Seems even with underprepared players, the one thing that they want to do is the draft. Probably managing week to week roster management would have a higher upside.Just wondering how many get paid a little something to help draft a team...you know, $20 or so to help someone in need to draft a great team?Could be a decent little side job for those looking for work...
Without a doubt, everyone wants to draft their team unless it's a high stakes league over a G.Seems even with underprepared players, the one thing that they want to do is the draft. Probably managing week to week roster management would have a higher upside.Just wondering how many get paid a little something to help draft a team...you know, $20 or so to help someone in need to draft a great team?Could be a decent little side job for those looking for work...
That made me laugh.Tho Im sure LHUCKS will have a little to say about itWould rather just pay LHUCKS $20 to draft for the other teams.I'll pay you when I feel like it.
What you did here...I see it.I helped out a guy once who couldn't make the draft, and he sent me half his winnings at the end of the season.
there are definitely ppl who do thisif anyone could convincingly demonstrate that they are +EV playing fantasy sports, you'd be able to pitch that to people with capital and start your own business getting staked into big money leagues.
Would rather just pay LHUCKS $20 to draft for the other teams.I'll pay you when I feel like it.
Already exists - both FFPC and NFFC have leagues with higher entry fees ($5K and $10K) with much higher payouts'FantasyTrader said:If the stakes ever got big enough in FF and we start talking tens of thousands of dollars in 10-12 team leagues
I bet more than half the board would opt for a FFL draft over getting ###...'rizzler said:The draft is ALWAYS the best part of the fantasy season.Honestly, I enjoy it more than winning the league. There's just so much mystique, arrogance and competition in such a short 2hr window... Nothing beats it.Ya know, except getting ###.
poll?I bet more than half the board would opt for a FFL draft over getting ###...
Since AIU is using poker references I'm going to continue the analogy. In this analogy, you would have to be so good at fantasy football that you'd have to be able to document that you can regularly win money in big prize leagues. And like AIU points out, that's tough to do. Even the best fantasy football players would have a tough time making a living playing high stake prize leagues. Again, kind of like poker. There are millions that play poker for money (at least there were before Black Friday). But only a handful are so good that they can make a successful living.1) Most people that are aware of high stake leagues are fantasy football enthusiasts. The thrill/fun of the game is probably a much higher motive than profit. Why would they give away one of the most enjoyable parts of the experience?2) How do you document that you're such a star that you can get other people to give you money to draft for them? Most people, especially playing at a high level, are already confident of their abilities. For example, most people here have great respect for Joe Bryant and David Dodds. I certainly do. However, I doubt if anyone here would be intimidated if they were in a league with them. If anything, they'd enjoy the challenge of getting to compete against them. It's different from a good poker player sitting down at a table and suddenly seeing Phil Ivey take a seat.3) It's hard enough to win money in a high stakes league because theoretically you're already facing people good enough at Fantasy Football that they're willing to invest high stakes. You're not going to find Jill the Secretary doing it just because she thinks it would be a hoot to go up against the fellas. Now you have to win extra money to cover the expenses. 4) Nobody in poker would pay someone to play for them. They may stake a player that think is a good investment. But every player dreams of going on the 8-day card rush and winning the World Series, not having it won for them.What you see in poker are training sites. Instead of paying Daniel Negranu to play for you, you join Negranu's site and he helps you become a better player.Fantasy Football training sites aren't really viable because there is so much good information and strategy available for free.'Anonymous Internet User said:if anyone could convincingly demonstrate that they are +EV playing fantasy sports, you'd be able to pitch that to people with capital and start your own business getting staked into big money leagues.
Giant whiff. I think the concept is that there are lots of people out there that ARE NOT interested in whatever the "game" is. They are simply looking for a sizable advantage. If I could give someone money and have a huge advantage in winning - I would care less. The challenge - who the hell could possibly give you the kind of advantage you could really bank on?Since AIU is using poker references I'm going to continue the analogy. In this analogy, you would have to be so good at fantasy football that you'd have to be able to document that you can regularly win money in big prize leagues. And like AIU points out, that's tough to do. Even the best fantasy football players would have a tough time making a living playing high stake prize leagues. Again, kind of like poker. There are millions that play poker for money (at least there were before Black Friday). But only a handful are so good that they can make a successful living.1) Most people that are aware of high stake leagues are fantasy football enthusiasts. The thrill/fun of the game is probably a much higher motive than profit. Why would they give away one of the most enjoyable parts of the experience?2) How do you document that you're such a star that you can get other people to give you money to draft for them? Most people, especially playing at a high level, are already confident of their abilities. For example, most people here have great respect for Joe Bryant and David Dodds. I certainly do. However, I doubt if anyone here would be intimidated if they were in a league with them. If anything, they'd enjoy the challenge of getting to compete against them. It's different from a good poker player sitting down at a table and suddenly seeing Phil Ivey take a seat.3) It's hard enough to win money in a high stakes league because theoretically you're already facing people good enough at Fantasy Football that they're willing to invest high stakes. You're not going to find Jill the Secretary doing it just because she thinks it would be a hoot to go up against the fellas. Now you have to win extra money to cover the expenses. 4) Nobody in poker would pay someone to play for them. They may stake a player that think is a good investment. But every player dreams of going on the 8-day card rush and winning the World Series, not having it won for them.What you see in poker are training sites. Instead of paying Daniel Negranu to play for you, you join Negranu's site and he helps you become a better player.Fantasy Football training sites aren't really viable because there is so much good information and strategy available for free.'Anonymous Internet User said:if anyone could convincingly demonstrate that they are +EV playing fantasy sports, you'd be able to pitch that to people with capital and start your own business getting staked into big money leagues.
Really? Care to back that up with any kind of numbers or analysis?Giant whiff. I think the concept is that there are lots of people out there that ARE NOT interested in whatever the "game" is. They are simply looking for a sizable advantage. If I could give someone money and have a huge advantage in winning - I would care less. The challenge - who the hell could possibly give you the kind of advantage you could really bank on?Since AIU is using poker references I'm going to continue the analogy. In this analogy, you would have to be so good at fantasy football that you'd have to be able to document that you can regularly win money in big prize leagues. And like AIU points out, that's tough to do. Even the best fantasy football players would have a tough time making a living playing high stake prize leagues. Again, kind of like poker. There are millions that play poker for money (at least there were before Black Friday). But only a handful are so good that they can make a successful living.1) Most people that are aware of high stake leagues are fantasy football enthusiasts. The thrill/fun of the game is probably a much higher motive than profit. Why would they give away one of the most enjoyable parts of the experience?2) How do you document that you're such a star that you can get other people to give you money to draft for them? Most people, especially playing at a high level, are already confident of their abilities. For example, most people here have great respect for Joe Bryant and David Dodds. I certainly do. However, I doubt if anyone here would be intimidated if they were in a league with them. If anything, they'd enjoy the challenge of getting to compete against them. It's different from a good poker player sitting down at a table and suddenly seeing Phil Ivey take a seat.3) It's hard enough to win money in a high stakes league because theoretically you're already facing people good enough at Fantasy Football that they're willing to invest high stakes. You're not going to find Jill the Secretary doing it just because she thinks it would be a hoot to go up against the fellas. Now you have to win extra money to cover the expenses. 4) Nobody in poker would pay someone to play for them. They may stake a player that think is a good investment. But every player dreams of going on the 8-day card rush and winning the World Series, not having it won for them.What you see in poker are training sites. Instead of paying Daniel Negranu to play for you, you join Negranu's site and he helps you become a better player.Fantasy Football training sites aren't really viable because there is so much good information and strategy available for free.'Anonymous Internet User said:if anyone could convincingly demonstrate that they are +EV playing fantasy sports, you'd be able to pitch that to people with capital and start your own business getting staked into big money leagues.
I like your dad!Drafted for my dad once when he couldn't make a draft with his buddies. He won and bought two cigars and a bunch of fireworks. You can not beat father son bonding.He asked about this year. I asked, "You don't enjoy drafting your own team?" Response: "I like good cigars and a great light show more."
I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.Luck tends to be an excuse for people who just aren't that good. Kind of like the guys I play poker withI don't think anyone could claim they make bank year after year playing FF unless they are playing with mental midgets. FF has too much luck involved. Its hard enough predicting a team to cover a point spread, but now you want someone to accurately predict the amount of targets, yards, and TDs of your roster, and possibly manage it. You are asking for a time machine or a crystal ball. Those guys who win the $1,000,000 playing FF in Las Vegas would probably NEVER win again. Everyone has a 1/10, 1/12 etc chance at winning but those arent good odds. FF is a hobby and is the worst bet you could make. An entry fee of $100 in a winner takes all is a sucker bet if every coach is evenly knowledgeable on FF.
It's the playing in multiple leagues that reduces the overall variance. I play in 6 leagues and am in the positive every year. It's reliable enough that I plan on using that money for xmas shopping every year.I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.Luck tends to be an excuse for people who just aren't that good. Kind of like the guys I play poker withI don't think anyone could claim they make bank year after year playing FF unless they are playing with mental midgets. FF has too much luck involved. Its hard enough predicting a team to cover a point spread, but now you want someone to accurately predict the amount of targets, yards, and TDs of your roster, and possibly manage it. You are asking for a time machine or a crystal ball. Those guys who win the $1,000,000 playing FF in Las Vegas would probably NEVER win again. Everyone has a 1/10, 1/12 etc chance at winning but those arent good odds. FF is a hobby and is the worst bet you could make. An entry fee of $100 in a winner takes all is a sucker bet if every coach is evenly knowledgeable on FF.
Then you are playing against people that dont really care and just doing it because everyone else is. FF is alot more than 50% luck. There really isnt an advantage. Everyone has the same information so it comes down to luck. If we went in a head to head FF competition enlighten me how you would have such a big advantage. Just me and you picking 9 players from the entire pool to start week 1. 1QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs , 1 TE, 1PK, 1DEFWe only playing week 1. You gonna tell me that if I win that I wasnt lucky? Now multiply that by 10,12, 14 or whatever and then multiplied by 16 weeks. Yea luck is just an excuse.I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.Luck tends to be an excuse for people who just aren't that good. Kind of like the guys I play poker withI don't think anyone could claim they make bank year after year playing FF unless they are playing with mental midgets. FF has too much luck involved. Its hard enough predicting a team to cover a point spread, but now you want someone to accurately predict the amount of targets, yards, and TDs of your roster, and possibly manage it. You are asking for a time machine or a crystal ball. Those guys who win the $1,000,000 playing FF in Las Vegas would probably NEVER win again. Everyone has a 1/10, 1/12 etc chance at winning but those arent good odds. FF is a hobby and is the worst bet you could make. An entry fee of $100 in a winner takes all is a sucker bet if every coach is evenly knowledgeable on FF.
FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.'saintsfan1977 said:Then you are playing against people that dont really care and just doing it because everyone else is. FF is alot more than 50% luck. There really isnt an advantage. Everyone has the same information so it comes down to luck. If we went in a head to head FF competition enlighten me how you would have such a big advantage. Just me and you picking 9 players from the entire pool to start week 1. 1QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs , 1 TE, 1PK, 1DEFWe only playing week 1. You gonna tell me that if I win that I wasnt lucky? Now multiply that by 10,12, 14 or whatever and then multiplied by 16 weeks. Yea luck is just an excuse.I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.Luck tends to be an excuse for people who just aren't that good. Kind of like the guys I play poker withI don't think anyone could claim they make bank year after year playing FF unless they are playing with mental midgets. FF has too much luck involved. Its hard enough predicting a team to cover a point spread, but now you want someone to accurately predict the amount of targets, yards, and TDs of your roster, and possibly manage it. You are asking for a time machine or a crystal ball. Those guys who win the $1,000,000 playing FF in Las Vegas would probably NEVER win again. Everyone has a 1/10, 1/12 etc chance at winning but those arent good odds. FF is a hobby and is the worst bet you could make. An entry fee of $100 in a winner takes all is a sucker bet if every coach is evenly knowledgeable on FF.Unless you have a crystal ball or playing against people that dont even watch football, you cant possibly win year in and year out. You must be playing against guys that are reaching in the first round, or picking DEF in the 3rd. Definitely not re-draft. How do you know the 3rd WR of (insert team name) blows up for 110 and 3 TDs? You dont and never will.
Your clueless friend will probably win his league.Funny I should see this thread tonight...About 2 hours ago my buddy from Brasil asks if I can help him with his draft. I say "Sure", excited to answer his questions about players and stratagies.I go to his laptop and tell him to log into his league. He looks up at me quizzically and says "No, I need help with this. I don't understand how to log-in. This means to see my team, right?"2 hours later and I've set up his account, linked it to his Facebook page, explained to him what "drafting" actually is, how players are picked and how points are scored.After all this he says to me "Now you can show me who to pick?"I came here, printed up a Cheat Sheet, gave it to him and said "Read this. I gotta run."In hindsight - they'd have to pay me A LOT to do this for total strangers.
I went to Vegas in a $50,000 car and came back on a $100,000 bus. Does that count?I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.
Well now, you are really scaring me. Back it up with what analysis?Really? Care to back that up with any kind of numbers or analysis?Giant whiff. I think the concept is that there are lots of people out there that ARE NOT interested in whatever the "game" is. They are simply looking for a sizable advantage. If I could give someone money and have a huge advantage in winning - I would care less. The challenge - who the hell could possibly give you the kind of advantage you could really bank on?Since AIU is using poker references I'm going to continue the analogy. In this analogy, you would have to be so good at fantasy football that you'd have to be able to document that you can regularly win money in big prize leagues. And like AIU points out, that's tough to do. Even the best fantasy football players would have a tough time making a living playing high stake prize leagues. Again, kind of like poker. There are millions that play poker for money (at least there were before Black Friday). But only a handful are so good that they can make a successful living.1) Most people that are aware of high stake leagues are fantasy football enthusiasts. The thrill/fun of the game is probably a much higher motive than profit. Why would they give away one of the most enjoyable parts of the experience?2) How do you document that you're such a star that you can get other people to give you money to draft for them? Most people, especially playing at a high level, are already confident of their abilities. For example, most people here have great respect for Joe Bryant and David Dodds. I certainly do. However, I doubt if anyone here would be intimidated if they were in a league with them. If anything, they'd enjoy the challenge of getting to compete against them. It's different from a good poker player sitting down at a table and suddenly seeing Phil Ivey take a seat.3) It's hard enough to win money in a high stakes league because theoretically you're already facing people good enough at Fantasy Football that they're willing to invest high stakes. You're not going to find Jill the Secretary doing it just because she thinks it would be a hoot to go up against the fellas. Now you have to win extra money to cover the expenses. 4) Nobody in poker would pay someone to play for them. They may stake a player that think is a good investment. But every player dreams of going on the 8-day card rush and winning the World Series, not having it won for them.What you see in poker are training sites. Instead of paying Daniel Negranu to play for you, you join Negranu's site and he helps you become a better player.Fantasy Football training sites aren't really viable because there is so much good information and strategy available for free.'Anonymous Internet User said:if anyone could convincingly demonstrate that they are +EV playing fantasy sports, you'd be able to pitch that to people with capital and start your own business getting staked into big money leagues.
The skill is drafting the right guys better than everyone else. If you put the time and research along with luck you will definitely make the playoffs. The thing is I could have a team that completely dominates the regular season because i drafted well and got lucky with matchups, but the first week in the playoffs my team decides to snore. You wont sit your studs so your team is totally dependent on luck. Sure ADP will outperform Pierre Thomas, but once we get to the playoffs PT could go for 60 rush,15 rec and 2 TDs while ADP gets 70 rushing. FF is not a money making oppurtunity. Its a past time or a hobby just for fun with hopes of winning it all.FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.
Honestly, this seems like a terrible business model. You're not even making minimum wage.
I do take it seriously but doing it for fun. Whatever happens happens.Honestly, this seems like a terrible business model. You're not even making minimum wage.
I went to Vegas in a $50,000 car and came back on a $100,000 bus. Does that count?I play 6-8 leagues every year and double my money every year.
How much do you want to play for?'saintsfan1977 said:Then you are playing against people that dont really care and just doing it because everyone else is. FF is alot more than 50% luck. There really isnt an advantage. Everyone has the same information so it comes down to luck. If we went in a head to head FF competition enlighten me how you would have such a big advantage. Just me and you picking 9 players from the entire pool to start week 1.
1QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs , 1 TE, 1PK, 1DEF
We only playing week 1. You gonna tell me that if I win that I wasnt lucky? Now multiply that by 10,12, 14 or whatever and then multiplied by 16 weeks. Yea luck is just an excuse.![]()
Unless you have a crystal ball or playing against people that dont even watch football, you cant possibly win year in and year out. You must be playing against guys that are reaching in the first round, or picking DEF in the 3rd. Definitely not re-draft. How do you know the 3rd WR of (insert team name) blows up for 110 and 3 TDs? You dont and never will.
Flat out wrong? Prove it then. I want you to show me the skill involved. I saw Poker being compared and that isnt even the same ball park. There are mathematical odds using cards along with bluffing and some luck involved but there is more skill in cards than FF.Here is an example:2 teams playing head to head. Team A loses a RB due to injury the week before. The backup RB is not availabe so he has to pick out of a crop of 3rd down Jason Snelling/Justin Forsett RBBC types. Team B still has his full strength team going. Team A's 3rd down RBBC just happens to break a long TD and gets a goal line TD while Team B's 2 running backs combined fail miserably and lose the game by 5 points. No luck involved there. Team B just used his finely tuned skill to correctly pick the backup running back that would blow up for him, never mind the starter on someone elses team. This happens every week. On paper one team looks dominant cant lose playing against the absolute worst team and expects to blow them out. Game over and the expected winner is doing a face palm. Why dont you consistently go undefeated every year since its not luck? Why is there no guy with his face plastered all over the web as the best FF player in the world year in and year out? You are counting on grabbing guys that will perform at a high level more often than others. You could have a team full of studs but when you need them to win and they dont perform you lose. Where is the skill at then? Its luck and you can take that to the bank. I have seen guys who drafted the absolute worst roster you could imagine on paper and win the championship. PURE LUCK. Ask those high stake FF players how much luck is involved, I bet they same the same thing.'FantasyTrader said:This is flat out wrong. There are consistent winners in high stakes fantasy sports. I'm sorry if your psyche can't handle that, that you NEED it to be luck, but it's the truth. There's people out there winning money consistently.The skill is drafting the right guys better than everyone else. If you put the time and research along with luck you will definitely make the playoffs. The thing is I could have a team that completely dominates the regular season because i drafted well and got lucky with matchups, but the first week in the playoffs my team decides to snore. You wont sit your studs so your team is totally dependent on luck. Sure ADP will outperform Pierre Thomas, but once we get to the playoffs PT could go for 60 rush,15 rec and 2 TDs while ADP gets 70 rushing. FF is not a money making oppurtunity. Its a past time or a hobby just for fun with hopes of winning it all.FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.
We dont need to wager. My suggestion was hypothetical but we could take turns grabbing each a QB, 2RBS,3WRS, 1TE, 1PK, and 1DEF/ST. Come up with a point system. The thing is it would be hard to compare since its only 1vs1. Im not saying there is NO skill. Im saying that there is just ALOT more luck involved. See 1 on 1 doesnt show the backup players taken in a 12 man team that blow up and to help a poor team beat a good team. There is no way to account for it.Team ARodgersAPCJA.JohnsonL.FitzgeraldM.WallaceA.GatesN.keadingNYJVSTeam BVickA.FosterR.RiceC.JohnsonR.WhiteV.JacksonD.ClarkM.CrosbyPITTell me which team will win?How much do you want to play for?![]()
See, now you're talking about variance. That isn't luck. If a poker player has a documented +EV 3.5 BB for over 300,000 hands of poker, that's generally their expected win rate. But over 1,000 hands, ANYTHING can happen. Because the variance is so large they can be +46 BB or -53 BB. That doesn't change their overall EV of 3.5 BB per 1,000. Same with FF. You're talking about seeing teams draft dog crap and win leagues. Variance. But show me that same player win $ by playing in 8, 10, 12 leagues drafting that way or over multiple years. Also the reverse is true, you can be the best fantasy player in the world and finish dead last in a league. ONE league. Variance. But put the same owner in multiple leagues over multiple years - at some point his return will normalize to his EV once he reaches a large enough sample size. As you increase the number of leagues and number of years played, luck decreases proportionately until it's non-existant.Flat out wrong? Prove it then. I want you to show me the skill involved. I saw Poker being compared and that isnt even the same ball park. There are mathematical odds using cards along with bluffing and some luck involved but there is more skill in cards than FF.Here is an example:2 teams playing head to head. Team A loses a RB due to injury the week before. The backup RB is not availabe so he has to pick out of a crop of 3rd down Jason Snelling/Justin Forsett RBBC types. Team B still has his full strength team going. Team A's 3rd down RBBC just happens to break a long TD and gets a goal line TD while Team B's 2 running backs combined fail miserably and lose the game by 5 points. No luck involved there. Team B just used his finely tuned skill to correctly pick the backup running back that would blow up for him, never mind the starter on someone elses team. This happens every week. On paper one team looks dominant cant lose playing against the absolute worst team and expects to blow them out. Game over and the expected winner is doing a face palm. Why dont you consistently go undefeated every year since its not luck? Why is there no guy with his face plastered all over the web as the best FF player in the world year in and year out? You are counting on grabbing guys that will perform at a high level more often than others. You could have a team full of studs but when you need them to win and they dont perform you lose. Where is the skill at then? Its luck and you can take that to the bank. I have seen guys who drafted the absolute worst roster you could imagine on paper and win the championship. PURE LUCK. Ask those high stake FF players how much luck is involved, I bet they same the same thing.'FantasyTrader said:This is flat out wrong. There are consistent winners in high stakes fantasy sports. I'm sorry if your psyche can't handle that, that you NEED it to be luck, but it's the truth. There's people out there winning money consistently.The skill is drafting the right guys better than everyone else. If you put the time and research along with luck you will definitely make the playoffs. The thing is I could have a team that completely dominates the regular season because i drafted well and got lucky with matchups, but the first week in the playoffs my team decides to snore. You wont sit your studs so your team is totally dependent on luck. Sure ADP will outperform Pierre Thomas, but once we get to the playoffs PT could go for 60 rush,15 rec and 2 TDs while ADP gets 70 rushing. FF is not a money making oppurtunity. Its a past time or a hobby just for fun with hopes of winning it all.FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.
FF is not all about variance. You are pitting players against each other in hope they outscore the other opponent for that week. If you win great but take the same winning team and pit it against another team and you lose that same week. The FF schedule comes into play. It really is a crapshoot about who and when you play. In the NFL its a team game so if they lose its not always because they were a bad team. They might not have been motivated enough. There is alot of luck involved. You dont get to pick out the entire player pool. You are given a choice of when to pick.I beat the guy who had A.Rodgers last year when he went down with a concussion vs the Lions. I whould have lost that game if it wasn't for Rodgers going down.See, now you're talking about variance. That isn't luck. If a poker player has a documented +EV 3.5 BB for over 300,000 hands of poker, that's generally their expected win rate. But over 1,000 hands, ANYTHING can happen. Because the variance is so large they can be +46 BB or -53 BB. That doesn't change their overall EV of 3.5 BB per 1,000. Same with FF. You're talking about seeing teams draft dog crap and win leagues. Variance. But show me that same player win $ by playing in 8, 10, 12 leagues drafting that way or over multiple years. Also the reverse is true, you can be the best fantasy player in the world and finish dead last in a league. ONE league. Variance. But put the same owner in multiple leagues over multiple years - at some point his return will normalize to his EV once he reaches a large enough sample size. As you increase the number of leagues and number of years played, luck decreases proportionately until it's non-existant.Flat out wrong? Prove it then. I want you to show me the skill involved. I saw Poker being compared and that isnt even the same ball park. There are mathematical odds using cards along with bluffing and some luck involved but there is more skill in cards than FF.Here is an example:2 teams playing head to head. Team A loses a RB due to injury the week before. The backup RB is not availabe so he has to pick out of a crop of 3rd down Jason Snelling/Justin Forsett RBBC types. Team B still has his full strength team going. Team A's 3rd down RBBC just happens to break a long TD and gets a goal line TD while Team B's 2 running backs combined fail miserably and lose the game by 5 points. No luck involved there. Team B just used his finely tuned skill to correctly pick the backup running back that would blow up for him, never mind the starter on someone elses team. This happens every week. On paper one team looks dominant cant lose playing against the absolute worst team and expects to blow them out. Game over and the expected winner is doing a face palm. Why dont you consistently go undefeated every year since its not luck? Why is there no guy with his face plastered all over the web as the best FF player in the world year in and year out? You are counting on grabbing guys that will perform at a high level more often than others. You could have a team full of studs but when you need them to win and they dont perform you lose. Where is the skill at then? Its luck and you can take that to the bank. I have seen guys who drafted the absolute worst roster you could imagine on paper and win the championship. PURE LUCK. Ask those high stake FF players how much luck is involved, I bet they same the same thing.'FantasyTrader said:This is flat out wrong. There are consistent winners in high stakes fantasy sports. I'm sorry if your psyche can't handle that, that you NEED it to be luck, but it's the truth. There's people out there winning money consistently.The skill is drafting the right guys better than everyone else. If you put the time and research along with luck you will definitely make the playoffs. The thing is I could have a team that completely dominates the regular season because i drafted well and got lucky with matchups, but the first week in the playoffs my team decides to snore. You wont sit your studs so your team is totally dependent on luck. Sure ADP will outperform Pierre Thomas, but once we get to the playoffs PT could go for 60 rush,15 rec and 2 TDs while ADP gets 70 rushing. FF is not a money making oppurtunity. Its a past time or a hobby just for fun with hopes of winning it all.FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.
Again you're talking about individual unlucky events which occured. That's...variance. In the short term, I TOTALLY agree with you, FF is very much about luck. Just like any game that blends skill with elements of chance. At this point though, I kinda feel like we're spinning our wheels. You're welcome to think FF is luck over the long term and I'm welcome to think it's skill over the long term.FF is not all about variance. You are pitting players against each other in hope they outscore the other opponent for that week. If you win great but take the same winning team and pit it against another team and you lose that same week. The FF schedule comes into play. It really is a crapshoot about who and when you play. In the NFL its a team game so if they lose its not always because they were a bad team. They might not have been motivated enough. There is alot of luck involved. You dont get to pick out the entire player pool. You are given a choice of when to pick.I beat the guy who had A.Rodgers last year when he went down with a concussion vs the Lions. I whould have lost that game if it wasn't for Rodgers going down.See, now you're talking about variance. That isn't luck. If a poker player has a documented +EV 3.5 BB for over 300,000 hands of poker, that's generally their expected win rate. But over 1,000 hands, ANYTHING can happen. Because the variance is so large they can be +46 BB or -53 BB. That doesn't change their overall EV of 3.5 BB per 1,000. Same with FF. You're talking about seeing teams draft dog crap and win leagues. Variance. But show me that same player win $ by playing in 8, 10, 12 leagues drafting that way or over multiple years. Also the reverse is true, you can be the best fantasy player in the world and finish dead last in a league. ONE league. Variance. But put the same owner in multiple leagues over multiple years - at some point his return will normalize to his EV once he reaches a large enough sample size. As you increase the number of leagues and number of years played, luck decreases proportionately until it's non-existant.Flat out wrong? Prove it then. I want you to show me the skill involved. I saw Poker being compared and that isnt even the same ball park. There are mathematical odds using cards along with bluffing and some luck involved but there is more skill in cards than FF.Here is an example:2 teams playing head to head. Team A loses a RB due to injury the week before. The backup RB is not availabe so he has to pick out of a crop of 3rd down Jason Snelling/Justin Forsett RBBC types. Team B still has his full strength team going. Team A's 3rd down RBBC just happens to break a long TD and gets a goal line TD while Team B's 2 running backs combined fail miserably and lose the game by 5 points. No luck involved there. Team B just used his finely tuned skill to correctly pick the backup running back that would blow up for him, never mind the starter on someone elses team. This happens every week. On paper one team looks dominant cant lose playing against the absolute worst team and expects to blow them out. Game over and the expected winner is doing a face palm. Why dont you consistently go undefeated every year since its not luck? Why is there no guy with his face plastered all over the web as the best FF player in the world year in and year out? You are counting on grabbing guys that will perform at a high level more often than others. You could have a team full of studs but when you need them to win and they dont perform you lose. Where is the skill at then? Its luck and you can take that to the bank. I have seen guys who drafted the absolute worst roster you could imagine on paper and win the championship. PURE LUCK. Ask those high stake FF players how much luck is involved, I bet they same the same thing.'FantasyTrader said:This is flat out wrong. There are consistent winners in high stakes fantasy sports. I'm sorry if your psyche can't handle that, that you NEED it to be luck, but it's the truth. There's people out there winning money consistently.The skill is drafting the right guys better than everyone else. If you put the time and research along with luck you will definitely make the playoffs. The thing is I could have a team that completely dominates the regular season because i drafted well and got lucky with matchups, but the first week in the playoffs my team decides to snore. You wont sit your studs so your team is totally dependent on luck. Sure ADP will outperform Pierre Thomas, but once we get to the playoffs PT could go for 60 rush,15 rec and 2 TDs while ADP gets 70 rushing. FF is not a money making oppurtunity. Its a past time or a hobby just for fun with hopes of winning it all.FF is a skill game imo, over the long run more skillfull players will win. Off course everyone has the same information(wich is debatable since some people just follow more news then others), that's the same as in poker everyone knows what they are holding and see the cards on the table. It's not the information but it's what you do with it, as it is in most games. Only the variance is soooo enormous that to find your true roi you have to play in an insane amount of leagues and the most skillfull player will not always come out a winner. Off course it's more then 50% luck maybe it's closer to 90% luck or hell even 99,9% luck but as long as there's skill involved the more skillfull players will win more over the long run then others.