What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Quinshon Judkins, CLE (2 Viewers)

What if Judkins' story is that she punched herself, or had someone other than him punch her, to make it look like he did?

...and what if that's exactly what happened? In many of these type of cases, unfortunately, truth is stranger than fiction...
 
What if Judkins' story is that she punched herself, or had someone other than him punch her, to make it look like he did?

...and what if that's exactly what happened? In many of these type of cases, unfortunately, truth is stranger than fiction...


Read the first and last paragraph of the second page of the ASA report. That’s clearly not what his statement/version of events says. According to the report he admits that he hit and pushed her back. Her version is that he initiated the contact. What will the NFL believe?

Unless this statement is fake. I didn’t research its authenticity.
 
Last edited:
What if Judkins' story is that she punched herself, or had someone other than him punch her, to make it look like he did?

...and what if that's exactly what happened? In many of these type of cases, unfortunately, truth is stranger than fiction...


Read the first and last paragraph of the second page of the ASA report. That’s clearly not what his statement/version of events says. According to the report he admits that he hit and pushed her back.

Unless this statement is fake. I didn’t research its authenticity.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story man... guys love to put on their tin foil hats.

:tinfoilhat:
 
Just pointing out that there is a difference between saying “the video didn’t show the victim with injuries” and “the video showed the victim didn’t have injuries.”
Now this was released.
LINK
This document states that bruises and marks were visible on the victim in surveillance videos that the State Attorney confiscated so I expect a suspension.
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.
 
Just pointing out that there is a difference between saying “the video didn’t show the victim with injuries” and “the video showed the victim didn’t have injuries.”
Now this was released.
LINK
This document states that bruises and marks were visible on the victim in surveillance videos that the State Attorney confiscated so I expect a suspension.
IDK, super sus IMO; then why decline to prosecute
 
Just pointing out that there is a difference between saying “the video didn’t show the victim with injuries” and “the video showed the victim didn’t have injuries.”
Now this was released.
LINK
This document states that bruises and marks were visible on the victim in surveillance videos that the State Attorney confiscated so I expect a suspension.
To be accurate this was not just released. It was released 2 days ago and I posted it here.

But the main thing is it does not say the bruises and marks were visible in the surveillance video. It says they were present on photo's, which would be the photo's she took on her phone.

I still expect a suspension though, but just wanted to clear that up.
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.

people keeping pointing to the Zeke case so lets review

The Zeke allegations were so close to the Ray Rice incident that YES, I'm sure the NFL felt that no matter what they had to do something to Zeke and it would be up to Zeke to prove his innocence instead of the NFL proving his guilt. Even hiccups in her stories and text messages where she told her friends to collaborate with her; even hiring an agreed 3rd party person to review the information weren't enough for the NFL to let Zeke walk and they decided to swing their hammer and made an example here. Now we will never know what the NFL found with its independent investigation but they claim it was enough for them to ignore the 3rd party and went with the 6 games... IMO unless what they dug up was bad the NFLPA should of declared strike that day.

As for Judkins, its a different day and I doubt there is as much pressure to hang the player out to dry as fast. 1st and main hurdle is getting signed by the Browns who we are sure is trying to nickel and dime him even though the charges are dropped... I think we don't hear much about suspension until mid-season especially if Judkins chooses to fight it.
 
Judkins went at 1.04 in our rookie draft today.
I guess that beats traded him for a 2026 2nd and Skatteboo.

I wonder how that Judkins owner is feeling now. I wish I had known I could got that kind of deal basically 2 2nd round picks for Judkins.

I guess u just have to throw out trades and pray
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.
Whether intentional or not, I am sure the league will make a biased ruling due to the team he is on.
 
Rookie draft starting today … up to pick 5 in the first round and no hint of Judkins yet.

I’m sitting on 1.12, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7 and trying to determine where the reward outweighs the risk.

I should also add I have Derrius Guice PTSD on this particular team.

I wouldn't take him at 1.12, but would consider it at 2.1 ;)
I was aligned on this thinking. He went 1.12 after I had flipped with the 1.11 owner.

This was first weekend in August. I’d expect he goes top-5 now even in superflex.
 
Rookie draft starting today … up to pick 5 in the first round and no hint of Judkins yet.

I’m sitting on 1.12, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7 and trying to determine where the reward outweighs the risk.

I should also add I have Derrius Guice PTSD on this particular team.

I wouldn't take him at 1.12, but would consider it at 2.1 ;)
I was aligned on this thinking. He went 1.12 after I had flipped with the 1.11 owner.

This was first weekend in August. I’d expect he goes top-5 now even in superflex.

So... you didn't want him?
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.

people keeping pointing to the Zeke case so lets review

The Zeke allegations were so close to the Ray Rice incident that YES, I'm sure the NFL felt that no matter what they had to do something to Zeke and it would be up to Zeke to prove his innocence instead of the NFL proving his guilt. Even hiccups in her stories and text messages where she told her friends to collaborate with her; even hiring an agreed 3rd party person to review the information weren't enough for the NFL to let Zeke walk and they decided to swing their hammer and made an example here. Now we will never know what the NFL found with its independent investigation but they claim it was enough for them to ignore the 3rd party and went with the 6 games... IMO unless what they dug up was bad the NFLPA should of declared strike that day.

As for Judkins, its a different day and I doubt there is as much pressure to hang the player out to dry as fast. 1st and main hurdle is getting signed by the Browns who we are sure is trying to nickel and dime him even though the charges are dropped... I think we don't hear much about suspension until mid-season especially if Judkins chooses to fight it.
We're definitely in a different time. However you want to describe it - this is 8 years after Zeke's situation and alot has happened since his suspension.

Roger Goodell wishes he had listened earlier to Colin Kaepernick
 
Rookie draft starting today … up to pick 5 in the first round and no hint of Judkins yet.

I’m sitting on 1.12, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7 and trying to determine where the reward outweighs the risk.

I should also add I have Derrius Guice PTSD on this particular team.

I wouldn't take him at 1.12, but would consider it at 2.1 ;)
I was aligned on this thinking. He went 1.12 after I had flipped with the 1.11 owner.

This was first weekend in August. I’d expect he goes top-5 now even in superflex.

So... you didn't want him?
I would have taken him at 2.1. I had prioritized Burden/Golden given the legal situation with Judkins and the needs of my team being desperate for a WR. I had them all as basically equal, but I wanted WR first/more I guess you could say. I also misread the intent of the guy when he dropped back at 11 to 12. I thought I was getting Judkins at 2.1 regardless.
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.

people keeping pointing to the Zeke case so lets review

The Zeke allegations were so close to the Ray Rice incident that YES, I'm sure the NFL felt that no matter what they had to do something to Zeke and it would be up to Zeke to prove his innocence instead of the NFL proving his guilt. Even hiccups in her stories and text messages where she told her friends to collaborate with her; even hiring an agreed 3rd party person to review the information weren't enough for the NFL to let Zeke walk and they decided to swing their hammer and made an example here. Now we will never know what the NFL found with its independent investigation but they claim it was enough for them to ignore the 3rd party and went with the 6 games... IMO unless what they dug up was bad the NFLPA should of declared strike that day.

As for Judkins, its a different day and I doubt there is as much pressure to hang the player out to dry as fast. 1st and main hurdle is getting signed by the Browns who we are sure is trying to nickel and dime him even though the charges are dropped... I think we don't hear much about suspension until mid-season especially if Judkins chooses to fight it.
We're definitely in a different time. However you want to describe it - this is 8 years after Zeke's situation and alot has happened since his suspension.

Roger Goodell wishes he had listened earlier to Colin Kaepernick

You’re not offering his spoken contrition as evidence of his actual contrition are you?
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.

people keeping pointing to the Zeke case so lets review

The Zeke allegations were so close to the Ray Rice incident that YES, I'm sure the NFL felt that no matter what they had to do something to Zeke and it would be up to Zeke to prove his innocence instead of the NFL proving his guilt. Even hiccups in her stories and text messages where she told her friends to collaborate with her; even hiring an agreed 3rd party person to review the information weren't enough for the NFL to let Zeke walk and they decided to swing their hammer and made an example here. Now we will never know what the NFL found with its independent investigation but they claim it was enough for them to ignore the 3rd party and went with the 6 games... IMO unless what they dug up was bad the NFLPA should of declared strike that day.

As for Judkins, its a different day and I doubt there is as much pressure to hang the player out to dry as fast. 1st and main hurdle is getting signed by the Browns who we are sure is trying to nickel and dime him even though the charges are dropped... I think we don't hear much about suspension until mid-season especially if Judkins chooses to fight it.
We're definitely in a different time. However you want to describe it - this is 8 years after Zeke's situation and alot has happened since his suspension.

Roger Goodell wishes he had listened earlier to Colin Kaepernick

You’re not offering his spoken contrition as evidence of his actual contrition are you?
His contrition is based on the amount of friction and turbulence the actions of the league produce.

My guess is significant punitive action against a young black male where authorities not only couldn't corroborate charges, but even expressed doubt about the timeline of the injuries incurred...is this a 'let sleeping dogs lie' situation?
 
I think Judkins did it.

I don’t think there is enough evidence to prosecute.

I think the league definitely cares about PR to “justice” probably at a 50:1 ratio and I’m not exaggerating.

Judkins is going to be suspended.

Boom.
This is exactly where I am. If Zeke got suspended, so will Judkins. Plus he's a Brown and I assume everything they do turns into disaster.

people keeping pointing to the Zeke case so lets review

The Zeke allegations were so close to the Ray Rice incident that YES, I'm sure the NFL felt that no matter what they had to do something to Zeke and it would be up to Zeke to prove his innocence instead of the NFL proving his guilt. Even hiccups in her stories and text messages where she told her friends to collaborate with her; even hiring an agreed 3rd party person to review the information weren't enough for the NFL to let Zeke walk and they decided to swing their hammer and made an example here. Now we will never know what the NFL found with its independent investigation but they claim it was enough for them to ignore the 3rd party and went with the 6 games... IMO unless what they dug up was bad the NFLPA should of declared strike that day.

As for Judkins, its a different day and I doubt there is as much pressure to hang the player out to dry as fast. 1st and main hurdle is getting signed by the Browns who we are sure is trying to nickel and dime him even though the charges are dropped... I think we don't hear much about suspension until mid-season especially if Judkins chooses to fight it.
We're definitely in a different time. However you want to describe it - this is 8 years after Zeke's situation and alot has happened since his suspension.

Roger Goodell wishes he had listened earlier to Colin Kaepernick

You’re not offering his spoken contrition as evidence of his actual contrition are you?
His contrition is based on the amount of friction and turbulence the actions of the league produce.

My guess is significant punitive action against a young black male where authorities not only couldn't corroborate charges, but even expressed doubt about the timeline of the injuries incurred...is this a 'let sleeping dogs lie' situation?

I think we agree then. His contrition is utile and not moral—not a reckoning. He’s doing what is most beneficial to the league. Right now, I do not see it being 2020 and I don’t think this guy is skating on by untouched by the commissioner, who has to b be concerned with the female husbandry of family finances and PR. But you’re welcome to disagree about the weight given to the competing interests because we agree Goodell is no moral agent here.
 
What if Judkins' story is that she punched herself, or had someone other than him punch her, to make it look like he did?

...and what if that's exactly what happened? In many of these type of cases, unfortunately, truth is stranger than fiction...


Read the first and last paragraph of the second page of the ASA report. That’s clearly not what his statement/version of events says. According to the report he admits that he hit and pushed her back. Her version is that he initiated the contact. What will the NFL believe?

Unless this statement is fake. I didn’t research its authenticity.
My line of thought on media reports are possibly speculation. We dont know the whole story. The fact that the state prosecutors decided not to pursue charges against Judkins are the only real news and they had all the time in the world to do exhaustive investigation (despite Judkins' decision to waive a speedy trial).

Maybe it's only my opinion but perhaps Judkins decided to confront his alleged victim due to possibly being annoyed on her potentially escalating threats to exploit him. Maybe she kept threatening him with make-up lies on DV. We simply dont know. But what I do know that he seems to be fairly good kid who was raised well by his parents especially his mother such as importance of academics.
 
To be accurate this was not just released. It was released 2 days ago and I posted it here.

But the main thing is it does not say the bruises and marks were visible in the surveillance video. It says they were present on photo's, which would be the photo's she took on her phone.

I still expect a suspension though, but just wanted to clear that up.
It is a poorly written report and confusing as it lumps of the evidence together and also states the battery occurred on the ride from the airport on July 7 AND 8th to the hotel.
I got confused.
My issue is that surveillance NOT proffered by the 'alleged victim' didn't show bruises.
Only HER photos showed bruises.
She stated Quin punched her in the mouth with a closed fist causing a busted lip.
I don't have the evidence and most importantly the evidence that didn't come from the 'alleged' victim because THAT is crucial IMHO.
If the video clearly showed them then it would have picked up a busted lip.
I've seen tons of surveillance vids and some are high quality.
I've read the sworn testimony and quite frankly do not believe the allegations as she put forth.
The other thing that bothers me is she didn't want to pursue with a public prosecutor. She hired her own attorney which would indicate someone who is not seeking a criminal prosecution but is angling for a civil suit and compensation.
 
Just got him at 10.01 as my RB3 in 12T PPR Redraft. Figuring it as a dice roll who I am mentally prepared to cut bait with if things turn south.
 
He's sitting at 1.6 in my current draft. Would you trade a potential top 3 next year pick away for him? I don't even know who's out there next year.
 
He's sitting at 1.6 in my current draft. Would you trade a potential top 3 next year pick away for him? I don't even know who's out there next year.
I’m not sure I’m ready to fully think he is in the clear.

I mean, at this point even if they suspend him just to be on the safe side of PR, its only going to be 3 or 4 games and the kid is only 21 turning 22... your not losing much.

As for 1.06, not sure im that high on him as other rookies have shined. There's a chance he'll fall more.
 
He's sitting at 1.6 in my current draft. Would you trade a potential top 3 next year pick away for him? I don't even know who's out there next year.
I’m not sure I’m ready to fully think he is in the clear.

I mean, at this point even if they suspend him just to be on the safe side of PR, its only going to be 3 or 4 games and the kid is only 21 turning 22... your not losing much.

As for 1.06, not sure im that high on him as other rookies have shined. There's a chance he'll fall more.

Well he just fell to my pick at 1.07. I've had my heart set on Warren this whole time, so now I'm torn.
 
He's sitting at 1.6 in my current draft. Would you trade a potential top 3 next year pick away for him? I don't even know who's out there next year.
I’m not sure I’m ready to fully think he is in the clear.

I mean, at this point even if they suspend him just to be on the safe side of PR, its only going to be 3 or 4 games and the kid is only 21 turning 22... your not losing much.

As for 1.06, not sure im that high on him as other rookies have shined. There's a chance he'll fall more.

Well he just fell to my pick at 1.07. I've had my heart set on Warren this whole time, so now I'm torn.
SF, Full IDP draft on Saturday. Judkins also went at 1.07 (Jeanty, Hunter, Hampton, Tet, Abdul Carter, Hendo went prior).
 
It's because he can still be suspended by the NFL.
Additionally it's difficult to wage how much they are willing to utilize the cap without knowing his rookie year outcome.
 
If there is one thing I am surprised at, it's that in 4 days...we've heard absolutely nothing regarding his contract status.
Same. Thought it would be relatively quickly, like both sides hashed out parameters of agreement if/once he got cleared.

Not even throwing him any kind of bouquet to boot. No comments when asked about him like "we are glad he's handled his legal issues and we look forward to him joining the team". Just terse "no updates" whenever asked.

I hope they are haggling over guarantees and not waiting on slow moving NFL to issue any discipline but they just signed Bond and guaranteed his whole contract, which is probably going to be about 1/4th of Judkins, but still fair to note Bond's possible suspension did not scare them off from guaranteeing him his deal.
 
You have to also consider that Cle is still paying DeShaun Watson, who ultimately was suspended due to his own off field issues-who derailed the Browns organization.
Although Watson's contract was restructured into a signing bonus and not counting toward the cap, the owner is still the one losing money.
To me it make sense for them to be extremely cautious on handing out contracts to another player who has off field issues.

Bottom line-if Judkins is to ever play a game for the Browns, he has a long way to go to earn trust. You just cannot be that stupid. A rookie with a solid draft profile. He had a 4 year multi million dollar contract coming his way as a 2nd round pick.
 

That could be a very long time. We might be back to where we were before the announcement that he wouldn’t face charges.

I suspect that if Cleveland is waiting for the NFL investigation they’ve already been told he would hit the CE list. I can’t think of another reason why they would wait.
 

That could be a very long time. We might be back to where we were before the announcement that he wouldn’t face charges.

I suspect that if Cleveland is waiting for the NFL investigation they’ve already been told he would hit the CE list. I can’t think of another reason why they would wait.

I don't think so, there's no video evidence or pictures leaking so I wouldn't worry about CE. This is now PURELY financial, the team is using this to their advantage and want to sign him for less than his draft capital is worth. Not a good start to their relationship.
 
so the Browns sign Bond who was accused of sexual misconduct but want to take the moral high ground the with Judkins... yeah; OKAY!
Bond's contract deets:
Isaiah Bond signed a 3 year, $3,018,000 contract
Average Salary:
$1,006,000
Jud's running mate also selected in the 2nd round a few spots later and would get LESS and who hasn't been arrested and who has no issues hanging over his head signed his contract.
TreVeyon Henderson signed a 4 year, $11,143,234 contract
One is NOT like the other.
 
so the Browns sign Bond who was accused of sexual misconduct but want to take the moral high ground the with Judkins... yeah; OKAY!
It is bizarre. As Bracie pointed out it's much less money than Judkins but Bond still got more money than any 3rd round pick got so it's not nothing. Couldn't Bond still get suspended by the NFL just like Judkins could?
 
Last edited:
Bond still got more money than any 3rd round pick
I'm not sure where you're getting numbers on that one.
Round by round results of the 2025 NFL Draft, including rookie contract details.
Details of the last player drafted in the 7th round.
Pick number 257 seventh round last player drafted.
Kobee Minor S
4 years, $4,301,672 for an average of $1,076,418
Isaiah Bond signed a 3 year, $3,018,000 contract
Average Salary:
$1,006,000

Last player selected in the 3rd round got:
Pick number 102
Tai Felton WR
4 years, $6,161,184
Average salary: $1,540,296
 
Bond still got more money than any 3rd round pick
I'm not sure where you're getting numbers on that one.
Round by round results of the 2025 NFL Draft, including rookie contract details.
Details of the last player drafted in the 7th round.
Pick number 257 seventh round last player drafted.
Kobee Minor S
4 years, $4,301,672 for an average of $1,076,418
Isaiah Bond signed a 3 year, $3,018,000 contract
Average Salary:
$1,006,000

Last player selected in the 3rd round got:
Pick number 102
Tai Felton WR
4 years, $6,161,184
Average salary: $1,540,296
Because Bond's deal is fully guaranteed. The larget guarantee ever given to an UDFA was $350,000. Bond is getting $3 million fully guaranteed. Darius Alexander was the first pick of round 3 and he only got $1.56 guaranteed. This is historic commitment that the Browns have made.

 
Projected as a Day-2 pick as stated in the article.
"... wide receiver was actually projected to be a Day 2 pick, which means that most experts thought he would be taken in the second or third round. "
Browns did NOT use a 2nd or 3rd round pick.
Browns need WRs.
The guarantee for an UDFA is typically NOT a Day-2 talent by a team in need of talent at the position of the player.
Do you know who he's directly competing against?
Diontae Johnson's Browns' roster spot is far from secure following Isaiah Bond signing
... Johnson signed a one-year deal worth just $1.17 million - the veteran minimum. Even more jarring was that not a single cent of that contract was guaranteed.
... So far in the preseason, Johnson has been targeted five times but has just one reception for seven yards."
---------
Between the two the entire guaranteed money is on Bond's contract so... Not back breaking without a single draft pick spent.
 
Projected as a Day-2 pick as stated in the article.
"... wide receiver was actually projected to be a Day 2 pick, which means that most experts thought he would be taken in the second or third round. "
Browns did NOT use a 2nd or 3rd round pick.
Browns need WRs.
The guarantee for an UDFA is typically NOT a Day-2 talent by a team in need of talent at the position of the player.
Do you know who he's directly competing against?
Diontae Johnson's Browns' roster spot is far from secure following Isaiah Bond signing
... Johnson signed a one-year deal worth just $1.17 million - the veteran minimum. Even more jarring was that not a single cent of that contract was guaranteed.
... So far in the preseason, Johnson has been targeted five times but has just one reception for seven yards."
---------
Between the two the entire guaranteed money is on Bond's contract so... Not back breaking without a single draft pick spent.
This is the Judkins thread so I will try to steer it back after I derailed it a bit but this at least shows Cleveland is willing offer good money with guarantees for a player in a similar circumstance.
 
Cleveland is willing offer good money with guarantees for a player in a similar circumstance.
I write this from the perspective of someone that's not really paid attention, but my rudimentary understanding is A) there is a difference between the Bond and Judkins cases and B) there is a potential commish exempt list issue that may be why they're waiting to move on Judkins.

If either / both of those are wrong, feel free to share. Again, I'm not locked in on the details of either.
 
Cleveland is willing offer good money with guarantees for a player in a similar circumstance.
I write this from the perspective of someone that's not really paid attention, but my rudimentary understanding is A) there is a difference between the Bond and Judkins cases and B) there is a potential commish exempt list issue that may be why they're waiting to move on Judkins.

If either / both of those are wrong, feel free to share. Again, I'm not locked in on the details of either.
No doubt there are differences. I did a little research and with the Bond case, the biggest thing seems to be there was no evidence of injury. So she didn't have pictures of bruises, cuts, etc. As for the NFL suspending Bond or putting him on the exempt list, unless Cleveland got some kind of secret wink wink message from the league, I would assume he is still likely to be suspended at some point. We probably won't know for awhile. It sounds like the NFL uses some kind of legal counsel person to do these investigations for them. They have already started they are so busy that they won't be able to begin work on the Rashee Rice case until the end of September. So I assume that means Judkins and Bond aren't going to get resolved by the league any time soon.
 
Cleveland is willing offer good money with guarantees for a player in a similar circumstance.
I write this from the perspective of someone that's not really paid attention, but my rudimentary understanding is A) there is a difference between the Bond and Judkins cases and B) there is a potential commish exempt list issue that may be why they're waiting to move on Judkins.

If either / both of those are wrong, feel free to share. Again, I'm not locked in on the details of either.
No doubt there are differences. I did a little research and with the Bond case, the biggest thing seems to be there was no evidence of injury. So she didn't have pictures of bruises, cuts, etc. As for the NFL suspending Bond or putting him on the exempt list, unless Cleveland got some kind of secret wink wink message from the league, I would assume he is still likely to be suspended at some point. We probably won't know for awhile. It sounds like the NFL uses some kind of legal counsel person to do these investigations for them. They have already started they are so busy that they won't be able to begin work on the Rashee Rice case until the end of September. So I assume that means Judkins and Bond aren't going to get resolved by the league any time soon.

I think its more of Cleveland has control over Judkins due to his draft status while Bond was a FA and had competition for signing him. But being the Browns they're deciding to hold up his development to squeeze him out of a few 100ks
 
Cleveland is willing offer good money with guarantees for a player in a similar circumstance.
I write this from the perspective of someone that's not really paid attention, but my rudimentary understanding is A) there is a difference between the Bond and Judkins cases and B) there is a potential commish exempt list issue that may be why they're waiting to move on Judkins.

If either / both of those are wrong, feel free to share. Again, I'm not locked in on the details of either.
No doubt there are differences. I did a little research and with the Bond case, the biggest thing seems to be there was no evidence of injury. So she didn't have pictures of bruises, cuts, etc. As for the NFL suspending Bond or putting him on the exempt list, unless Cleveland got some kind of secret wink wink message from the league, I would assume he is still likely to be suspended at some point. We probably won't know for awhile. It sounds like the NFL uses some kind of legal counsel person to do these investigations for them. They have already started they are so busy that they won't be able to begin work on the Rashee Rice case until the end of September. So I assume that means Judkins and Bond aren't going to get resolved by the league any time soon.

I think its more of Cleveland has control over Judkins due to his draft status while Bond was a FA and had competition for signing him. But being the Browns they're deciding to hold up his development to squeeze him out of a few 100ks
Yes that is a very good point. Bond could have signed anywhere.
 
At this point it is tough to see Judkins being much of a factor this season as this drags on. Learning the playbook and getting into football shape will take some time no matter when this resolves.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top