Unfortunately, Matt Ryan has faded during Dec. too - his performance in this game is going to be the difference (either way) in my opinion. Turner and Norwood will score multiple TDs for Atlanta, and Warner/Fitzgerald/Boldin/Breaston will also put up several TDs - if Matt Ryan can connect for more TDs than interceptions, then I think the Falcons walk away with a 3+ point win. If Ryan goes 11/25-ish for 145-ish yards, 1 TD and 2 or more interceptions, then I think the Cardinals' offense scores enough points off of the turnovers to over-balance the scales.Secondarily, Edgerrin James' level of desire to perform well in a playoff game will be a possible plus for the Cardinals (assuming he is "up" for this game and gets handed the ball). I don't see James as a deciding factor for the Cardinals (their passing attack is too good and the Atlanta secondary too suspect) but he is a wild card here that could help move the sticks between the 20's and get the Cards in good position for field goals at the end of the first and second half. My .02.In the end, I think Ryan throws a lot of safe passes and maybe 1 TD with 0 picks due to a basic passing attack, and the Falcons win 31-27.Since moving to Arizona, the Cardinals have had a habit of fading late in the years. Nothing seems to be disproving that theory this year. Atlanta's got the better offense and the better defense. The Cardinals can't exploit the Falcons Achilles heel, and Matt Ryan should throw for 300/3 against this defense.Atlanta 38, Arizona 24.
I don't disagree that Ryan's faded, but I think he's found the perfect cure -- the Arizona D.The NFC West QBs are awful. Outside of them, the other 10 teams have thrown 28 passing touchdowns and 2 interceptions against the Cardinals this year. That's 28 touchdowns against 2 interceptions. TWENTY EIGHT TOUCHDOWNS AGAINST TWO INTERCEPTIONS.Unfortunately, Matt Ryan has faded during Dec. too - his performance in this game is going to be the difference (either way) in my opinion. Turner and Norwood will score multiple TDs for Atlanta, and Warner/Fitzgerald/Boldin/Breaston will also put up several TDs - if Matt Ryan can connect for more TDs than interceptions, then I think the Falcons walk away with a 3+ point win. If Ryan goes 11/25-ish for 145-ish yards, 1 TD and 2 or more interceptions, then I think the Cardinals' offense scores enough points off of the turnovers to over-balance the scales.Secondarily, Edgerrin James' level of desire to perform well in a playoff game will be a possible plus for the Cardinals (assuming he is "up" for this game and gets handed the ball). I don't see James as a deciding factor for the Cardinals (their passing attack is too good and the Atlanta secondary too suspect) but he is a wild card here that could help move the sticks between the 20's and get the Cards in good position for field goals at the end of the first and second half.Since moving to Arizona, the Cardinals have had a habit of fading late in the years. Nothing seems to be disproving that theory this year. Atlanta's got the better offense and the better defense. The Cardinals can't exploit the Falcons Achilles heel, and Matt Ryan should throw for 300/3 against this defense.
Atlanta 38, Arizona 24.
My .02.
In the end, I think Ryan throws a lot of safe passes and maybe 1 TD with 0 picks due to a basic passing attack, and the Falcons win 31-27.
I looked a little at this and these numbers tell quite a story. In the five games that Arizona played on the East Coast (actually four trips as they stayed for two games on one trip), the Cardinals played @ Redskins, @ Jets, @ Panthers, @ Eagles, and @ Patriots. In those five games the Cards offense had 11 TD passes and threw 9 ints. On the other hand, their defense gave up 17 TD passes and had ony one int. That includes the 6 TD game by Favre and 4 TD passes by McNabb.However at home, their offense produced 17 TD passes against only 5 ints whereas the opposing teams threw 16 TD passes and 6 ints. Their home record was 6-2 while they lost all five of those East Coast games.I don't disagree that Ryan's faded, but I think he's found the perfect cure -- the Arizona D.The NFC West QBs are awful. Outside of them, the other 10 teams have thrown 28 passing touchdowns and 2 interceptions against the Cardinals this year. That's 28 touchdowns against 2 interceptions. TWENTY EIGHT TOUCHDOWNS AGAINST TWO INTERCEPTIONS.Unfortunately, Matt Ryan has faded during Dec. too - his performance in this game is going to be the difference (either way) in my opinion. Turner and Norwood will score multiple TDs for Atlanta, and Warner/Fitzgerald/Boldin/Breaston will also put up several TDs - if Matt Ryan can connect for more TDs than interceptions, then I think the Falcons walk away with a 3+ point win. If Ryan goes 11/25-ish for 145-ish yards, 1 TD and 2 or more interceptions, then I think the Cardinals' offense scores enough points off of the turnovers to over-balance the scales.Secondarily, Edgerrin James' level of desire to perform well in a playoff game will be a possible plus for the Cardinals (assuming he is "up" for this game and gets handed the ball). I don't see James as a deciding factor for the Cardinals (their passing attack is too good and the Atlanta secondary too suspect) but he is a wild card here that could help move the sticks between the 20's and get the Cards in good position for field goals at the end of the first and second half.Since moving to Arizona, the Cardinals have had a habit of fading late in the years. Nothing seems to be disproving that theory this year. Atlanta's got the better offense and the better defense. The Cardinals can't exploit the Falcons Achilles heel, and Matt Ryan should throw for 300/3 against this defense.
Atlanta 38, Arizona 24.
My .02.
In the end, I think Ryan throws a lot of safe passes and maybe 1 TD with 0 picks due to a basic passing attack, and the Falcons win 31-27.
That's the most pathetic stat I've ever seen for a playoff team. Wow.
Arizona is good at home in the first half of the year. Their last two home games against non-NFCW QBs saw Tarvaris Jackson and Eli Manning throw 7 TDs and 0 INTs (both Cardinals losses). This is a bad pass defense, and I don't see how the Falcons don't shred them. This should be a shoot out.I looked a little at this and these numbers tell quite a story. In the five games that Arizona played on the East Coast (actually four trips as they stayed for two games on one trip), the Cardinals played @ Redskins, @ Jets, @ Panthers, @ Eagles, and @ Patriots. In those five games the Cards offense had 11 TD passes and threw 9 ints. On the other hand, their defense gave up 17 TD passes and had ony one int. That includes the 6 TD game by Favre and 4 TD passes by McNabb.However at home, their offense produced 17 TD passes against only 5 ints whereas the opposing teams threw 16 TD passes and 6 ints. Their home record was 6-2 while they lost all five of those East Coast games.I don't disagree that Ryan's faded, but I think he's found the perfect cure -- the Arizona D.The NFC West QBs are awful. Outside of them, the other 10 teams have thrown 28 passing touchdowns and 2 interceptions against the Cardinals this year. That's 28 touchdowns against 2 interceptions. TWENTY EIGHT TOUCHDOWNS AGAINST TWO INTERCEPTIONS.Unfortunately, Matt Ryan has faded during Dec. too - his performance in this game is going to be the difference (either way) in my opinion. Turner and Norwood will score multiple TDs for Atlanta, and Warner/Fitzgerald/Boldin/Breaston will also put up several TDs - if Matt Ryan can connect for more TDs than interceptions, then I think the Falcons walk away with a 3+ point win. If Ryan goes 11/25-ish for 145-ish yards, 1 TD and 2 or more interceptions, then I think the Cardinals' offense scores enough points off of the turnovers to over-balance the scales.Secondarily, Edgerrin James' level of desire to perform well in a playoff game will be a possible plus for the Cardinals (assuming he is "up" for this game and gets handed the ball). I don't see James as a deciding factor for the Cardinals (their passing attack is too good and the Atlanta secondary too suspect) but he is a wild card here that could help move the sticks between the 20's and get the Cards in good position for field goals at the end of the first and second half.Since moving to Arizona, the Cardinals have had a habit of fading late in the years. Nothing seems to be disproving that theory this year. Atlanta's got the better offense and the better defense. The Cardinals can't exploit the Falcons Achilles heel, and Matt Ryan should throw for 300/3 against this defense.
Atlanta 38, Arizona 24.
My .02.
In the end, I think Ryan throws a lot of safe passes and maybe 1 TD with 0 picks due to a basic passing attack, and the Falcons win 31-27.
That's the most pathetic stat I've ever seen for a playoff team. Wow.
If this game was at Atlanta, i don't think the Cards have a shot, but at home, I expect them to win.
Falcons won a shootout against the Panthers last month. I don't think it's that they can't, it's just the focus on the run game means they tend to avoid it.We can't win a shootout, IMO. We'll need 150 yards rushing minimum to control the clock and keep Warner off the field. And when he's on the field, we need to keep him on his back. Big games from Turner and Abraham will be key for us.
Panthers aren't as explosive as Arizona, IMO. But, Ari isn't as consistent because of a heavy reliance on the pass game. They get just a little bit out of rhythm, and they can lay a huge egg but, by the same token, if everything's clicking, really tough to stop.Falcons won a shootout against the Panthers last month. I don't think it's that they can't, it's just the focus on the run game means they tend to avoid it.We can't win a shootout, IMO. We'll need 150 yards rushing minimum to control the clock and keep Warner off the field. And when he's on the field, we need to keep him on his back. Big games from Turner and Abraham will be key for us.
That game wasn't really a shootout with back and forth scoring. The Falcons went up by more than 2 touchdowns, let the Panthers back into the game and eventually ran them out of the building. Atlanta was always in control of that game. If this team tries to trade touchdowns with the Arizona Cardinals more than likely they will lose.Falcons won a shootout against the Panthers last month. I don't think it's that they can't, it's just the focus on the run game means they tend to avoid it.We can't win a shootout, IMO. We'll need 150 yards rushing minimum to control the clock and keep Warner off the field. And when he's on the field, we need to keep him on his back. Big games from Turner and Abraham will be key for us.
Been thinking about it a lot, unfortunately. Hope Ryan returns to form for Arizona. We also had Milloy out for that game, and he's bigger in the run game than most people, myself included, realized.Everyone is picking the Falcons in this game, so that means the Cardinals will probably win. And as crappy as the Cardinals have looked at times over the last month, keep in mind that, in a game that could have gotten them a first round bye (had Carolina lost), the Falcons struggled mightily to beat the pathetic Rams last Sunday...at home. Just something to think about.
With that pass defense, the Cardinals better be afraid to trade touchdowns with anyone.That game wasn't really a shootout with back and forth scoring. The Falcons went up by more than 2 touchdowns, let the Panthers back into the game and eventually ran them out of the building. Atlanta was always in control of that game. If this team tries to trade touchdowns with the Arizona Cardinals more than likely they will lose.Falcons won a shootout against the Panthers last month. I don't think it's that they can't, it's just the focus on the run game means they tend to avoid it.We can't win a shootout, IMO. We'll need 150 yards rushing minimum to control the clock and keep Warner off the field. And when he's on the field, we need to keep him on his back. Big games from Turner and Abraham will be key for us.
NO - it's 60+ years (61 to be exact - 1947 when they were the Chicago Cardinals)This is the first Cardinals home playoff game in 30+ years... how the hell can they fail to sell out the stadium?????????????????????????????????
Link
Seriously, what's the issue? They have sold out every regular season home game since they moved into the new stadium and suddenly they cannot fill it for the playoffs?That's some serious Weak Sauce.NO - it's 60+ years (61 to be exact - 1947 when they were the Chicago Cardinals)This is the first Cardinals home playoff game in 30+ years... how the hell can they fail to sell out the stadium?????????????????????????????????
Link
Playoff games, schlayoff games. It's all about the regular season in AZ, baby!Seriously, what's the issue? They have sold out every regular season home game since they moved into the new stadium and suddenly they cannot fill it for the playoffs?That's some serious Weak Sauce.NO - it's 60+ years (61 to be exact - 1947 when they were the Chicago Cardinals)This is the first Cardinals home playoff game in 30+ years... how the hell can they fail to sell out the stadium?????????????????????????????????
Link
No Edge, you went for the money. That was your decision so deal with it. What a disgrace.flapgreen said:Wow. Edge's display of selfishness is as bad as I've witnessed in a long time. Way to be a team player, Edge.
"I can't go through this again," James told ESPN. "I didn't come here to block. I'm not an offensive lineman."
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs2008...tory?id=3805610