I understand he's a competitor beyond what we can comprehend, but he sure complains a lot for a guy who has multigenerational wealth whereby even his grandkids (and perhaps beyond) are probably set up for life financially.
Wut? When?
Dudes career was him getting one year extensions after being drafted behind the new GOAT RG3 and managing to keep those Washington teams competitive. Name me one other player treated like he was by Wash. Then get goes to Vikings and I don't remember any complaints out of him. Then he signs a huge contract without being told the teams plans and he says he was "mislead" and suddenly he's complaining a lot?
Just an awful take.
Your take is just as awful. This guy has demanded every single red cent in every situation throughout his entire career. He has done it in an aw shucks kind of way and therefore avoided a lot of criticism, but if you ignore his comments and focus on his actions, you won’t find a more selfish player in terms of how they handle their business.
And you know what? That is all completely fine. Got no problem with guys getting paid. Not at all. But it’s a double edged sword and you don’t get to conduct your business the way he has his whole career and then turn around and cry about the Falcons doing whatever they think is best for their franchise.
Door swings both ways. Kirk needs to STFU.
Players go for the highest dollar value or for winning a championship (more money during the playoffs along with the prestige). Cousins trying to secure a long term contract is a totally normal thing for any player to do. Washington hitting him with the tag repeatedly didn't give him that "generational wealth" you talk about (especially not by today's standards). Like everyone else at his position he wanted to get paid.
And he shut up when he got a contract he wanted. If he complained in Minn I don't remember it. So you've got the start of his career where the team that drafted him wouldn't extend him at his price or trade him putting the tag on him repeatedly, something I don't believe has happened to any QB in the past 30 years which he didn't like. Then the middle of his career where he got the contract he wanted...Crickets. Then the end of his career the team that signed him didn't tell him they planned to grab a QB in the first and he was obviously upset about that.
Sounds like you just don't like the dude to me.
Side question - how do you feel about Eli Manning? I'm genuinely interested to see if there's a difference between your take on the two.
Bro you need to reread what I wrote and then probably do it a couple more times, because nothing you just said address my comments.
I have no problem whatsoever with how he’s handled negotiations throughout his career. I am very pro-player. Game is brutal, they should fight for every dollar. And he never was a squeaky wheel in Washington or Minnesota. This would be that “aw shucks” I mentioned. He knows how to present himself in the media.
I’m a Wash fan, extremely aware of the back and forth in his negotiations and tags. We low balled him, he called our bluff, then he used the upper hand to leverage into two huge cash years on the tag and a massive contract in Minnesota. He shows up as 6th all time in career earnings anywhere I check and pretty sure will be 3rd after this season. And that’s fine, good for him. I’m not bitter he left Wash either. We mismanaged him just as much as he worked us.
*the whole point* is if you do all of that ^, and a franchise signs you, pays you a **** load more$$, then decides they want to draft a guy to replace you the next day, you gotta shut up about it. I don’t want to hear one single word. Just shut the **** up while the leopards eat your face because you’ve been the leopard your whole life.