***Pre-Game Thread*** Green Bay at Chicago (1 Viewer)

[DrJ]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

Of course, the Eagles probably end up winning since they only need a field goal at the end of the game. The game wasn't won because of some dominant performance from the Packers offense, where they put up 309 total yards (less than 24 of 32 teams averaged on the season), were actually outgained in total yards by about 50 and put up 21 total points.

 

[Serafino]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

Of course, the Eagles probably end up winning since they only need a field goal at the end of the game.

Not true, because Jones catches the TD in your "what if" world making it 28-19 Packers.

 

[boubucarow]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

And James and Jennings have been dropping or fumbling on sure huge plays the last few weeks. It would help the Bears if that continued.

 

[whitem0nkey]

Bears lead the Packers in the all-time series 92-83-6(181 games), including their only playoff game in 1941

 

[onlyseventeenpoints?]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

Of course, the Eagles probably end up winning since they only need a field goal at the end of the game.

This is the type of a statement made by people that just started watching the game.

 

[Tickle Monster]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

 

[DrJ]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

Of course, the Eagles probably end up winning since they only need a field goal at the end of the game.

Not true, because Jones catches the TD in your "what if" world making it 28-19 Packers.

We can discount the missed FG's more than the Packers drop, because the Packers do that like once a game. Like the one Packers fans are counting as a TD from week 17.

 

[Serafino]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

You do realize that the game plays out completely differently if Akers makes either of those kicks, right? Sure, Akers blew six points for them, but James Jones also blew an easy seven for GB by dropping that bomb at the end of the 2nd quarter, so it goes both ways.

Of course, the Eagles probably end up winning since they only need a field goal at the end of the game.

Not true, because Jones catches the TD in your "what if" world making it 28-19 Packers.

We can discount the missed FG's more than the Packers drop, because the Packers do that like once a game. Like the one Packers fans are counting as a TD from week 17.

Yeah....well, the Packers would have lost that game too if Robbie Gould would have made 3 more field goals...

 

[DrJ]

We can discount the missed FG's more than the Packers drop, because the Packers do that like once a game. Like the one Packers fans are counting as a TD from week 17.

Yeah....well, the Packers would have lost that game too if Robbie Gould would have made 3 more field goals...

That is also true. Because it was another contest where the Packers offense was far from dominant and showed they can be handled by the Chicago D. If the Bears were interested in actually running their offense, like they did in the first half of the Seahawks game - rather than use the time as some sort of bizarre experiment like the 2nd half of the Seahawks game, Robbie may have come up with those 3 field goals too. We'll see what happens this week, I imagine the Bears will have a bit different gameplan this time around.

 

[sho nuff]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

So, we are going to play the if game huh?Well...if Jones catches that easy ball at the end of the half, it might have gone even more towards the Packers.The Packers won...you seem to want to make excuses as to why.And then they went to play a better team and blew them out of the water.Both Philly and Atlanta were far better than the Seahawks.

 

[sho nuff]

We can discount the missed FG's more than the Packers drop, because the Packers do that like once a game. Like the one Packers fans are counting as a TD from week 17.

Yeah....well, the Packers would have lost that game too if Robbie Gould would have made 3 more field goals...

That is also true. Because it was another contest where the Packers offense was far from dominant and showed they can be handled by the Chicago D. If the Bears were interested in actually running their offense, like they did in the first half of the Seahawks game - rather than use the time as some sort of bizarre experiment like the 2nd half of the Seahawks game, Robbie may have come up with those 3 field goals too. We'll see what happens this week, I imagine the Bears will have a bit different gameplan this time around.

And for the past 2 years now, Cutler and the Bears offense has been handled by the Packer D.The Bears offense never scoring more than 15 points against Capers defense.

 

[DrJ]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

So, we are going to play the if game huh?Well...if Jones catches that easy ball at the end of the half, it might have gone even more towards the Packers.The Packers won...you seem to want to make excuses as to why.And then they went to play a better team and blew them out of the water.Both Philly and Atlanta were far better than the Seahawks.

Not really. It was suggested that the games that have happened since the Packers offense with its back to the wall was held to 10 point in Lambeau indicate the Packers are reaching some new level of offensive power that the Bears are incapable of stopping. Fact is that their offense didn't really blow anyone out of the water in the Eagles game, and it very easily could have been a Packers loss if not for the Eagles kicker not showing up. They had a nice game against Atlanta. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[sho nuff]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

So, we are going to play the if game huh?Well...if Jones catches that easy ball at the end of the half, it might have gone even more towards the Packers.The Packers won...you seem to want to make excuses as to why.And then they went to play a better team and blew them out of the water.Both Philly and Atlanta were far better than the Seahawks.

Not really. It was suggested that the games that have happened since the Packers offense with its back to the wall was held to 10 point in Lambeau indicate the Packers are reaching some new level of offensive power that the Bears are incapable of stopping. Fact is that their offense didn't really blow anyone out of the water in the Eagles game, and it very easily could have been a Packers loss if not for the Eagles kicker not showing up. They had a nice game against Atlanta. Nothing more, nothing less.

So basically...making excuses to try and diminish the Packers O and base that on a grand total of 2 games now.Awesome.How about being 3-1 vs. a Cutler led Bears team and Capers D holing a Cutler led Bears offense to 15 points or less every time they played.

 

[Tony Jabroni]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

 

[DrJ]

The Packers won by a narrow margin thanks to the opposing kicker not making routine kicks. The Eagles win had little to do with the Eagles being unable to contain the Packers offense, to the tune of 21 whole points.

So, we are going to play the if game huh?Well...if Jones catches that easy ball at the end of the half, it might have gone even more towards the Packers.The Packers won...you seem to want to make excuses as to why.And then they went to play a better team and blew them out of the water.Both Philly and Atlanta were far better than the Seahawks.

Not really. It was suggested that the games that have happened since the Packers offense with its back to the wall was held to 10 point in Lambeau indicate the Packers are reaching some new level of offensive power that the Bears are incapable of stopping. Fact is that their offense didn't really blow anyone out of the water in the Eagles game, and it very easily could have been a Packers loss if not for the Eagles kicker not showing up. They had a nice game against Atlanta. Nothing more, nothing less.

So basically...making excuses to try and diminish the Packers O and base that on a grand total of 2 games now.Awesome.How about being 3-1 vs. a Cutler led Bears team and Capers D holing a Cutler led Bears offense to 15 points or less every time they played.

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

 

[sho nuff]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

 

[tdmills]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

Are you holding onto the excuse that they did try?

 

[whitem0nkey]

Reporter to Greg Jennings: Are the Bears the fastest defense you've faced this year? Jennings: "I would have to say yes."

Reporter to A.J. Hawk: Why do you think the Bears defense gets more press than you guys? Hawk: "Do they?"

 

[whitem0nkey]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

DrJ is correct its well know that the bears did not game plan for the packer game week 17, they pretty much just called random plays on offense. I'm not taking anything away from the packers that game they won, but your fooling your self to use week 17 as a precursor to what will happen next week.

 

[whitem0nkey]

Love how Ryan Grant, who's been injured all year, is talking smack via twitter.

1st n last tweet.Pack Fans might want 2 start booking flights 4 feb. Not looking ahead but u c we just have better players than other teams

Football Outsiders computers have this game as a toss up, more or less.GB- 50.6%

CHI- 49.4%

 

[sho nuff]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

Are you holding onto the excuse that they did try?

Excuse?The Packers won, why would I need an excuse.The Bears starters played the whole game...does a team do that and expose their QB to the pressure and hits he was taking if they are not trying?

 

[sho nuff]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

DrJ is correct its well know that the bears did not game plan for the packer game week 17, they pretty much just called random plays on offense. I'm not taking anything away from the packers that game they won, but your fooling your self to use week 17 as a precursor to what will happen next week.

Link to that being some well known fact that they didn't even game plan?BTW...I have never said to just use week 17 as anything. Im just disagreeing with this notion that the Bears didn't try that week.The FACT remains...that with Cutler at QB and Capers as DC for the Packers...the Bears offense has never scored more than 15 points.

 

[whitem0nkey]

Jay Cutler (the jerk) is raffling off a lot for this game:

tickets just $2

* Winner and guest will enjoy 2 premium seats to watch the Bears take on Green Bay for the NFC Championship (Soldier Field, Sunday, January 23, 2011, Kickoff at 2:00 PM Central)

* Winner and guest will enjoy 2 pregame field passes

* Winner and guest will enjoy 2 night hotel accomodations in Chicago (Saturday January 22 and Sunday January 23, 2011, Single Room Double Occupancy)

* Winner will receive a $1,000 travel allowance

* Winner will receive a $500 allowance for meals and other expenses

* Winner will receive an autographed Jay Culter Chicago Bears Mini Helmet

* Winner will receive a cash prize in the amount of $1,089.00 to mitigate the Winner's tax liability that results from winning the raffle. This prize is withheld and paid, on behalf of the Winner, directly to the IRS ($900.00) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ($189)

 

[Tony Jabroni]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

DrJ is correct its well know that the bears did not game plan for the packer game week 17, they pretty much just called random plays on offense. I'm not taking anything away from the packers that game they won, but your fooling your self to use week 17 as a precursor to what will happen next week.

Link to that being some well known fact that they didn't even game plan?BTW...I have never said to just use week 17 as anything. Im just disagreeing with this notion that the Bears didn't try that week.The FACT remains...that with Cutler at QB and Capers as DC for the Packers...the Bears offense has never scored more than 15 points.

Please, Packer Nation urges you to zip it. You ruin every thread. This will be the first and only post from me on this matter. Do yourself a favor.

 

[Eric Stratton]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

DrJ is correct its well know that the bears did not game plan for the packer game week 17, they pretty much just called random plays on offense. I'm not taking anything away from the packers that game they won, but your fooling your self to use week 17 as a precursor to what will happen next week.

Link to that being some well known fact that they didn't even game plan?BTW...I have never said to just use week 17 as anything. Im just disagreeing with this notion that the Bears didn't try that week.The FACT remains...that with Cutler at QB and Capers as DC for the Packers...the Bears offense has never scored more than 15 points.

Please, Packer Nation urges you to zip it. You ruin every thread. This will be the first and only post from me on this matter. Do yourself a favor.

 

[whitem0nkey]

Majority of nation (74%) thinks Bears lose

Bears comfortably - 5%

Bears in a close one- 21%

Packers comfortably -31%

Packers in a close one - 43%

I honestly have no idea who pulls this out but I cant wait. I can see this being a one possession game for all 60 minutes. maybe will finally see an overtime game.

 

[sho nuff]

Please, Packer Nation urges you to zip it. You ruin every thread. This will be the first and only post from me on this matter. Do yourself a favor.

And as I and others have said when this accusation goes on.Who ruins it more...me (posting information on the actual topic and bringing things to support my opinion) or those of you who constantly bicker at me for posting?I don't think either of you speak for the Packer nation. You speak for a very small minority who seem to get pissed because I post a lot.If you have a problem with me...ignore me or take it to private messages. No need to clutter threads with this crap that some of you continuously do.

 

[Tony Jabroni]

"If you have a problem with me...ignore me or take it to private messages. No need to clutter threads with this crap that some of you continuously do."

Which is precisely what you do.

You are hooked like a marlin off the Florida coast EVERY time a Viking/Bear fan questions anything you post. Oh sure, that marlin will fight for hours and hours on end (in your case days & months), yet eventually, he always ends up in the boat.

Quite simply, I am embarrassed you are fan & "defender" of my favorite team.

Ignore is for communists and kiss my ### with your "private messages". Look in the mirror, sir.

 

[sho nuff]

"If you have a problem with me...ignore me or take it to private messages. No need to clutter threads with this crap that some of you continuously do."Which is precisely what you do.You are hooked like a marlin off the Florida coast EVERY time a Viking/Bear fan questions anything you post. Oh sure, that marlin will fight for hours and hours on end (in your case days & months), yet eventually, he always ends up in the boat.Quite simply, I am embarrassed you are fan & "defender" of my favorite team.Ignore is for communists and kiss my ### with your "private messages". Look in the mirror, sir.

I clutter the thread with talk of the actual topic.You all clutter the thread whining about someone posting discussions on a message board.Yes, when someone questions my post...I respond.Quite simply, if you are embarrassed by a person on a message board discussing the Packers while remaining civil...then you might want to adjust your own attitude.Look in the mirror?I see a guy discussing the topic and remaining civil. I don't believe you can say the same.Grow up.

 

[Limp Ditka]

O/U on the Sho Nuff head explosion has been set at Friday @ 3:00 PM CST.

 

[Joe Bryant]

"If you have a problem with me...ignore me or take it to private messages. No need to clutter threads with this crap that some of you continuously do."Which is precisely what you do.You are hooked like a marlin off the Florida coast EVERY time a Viking/Bear fan questions anything you post. Oh sure, that marlin will fight for hours and hours on end (in your case days & months), yet eventually, he always ends up in the boat.Quite simply, I am embarrassed you are fan & "defender" of my favorite team.Ignore is for communists and kiss my ### with your "private messages". Look in the mirror, sir.

I clutter the thread with talk of the actual topic.You all clutter the thread whining about someone posting discussions on a message board.Yes, when someone questions my post...I respond.Quite simply, if you are embarrassed by a person on a message board discussing the Packers while remaining civil...then you might want to adjust your own attitude.Look in the mirror?I see a guy discussing the topic and remaining civil. I don't believe you can say the same.Grow up.

Both of you please turn it way down.J

 

[Tickle Monster]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

That too. Peppers needs to be double teamed most of the game. And not just blocked, I mean cut his legs out from under him as much as possible.

 

[RudeDog]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

That too. Peppers needs to be double teamed most of the game. And not just blocked, I mean cut his legs out from under him as much as possible.

Thats a chop block and its illegal.

 

[Tickle Monster]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

That too. Peppers needs to be double teamed most of the game. And not just blocked, I mean cut his legs out from under him as much as possible.

Thats a chop block and its illegal.

Well, I'm sure they'll work on one guy disengaging as the other goes low.

 

[Mr.Pack]

It might concern me if I didn't know that the Packers offense, in their biggest game of the season to that point, put up a 10 spot on this Bears defense and were 0-1 in games where the Bears actually tried this season.

Still thinking the Bears didn't try.Fishing...or really going to hold onto those excuses that strongly?

DrJ is correct its well know that the bears did not game plan for the packer game week 17, they pretty much just called random plays on offense. I'm not taking anything away from the packers that game they won, but your fooling your self to use week 17 as a precursor to what will happen next week.

Link to that being some well known fact that they didn't even game plan?BTW...I have never said to just use week 17 as anything. Im just disagreeing with this notion that the Bears didn't try that week.

The FACT remains...that with Cutler at QB and Capers as DC for the Packers...the Bears offense has never scored more than 15 points.

Please, Packer Nation urges you to zip it. You ruin every thread. This will be the first and only post from me on this matter. Do yourself a favor.

Agreed. sho, STOP...... :seriously:

 

[Mr.Pack]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

That too. Peppers needs to be double teamed most of the game. And not just blocked, I mean cut his legs out from under him as much as possible.

The good thing is, playing on that cow pasture will slow him down some.

 

[RudeDog]

This game comes down to Cutler. The opportunistic Packers D won't drop the easy picks like Seattle did. If he throws up some gimme's, the Pack are going to take them. He needs to be near flawless, come Sunday. But I personally don't think he has the mental toughness. He's gonna get hit, and then hit some more. Seattle had some of the crappiest blitz schemes I've ever seen in a pro football game. I'm sure Dom Capers will be a little more inventive. And once Cutler even gets the slightest bit frazzled, the ducks are going to start flying (with the bad footwork and mechanics).

Agreed 100%, also, if our tackles can give Rodgers time, look out.I truly believe these are the 2 keys to Packer victory.

That too. Peppers needs to be double teamed most of the game. And not just blocked, I mean cut his legs out from under him as much as possible.

Thats a chop block and its illegal.

Well, I'm sure they'll work on one guy disengaging as the other goes low.

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a Bear fan.Stay classy

 

[RudeDog]

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a Bear fan.Stay classy

If you would take the time you would see your fellow Packer backer started this line of garbage. I was just making a point. Maybe you should look at your own and not make ignorant comments.

 

[Tickle Monster]

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a Bear fan.Stay classy

If you would take the time you would see your fellow Packer backer started this line of garbage. I was just making a point. Maybe you should look at your own and not make ignorant comments.

**DISCLAIMER**I am not a Packer fan.

 

[Green94]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

 

[Chicago Hooligan]

Yeah I think I'm gonna watch this one at home.

 

[Mr.Pack]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a Bear fan.Stay classy

If you would take the time you would see your fellow Packer backer started this line of garbage. I was just making a point. Maybe you should look at your own and not make ignorant comments.

He's not a Packer fan.I hope no one gets hurt, no one.

 

[Pipes]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

I think this is perceived shtick...not too many Packer fans feel the Bears have no chance. In fact I think most people feel it's going to be a close game.

 

[Tony Jabroni]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

I think this is perceived shtick...not too many Packer fans feel the Bears have no chance. In fact I think most people feel it's going to be a close game.

Agreed. I am nervous and will gladly admit it. I just hate sifting through posts and posts and posts of banter that deals with the past, hypotheticals, etc. Let's just talk about Sunday.But that's just me.

 

[Mr.Pack]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

I think this is perceived shtick...not too many Packer fans feel the Bears have no chance. In fact I think most people feel it's going to be a close game.

They are using the old "reverse psychology: thing here.

 

[Mr.Pack]

The whole "the way they've been playing lately" thing didn't help GB much in Week 17. They put up 10 points against the Bears in a desperation game on their home field in decent weather. I don't understand where this notion comes from that the Bears can't stop the GB offense. They can and they have, even when GB came in flying high.

Exactly, people see what they want to see. The whole "Bears have no chance shtick" is awful amusing.

I think this is perceived shtick...not too many Packer fans feel the Bears have no chance. In fact I think most people feel it's going to be a close game.

Agreed. I am nervous and will gladly admit it. I just hate sifting through posts and posts and posts of banter that deals with the past, hypotheticals, etc. Let's just talk about Sunday.But that's just me.

Looks like you picked the wrong week to give up :BullSchtick:

 

[whitem0nkey]

NFL monitoring field conditions at Soldier Field

the field has been bad for years, but its encouraging to see more negatives press on it than in the past. I would love for this to result in a new paying surface for the next season, a surface that would complement the team speed.

 

[Tickle Monster]

Maybe Chicago can work on allowing Rodgers to run so they can hit him helmet to helmet and re-concuss him.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a Bear fan.Stay classy

If you would take the time you would see your fellow Packer backer started this line of garbage. I was just making a point. Maybe you should look at your own and not make ignorant comments.

He's not a Packer fan.I hope no one gets hurt, no one.

This. I didn't mean to imply that I wanted anyone to get hurt.