What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raiders' Janikowski charged with misdemeanor battery, false impris (1 Viewer)

Hairy Snowman

Footballguy
"What is known comes from court documents in which Nicholson, 36, alleges Janikowski "did unlawfully violate (her) personal liberty" and "did willfully and unlawfully use force and violence upon (her) person" in Walnut Creek on Sept. 24, 2010 -- one day before Janikowski and the Raiders flew to Arizona for a game against the Cardinals. No arrest was made at the time; Nicholson, a Berkeley woman, filed her complaint after the fact."

Sounds fishy.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/twitter/ci_18913564

 
May be a bit of behavioral history here... wasn't Janikowski in trouble just before/after entering the NFL for connections to the "date rape" drug?

 
Set(tie) a record, get suspended. oh wait, the NFL doesnt do that anymore

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"did willfully and unlawfully use force and violence upon (her) person" in Walnut Creek

Hey Sea Bass, stop doing crimes in my town!

<=======

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This happened over a year ago and the woman is just bringing charges. She isnt bringing rape charges or criminal assault charges.

This smells like a deadbeat looking for a payday after speaking to a lawyer to me. False imprisonment? Misdemeanor battery? I want to see how this shakes out but it just smells fishy to me.

 
First of all, we know he's never been a choir boy. Always been a party boy, had arrests for substance-related incidents in the past. Lots of stuff back at FSU, later on drunk driving, the date rape drug thing, another fight/argument/whatever incident here at a Walnut Creek restaurant a few years back. Let's just say he's known in these parts and it's not for his positive community service.

Second, and sorry if I'm painting with a broad brush, but Berkeley chicks are wacko. I was dating one of them earlier this year. They just are. There's a psychology about that town and the women living in it. Again, no offense to anyone, but they just are wacko.

So, bad combination.

With the California unemployment rate second only to Nevada's and the foreclosure mess (in Berkeley big time), it's not hard to imagine she probably is desperate for some coin a year after whatever incident occurred.

I speculate he was hoping to split the uprights and the attempt was blocked by the defense. He didn't like that and got teed off, probably did a little illegal blocking when she tried to run her fly pattern out of there, then kicked her to the curb. Happens all the time in bars and clubs across America when people are imbibing. But because he has some celebrity and some bucks she's looking to cash in.

If he doesn't write her a little check to make this go away, it'll get tossed out by a judge in about 3 seconds. Courtrooms are too full already for this nonsense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This happened over a year ago and the woman is just bringing charges. She isnt bringing rape charges or criminal assault charges. This smells like a deadbeat looking for a payday after speaking to a lawyer to me. False imprisonment? Misdemeanor battery? I want to see how this shakes out but it just smells fishy to me.
Maybe, but it's hard to give him the benefit of the doubt given his history. There aren't a whole lot of good reasons for having a bunch of GHB.
 
"What is known comes from court documents in which Nicholson, 36, alleges Janikowski "did unlawfully violate (her) personal liberty" and "did willfully and unlawfully use force and violence upon (her) person" in Walnut Creek on Sept. 24, 2010 -- one day before Janikowski and the Raiders flew to Arizona for a game against the Cardinals. No arrest was made at the time; Nicholson, a Berkeley woman, filed her complaint after the fact."

Sounds fishy.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/twitter/ci_18913564
What does this mean? When did she file the complaint? Many here are saying she filed her complaint a long time after, but this doesn't insinuate either or.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top