I just meant comparing the two players based on them both playing for the same school in college.
NE RBBC has always been difficult to figure out. If anyone could its Anarchy but even he throws his hands up at the prospect most of the time.
I think that's the way Bill likes it to be for defensive coordinators.
My comment more about agreeing with Soul that Damien Harris is a good player.
I dont know if he is good enough for Bill to change his ways or not. It's possible but the other guys would need to fail somewhat as well for Harris to earn a majority share of RB opportunities.
Huh? The Patriots have been doing the same thing with their RB's since Dillon left 15 years ago. There is no mystery or need for a Rosetta Stone to try to decipher anything. Here is the roster breakdown and how things have been set up for many years . . .
- A 2 down bigger back that will see the most carries (BJGE, Ridley, Blount, etc.)
- A back up that gets at least an entire series to himself each half (a Burkhead type), sometimes more if effective.
- A pass catching / 3rd down back (Woodhead, Vereen, White)
- A developmental guy that doesn't usually play a ton (a rookie back, JJ Taylor, etc.)
- A depth guy that might get a few carries / snaps but is normally a special teamer (Bolden).
The one player that seemed to be utilized differently was Lewis, but he had injury issues and NE went out and added Blount to be the bruising back, making Lewis more of that gets-some-carries-and-receptions-but-not-a-heavy-workload back as described above.
To echo what I posted earlier in this thread, things get harder to decipher when guys are hurt . . . which happens a lot in NE. Last year, both Harris and Michel looked good when the other was out, but there were only 2 games when they both played together. In those two games, Burkhead was out for the season by then, but Harris had 27 carries, Cam had 21 carries, and Michel had 17 carries (to illustrate how disruptive Cam is to the RBs).
I posted in other threads that the talk out of camp every year is that PLAYER X has good hands, could be a receiving threat, is seeing routes out of the backfield, etc. Reporters say that every year and only the anointed receiving back will ever get many targets. Last year it was Harris, this year it's Stevenson. When Michel showed up it was him. I posted in another thread that in the past 15 years, the only NE back to get 100 carries and 20 receptions in a season was Lewis. For some reason, they don't buy into an every down back theory. At most, they show that every now and again they COULD have their primary ball carrier see a target or two as a potential threat, but they hardly ever go that way scheme wise.
This year if guys are healthy, I expect Harris to see 60% of the RB carries, Michel 30%, and the other guys the leftovers. I don't expect Stevenson to do much, as BB typically red shirts rookie RBs. White will get his targets as always and an occasional third down carry to try to fool the defense.
The one season when Blount went crazy and scored a ton of TDs (2016), Lewis was hurt and they carried fewer RBs that season. Since then, they have added more RB depth on their roster. They likely will roster Harris, Michel, White, Stevenson, Taylor, and Bolden. Taylor may end up going back and forth to the practice squad if everyone is healthy.
One thing Michel has an advantage on is the past couple of years his blitz protection has become stellar . . . as in he can completely neutralize blitzers or take on a D-lineman on his own and give the QB time to get the ball out. I can't make that claim about Harris (at least not yet).
With Cam as QB (and there are plenty of media folks suggesting it would take a lot for Jones to take over), Harris' value isn't that great. He will lose a lot of touches and TD opportunities to Cam. They also added Henry and Smith as red zone threats, which should also take away some potential scoring chances in the red zone.
I am not really buying the Stevenson-is-threatening-to-take-Michel's-roster-spot speculation. Michel overall was excellent last year and is playing for very low dollars on a rookie contract. Where else are they going to find a competent and experienced back that knows their system? He's not costing them very much. Add in that BB usually sits mid-round rookie backs, and I think Michel will stick. I suppose Michel could get traded, but he wouldn't bring back much in return.
I would guess Harris will get a steady 13-15 carries a game, sometimes more here and there. But very few receptions and not a lot of TDs. His had his own injury issues last season, and his availability has become something to monitor. The part I am murky about is what would happen if Jones were to take over and what impact that would have on Harris. IMO, the threat of Cam running helped the RBs last year, so even though Newton stole carries from the RBs, he likely opened up some running room for them. We know Jones isn't going to take off running, so defenders could better key on the RBs. Plus the Patriots would likely look to pass more with Jones under center. So probably more carries but potentially smaller lanes and shorter gains.