What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raiders' camp "too intense" per NFLPA (1 Viewer)

pettifogger

Footballguy
When I first saw the article over the weekend, I thought it was a joke. But, apparently the team has been forced by a union complaint to cancel a week of the voluntary camp because it was being run too intensely.

Could be a good sign for Raider fans, though, that Kiffin has started to light a fire under the team. I'm not a fan of coaches who beat their teams up in practice to the point that they have less at game time, that's not intelligent coaching, but these are offseason drills, and the Raiders definitely needed to add some intensity.

Now if they can get the player(s) who :mellow: to the NFLPA off the team, so much the better.

Too intense to continue

Raiders' offseason workouts cut short by a week

David White, Chronicle Staff Writer

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Raiders coach Lane Kiffin often boasts about the high intensity level of offseason workouts. Turns out all that full-speed work cost his team one last week of pre-camp training.

The Raiders were forced to cancel the final week of voluntary workouts after the NFL Players Association complained about rules violations regarding offseason training, the team confirmed Friday.

The decision was more symbolic than anything else. The Raiders' third and final offseason minicamp ended Wednesday, their final offseason practice after more than three months of organized team activities.

What the Raiders lost is next week's scheduled weight training, which was voluntary and did not include action on the field.

"I was notified that the players' union believes our total commitment to improving our football team has resulted in some violations of rules regarding practice standards," Kiffin said in a team-issued statement Friday.

"The union has complained about the high level of intensity, player aggressiveness and fast pace of our practices and, as a result, has taken away the final week of our offseason program."

An NFLPA spokesman did not immediately return a phone message for comment.

Kiffin, 32, is in his first season as an NFL coach. When he was hired in January, he talked about how "the games will be easy because practice is so hard."

Indeed, offseason workouts were run at a fast pace. It was a noticeable contrast to last season, when players complained about too much downtime and standing around at practice.

During offseason workouts, players could not wear pads and tackling was not allowed per the union contract. Serious contact was inevitable as players -- especially on offense -- worked to earn a starting job.

The clearest physical contact was when the offensive and defensive lines went against each other. Kiffin once praised Robert Gallery for putting players on the ground as a sign of improvement.

Media outlets across the country have reported on contact and other rule violations at NFL minicamps in the past three months. No other team is known to have been penalized.

Kiffin apparently never saw it coming. At the end of minicamp Wednesday, he told reporters he was pleased with how his team worked through 14 weeks of organized team activities.

"I think we learned they're willing to compete and they're willing to practice the way we want to practice," Kiffin said Wednesday. "We ask a lot of them. We ask an extremely high tempo of them at practice and, no complaints, they just jump right in and do it."

The Raiders reconvene for training camp July 26 in Napa.

E-mail David White at dwhite@sfchronicle.com.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c...SPG1VQGC6A1.DTL

 
Good for Kiffin for working these guys hard. The are paid plenty of money and should be working hard. I can't believe someone would complain and that the complaint actually was rewarded by NFLPA for cancelling team functions. That is ridiculous.

I like this Kiffin guy.

 
It was announced Friday that the Oakland Raiders would be forced to cancel the final week of their offseason training program because of violations to the NFL's collective bargaining agreement. The rules for offseason workouts in the CBA state:

"The intensity and tempo of drills shall be at a level conducive to learning, with player safety as the highest priority, and not at a level where one player is in a physical contest with another player."

Because their organized training activities have already concluded, the penalty the Raiders face is not exactly a painful one. Players will simply lose a week of strength and conditioning workout time at the team's facilities.

But there may be a bigger issue at hand than the severity of the punishment. It's not exactly a secret that contact takes place all across the league during offseason workouts, yet no other team has been disciplined for it to this point. So why have the Raiders suddenly been singled out for breaking the rule?

Of the theories offered so far, only two really seem to be plausible. It's well within the discretion of the NFL Players Association, led by former Raider Gene Upshaw, to investigate offseason practices and make sure teams are complying with the rules. And some speculation has centered around comments that head coach Lane Kiffin made to the media earlier in the week about the physical nature of the practices. If the NFLPA got wind of those comments, it may have simply looked into the matter and found the Raiders' practice sessions to be in violation.

But if that's the case, it seems rather unfair considering there's been evidence of contact at the practices of numerous other teams. Most notably, New York Giants fullback Jim Finn was placed on the injured reserve list last Wednesday, reportedly because of an injury he suffered while executing a block. A fullback suffering an injury while blocking should make it abundantly clear that contact is being made at the practices in New York, but the NFLPA has yet to discipline the Giants for the violation.

As for the notion that the NFLPA investigated Oakland because of what had been said in the media, articles detailing contact in other teams' practices have been written in other cities, and comments similar to Kiffin's about the physicality of practices have also been made by members of other teams. Yet no action has resulted from any of those examples, either.

The only other theory that seems possible is that someone on the Raiders' roster lodged a complaint with the NFLPA. There doesn't seem to be any evidence to support this claim at the moment, though, meaning that it may have arisen simply because nothing else seemed to make sense.

Obviously, the idea of unrest in the locker room isn't exactly new to the Raiders as of late, but those feelings seemed toned down, if not totally gone, judging by recent player comments. Several have commented on the renewed excitement and their enjoyment of practices that are drastically different from the long, unorganized sessions of the Art Shell era.

It may never become clear what exactly prompted the NFLPA to crack down on the Raiders for this violation, but the wrist-slapping given to the team has been the only sour note on what has otherwise been an offseason of enthusiasm in Oakland. And if it turns out that the team was indeed singled out unfairly, Kiffin already has a prime example to help reinforce the "us against the world" mentality that the Raiders are so well-known for.

:banned:

 
This happened to the Lions last year. Obviously it was a wonderful sign of an imminent turnaround for them. Raiders fans, expect similar results.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top