads of RBs and make them look good in their system. Why would they feel the need to trade for a RB now? When have they ever traded for a RB?

 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
:goodposting: The likelihood of any of those trades is very slim IMO.
not if one of them is worth Lelie and/or can be had cheap. There have beens tons of player movement in June during the last 10-20 years or so.
 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
:goodposting: The likelihood of any of those trades is very slim IMO.
not if one of them is worth Lelie and/or can be had cheap. There have beens tons of player movement in June during the last 10-20 years or so.
I'm going to have to call you on the "tons" part of this statement. Please provide any players that were dealt June 1st or later that were starting RB and the deal was made without an injury that took out the #1 RB for the acquiring team. :popcorn:

BTW, what ever happened in the past does not mean that the Broncos will not get another RB heading into the season, but at this point put me in the camp that it would be "unlikely."

 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
:goodposting: The likelihood of any of those trades is very slim IMO.
not if one of them is worth Lelie and/or can be had cheap. There have beens tons of player movement in June during the last 10-20 years or so.
I'm going to have to call you on the "tons" part of this statement. Please provide any players that were dealt June 1st or later that were starting RB and the deal was made without an injury that took out the #1 RB for the acquiring team. :popcorn:

BTW, what ever happened in the past does not mean that the Broncos will not get another RB heading into the season, but at this point put me in the camp that it would be "unlikely."
"tons of player movement"/= starting RBs without an injury taking out the #1 RB for the acquiring team
 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
:goodposting: The likelihood of any of those trades is very slim IMO. This is just more of fantasy football players wondering "what if" more than anything else. I think that the Broncos feel just fine going to war with Dayne and Bell. I think that they'll split time and whatever back has the hot hand will continue to get the ball. Denver has managed to take loads of RBs and make them look good in their system. Why would they feel the need to trade for a RB now? When have they ever traded for a RB?
:thumbup:
 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.
True, but it is interesting to note the Denver traded both of their top RBs from 2004 and 2003. My point is, when you take about Denver and their #1 RB, a trade is a possibility...

That being said, I would agree that odds are with Bell and Cobbs

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.
True, but it is interesting to note the Denver traded both of their top RBs from 2004 and 2003. My point is, when you take about Denver and their #1 RB, a trade is a possibility...

That being said, I would agree that odds are with Bell and Cobbs
Cedric Cobbs will emerge as the Bronco's #1 back and run for 1500 yards and 9 TDs in 2007. You heard it here first!
 
Players/odds.......

1. Tatum Bell (4:1)

2. Cedric Cobbs (20:1)

3. T.J. Duckett (25:1)

4. Michael Bennett (50:1)

5. Thomas Jones (75:1)

6. Mike Bell (80:1)

7. Cecil Sapp (100:1)

 
Here are the remaining free agents as best that I can tell . . .

Stephen Davis RB UFA CAR

Jonathan Wells RB UFA HOU

LaBrandon Toefield RB RFA JAX

Lamar Gordon RB UFA PHI

Moe Williams (Retired) RB UFA MIN

Tony Hollings RB UFA HOU

Jesse Chatman RB UFA NO

Obafemi Ayanbadejo RB UFA ARI

Daimon Shelton RB UFA BUF

Marc Edwards RB UFA CHI

Ovie Mughelli RB RFA BAL

Aveion Cason RB UFA STL

Chris Massey RB UFA STL

Omar Easy RB UFA OAK

Clarence Farmer RB UFA OAK

Amos Zereoue RB UFA NE

Paul Smith RB UFA DET

Michael Cloud RB UFA NYG

Darian Barnes RB UFA MIA

James Jackson RB UFA ARI

J.R. Redmond RB UFA ARI

Jarrod Baxter RB UFA ARI

Harold Morrow RB UFA ARI

Nick Luchey RB UFA CIN

Steve Bush RB UFA SF

 
Moe retired?

I thought Hollings was with Chicago...

Here are the remaining free agents as best that I can tell . . .

Stephen Davis RB UFA CAR

Jonathan Wells RB UFA HOU

LaBrandon Toefield RB RFA JAX

Lamar Gordon RB UFA PHI

Moe Williams (Retired) RB UFA MIN

Tony Hollings RB UFA HOU

Jesse Chatman RB UFA NO

Obafemi Ayanbadejo RB UFA ARI

Daimon Shelton RB UFA BUF

Marc Edwards RB UFA CHI

Ovie Mughelli RB RFA BAL

Aveion Cason RB UFA STL

Chris Massey RB UFA STL

Omar Easy RB UFA OAK

Clarence Farmer RB UFA OAK

Amos Zereoue RB UFA NE

Paul Smith RB UFA DET

Michael Cloud RB UFA NYG

Darian Barnes RB UFA MIA

James Jackson RB UFA ARI

J.R. Redmond RB UFA ARI

Jarrod Baxter RB UFA ARI

Harold Morrow RB UFA ARI

Nick Luchey RB UFA CIN

Steve Bush RB UFA SF
 
I still cannot believe Wells is still unsigned. I think he could be a solid, viable option in Pitt, Philly, Den, or a few other places.

 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.
True, but it is interesting to note the Denver traded both of their top RBs from 2004 and 2003. My point is, when you take about Denver and their #1 RB, a trade is a possibility...
Agreed, although Portis and Droughns were traded away from the Broncos, with the team believing they could find someone else to step in. I don't see the team trading for someone at this point to take over.
 
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.

Realistically, it's probably only Tatum Bell and Cobbs at this point.
I would say the same thing, except there have been persistant rumors from multiple sources linking Duckett to the Broncos. I'm not sure they actually want him, since they turned down a straight-up Lelie for Duckett swap during the draft, but it's something I'm paying attention to. Unlike the Barlow rumors, these are actually coming from multiple DIFFERENT sources, most of which are pretty credible.
Trades are far-fetched to begin with, and any FA signings will surely be at the bottom of the pecking order.
True, but it is interesting to note the Denver traded both of their top RBs from 2004 and 2003. My point is, when you take about Denver and their #1 RB, a trade is a possibility...
Agreed, although Portis and Droughns were traded away from the Broncos, with the team believing they could find someone else to step in. I don't see the team trading for someone at this point to take over.
Exactly right. Denver has traded *AWAY* two of its past 3 leading rushers, and cut the third. Denver views RBs as a very fungible position, and will always shuffle off proven performers in order to save money. Trading *FOR* a new RB doesn't make any sense unless he comes dirt cheap.
 
One name mentioned quickly and overlooked.

Brandon Miree.

Good player, hurt at Pitt when he was coming out. And he's been in Denver a few years.

Anyone who you would gues, has to know the zone blocking system.

It takes a while to figure out. So if the guys comes off FA or a trade it would seem logical it's:

Vernand Morency

Duckett

That's about it.

As bad a Dayne is(and he's bad) he still may be better than those guys.....

 
I just find it hilarious that we're even discussing Ron Dayne and the fact that he's in the starting role.... :lmao:

 
Key Points:

1. 2300 yds. and 20-25 TD's are coming out of Denver RB's combined.

2. A serious threat to Daynes job does not appear to be there.

3. Dayne looked solid last year / Mike Anderson is gone.

4. It's Denver.

5. Bell cannot carry the load and production falls after 10-15 touches.

Dayne carries value, possibly only for one year, but this is his shot.

1200 yds and 12 scores. :thumbup:

 
Maybe Denver could have a beer truck guy try-out?

Seriously, unless they wind up trading Lelie for someone with better credentials, I am starting to believe SSOG and others with the renewed Dayne hype. I just can't see Bell as an every-down back. C Cobbs has loads of talent, but does he have the committment? Who has ever been cut by the Pats to re-surface as a star elsewhere? They usually specialize in the opposite movement, cast-off elsewhere to star in New England.

 
Maybe Denver could have a beer truck guy try-out?

Seriously, unless they wind up trading Lelie for someone with better credentials, I am starting to believe SSOG and others with the renewed Dayne hype. I just can't see Bell as an every-down back. C Cobbs has loads of talent, but does he have the committment? Who has ever been cut by the Pats to re-surface as a star elsewhere? They usually specialize in the opposite movement, cast-off elsewhere to star in New England.
Lawyer Milloy. Law led the league in INTs last season and made the pro bowl, too.
 
Maybe Denver could have a beer truck guy try-out?

Seriously, unless they wind up trading Lelie for someone with better credentials, I am starting to believe SSOG and others with the renewed Dayne hype.  I just can't see Bell as an every-down back.  C Cobbs has loads of talent, but does he have the committment?  Who has ever been cut by the Pats to re-surface as a star elsewhere?  They usually specialize in the opposite movement, cast-off elsewhere to star in New England.
Lawyer Milloy. Law led the league in INTs last season and made the pro bowl, too.
I don't think Law was cut. I think he just walked as a FA. Robbie Gould has done OK in Chi-town and IIRC he was camp fodder for Vinatieri at one point. Jermaine Wiggins, not a star, has done well away from the Pats+Jets, much better IMO. I think he was cut from the Pats but not certain.SSOG what do you say to those that say Cobbs couldn't make a NE team that was screaming for a young back to be Dillon's heir, why would he be an impact player on Denver then?

 
SSOG what do you say to those that say Cobbs couldn't make a NE team that was screaming for a young back to be Dillon's heir, why would he be an impact player on Denver then?
I say Reuben Droughns, I say Olandis Gary. Not just offense, either- what about Bertrand Berry? The guy got cut from the Indianapolis Colts, spent a year out of football, got signed to Denver, and either last year or the year before was an All-Pro.The stink of it from New England was that Cobbs got injured and never got a fair chance, and then by the time he got healthy, New England was ready to invest more substantially into a backup for Dillon. However, when he came out, he was a guy that Denver was very high on (they were debating between taking Bell and Cobbs with their second round choice, just to give you an idea of how much they liked him). Further, Shanahan and Bobby Turner have a long history of not only identifying players who are ideal for their system, but also coaching them up better than anyone else in the league.

I also think the New England thing is kind of funny. Some people believe that Bill Bellichick can walk on water and part the seas, but historically, he makes as many personnel mistakes as anyone else. He had a remarkable run of 3 or 4 years where pretty much every decision was a hit, but then again, so did Mike Shanahan from 1996-1998, and people have quickly forgotten about his "personnel wizardry" (his success in a fledgling free agency system pretty much defined free agency for almost a decade, much as Bellichick's success with bargain basement players is currently shaping team philosophies). If you want an example of how Bellichick can screw up personnel matters just like anyone else, go back to the 2001 draft. They selected Richard Seymour and Matt Light with their first two picks (both pick were fantastic selections). They then selected 7 consecutive players who were out of football within 3 years.

Cobbs could be a matter of Bill Bellichick screwing up in personnel evaluation. He could be a matter of Bellichick needing a more naturally gifted runner to succeed in his system than Denver needs. He could also be an example of a guy who gets a lot of hype and then fades into obscurity. Personally, I subscribe to the latter theory. I think two years from now, no one will remember his name- not because he couldn't succeed if given his chance, but just because I don't think he'll ever get the chance. He reminds me a lot of Ahmaad Galloway, another RB who Shanahan absolutely raved over every single offseason but who never became much of anything during the actual season.

 
SSOG what do you say to those that say Cobbs couldn't make a NE team that was screaming for a young back to be Dillon's heir, why would he be an impact player on Denver then?
I say Reuben Droughns, I say Olandis Gary. Not just offense, either- what about Bertrand Berry? The guy got cut from the Indianapolis Colts, spent a year out of football, got signed to Denver, and either last year or the year before was an All-Pro.The stink of it from New England was that Cobbs got injured and never got a fair chance, and then by the time he got healthy, New England was ready to invest more substantially into a backup for Dillon. However, when he came out, he was a guy that Denver was very high on (they were debating between taking Bell and Cobbs with their second round choice, just to give you an idea of how much they liked him). Further, Shanahan and Bobby Turner have a long history of not only identifying players who are ideal for their system, but also coaching them up better than anyone else in the league.

I also think the New England thing is kind of funny. Some people believe that Bill Bellichick can walk on water and part the seas, but historically, he makes as many personnel mistakes as anyone else. He had a remarkable run of 3 or 4 years where pretty much every decision was a hit, but then again, so did Mike Shanahan from 1996-1998, and people have quickly forgotten about his "personnel wizardry" (his success in a fledgling free agency system pretty much defined free agency for almost a decade, much as Bellichick's success with bargain basement players is currently shaping team philosophies). If you want an example of how Bellichick can screw up personnel matters just like anyone else, go back to the 2001 draft. They selected Richard Seymour and Matt Light with their first two picks (both pick were fantastic selections). They then selected 7 consecutive players who were out of football within 3 years.

Cobbs could be a matter of Bill Bellichick screwing up in personnel evaluation. He could be a matter of Bellichick needing a more naturally gifted runner to succeed in his system than Denver needs. He could also be an example of a guy who gets a lot of hype and then fades into obscurity. Personally, I subscribe to the latter theory. I think two years from now, no one will remember his name- not because he couldn't succeed if given his chance, but just because I don't think he'll ever get the chance. He reminds me a lot of Ahmaad Galloway, another RB who Shanahan absolutely raved over every single offseason but who never became much of anything during the actual season.
you love to pit shanny and BB vs each other and bash BB huh? I'm not so into that but wouldn't mind continuing this debate on some level. Galloway went to SD IIRC and flopped there after playing in NFLE. Shanny also praised Karon Coleman years ago cut him, brought him back to play(lineup as) WR for a week or so, then cut him again. In my experience, Shanny likes to praise lesser known players a little too strongly and he's more genuine with the starters. Almost like "he's laying it on thick." You disagree?

As for the drafting prowess, Denver either doesn't have a single DL they drafted or has one left backup...Emeril? Emervill? that could be cut.

 
you love to pit shanny and BB vs each other and bash BB huh? I'm not so into that but wouldn't mind continuing this debate on some level.

Galloway went to SD IIRC and flopped there after playing in NFLE. Shanny also praised Karon Coleman years ago cut him, brought him back to play(lineup as) WR for a week or so, then cut him again. In my experience, Shanny likes to praise lesser known players a little too strongly and he's more genuine with the starters. Almost like "he's laying it on thick." You disagree?

As for the drafting prowess, Denver either doesn't have a single DL they drafted or has one left backup...Emeril? Emervill? that could be cut.
I'm not trying to bash Bill Bellichick by any stretch of the imagination. I think he's a phenominal coach, easily one of the top 5 in the league, and any franchise would be incredibly lucky to have him. I'm just trying to say that Bellichick isn't nearly as good as his press clippings from the last 3 years would lead you to believe. I remember all too well that those press clippings were saying the EXACT SAME THINGS about Shanahan after his back-to-back superbowls. No one has ever managed to sustain excellence at that level forever, and Bellichick will prove no exception. Eventually he'll have a couple of decent but not spectacular seasons, and everyone will forget all about him and move on to some new wunderboy coach, recognizing Bellichick as a good coach, but no longer as this alien entity that could not possibly make a mistake.I don't mind people saying that Bill Bellichick is a phenominal coach or evaluator of talent. What I have a problem with is people who say "Well, if BELLICHICK couldn't get anything out of him..." as if Bellichick is wholly incapable of erring in judgement, or as if no other coach in the entire league could ever get more from a player than Bellichick could.

I also get bugged when people say "Yeah, I don't really like New England's draft, but I'm going to bump it up a letter grade or two because it's New England, so I'm sure they're smarter than me and I'm just underrating them."

I also don't by any stretch of the imagination mean to say that Shanahan is himself infallable when it comes to player evaluation. Shanahan makes plenty of mistakes. The thing is, most people don't pretend that he doesn't, so I never see the need to point them out. I'm not trying to praise Shanahan, I'm just trying to serve as a voice of reason before everyone gets out of hand with their man-love of Bellichick.

I also don't think that Shanahan "lays it on thick". I fully believe that he is nothing but 100% honest in his evaluations of his players... I just think that these lesser-known backs never get their chance to shine in the system. I think if Ahmaad Galloway had a few key injuries ahead of him, he'd be in the same sentence as Olandis Gary when we talk about Denver RBs.

 
Key Points:1. 2300 yds. and 20-25 TD's are coming out of Denver RB's combined.2. A serious threat to Daynes job does not appear to be there.3. Dayne looked solid last year / Mike Anderson is gone.4. It's Denver.5. Bell cannot carry the load and production falls after 10-15 touches.
6. Dayne's production falls after 10-15 touches.
 
Key Points:

1. 2300 yds. and 20-25 TD's are coming out of Denver RB's combined.

2. A serious threat to Daynes job does not appear to be there.

3. Dayne looked solid last year / Mike Anderson is gone.

4. It's Denver.

5. Bell cannot carry the load and production falls after 10-15 touches.
6. Dayne's production falls after 10-15 touches.
Dayne has not had a true shot yet. He is next in line. Any statistical evidence regarding the production decline?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top