Colts were like 25th against the run this year, weren't they?I'm guessing the early line is Colts -8. It's going to be a long day for Flacco and Company once the Colts stop the run. I see a 27-14 score.Whatcha got?
How was their scoring Defense?Colts were like 25th against the run this year, weren't they?I'm guessing the early line is Colts -8. It's going to be a long day for Flacco and Company once the Colts stop the run. I see a 27-14 score.Whatcha got?
That's an entirely different metric. Looks like 307 points allowed for the Colts and 261 points allowed for the Ravens. This is according to a stats check from my FF league at CBS so it may not be exact. I don't know if they are counting today's game.Rushing allowed was 1492 for the Ravens and 2024 for the Colts. Passing allowed was 3316 for the Ravens and 3403 for the Colts.How was their scoring Defense?Colts were like 25th against the run this year, weren't they?I'm guessing the early line is Colts -8. It's going to be a long day for Flacco and Company once the Colts stop the run. I see a 27-14 score.Whatcha got?
I'm not as worried about rust. The Colts came out fast in 2007 after time off - until Marvin fumbled the momentum away. As horrid as it was for public relations (and it was horrid), the Colts did get nearly a game's worth of 1st team offense the last two games. Much more than in 2005.I hope they can attack the Ravens with 3 WR sets, but I'm not sure if that will be the case or not (they used 2 TE sets mostly in the first game). I don't want to see Gijon Robinson catching 4 yard passes.What worries me about this game, is the first 8:00. If the Colts can "warm up" quickly after basically being off for a month, the game won't ever really be in doubt. If they come out as slow as I expect, then the Ravens will get up by 10-14. At that point, I'm just hoping the Colts will trust in the gameplan and know that over the course of 45:00 they will end up ahead. If the spread is -8, I'd take the Ravens to cover. I just don't think the Colts will really be able to play up to speed until mid 2nd quarter.
The run D is what will ultimately kill the Colts in this game. This is the number one strength for the Ravens and they proved this week that they're not afraid to simply run it down a team's throat. I think the Ravens defense will play with a lot of emotion and force a few turnovers. I'll take the Ravens.switz said:Manning doesn't choke like Tom Brady. Not too sure about Colts run D, but I believe their O is too good for the Ravens to keep down.
Or they could be mad as hell and wanting to show everyone up. We won't know until 8:15 on Saturday.The fact that the Colts got just roasted by the media and their fans for their lame and dispiriting surrender in the final two games of the season has to have had an effect. I'm not talking about a little rust, I'm talking about the collective will of the team getting sapped. It can happen. Look what happened to the Pats after Belichick's failed 4th down call vs the Colts. They were limp for weeks after that and arguably never really recovered. Wouldn't be surprised if something similar occured here. I know Manning's the ultimate pro, but he's only one guy.
But for them to be mad as hell they would have to think that some sort of injustice had been perpetrated against them. But I wouldn't mind betting 95% of the Colts players actually agree with the criticism of Polian and the team's management. I think they wanted to go for 16-0. They're more likely to be listless and dispirited rather than mad as hell.Or they could be mad as hell and wanting to show everyone up. We won't know until 8:15 on Saturday.The fact that the Colts got just roasted by the media and their fans for their lame and dispiriting surrender in the final two games of the season has to have had an effect. I'm not talking about a little rust, I'm talking about the collective will of the team getting sapped. It can happen. Look what happened to the Pats after Belichick's failed 4th down call vs the Colts. They were limp for weeks after that and arguably never really recovered. Wouldn't be surprised if something similar occured here. I know Manning's the ultimate pro, but he's only one guy.
I would think as a Colts player I'd be more likely to be teed off at management than listless because of management. I would be.But for them to be mad as hell they would have to think that some sort of injustice had been perpetrated against them. But I wouldn't mind betting 95% of the Colts players actually agree with the criticism of Polian and the team's management. I think they wanted to go for 16-0. They're more likely to be listless and dispirited rather than mad as hell.Or they could be mad as hell and wanting to show everyone up. We won't know until 8:15 on Saturday.The fact that the Colts got just roasted by the media and their fans for their lame and dispiriting surrender in the final two games of the season has to have had an effect. I'm not talking about a little rust, I'm talking about the collective will of the team getting sapped. It can happen. Look what happened to the Pats after Belichick's failed 4th down call vs the Colts. They were limp for weeks after that and arguably never really recovered. Wouldn't be surprised if something similar occured here. I know Manning's the ultimate pro, but he's only one guy.
Until you listened to some of them after those games, they were mad, not listless. I challenge any team to match Manning's will this year. Manning has seemed to will the entire offense at times. And Mathis and Freeney are playing extremely well.But for them to be mad as hell they would have to think that some sort of injustice had been perpetrated against them. But I wouldn't mind betting 95% of the Colts players actually agree with the criticism of Polian and the team's management. I think they wanted to go for 16-0. They're more likely to be listless and dispirited rather than mad as hell.Or they could be mad as hell and wanting to show everyone up. We won't know until 8:15 on Saturday.The fact that the Colts got just roasted by the media and their fans for their lame and dispiriting surrender in the final two games of the season has to have had an effect. I'm not talking about a little rust, I'm talking about the collective will of the team getting sapped.
It can happen. Look what happened to the Pats after Belichick's failed 4th down call vs the Colts. They were limp for weeks after that and arguably never really recovered. Wouldn't be surprised if something similar occured here. I know Manning's the ultimate pro, but he's only one guy.
What worries me about this game, is the first 8:00. If the Colts can "warm up" quickly after basically being off for a month, the game won't ever really be in doubt. If they come out as slow as I expect, then the Ravens will get up by 10-14. At that point, I'm just hoping the Colts will trust in the gameplan and know that over the course of 45:00 they will end up ahead. If the spread is -8, I'd take the Ravens to cover. I just don't think the Colts will really be able to play up to speed until mid 2nd quarter.
Baltimore jumped all over the patriots it very well replay its self this weekend.Colts Defense has to play good football to win this one.In their regular season game, Colts hit a 66-yard TD pass on their first possession vs. the Ravens. Hard to come out much faster than that. Then they scored 10 points the rest of the game.The Ravens had 9 possessions vs. the Colts -- punted twice, made 5 FGs, missed a 30-yard FG, and then Flacco threw the game losing INT in FG range late in the 4th quarter. I see this game as being very tight, with the team that makes the most of its red zone chances coming out on top. Would be surprised to see either team get 10-14 points ahead at any point.What worries me about this game, is the first 8:00. If the Colts can "warm up" quickly after basically being off for a month, the game won't ever really be in doubt. If they come out as slow as I expect, then the Ravens will get up by 10-14. At that point, I'm just hoping the Colts will trust in the gameplan and know that over the course of 45:00 they will end up ahead. If the spread is -8, I'd take the Ravens to cover. I just don't think the Colts will really be able to play up to speed until mid 2nd quarter.Baltimore jumped all over the patriots it very well replay its self this weekend.Colts Defense has to play good football to win this one.
The Colts haven't played 4 quarters in 3 weeks because they haven't needed to. They won't need to in this one either.IND 35 BAL 17.Surprised at all of the comments discounting Baltimore. The Colts havent played 4 Quarters in what.. almost 3 weeks? Im not sold on the Colts being able to stop the run. Flacco had a suspect game last week but I believe he'll rebound if the Ravens can run the ball. Pass rush on both sides along with who can force a TO or 2 will determine this one.Call me crazy or a homer.. but i'll take Baltimore 24-20
As usual, a good analysis. I would add, to something you hit on several times, that the secondary is playing considerably better over the last five or six games. Some good coverage, resulting in some three and outs, would be a huge factor in this game.I watched the NFL Replay of their Nov. 22 game, and here are my impressions.A lot went right for the Ravens in this game, but they still lost. Freeney and Mathis did absolutely nothing. The Ravens had a +3 turnover differential until Flacco's pick on the final drive and were still down by a couple of points. That will be hard to duplicate. Ladarias Webb lined up on Dallas Clark all day and completely shut him down. His one catch, the TD, was one of the few times all game Webb wasn't covering him. Now, the Ravens don't have Webb.But there's room for improvement too. Also, after Ray hit Manning on the first drive of the game, the pass rush never sniffed him again all day. The blitz was particularly ineffective, as it never got close to him and left fewer guys in pass coverage. Ed Reed got fooled on a pump fake that allowed Manning to complete a 66-yard pass over his head. It was the only time the Ravens got beat deep all day. Also, I think this must have been the game that got RG Chris Chester benched in favor of Marshall Yanda. He got blown up several times. The Ravens never once went with 6 O linemen, or the unbalanced line and still ran the ball pretty effectively. It will be very interesting to see how the Colts handle the revitalized running game.One note about Webb on Clark. For almost the entire game, the Ravens played a straight 4-3 nickel package, with Webb as the nickel back playing man-to-man on Clark. It totally took him out of the game. However, the four-man line was very, very bad at generating pass rush, and not much better in stopping the run. In particular, Trevor Pryce had a very bad game setting the edge vs. the run at DE. The Ravens made the decision to sacrifice some of their run D in order to take Clark away. Suggs did not play that game and I think he could make a big difference vs. both the run and pass if they go with a similar approach.Also, ILB Tavares Gooden was bad and got benched for the rookie Dannell Ellerbee, who also didn't play that well, continually biting on play action and getting burned in coverage. He's come a long way since then.One really interesting thing is that the Ravens did very little pre-snap moving around. The chess match wasn't played out at the line of scrimmage, it was played out on the sidelines between possessions. Indy hits a deep ball, so the Ravens take it away. The Ravens take away Clark, so Manning goes to backup TE Santi up and down the field. The Ravens start to cover him, and the Colts get the running game rolling. It was a very entertaining, closely played game.
Ravens were 'in the game' missing half their defensive core.I bet the ranch last time and got my ranch back (doh!).But when was the last time manning saw pressure like Brady did last weekend?1998?Colts O romps!The Ravens were in the game at home. Being on the road in Indy is much different! I'm not sure a lot can be taken away from the win against the Pats other than some confidence. It appeared to me that Moss took the day off (again). That won't happen this week. I expect the Colts to have Garcon back giving them all 4 weapons in the passing game.The key for the Ravens to me is to keep it close. I think they get behind 10, it's over. Asking Flacco to come back against a healthy pass rush and DBs is too much to me.
All good points, TM. The two bolded comments in particular should give Ravens fans a little hope. That 6 O-Linemen look, while I didn't like it at first, gives opposing defenses fits - not because it's tricky, but because it's 2,000 lbs of angry beef trying to run the D over.The_Man said:I watched the NFL Replay of their Nov. 22 game, and here are my impressions.
A lot went right for the Ravens in this game, but they still lost. Freeney and Mathis did absolutely nothing. The Ravens had a +3 turnover differential until Flacco's pick on the final drive and were still down by a couple of points. That will be hard to duplicate. Ladarias Webb lined up on Dallas Clark all day and completely shut him down. His one catch, the TD, was one of the few times all game Webb wasn't covering him. Now, the Ravens don't have Webb.
But there's room for improvement too. Also, after Ray hit Manning on the first drive of the game, the pass rush never sniffed him again all day. The blitz was particularly ineffective, as it never got close to him and left fewer guys in pass coverage. Ed Reed got fooled on a pump fake that allowed Manning to complete a 66-yard pass over his head. It was the only time the Ravens got beat deep all day.
Also, I think this must have been the game that got RG Chris Chester benched in favor of Marshall Yanda. He got blown up several times. The Ravens never once went with 6 O linemen, or the unbalanced line and still ran the ball pretty effectively. It will be very interesting to see how the Colts handle the revitalized running game.
One note about Webb on Clark. For almost the entire game, the Ravens played a straight 4-3 nickel package, with Webb as the nickel back playing man-to-man on Clark. It totally took him out of the game. However, the four-man line was very, very bad at generating pass rush, and not much better in stopping the run. In particular, Trevor Pryce had a very bad game setting the edge vs. the run at DE. The Ravens made the decision to sacrifice some of their run D in order to take Clark away. Suggs did not play that game and I think he could make a big difference vs. both the run and pass if they go with a similar approach.
Also, ILB Tavares Gooden was bad and got benched for the rookie Dannell Ellerbee, who also didn't play that well, continually biting on play action and getting burned in coverage. He's come a long way since then.
One really interesting thing is that the Ravens did very little pre-snap moving around. The chess match wasn't played out at the line of scrimmage, it was played out on the sidelines between possessions. Indy hits a deep ball, so the Ravens take it away. The Ravens take away Clark, so Manning goes to backup TE Santi up and down the field. The Ravens start to cover him, and the Colts get the running game rolling. It was a very entertaining, closely played game.
They have played better, even with Rolle/Webb/Washington all gone. Frank Walker still scares the snot out of me, though, and I'm sure Peyton's gonna be looking for him.roadkill1292 said:As usual, a good analysis. I would add, to something you hit on several times, that the secondary is playing considerably better over the last five or six games. Some good coverage, resulting in some three and outs, would be a huge factor in this game.The_Man said:I watched the NFL Replay of their Nov. 22 game, and here are my impressions.A lot went right for the Ravens in this game, but they still lost. Freeney and Mathis did absolutely nothing. The Ravens had a +3 turnover differential until Flacco's pick on the final drive and were still down by a couple of points. That will be hard to duplicate. Ladarias Webb lined up on Dallas Clark all day and completely shut him down. His one catch, the TD, was one of the few times all game Webb wasn't covering him. Now, the Ravens don't have Webb.But there's room for improvement too. Also, after Ray hit Manning on the first drive of the game, the pass rush never sniffed him again all day. The blitz was particularly ineffective, as it never got close to him and left fewer guys in pass coverage. Ed Reed got fooled on a pump fake that allowed Manning to complete a 66-yard pass over his head. It was the only time the Ravens got beat deep all day. Also, I think this must have been the game that got RG Chris Chester benched in favor of Marshall Yanda. He got blown up several times. The Ravens never once went with 6 O linemen, or the unbalanced line and still ran the ball pretty effectively. It will be very interesting to see how the Colts handle the revitalized running game.One note about Webb on Clark. For almost the entire game, the Ravens played a straight 4-3 nickel package, with Webb as the nickel back playing man-to-man on Clark. It totally took him out of the game. However, the four-man line was very, very bad at generating pass rush, and not much better in stopping the run. In particular, Trevor Pryce had a very bad game setting the edge vs. the run at DE. The Ravens made the decision to sacrifice some of their run D in order to take Clark away. Suggs did not play that game and I think he could make a big difference vs. both the run and pass if they go with a similar approach.Also, ILB Tavares Gooden was bad and got benched for the rookie Dannell Ellerbee, who also didn't play that well, continually biting on play action and getting burned in coverage. He's come a long way since then.One really interesting thing is that the Ravens did very little pre-snap moving around. The chess match wasn't played out at the line of scrimmage, it was played out on the sidelines between possessions. Indy hits a deep ball, so the Ravens take it away. The Ravens take away Clark, so Manning goes to backup TE Santi up and down the field. The Ravens start to cover him, and the Colts get the running game rolling. It was a very entertaining, closely played game.
I thought I saw Dierdorf quoted on his take, which I assumed meant he was calling it (w/Enberg?).Anyone know if Jim Nantz and Phil Simms are calling this game?
It is Gumbel and Dierdorf. Simms/Nantz hasn't done a Colts game all season.I thought I saw Dierdorf quoted on his take, which I assumed meant he was calling it (w/Enberg?).Anyone know if Jim Nantz and Phil Simms are calling this game?
Oh god Dierdorf goes completely overboard with his love for Manning.It is Gumbel and Dierdorf. Simms/Nantz hasn't done a Colts game all season.I thought I saw Dierdorf quoted on his take, which I assumed meant he was calling it (w/Enberg?).Anyone know if Jim Nantz and Phil Simms are calling this game?
Yeah - he does do that.Oh god Dierdorf goes completely overboard with his love for Manning.It is Gumbel and Dierdorf. Simms/Nantz hasn't done a Colts game all season.I thought I saw Dierdorf quoted on his take, which I assumed meant he was calling it (w/Enberg?).Anyone know if Jim Nantz and Phil Simms are calling this game?
Flacco has been hurt for months.Flacco's hurt and they won't be able to hide it again. Colts win safely 31-18 at home.
C'mon Jeff call it one way or the other. What do you think?I'm surprised at how little pre-game discussion this contest is getting.Sure MIN-DAL and AZ-NO are looking like high-scoring contests, and Chase and the SD contingent on the board is driving that game.For me, this could be the best game of the weekend.I see this as a 3-4 point game and it could go either way. Can Indy flip the switch back on? What about the lack of experience at HC and WR for Indy? Baltimore is hot right now, and if Ray Lewis and Ed Reed get the other 9 guys up for this one then it can be a great game. Ray Rice and Willis McGahee are going to run (and screen) their way to well over 100 yards combined and make this a very interesting contest.20-17 and I struggle calling it either way. Odds say Indy 20-17, but the Ravens could certainly pull it out.
Ray Rice probably over 100 solo and I think this is the key to the game. The Ravens need to run the ball and sustain drives. I also think that there will be a huge play by the Ravens defense. Ravens win a shocker.I'm surprised at how little pre-game discussion this contest is getting.
Sure MIN-DAL and AZ-NO are looking like high-scoring contests, and Chase and the SD contingent on the board is driving that game.
For me, this could be the best game of the weekend.
I see this as a 3-4 point game and it could go either way. Can Indy flip the switch back on? What about the lack of experience at HC and WR for Indy? Baltimore is hot right now, and if Ray Lewis and Ed Reed get the other 9 guys up for this one then it can be a great game. Ray Rice and Willis McGahee are going to run (and screen) their way to well over 100 yards combinedand make this a very interesting contest.
20-17 and I struggle calling it either way. Odds say Indy 20-17, but the Ravens could certainly pull it out.
I did pick this game and the rest of them in For The Win this week.....I chose Indy 20, Baltimore 17 this week, but I'll be with many Ravens fans tonight and I've a Flacco and Ray Rice fan, so I'll be pulling for Purple.C'mon Jeff call it one way or the other. What do you think?I'm surprised at how little pre-game discussion this contest is getting.
Sure MIN-DAL and AZ-NO are looking like high-scoring contests, and Chase and the SD contingent on the board is driving that game.
For me, this could be the best game of the weekend.
I see this as a 3-4 point game and it could go either way. Can Indy flip the switch back on? What about the lack of experience at HC and WR for Indy? Baltimore is hot right now, and if Ray Lewis and Ed Reed get the other 9 guys up for this one then it can be a great game. Ray Rice and Willis McGahee are going to run (and screen) their way to well over 100 yards combined and make this a very interesting contest.
20-17 and I struggle calling it either way. Odds say Indy 20-17, but the Ravens could certainly pull it out.