jdoggydogg
Footballguy
I know, right??? Those lips are nasty.The most disturbing element of We Were Soldiers was Madeleine Stowe's collagen injection mangled lips.
She used to be pretty but in that show she looks like a carp.
I know, right??? Those lips are nasty.The most disturbing element of We Were Soldiers was Madeleine Stowe's collagen injection mangled lips.
She used to be pretty but in that show she looks like a carp.
This I agree with. There is one cut, where it goes from a firefight to a shot of a vacuum cleaner that's so abrupt I physically flinch every time I see it.Let's just set aside my other beefs and look at the editing. The editing of this movie is terrible. Some scenes end abruptly at times, while others go on and on. I'm surprised this movie was directed by the same man that made Braveheart. Because that is a far superior film.
She was fantastic opposite Albert Brooks in a very underrated and great film:The MuseAnd I love Casino. it is a classic.Watched The Wolfman last night (Benito Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins) It was a good monster flick. Very well made.I think Sharon Stone is, in many ways, a bad actor. But I think she nailed this role.agree completely.i think the sharon stone stuff kind of took me out of the movie. it could have been another "goodfellas", i think, but for that subplot.Personally, I didn't think it was that great of a film either. I enjoyed the first half of the film, but the 2nd half wasn't very good; mostly because the 2nd half of the film was mostly just Sharon Stone screaming for 45 minutes which made me want to kill her due to how annoying it was. I also find the film to be too long, it was just dragging on for the last 45min or so.
Ohhh... The Muse. Completely forgot about that one... fun movie, but like most Brooks movies, I'd call it more flawed than "great". Still enjoyable, especially as a rental. And you're right- Stone is particularly good in it.She was fantastic opposite Albert Brooks in a very underrated and great film:The MuseAnd I love Casino. it is a classic.Watched The Wolfman last night (Benito Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins) It was a good monster flick. Very well made.I think Sharon Stone is, in many ways, a bad actor. But I think she nailed this role.agree completely.i think the sharon stone stuff kind of took me out of the movie. it could have been another "goodfellas", i think, but for that subplot.Personally, I didn't think it was that great of a film either. I enjoyed the first half of the film, but the 2nd half wasn't very good; mostly because the 2nd half of the film was mostly just Sharon Stone screaming for 45 minutes which made me want to kill her due to how annoying it was. I also find the film to be too long, it was just dragging on for the last 45min or so.
Very underrated.Tonight I'll watch Network or the Last King of Scotland for the first time.
Very underrated.Tonight I'll watch Network or the Last King of Scotland for the first time.
Robert AltmanDid I miss it or did no one mention his best, Short Cuts? The Player and Gosford Park are my other favorites.
Short Cuts never gets enough attention.Alas, manipulative or not, I still dig Spielberg. Haven't rewatched most of the older stuff in ages, but I doubt my opinion would change much.It was quite good, but the gross-out scenes at the end of the movie are pretty disturbing. Forest Whitaker's crazy eyes were an asset for this role, he was phenomenally crazy in that film.Very underrated.Tonight I'll watch Network or the Last King of Scotland for the first time.Rewatched it a couple days ago when it was on. Really damn good.Also, King of Comedy rules.
This movie might very well suck, I haven't seen it. But that scene where Ferrell screams while attacking the suspect cracks me up.The Other Guys
Ferrell plays a nerd instead of a buffoon. Couple bits had me rolling. Good blend of serious action and comedy. Mark Wahlberg looked ridiculously tiny standing next to Ferrell and playing the tough guy. Decent but I thought Cop Out was the same movie with more laughs.
3/5
Definitely. Plus...you know...there's that one scene with Juilanne MooreShort Cuts never gets enough attention.

This movie is really fun. Nothing really unique about it - and the one-dimensional British fascist government was over the top. But I sure liked it a lot.Pirate Radio Mrs. TRF and I caught the last 30 minutes of it the other night. It was awesome. So we DVR'd it and will watch it this weekend. Can't wait!!!!!!!!!
There is a bit at the beginning with Ferrell and Wahlberg jawing at each other that may be the funniest thing I've ever seen from Ferrell.This movie might very well suck, I haven't seen it. But that scene where Ferrell screams while attacking the suspect cracks me up.The Other Guys
Ferrell plays a nerd instead of a buffoon. Couple bits had me rolling. Good blend of serious action and comedy. Mark Wahlberg looked ridiculously tiny standing next to Ferrell and playing the tough guy. Decent but I thought Cop Out was the same movie with more laughs.
3/5
Saw a preview for this on a disc the other night. Looked pretty cool. Recognized Dominick West.TexanFan02 said:Saw a movie I had never even heard of before the other night. Centurion.
Kind of speculative history turned into an action movie. Deals with the 9th Legion of Rome, which may have disappeared under strange circumstances.
If you liked Gladiator, you'll like this. I liked Gladiator but thought it was overrated. I still enjoyed this.
Full Metal Jacket >>>> We Were SoldiersFMJ is a full blown masterpiece, I wasn't putting WWS anywhere near that category.I did enjoy seeing the planning and execution of the battles from both sides. But without having read the book, I will assume that was more about the source material. Including the female characters was a good idea. But how about that scene where the one white wife is just horrified that a black soldier can't have his laundry washed at an all-white laundromat? That was some of the most painful writing and acting I've ever seen in a major film.Let's just set aside my other beefs and look at the editing. The editing of this movie is terrible. Some scenes end abruptly at times, while others go on and on. I'm surprised this movie was directed by the same man that made Braveheart. Because that is a far superior film.While I don't think it was Royal Shakespeare Theater quality I think WWS was better than all that. Some of the cliches were a little painful to watch and all that but I thought that from a strictly military aspect it presented some unique perspectives and is one of the few battle films that bothered to really lay out and map the events to give the audience a more realistic glimpse of how battles develop. In other words I think they did a very good job lifting the Fog of War for the audience.I also liked the way they included the female characters in the overall story. I thought they had a powerful impact.I was expecting a better script and something other than a bunch of rehashed war movie cliches. If John Wayne had made this movie fifty years ago, it would have been excellent. But in the modern era, we've seen too many excellent war films to let an inferior movie like this slide.Just curious but what were you expecting? It's based, pretty closely, on the book.Agree with Sam Elliot, I've never seen him in a bad role and that includes Ghostrider.We Were Soldiers
Meh. That said, is there a more enjoyable actor to watch than Sam Elliott? This guy should be in every movie. All of them. Mel Gibson was solid. But this is a pretty lame effort overall. This movie might have been decent pre-Flags of Our Fathers or pre-Apocalypse Now. But as it stands, it's more like a Michael Bay movie than anything else. Painfully obvious and cliche.
So while I agree that there were many cliches that were at times tough to bear (and the ending battle was a little oddly executed) I thought it also had many redeeming elements that make it a worthwhile film to view.
The movie has some redeeming qualities. I think it was very earnest in showing the fear and anxiety of being a soldier. But Full Metal Jacket showed all that and was 100 times better.
i think back to all those movies in the 80's that were built on the premise of "one wild crazy night" and how "after hours" just teases that out to great effect. it is dark and funny but also a pretty keen character analysis of a type played by dunne.Just got done with After Hours
Not sure what I expected, but I wasn't expecting it to be that dark of a comedy. Great movie experience. Love the claustrophobic feeling you get watching the movie - as if you were trapped with this poor sap in hell for the night too. Maybe got a tad too much at the end, but it's a minor beef. 8/10
OH GOD YES
Definitely. He's fantastic.Maik Jeaunz said:Ray Winstone is one of my favorite underrated actors.
Mean Streets, King of Comedy, and especially Casino are all must watches IMO. Bringing Out The Dead I dont think is must watch, but worth watching. Id watch any of those 4 before re-watching Raging Bull (which I personally didnt like much at all).Next up I'll catch up on some Scorsese films here's the list:
Haven't seen:
Mean Streets
King of Comedy
After Hours
Casino
Last Temptation of Christ
Bringing out the Dead
Seen Once/long ago:
Raging Bull
Gangs of New York
I bolded the 3 I had down to watch. Is there another on the 'haven't seen' list that is a must watch?
Cant wait to see this, I think Im definitely going to check it out sometime this weekend. Bale looks like he put in his best performance since American Psycho and already got nominated for the Golden Globe BSA. Surprisingly, Wahlberg also got nominated so maybe all you Wahlberg haters here will realize he's got some talent....Also, as far as the previews before the movie go, The Fighter looks like its going to be great and Christian Bale looks poised for an almost surefire Oscar nom and possible win.
Not concerned in the least about the rating, the original was G, so they probably just didn't add the abundance of cursing we are used to. The violence they can get away with in PG-13 movies is really surprising sometimes, (Think Bourne movies) and there are only a couple short gunfights in the story, all with dudes wearing heavy western clothing so its not like there is much opportunity for blood baths anyways.I think the only difference between this and a R rated version would be a couple F bombs and a gruesome head shot or two. I doubt most people will notice......I also want to see True Grit, but Im a little concerned the Coen's made it PG13 instead of R. Yeah, theyve succeeded at PG13 before with Raising Arizona and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, but True Grit + Coens feels like it should be an R-rated movie and I hope the violence isnt dulled down so they could make it PG13 and maybe hit the box office bigger. Surprised this didnt get any GG nominations, so that might be telling.
Yeah, youre probably right. I still think it looks good, surprised it didnt get any sort of nomination, actors or otherwise.Not concerned in the least about the rating, the original was G, so they probably just didn't add the abundance of cursing we are used to. The violence they can get away with in PG-13 movies is really surprising sometimes, (Think Bourne movies) and there are only a couple short gunfights in the story, all with dudes wearing heavy western clothing so its not like there is much opportunity for blood baths anyways.I think the only difference between this and a R rated version would be a couple F bombs and a gruesome head shot or two. I doubt most people will notice......I also want to see True Grit, but Im a little concerned the Coen's made it PG13 instead of R. Yeah, theyve succeeded at PG13 before with Raising Arizona and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, but True Grit + Coens feels like it should be an R-rated movie and I hope the violence isnt dulled down so they could make it PG13 and maybe hit the box office bigger. Surprised this didnt get any GG nominations, so that might be telling.
Oh, it will, when the awards that matter come around.Yeah, youre probably right. I still think it looks good, surprised it didnt get any sort of nomination, actors or otherwise.Not concerned in the least about the rating, the original was G, so they probably just didn't add the abundance of cursing we are used to. The violence they can get away with in PG-13 movies is really surprising sometimes, (Think Bourne movies) and there are only a couple short gunfights in the story, all with dudes wearing heavy western clothing so its not like there is much opportunity for blood baths anyways.I think the only difference between this and a R rated version would be a couple F bombs and a gruesome head shot or two. I doubt most people will notice......I also want to see True Grit, but Im a little concerned the Coen's made it PG13 instead of R. Yeah, theyve succeeded at PG13 before with Raising Arizona and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, but True Grit + Coens feels like it should be an R-rated movie and I hope the violence isnt dulled down so they could make it PG13 and maybe hit the box office bigger. Surprised this didnt get any GG nominations, so that might be telling.
El Floppo said:OH GOD YES
Announced the other dayDid the Golden Globe nominees come out, or is that still coming up?
BEST MOTION PICTURE, DRAMA Black Swan The Fighter Inception The King’s Speech The Social Network BEST MOTION PICTURE, MUSICAL OR COMEDY Alice in Wonderland Burlesque The Kids Are All Right Red The Tourist BEST DIRECTOR Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan David Fincher, The Social Network Tom Hooper, The King’s Speech Christopher Nolan, Inception David O. Russell, The Fighter BEST DRAMATIC ACTOR Jesse Eisenberg, The Social Network Colin Firth, The King’s Speech James Franco, 127 Hours Ryan Gosling, Blue Valentine Mark Wahlberg, The Fighter BEST DRAMATIC ACTRESS Halle Berry, Frankie & Alice ["A drama centered on a young woman with multiple personality disorder who struggles to remain her true self and not give in to her racist alter-personality." -Ed, via IMDB ] Nicole Kidman, Rabbit Hole Jennifer Lawrence, Winter’s Bone Natalie Portman, Black Swan Michelle Williams, Blue Valentine BEST ACTOR, COMEDY OR MUSICAL Johnny Depp, Alice in Wonderland Johnny Depp, The Tourist [You like Johnny Depp, Jesus, we get it already.] Paul Giamatti, Barney’s Version Jake Gyllenhaal, Love & Other Drugs Kevin Spacey, Casino Jack BEST ACTRESS, COMEDY OR MUSICAL Annette Bening, The Kids Are All Right Anne Hathaway, Love & Other Drugs Angelina Jolie, The Tourist Julianne Moore, The Kids Are All Right Emma Stone, Easy A BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR Christian Bale, The Fighter Michael Douglas, Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps Andrew Garfield, The Social Network Jeremy Renner, The Town Geoffrey Rush, The King’s Speech BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS Amy Adams, The Fighter Helena Bonham Carter, The King’s Speech Mila Kunis, Black Swan Melissa Weaver, The Fighter Jacki Weaver, Animal Kingdom BEST ANIMATED FILM Despicable Me How to Train Your Dragon The Illusionist Tangled Toy Story 3 BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE PICTURE Biutiful The Concert The Edge I Am Love In a Better World BEST SCREENPLAY 127 Hours [Really? Screenplay but not direction? -Ed] The Kids Are All Right Inception The King’s Speech The Social Network BEST ORIGINAL SCORE Alexander Desplot, The King’s Speech Danny Elfman, Alice in Wonderland A.R. Robin, 127 Hours Trent Reznor, The Social Network Hans Zimmer, Inception BEST SONG “Bound to You,” Burlesque “Coming Home,” Country Strong “I See the Light,” Tangled “There’s a Place For Us,” The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader “You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me,” Burlesque
Some of my favorite western films are pretty tame. Love all the Clint Eastwood westerns. So the PG-13 isn't worrisome to me. For some reason, I really don't like a bunch of violence in my westerns......I also want to see True Grit, but Im a little concerned the Coen's made it PG13 instead of R. Yeah, theyve succeeded at PG13 before with Raising Arizona and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, but True Grit + Coens feels like it should be an R-rated movie and I hope the violence isnt dulled down so they could make it PG13 and maybe hit the box office bigger. Surprised this didnt get any GG nominations, so that might be telling.
Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5
By the way, how did the movie get one star? Was there a really cool special effect that refunds your money at the end?Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5
Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5
Thank you very much Jim Lahey.Yeah, the more Ive thought about this the last few hours Im hoping the dialogue isnt toned down and thats why its PG13 as opposed to the violence.Some of my favorite western films are pretty tame. Love all the Clint Eastwood westerns. So the PG-13 isn't worrisome to me. For some reason, I really don't like a bunch of violence in my westerns......I also want to see True Grit, but Im a little concerned the Coen's made it PG13 instead of R. Yeah, theyve succeeded at PG13 before with Raising Arizona and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, but True Grit + Coens feels like it should be an R-rated movie and I hope the violence isnt dulled down so they could make it PG13 and maybe hit the box office bigger. Surprised this didnt get any GG nominations, so that might be telling.
<_<Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5Thank you very much Jim Lahey.

Who's Jim Lahey?Chaka said:jdoggydogg said:Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.TylerRoseFan said:Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5![]()
Thank you very much Jim Lahey.
Trailer Park Boys reference.Who's Jim Lahey?Chaka said:jdoggydogg said:Not sure how many signs a trailer can reveal that a movie is ####, but this one screams "####!" with every frame.They might as well have called this "TOTAL #### MOVIE #4,892." They could have showed people protesting outside the production with signs that read, "WARNING!!! THIS MOVIE SUCKS," and it wouldn't have mattered, because it's obvious ####tiness would have glowed like a #### candle on National #### Day.TylerRoseFan said:Prince of Persia WTF? Tuurble. Just Turrble. Please don't watch it. 1/5![]()
Thank you very much Jim Lahey.
I'm always surprised to hear this - despite the fact that a lot of people agree with you. I thought the sequel was exactly as good as the first movie - which I thoroughly enjoyed.Saw Iron man 2.
One of the worst sequels in a while. Too bad as I really liked the original.
I had low expectations and it was still worse than I thought.
I did like Mickey Rourke as the villian.
I pretty much agree.I'm always surprised to hear this - despite the fact that a lot of people agree with you. I thought the sequel was exactly as good as the first movie - which I thoroughly enjoyed.Saw Iron man 2.
One of the worst sequels in a while. Too bad as I really liked the original.
I had low expectations and it was still worse than I thought.
I did like Mickey Rourke as the villian.
Dude, I totally love dumb flicks. I have no shameTexanFan02 said:It's a good popcorn flick. Not up to the standards of the film snobs in this thread, but I'm a contrarion, I watch the dumb flicks and enjoy themSaw a preview for this on a disc the other night. Looked pretty cool. Recognized Dominick West.TexanFan02 said:Saw a movie I had never even heard of before the other night. Centurion.
Kind of speculative history turned into an action movie. Deals with the 9th Legion of Rome, which may have disappeared under strange circumstances.
If you liked Gladiator, you'll like this. I liked Gladiator but thought it was overrated. I still enjoyed this.![]()

Yeah, me too. Problem is, I didn't like the first one either.I'm always surprised to hear this - despite the fact that a lot of people agree with you. I thought the sequel was exactly as good as the first movie - which I thoroughly enjoyed.Saw Iron man 2.
One of the worst sequels in a while. Too bad as I really liked the original.
I had low expectations and it was still worse than I thought.
I did like Mickey Rourke as the villian.
Me too. I felt the same way when people derided Spiderman 3.I'm always surprised to hear this - despite the fact that a lot of people agree with you. I thought the sequel was exactly as good as the first movie - which I thoroughly enjoyed.Saw Iron man 2.
One of the worst sequels in a while. Too bad as I really liked the original.
I had low expectations and it was still worse than I thought.
I did like Mickey Rourke as the villian.
