Quality Starts vs Wins (1 Viewer)

[Wrigley]

What says the BBF?

 

[Captain Hook]

IF they would change the measure for QS - currently it is at 3 runs in six innings which everyone can see is NOT quality it would be a 4.50 ERA - make it runs for seven innings or 2 runs for six innings and it would be a much better reflection of value for starting pitchers

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Potential 4.5 era is a problem with QS, but wins do depend too much on team's offense so QS by a nose.

 

[beaux]

IF they would change the measure for QS - currently it is at 3 earned runs in six innings which everyone can see is NOT quality it would be a 4.50 ERA - make it runs for seven innings or 2 runs for six innings and it would be a much better reflection of value for starting pitchers

Fixed...

 

[beaux]

Wins... You determine a success a team with wins/losses, not quality starts/losses...

Just use both of them if you so desire...

 

[Wrigley]

Wins... You determine a success a team with wins/losses, not quality starts/losses...Just use both of them if you so desire...

Real life, sureThis is fantasy baseball.

 

[Green94]

Potential 4.5 era is a problem with QS, but wins do depend too much on team's offense so QS by a nose.

This.