Tau837
Footballguy
Is 45% run plays considered run first philosophy? They were 10th highest in the league. I guess if we go relatively speaking that couldn't qualify. I remember watching them all last year thinking they were throwing a lot more than I would have expected. Maybe improving the talent in the RB room will increase the run attempts.In addition to the risk Najee owners carry with not having any idea when he will return, now that it seems likely he will miss perhaps multiple weeks, the additional risk of Hampton running away with the gig have dramatically increased.
I won't pretend to be a scout, but seems likely that a 1st round RB paired with a Harbaugh OL and run-first philosophy would be a relatively good wager. Harris now has to get healthy and likely wrestle the job away from Hampton.
This is semantics, but "run first" isn't the proper term. Maybe "run heavy" is better. The splits you cited seemingly include scrambles on called passing plays. The Chargers called passing plays on ~58% of their offensive plays last season, meaning they called running plays on 42%. As you point out, they weren't among the league leaders at percentage of called running plays.
Here is another way to look at it. Dobbins was on IR for 4 games last season, weeks 13-16. Per PFF:
- During those games, Chargers RBs averaged 14.75 rushing attempts and 2.25 targets = 17.0 opportunities per game.
- During the other 13 regular season games with Dobbins, Chargers RBs averaged 24.2 rushing attempts and 3.2 targets = 27.4 opportunities per game.

I just wanted people to be aware that the subtracted variable might not account for the change.



