What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Post your week 6 waiver wire/free agent pickups here! (1 Viewer)

Najeh Davenport looks very good... might have to handcuff him if you have willie parker like i do...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Najeh Davenport looks very good... might have to handcuff him if you have willie parker like i do...
The whole Steelers offense is making the Chiefs D look like the Washington Generals vs. the Globetrotters. I agree that it's clear now who Willie's handcuff is. Going into this week, we had seen so little of Davenpoop that it was really up in the air whether he or Verron Haynes would be the primary ballcarrier if anything happened to Willie. I think we know the answer now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not that there is a how lot of FA on the wire in my league, but here are a few

Brandon Jones looked decent (I'll be stashing him on my roster)

Kyle Boller (based on McNair injury)

....

 
If Baskett is still out there, look at grabbing him - he got a lot of looks today.
too bad he didn't catch any of them...
Yeah - but he's a rookie. He should evolve over the course of the year and get better at catching McNabb's passes.When scouting the WW, it will be hard to find a WR who will be more targeted, esp. if Stallowrth continues to have health problems.
 
In some leagues, Musa Smith or Mike Anderson might be available - they might be good options to stash deep on your bench.

 
If Baskett is still out there, look at grabbing him - he got a lot of looks today.
too bad he didn't catch any of them...
Yeah - but he's a rookie. He should evolve over the course of the year and get better at catching McNabb's passes.When scouting the WW, it will be hard to find a WR who will be more targeted, esp. if Stallowrth continues to have health problems.
Reggie Brown down?
What's yer point?We're talking WW finds - comprehension down?
 
Some #3 WRs:

Patrick Crayton was worked well into the Cowboys passing offense, and that still with Glenn and Owens getting their share of targets. He was definitely a bigger part of the gameplan than Witten today. He would be useful if Glenn gets hurt or if TO eventually talks himself off the roster.

Drew Carter has an imposing size/speed combo and looks like a future starter in this league. If Steve Smith's hammy acts up, or Keyshawn suffers a freak injury, he will be a viable fantasy WR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Baskett is still out there, look at grabbing him - he got a lot of looks today.
too bad he didn't catch any of them...
Yeah - but he's a rookie. He should evolve over the course of the year and get better at catching McNabb's passes.When scouting the WW, it will be hard to find a WR who will be more targeted, esp. if Stallowrth continues to have health problems.
Reggie Brown down?
What's yer point?We're talking WW finds - comprehension down?
I dont know. Im just giddy I started Brown today
 
If Baskett is still out there, look at grabbing him - he got a lot of looks today.
too bad he didn't catch any of them...
Yeah - but he's a rookie. He should evolve over the course of the year and get better at catching McNabb's passes.When scouting the WW, it will be hard to find a WR who will be more targeted, esp. if Stallowrth continues to have health problems.
Reggie Brown down?
What's yer point?We're talking WW finds - comprehension down?
I dont know. Im just giddy I started Brown today
gotcha - no worries
 
Sigmund Bloom said:
Some #3 WRs:Patrick Crayton was worked well into the Cowboys passing offense, and that still with Glenn and Owens getting their share of targets. He was definitely a bigger part of the gameplan than Witten today. He would be useful if Glenn gets hurt or if TO eventually talks himself off the roster.Drew Carter has an imposing size/speed combo and looks like a future starter in this league. If Steve Smith's hammy acts up, or Keyshawn suffers a freak injury, he will be a viable fantasy WR.
Add Derek Hagan to the list. Ok, I'll admit was completely wrong about him in the pre-draft period. He may not give that #2 job back to Booker if he keeps playing like this.Wes who?edit to add: Wes must have heard me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're carrying a handcuff to Larry Johnson, I'd recommend making sure it's Derrick Ross, not Dee Brown.
Well, is it Ross, Brown, Bennett, or the Priest coming off of PUP? :loco: I missed the end of the game, how did Ross look?
CBS cut away to MIA/NYJ. I would carry Ross until Bennett or Holmes are playing again. Brown almost lost the game for the Chiefs last week with a fumble after LJ's head almost got torn off, and Herm confirmed what I expected when Ross was in instead of Brown at the end of the game this week.
 
I'll go do research, but I'd appreciate any comments on Nate Washington here. Thanks.
The #4 WR in Pittsburgh behind Ward, Wilson, and Holmes. They also like to give him an end around every now and then, but I don't think he's worth carrying, at least not over Holmes or Wilson.
 
Sigmund, are you serious? Nate Washington is getting good FF looks EVERY game!

Plus:

1) Ward is aging

2) Wilson is a #3

3) Holmes is young and making many mistakes

Washington might just land a starting spot soon? :banned:

 
Sigmund, are you serious? Nate Washington is getting good FF looks EVERY game!Plus:1) Ward is aging2) Wilson is a #33) Holmes is young and making many mistakesWashington might just land a starting spot soon? :banned:
He's consistently getting 4 or 5 targets a game. Today he was extremely productive on them because the Chiefs secondary thought the team was on bye. I agree that Wilson is best cast as a #3, and that Holmes is making rookie mistakes, but I don't think those things will turn Washington into a starting WR for fantasy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Going deeper:

DJ Hackett is very underrated. It took Bobby Engram's thyroid condition for him to get a consistent spot in the 4 WR sets, but he made the most of it, just as he did last year when injuries gave him playing time. He may well pass Burleson in the pecking order, and #3 WRs in good pass offenses are worth carrying in most leagues.

 
Sigmund, are you serious? Nate Washington is getting good FF looks EVERY game!Plus:1) Ward is aging2) Wilson is a #33) Holmes is young and making many mistakesWashington might just land a starting spot soon? :banned:
He's consistently getting 4 or 5 targets a game. Today he was extremely productive on them because the Chiefs secondary thought the team was on bye. I agree that Wilson is best cast as a #3, and that Holmes is making rookie mistakes, but I don't think those things will turn Washington into a starting WR for fantasy.
As a Steeler fan, I think it's a toss up between Washington and Holmes as to who establishes himself as the #2 fantasy WR on the team, Ward will be #1. Washington is getting more opportunities now, but I think Holmes value will increase as the season goes on and he learns the offense. Neither one are that likely to be anything more than your #3 WR, IMO. Wilson is no better than a #3 now and I see him being the odd man out as the 4th WR by season's end. I would boost the Steelers WR's values somewhat after this week, as Ben was the QB we saw last year against Cincy, Indy and the Broncos in the playoffs this week. He was not the one we saw the 1st 5 weeks of the season. Whatever confidence he lost from last year, he regained today.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gradkowski for dynasty/deep/keeper leagues. Two starts and two pretty good games. He missed some plays but overall played a solid game for a rookie. Seems a very good fit for the offense.

 
redraft: Brian Calhoun with the Bryson injury

dynasty: Crayton - he looked good today. Crayton should benefit with the attention TO gets

 
As a Steeler fan, I think it's a toss up between Washington and Holmes as to who establishes himself as the #2 fantasy WR on the team, Ward will be #1. Washington is getting more opportunities now, but I think Holmes value will increase as the season goes on and he learns the offense. Neither one are that likely to be anything more than your #3 WR, IMO. Wilson is no better than a #3 now and I see him being the odd man out as the 4th WR by season's end. I would boost the Steelers WR's values somewhat after this week, as Ben was the QB we saw last year against Cincy, Indy and the Broncos in the playoffs this week. He was not the one we saw the 1st 5 weeks of the season. Whatever confidence he lost from last year, he regained today.
I agree. the past 2 weeks, it seems Cowher is putting Holmes on the field more and I don't see him making that many mistakes. The natural ability is there and as fast as he is, he could be a great downfield threat as soon as Ben get's some confidence/chemistry with him. I actually picked him up and started him this week...I'm not upset, I'll take the 6 pts when everybody else was on bye. I'm not dropping him either as I like his upside as the season goes on. I think he'll be #2 by season's end.
 
So if you were Andy Reid/Donovan McNabb and saw that Hank Baskett had 7 targets and 0 catches would you want to continue feeding him the ball?

 
Hank Baskett can kiss my ###-kett!

I lost drinking that Kool-aide. Just because a WR is starting doesn't make an automatic play(what i learned this week).

 
The 3 biggest names on my WW are the Claytons and Eric Parker. All three have questions surrounding 'em though. As I see it...

Mike Clayton scares me but I just can't quit him, man. Maybe his looks and touches, incl the TD, break open the flood gates a bit - maybe Grad has a better feel for him now? I don't know...

Mark Clayton - everything I hear is that his 2 TD's were flukes. Still, if Boller gets more PT (can't believe I'm saying this) things could look up - Boller looked stout at the end of last year (MoFo singlehandedly knocked me out of the playoffs last year) and can do a better job of getting Clayton the deep ball.

Eric Parker is getting good looks and leading in receiving yards lately in SD. No TD's though. If Marty continues to open up the offense for Rivers, will Parker be the main beneficiary?

I'm trying to answer these questions in my own mind before I move on one of 'em.

 
Eric Parker is getting good looks and leading in receiving yards lately in SD. No TD's though. If Marty continues to open up the offense for Rivers, will Parker be the main beneficiary?
Parker is definitely intriguing. McCardell, despite his also solid game, is still 36 and looking every bit the part.Jackson and Floyd are interesting prospects, but still look like they have a ways to go. Parker definitely seems to be a preferred target of Rivers, of course after LT and Gates get theirs.
 
Mark Clayton - everything I hear is that his 2 TD's were flukes. Still, if Boller gets more PT (can't believe I'm saying this) things could look up - Boller looked stout at the end of last year (MoFo singlehandedly knocked me out of the playoffs last year) and can do a better job of getting Clayton the deep ball.
They were flukes. And I personally have no confidence in Clayton or Boller. Lot's of hit or miss with these two.
 
I forgot to add that the ###-ket comment landed coffee on the keyboard - Out standing stuff right there.

Zamboni - yeah, the number of looks that have to go around is what makes me worry the most w/ Parker - could be anyone week to week...

sdsjr - that's what I thought. And the hit/miss is the feeling I get with them too. Never did like anyone on the Ravens offense ever.

 
Mark Clayton - everything I hear is that his 2 TD's were flukes. Still, if Boller gets more PT (can't believe I'm saying this) things could look up - Boller looked stout at the end of last year (MoFo singlehandedly knocked me out of the playoffs last year) and can do a better job of getting Clayton the deep ball.
They were flukes. And I personally have no confidence in Clayton or Boller. Lot's of hit or miss with these two.
Boller and Clayton were a very solid combo at the end of 2005. I have more faith in Boller to make the Baltimore passing game productive right now than I do in McNair. Not to mention Boller actually has the arm to use Clayton deep.
 
Steve Dallas said:
Michael Clayton is available in a number of my leagues, so check your WWs -- I'll be looking to add him this week.
Done and DoneLike most of you I drafted Clayton late, 3rd to last pick, and gave up on him after Sims went down.I've been keeping my eye on him and now, finally seems to be coming on. I think it's a crapshoot for who gets the TDs, Galloway,Smith and Clayton all get looks. I'll take my chances and roll the dice this week as an avergae bye week fill in.Also picked up Jax Def Vs Hou, Jax was on a bye last week, and was surprisngly dropped for bye week fillins in a deeper league i am in (shorter bench). :porked:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top