What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rank these playoff seeds (1 Viewer)

tonystrong

Footballguy
How would you rank these seeds?

Head to Head

A beat C

B beat A

C beat B

Team -- Div. Record -- Total Points

A -------------- 3-1 ------------- 1,000

B ---------------2-2 ------------- 1,050

C -------------- 2-2 ------------- 1,100

Tie Breaking Scheme:

1.Head-To-Head Competition

2.Divisional Record

3.Total Points Scored

4.Points Scored Head-to-Head

 
How would you rank these seeds?

Head to Head

A beat C

B beat A

C beat B

Team -- Div. Record -- Total Points

A -------------- 3-1 ------------- 1,000

B ---------------2-2 ------------- 1,050

C -------------- 2-2 ------------- 1,100

Tie Breaking Scheme:

1.Head-To-Head Competition

2.Divisional Record

3.Total Points Scored

4.Points Scored Head-to-Head
A,C,BHead to head does not apply as they all split 1-1

A is top seed based on divisional record.

C beats B on either head-to-head or total points (see below)

I don't know if your rules are actually more explicit, but you have a couple potential landmines in them as written here. In this case it all works out, but there are a couple cases where you could have arguments on how to interpret the rules:

1) head to head - For 3-way ties, the NFL only applies this if one team either sweeps or loses to both of the others. Yours is not clear if that is how you want to interpret it or not. Without further guidance, I'd think you'd have to use overall h-t-h winning percentage, but someone may say "that's not how the nfl does it" and raise a stink.

2) You don't specify whether to go back to the first criteria once the first team is seeded. I.e., once team A is given the top seed because of divisional record, it is not clear whether you should go back to head-to-head between B and C or keep going down the list to total points. You got lucky in that both methods give the second seed to C. The NFL goes back to the top of the list, but without specific rules stating that you should do that, some team might argue that you should keep going down the list.

 
How would you rank these seeds?

Head to Head

A beat C

B beat A

C beat B

Team -- Div. Record -- Total Points

A -------------- 3-1 ------------- 1,000

B ---------------2-2 ------------- 1,050

C -------------- 2-2 ------------- 1,100

Tie Breaking Scheme:

1.Head-To-Head Competition

2.Divisional Record

3.Total Points Scored

4.Points Scored Head-to-Head
Tie breaker #1: no winner all 3 have 1-1 record vs each other.Tie breaker #2: Team A wins top seed with a better divisional record.

Tie breaker #3: Between teams B and C because Team A already won tie breaker #2. Team C wins with more points.

Final playoff seedings goes A,C,B

 
How would you rank these seeds?

Head to Head

A beat C

B beat A

C beat B

Team -- Div. Record -- Total Points

A -------------- 3-1 ------------- 1,000

B ---------------2-2 ------------- 1,050

C -------------- 2-2 ------------- 1,100

Tie Breaking Scheme:

1.Head-To-Head Competition

2.Divisional Record

3.Total Points Scored

4.Points Scored Head-to-Head
Assuming all three teams are in the same division, it's A C B as everyone else suggested.However, let's reverse the points for B and C, and how would you seed these new standings?:

Team -- Div. Record -- Total Points

A -------------- 3-1 ------------- 1,000

B ---------------2-2 ------------- 1,100

C -------------- 2-2 ------------- 1,050

The correct order is still A C B, because in standard tiebreaker situations, you start over after each seed is awarded. Once A is awarded the #1 seed, then #2 is determined by the head-to-head between B and C.

Of course, some people would disagree with this, which is why our rules explicitly state that the tiebreakers start over after each seed is awarded.

 
If C has more pts than B do you guys still answer the same?

Basically does the tie-breaker start over to break the 2nd place tie that arises after the first iteration of the tie-breaking process?

 
Just a suggestion: Head to head records should never be used as a fantasy football tiebreaker (or if it is, as a last tiebreaker, not the first) Because of bye weeks, teams aren't always on equal footing for their head to head games. Division records are fine since it takes a larger sample size, but efforts should be made to keep divisional games on non-bye weeks as much as practical. you really should get those tiebreakers re-written for next season.

O...and I agree with everyone else...ACB as your rules are currently written.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top