Rankings (1 Viewer)

[tones]

Because no one has posted to the rankings within 14 days for dynasty. You can on longer view them. Please take the edit check out of the program so that they maybe displayed.

Thanks!

 

[Butters]

I just noticed this last night ... no one has posted rankings recently, ergo you are not able to view any rankings from any time. :(

 

[munchkin]

I just noticed this last night ... no one has posted rankings recently, ergo you are not able to view any rankings from any time. :(

I find that perplexing too; why should we not be able to view the most recent rankings? I think we understand the caveat that an inaccuracy may exist if there has been a long lapse in ranking reviews. But it is nice to have access even if we need to "weight" the rankings ourselves.

 

[Weiner Dog]

There's a drop down allowing you to see rankings posted longer than 14 days ago. Outside of coaching changes, I think there would be little changes to the dynasty rankings of players from 30+ days ago.

 

[PewterFan]

There's a drop down allowing you to see rankings posted longer than 14 days ago.

I think that's where the problem lies. Often times I'll spend a few minutes going from 14 days, to 21 days to 35 days...then I'll have to go to another rankings and it's a big mess. I agree with the poster above who said that the most recent rankings should always be available no matter how old it is. It's a glitch in an otherwise great product.

 

[Butters]

There's a drop down allowing you to see rankings posted longer than 14 days ago. Outside of coaching changes, I think there would be little changes to the dynasty rankings of players from 30+ days ago.

Not sure if I can explain this, but I'll give it a shot. I think we are all aware of the drop-down box to display rankings from farther back. But the point is that you can't get to that interface right now. You can only get there if someone has some rankings posted within the past fourteen days. It's a Catch-22.

 

[Weiner Dog]

There's a drop down allowing you to see rankings posted longer than 14 days ago. Outside of coaching changes, I think there would be little changes to the dynasty rankings of players from 30+ days ago.

Not sure if I can explain this, but I'll give it a shot. I think we are all aware of the drop-down box to display rankings from farther back. But the point is that you can't get to that interface right now. You can only get there if someone has some rankings posted within the past fourteen days. It's a Catch-22.

The problem you reference pertains to the DB search. If you begin your search with DL or LB, you will have the ability to see the drop-down box.

 

[PranksterJD]

There's a drop down allowing you to see rankings posted longer than 14 days ago. Outside of coaching changes, I think there would be little changes to the dynasty rankings of players from 30+ days ago.

Not sure if I can explain this, but I'll give it a shot. I think we are all aware of the drop-down box to display rankings from farther back. But the point is that you can't get to that interface right now. You can only get there if someone has some rankings posted within the past fourteen days. It's a Catch-22.

Go into the URL and change the number after "howrecent=" to 200.

 

[The Man With No Name]

Last Dynasty rankings posted for:

LB's-

Borbely- 1/16

Bramel- 1/14

Bloom- 11/14

Pasquino- 8/15

Norton- 8/15

Rudnicki- 7/15

DL-

Borbely- 1/25

Bramel- 1/14

Bloom- 12/8

pasquino- 8/15

Norton- 8/15

Rudnicki- 7/15

DB's-

Bloom- 11/14

Borbely- 9/4

Pasquino- 8/15

Norton- 8/15

Rudnicki- 7/15

Bramel- ???

 

[PatsWillWin]

I posted about this in the Questions about the website forum, which I'm almost positive is not the correct place, but I didn't want to put up in a stink in the SP or start PMing the wrong FBG's.

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=453680

It's really annoying.

 

[PatsWillWin]

Another approach is simply to select a postion that has been updated recently, e.g. Dynasty WR. When that comes up change the position to e.g., DL and the days to 35.

Far as I can tell, this is the only approach. It's workable, just really annoying and seems unnecessary.

 

[Jene Bramel]

I'll bring this up with Doug soon. Thanks.