Nevermind, didn't read the question correctly.Who leads all rookie RBs in yards per touch (Rush & Receive - no special teams)Do not google the answer, see if you can get it.
My guess would be Peyton Hillis without googling the answer.Who leads all rookie RBs in yards per touch (Rush & Receive - no special teams)Do not google the answer, see if you can get it.
I'd go with Felix as well. If he didn't qualify, I'd probably go with McFadden, who I think has the second fewest touches, but that one really awesome game.Felix Jones, but that is really limited touches
Post #12Are we gonna get an answer on this today?
Worthless stat.
that was my first thought.Eddie Royal?
Waste of a thread. If the guy had more than 1 maybe 2 touches a game it might be a significant stat, otherwise it just looks like a GB homer trying to chime in on the current RB situationPost #12Are we gonna get an answer on this today?
whenever a trivia question includes "per touch", you can be reasonably certain that it is meaningless.Waste of a thread. If the guy had more than 1 maybe 2 touches a game it might be a significant stat, otherwise it just looks like a GB homer trying to chime in on the current RB situationPost #12Are we gonna get an answer on this today?
I've become very good at identifying worthless stats, GBWorthless stat.coming from the king of weird random trivia threads, that's saying something
![]()
Edit: like this one, and hundreds more I'm not even going to bother searching for.
I'm speculating that he was responding to my post, #20.Worthless stat.coming from the king of weird random trivia threads, that's saying something
![]()
Edit: like this one, and hundreds more I'm not even going to bother searching for.