RB Ahman Green Hurt In Practice (1 Viewer)

[a_rackowski]

Green hurt; fullback changed; line settled

Green Bay - Green Bay running back Ahman Green now has two hamstring injuries and has been downgraded to questionable for the game Monday against Philadelphia.

If Green can't play or is limited, the Packers plan to play Vernand Morency mostly on first and second downs and Noah Herron on third downs.

The Packers have also determined that Daryn Colledge, and not Jason Spitz, will start at left guard, and Tony Moll will start at right guard.

McCarthy said 12-year veteran fullback William Henderson will also not start. Instead, that duty goes to Brandon Miree, who was recently elevated from the practice squad. The Packers will have to look at their special teams needs to see if Henderson will even be activated for the Eagles game.

McCarthy said the decision to demote Henderson was one of the toughest he's had to make thus far in his head coaching tenure in Green Bay.

 

[ItsOnlytheRiver]

Ugh, should I drop Gado for Morency?

 

[jafo]

Here we go again.

 

[Limp Ditka]

Anxiously awaiting Fla\/\/ed's definition of "by week 4" again

 

[Limp Ditka]

Here we go again.

 

[Wheelhouse]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

 

[Wheelhouse]

One thing for sure -- Favre, Driver and Jennings are going to rack up the yards.

 

[PatsWillWin]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

Of course nobody knows that for sure, but he's questionable for THIS week - not doubtful, and obviously not out. He was questionable last week with a hamstring injury, same kinda thing, he "tweaked" it, and he played a good game.

 

[packersfan]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

I'm not sure we'll know anything conclusive until Monday or Tuesday. Obviously Green played -- and played pretty well in my opinion -- despite having one hamstring injury last week. But two? Obviously if he's out for a few or several games Morency becomes at least a viable RB3 in larger leagues. But if we're only talking a game or two he'll have minimal value to non-Green owners IMO.

 

[mr. furley]

McCarthy said 12-year veteran fullback William Henderson will also not start. Instead, that duty goes to Brandon Miree, who was recently elevated from the practice squad. The Packers will have to look at their special teams needs to see if Henderson will even be activated for the Eagles game. McCarthy said the decision to demote Henderson was one of the toughest he's had to make thus far in his head coaching tenure in Green Bay.

this is a brilliant decision by the coaching staff.

 

[The Football Freak]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

The blogger has an article with a bit more information. Per the blogger: "I'm hopeful he's going to play, just based on the information we have," Packers head coach Mike McCarthy said. "But it's just part of our game."

 

[Wheelhouse]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

The blogger has an article with a bit more information. Per the blogger: "I'm hopeful he's going to play, just based on the information we have," Packers head coach Mike McCarthy said. "But it's just part of our game."

Good stuff - sounds like it's just a tweak with pre-cautionary measures here.

 

[packersfan]

Morency vs. Philadelphia anyone? So how bad is the hamstring injury to Ahman Green? Are we talking 1 week and he's fine or he's out for 3-4 weeks? That's type of info I need here.

The blogger has an article with a bit more information. Per the blogger: "I'm hopeful he's going to play, just based on the information we have," Packers head coach Mike McCarthy said. "But it's just part of our game."

Good stuff - sounds like it's just a tweak with pre-cautionary measures here.

That's the hope. The concern is this is now two weeks in a row where Green has had some late-week issues physically. This is not the kind of pattern the Packers or Green owners want to see develop.

 

[pacman_fl]

McCarthy said 12-year veteran fullback William Henderson will also not start. Instead, that duty goes to Brandon Miree, who was recently elevated from the practice squad. The Packers will have to look at their special teams needs to see if Henderson will even be activated for the Eagles game. McCarthy said the decision to demote Henderson was one of the toughest he's had to make thus far in his head coaching tenure in Green Bay.

this is a brilliant decision by the coaching staff.

If it's "changing of the guard" time (Henderson, not the guards) - I am truely sad, but it's time to move forward. Henderson has been a great FB (and up there with Strong for most uderrated outside of the NFL community). McCarthy has changed the FB role and I really thing Henderson has reached the end of a great career based on his early season play.

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

Anxiously awaiting Fla\/\/ed's definition of "by week 4" again

He isn't listed as doubtful. He was listed as questionable last week too. Keep it up, Limpy.Oh, and the prediction for "by week 4" was he would be done for the season and his career.

 

[Biabreakable]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

 

[fosio]

 

[Limp Ditka]

Anxiously awaiting Fla\/\/ed's definition of "by week 4" again

He isn't listed as doubtful. He was listed as questionable last week too. Keep it up, Limpy.

I've said let him prove it on the field. Prove me wrong there, don't prove me wrong on the sideline.And while your point about him not being doubtful are valid, the continuous questions revolving around Green's status every week only make my sell high opinion more solid.

 

[phillzphan]

Herron will be good if Morency doesn't work out, but Morency will definitely be getting his shot first. Whether Green plays this week or not, its irrelevant. Hes not going to make it anywhere close to through the season. At that point, the backups will come in....

Herron was a guy the old coaches really liked. Morency was brought in by the new coaches. While Morency is very talented, he might prove to be too shifty for their scheme -- zone blocking. That might be the time Herron gets the call, but I don't think he'll have a shot for a LONG Time.

Morency is definitely worth a roster spot in redrafts OR dynasty. If you don't have him, buy or pick him off the FA wire. Don't buy Morency just yet though. Philly has a stifling rush d. I'd buy Morency just after this game, before any more bad news comes out about Green.

 

[Limp Ditka]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

Anxiously awaiting Fla\/\/ed's definition of "by week 4" again

He isn't listed as doubtful. He was listed as questionable last week too. Keep it up, Limpy.

I've said let him prove it on the field. Prove me wrong there, don't prove me wrong on the sideline.And while your point about him not being doubtful are valid, the continuous questions revolving around Green's status every week only make my sell high opinion more solid.

You stated his sell high period was last week before he played against Detroit and when the news came out that he was questionable due to a sore hammy. That time passed and his value went up after the Detroit game. Maybe you'd learn from your premature spouting off last week but I guess you aren't that bright.Your sell high opinion keeps changing so you can try and save face.

 

[phillzphan]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

 

[Biabreakable]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

Philly offense will win TOP easily in this game and put up a lot of points forcing the Slack to throw the ball early and often. Green if he plays could still get a lot of tagets in the passing game but I think I have better options than him this week.FYI Philly is 14th against the run so far this year giving up 3.8 ypc but are much worse against the pass 26th in the league because teams have been forced to air it out against them to catch up and one of thier starting corner backs is injured.Your over-rated comment is just It would be nice to actualy have this thread be about Ahman Green and the situation at hand instead of a Limp Ditka vs. fla\/\/ed slap fight.

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

It would be nice to actualy have this thread be about Ahman Green and the situation at hand instead of a Limp Ditka vs. fla\/\/ed slap fight.

I agree. Tell Limpy to get a clue.

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

 

[Limp Ditka]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Tell Brian Westbrook owners about this.Green is scoring just fine this year in standard leagues and doing quite well in PPR leagues.

 

[hammerd]

You guys think that the possibility of Green not playing changes Favre's fantasy outlook ????

 

[hellz_fireflies]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Remember Chicago and New Orleans are not push over dt's! Greens week 1 and 2 games

 

[Aaronl5]

Yes Green out hurts Favre. He likes the dumpoffs to Green as well as slinging it around.

 

[packersfan]

You guys think that the possibility of Green not playing changes Favre's fantasy outlook ????

Not really. This was a game I believed favored Favre and the passing game from a fantasy standpoint because I didn't see Green running the ball very effectively. Losing Green in the passing game will hurt but Driver and Jennings should be able to make plenty of noise against a wounded Eagles' secondary and Franks started to emerge a bit last week. The combination of Morency/Herron in the backfield should be respectable enough in the passing game. The key will be how well the line and the RBs protect Favre because I would expect Johnson to send plenty of blitzes at Favre all game long.

 

[JuniorNB]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

If I was a betting man, I'd say that the reason he didn't like Green's matchup, was due to the fact that the last three teams who faced the "over-rated" Philly defense had the following stats:Week 1 (Houston)Lundy/Morency 16 carries 45 yards (2.8 ypc)Week 2 (NY Giants)Tiki Barber 21 carries 51 yards (2.4 ypc)Week 3 (San Francisco)Frank Gore 16 carries 52 yards (3.1 ypc)Tiki and Gore are supposed to be quality backs. Who, exactly, is over-rating this defense?

 

[Ariakis]

Who's the better pass blocker and receiver between Morency and Herron? Answer that question and you'll figure out which of the two RB's are more likely to be relevant this week albeit on the fringe of the top 30 RB's at best.

 

[Limp Ditka]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Remember Chicago and New Orleans are not push over dt's! Greens week 1 and 2 games

Ah the again. Sure fire way to ensure victory in any debate. BRAVO!!! You are the man.Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball. Against NO he averaged an astounding 2.6 YPC rushingAgainst DET he averaged and astounding 2.8 YPC rushingLike I said before, I would like to have any RB on my roster be able to RUN the ball and not have to count on him getting yards in the passing game. Reception yards are a bonus. Not something worthy of depending on unless its LT2, LJ, or Westy

 

[Tyrion]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Remember Chicago and New Orleans are not push over dt's! Greens week 1 and 2 games

Ah the again. Sure fire way to ensure victory in any debate. BRAVO!!! You are the man.Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball. Against NO he averaged an astounding 2.6 YPC rushingAgainst DET he averaged and astounding 2.8 YPC rushingLike I said before, I would like to have any RB on my roster be able to RUN the ball and not have to count on him getting yards in the passing game. Reception yards are a bonus. Not something worthy of depending on unless its LT2, LJ, or Westy

Why just those guys? Green has always gotten a ton of receptions with the Packers. Not counting last year his numbers ranged between 70 and 40 receptions each season.

 

[Eric Stratton]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Remember Chicago and New Orleans are not push over dt's! Greens week 1 and 2 games

Ah the again. Sure fire way to ensure victory in any debate. BRAVO!!! You are the man.Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball. Against NO he averaged an astounding 2.6 YPC rushingAgainst DET he averaged and astounding 2.8 YPC rushingLike I said before, I would like to have any RB on my roster be able to RUN the ball and not have to count on him getting yards in the passing game. Reception yards are a bonus. Not something worthy of depending on unless its LT2, LJ, or Westy

Yet.....Green still keeps producing for his fantasy owners.

 

[Biabreakable]

Ahman Green is 2nd on the team in targets and catches with 23 for 17 respectivly.

I expect Jennings targets to increase this week though and Green even if he does play will likely not be asked to do quite as much because of the hamstring injuries. That is my guess anyways and why I am looking at other players I have available who might be better options than Green this week. There is also the risk that Green may not play at all.

As far as Greens impact on Favre I do think its significant. Rbs who can make yards reciving are the easiest way for Qbs to get completions and 1st downs. With less risk of interceptions also. I think Favre can still possibly put up decent numbers without Green but it wont be as much as it would be with Green. And there is greater risk of pressure and interceptions as well.

Philly defense is tied with Baltimore with the most sacks after 3 weeks with 16 total sacks after 3 games. That is over 5 sacks a game average. They have lost Kearse to injury but Cole is the defender who has been getting to the Qb the most. 5 sacks allready in 3 games. Philly sends blitzers from everywhere so poor pass protection from the Rb will definitly hurt. If Green does play I see a situation where he may be asked to stay in to help pick up the blitz more often than ushual but this does not help his prospects as a FF starter.

 

[The Football Freak]

Here we go again.

Calm down you.This 2nd hamstring injury to Green does concern me enough that I may Bench him. I didn't like the matchup against Philly anyways.

Dear god, why wouldn't you like the matchup? I was ready to eat serious crow this week after Monday night. There's very few teams out there that I wouldn't like matched up against a grossly over-rated Eagle D

11/3221/5016/52those are the starting RBs vs. Philly. unless that was really really subtle and bad sarcasm it would be a horrible idea to get all excited about this matchup.

The real value of Ahman Green will be as a receiver, not as a runner, vs. Philly. (Assuming he's a go).8/68/TD in the second half last week on 8 targets, and that was solely in the second half last week vs. Detroit.

Which is why I don't want to rely on him. Call me whatever you want, but I don't like having to depend on my RBs getting points in the passing game. Running the ball, Ahman has proved to be useless if there's any reason at all to opposing team to focus on him

Remember Chicago and New Orleans are not push over dt's! Greens week 1 and 2 games

Ah the again. Sure fire way to ensure victory in any debate. BRAVO!!! You are the man.Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball. Against NO he averaged an astounding 2.6 YPC rushingAgainst DET he averaged and astounding 2.8 YPC rushingLike I said before, I would like to have any RB on my roster be able to RUN the ball and not have to count on him getting yards in the passing game. Reception yards are a bonus. Not something worthy of depending on unless its LT2, LJ, or Westy

Or Green. Farve likes to dump off to him as an outlet, win or lose. That looks to be the deal this year, so it adds to Greens overall value, whether you like counting on it or not. I understand your point if it was fluke plays where they were sending him wide and he got open a couple weeks in a row, however, this is Farve dumping it off to Green for a positive play when no one else is open. That is his role in the passing game it seems, and will keep him scoring nicely in PPR leagues, or most any league for that matter.

 

[Biabreakable]

Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball.

This is incorrect. Ahman Green had 39 of his 110 yards rushing before the 1st half with a healthy YPC as well. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/gamebook/NFL_20060910_CHI@GB

Ahman Green has gotten more carries and higher YPC as games have gone on like most Rbs do:

1ST QUARTER 12 34 2.8

2ND QUARTER 14 48 3.4

3RD QUARTER 16 61 3.8

4TH QUARTER 16 72 4.5

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12404/splits/2006

 

[Limp Ditka]

Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball.

This is incorrect. Ahman Green had 39 of his 110 yards rushing before the 1st half with a healthy YPC as well. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/gamebook/NFL_20060910_CHI@GB

Ahman Green has gotten more carries and higher YPC as games have gone on like most Rbs do:

1ST QUARTER 12 34 2.8

2ND QUARTER 14 48 3.4

3RD QUARTER 16 61 3.8

4TH QUARTER 16 72 4.5

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12404/splits/2006

Care to break down those 2nd half numbers to help me prove the Bear game skews them?

 

[Biabreakable]

Ahman ran freely in the 2nd half of the Bear game to the tune of something like 85 yards. The defense was playing pass the entire half and gave Ahman at least an extra step whenever he ran the ball.

This is incorrect. Ahman Green had 39 of his 110 yards rushing before the 1st half with a healthy YPC as well. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/gamebook/NFL_20060910_CHI@GB

Ahman Green has gotten more carries and higher YPC as games have gone on like most Rbs do:

1ST QUARTER 12 34 2.8

2ND QUARTER 14 48 3.4

3RD QUARTER 16 61 3.8

4TH QUARTER 16 72 4.5

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12404/splits/2006

Care to break down those 2nd half numbers to help me prove the Bear game skews them?

Unecessary the links tell anyone they may want to know about it.FYI Greens longest run from scrimmage. 14 yards happened in the 2nd quarter of the Bears game.

Greens YPC has been effected by the hamstring injury since then without a doubt.

 

[zoos]

in an attempt to get back to football, in the chance that morency gets the nod and is starting-would he be effective in the packers offense?

he seems talented to me, but it also appear like green gets a lot of his value from passes. does morency have the skills to fufill this same role for the packers?

how much worse, fantasy-wise, would he be than green? or would he be better, with his fresh legs and lack of nagging injuries?

 

[mr. furley]

McCarthy said 12-year veteran fullback William Henderson will also not start. Instead, that duty goes to Brandon Miree, who was recently elevated from the practice squad. The Packers will have to look at their special teams needs to see if Henderson will even be activated for the Eagles game. McCarthy said the decision to demote Henderson was one of the toughest he's had to make thus far in his head coaching tenure in Green Bay.

this is a brilliant decision by the coaching staff.

If it's "changing of the guard" time (Henderson, not the guards) - I am truely sad, but it's time to move forward. Henderson has been a great FB (and up there with Strong for most uderrated outside of the NFL community). McCarthy has changed the FB role and I really thing Henderson has reached the end of a great career based on his early season play.

i haven't noticed that the guy's play has declined.just think that McCarthy wants an H-Back in there.. ####ing sucks. I just can't believe they brought up a guy from the practice squad.

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

Keep it to the topic at hand and leave the banter for another time and place.

 

[walkwithme]

I read he also has sore ribs. I really wanted to start him this week this is a perfect matchup for a receiving RB. I thought he would make some noise with his receptions and receiving yards. The Eagles will blitz early and often and a good thing to throw at a blitz is a good screen pass. His injury has forced my hand I either have to go with J. Lewis all rushing yards and no receiving yrds or Rueben Droughns who is also banged up going against a bad Raider defense. Whoever I put in watch A. Green end up playing and having a solid game I know it.

 

[NatronIsMean]

Quick Summary LimpDitka:

You were wrong on your sell high prediction in week 3. It was based on Ahman a) not recovering from the hammy injury well and not having a good game anytime soon to up his value more (based on the information at that time). You were proven wrong when he played and played very well.

Now, you're trying to keep up the Ahman is a sell high rather than admit to having been wrong last week. Just admit that you were wrong and let it go - flaVVed is making you look bad right now.

 

[Statorama]

I knew what I was in for when I signed on board the Ahman Green express. It's not his fault my backup RB2 is Ladell Betts.

 

[Limp Ditka]

Quick Summary LimpDitka:

You were wrong on your sell high prediction in week 3. It was based on Ahman a) not recovering from the hammy injury well and not having a good game anytime soon to up his value more (based on the information at that time). You were proven wrong when he played and played very well.

Now, you're trying to keep up the Ahman is a sell high rather than admit to having been wrong last week. Just admit that you were wrong and let it go - flaVVed is making you look bad right now.

Summary:I already admitted I was wrong and said that he had a good game. I still say that there are warning signs that may make you consider selling high while the value is still there. Injury history, YPC, O Line.

Thanks for the attempt at summarizing some of my posts

 

[thecardiackid]

From NFL.com (not sure how current, but shows AG as probable w/ ribs - no hammy)

GB

OUT DT Kenderick Allen (Foot)

QUESTIONABLE

CB Will Blackmon (Foot)

T Junius Coston (Knee)

DT Ryan Pickett (Ankle)

G Jason Spitz (Thigh)

PROBABLE

RB Ahman Green (Rib)

DE Aaron Kampman (Head)

TE David Martin (Illness)

 

[NatronIsMean]

Quick Summary LimpDitka:

You were wrong on your sell high prediction in week 3. It was based on Ahman a) not recovering from the hammy injury well and not having a good game anytime soon to up his value more (based on the information at that time). You were proven wrong when he played and played very well.

Now, you're trying to keep up the Ahman is a sell high rather than admit to having been wrong last week. Just admit that you were wrong and let it go - flaVVed is making you look bad right now.

Summary:I already admitted I was wrong and said that he had a good game. I still say that there are warning signs that may make you consider selling high while the value is still there. Injury history, YPC, O Line.

Thanks for the attempt at summarizing some of my posts

If you did then I missed it and was wrong on that. I'm just looking for one to concede and end the ongoing nonsense...