Just finshed up "88 Minutes" with Al Pacino. T'was pretty damn terrible.![]()
Save your time. Seriously, it was garbage. Predictable, shallow, and some pretty terrible acting all around.Just finshed up "88 Minutes" with Al Pacino. T'was pretty damn terrible.![]()
I read that elsewhere, too. I was looking forward to it.
Lemme guess the twist (if there is one): it's just his mind playing tricks on him.Just finshed up "88 Minutes" with Al Pacino. T'was pretty damn terrible.![]()
I won't give away the ending... but the answer to your question is below if you want to know.Lemme guess the twist (if there is one): it's just his mind playing tricks on him.Just finshed up "88 Minutes" with Al Pacino. T'was pretty damn terrible.![]()
No, I read that comment. He said you look hot in your jorts.x
Nigel's tells me I look fat in my Jorts.
eta:![]()
I thought the trailer looked weak. If a trailer can't put together two exciting minutes, I figure a thriller is doomed.Just finshed up "88 Minutes" with Al Pacino. T'was pretty damn terrible.![]()
I read that elsewhere, too. I was looking forward to it.
I liked this movie -- and thought Tommy Lee was great -- right up until the very end. That was really dumb and unrealistic. It actually took away from the rest of the movie, in my opinion.In the Valley of Elah
Liked this movie quite a bit. Some people might be annoyed with the director's "message" not being very subtle, but still worth a watch. I did feel that the ending lacked the punch that the rest of the movie was building up to - seemed to fizzle a little bit at the end.
On kind of a tangent here, but this is another example for me ofwhen I look at acting nominations for the AWs. I am pretty sure that Tommy Lee Jones is up for best actor, but he was exactly the same throughout the whole movie. Sure his character had a presence and you did feel for him, but there really wasn't much to him, IMO. Don't know why acting exactly the same throughout all the scenes warrants a best actor nod.
I think Jones is a fantastic actor, but certainly that's an understated role for him. If you put a mediocre actor in that spot, Jones' gifts do seem obvious. He seems to have a lot of subtext in his acting.In the Valley of Elah
Liked this movie quite a bit. Some people might be annoyed with the director's "message" not being very subtle, but still worth a watch. I did feel that the ending lacked the punch that the rest of the movie was building up to - seemed to fizzle a little bit at the end.
On kind of a tangent here, but this is another example for me ofwhen I look at acting nominations for the AWs. I am pretty sure that Tommy Lee Jones is up for best actor, but he was exactly the same throughout the whole movie. Sure his character had a presence and you did feel for him, but there really wasn't much to him, IMO. Don't know why acting exactly the same throughout all the scenes warrants a best actor nod.
I thought he was terrific in the movie. He didn't even need to speak.I think Jones is a fantastic actor, but certainly that's an understated role for him. If you put a mediocre actor in that spot, Jones' gifts do seem obvious. He seems to have a lot of subtext in his acting.In the Valley of Elah
Liked this movie quite a bit. Some people might be annoyed with the director's "message" not being very subtle, but still worth a watch. I did feel that the ending lacked the punch that the rest of the movie was building up to - seemed to fizzle a little bit at the end.
On kind of a tangent here, but this is another example for me ofwhen I look at acting nominations for the AWs. I am pretty sure that Tommy Lee Jones is up for best actor, but he was exactly the same throughout the whole movie. Sure his character had a presence and you did feel for him, but there really wasn't much to him, IMO. Don't know why acting exactly the same throughout all the scenes warrants a best actor nod.
The scene with the milk and the dripping blood was straight Coen Bros and brilliant. The rest, I don't remember so much... boobies, right?Saw "Bound" for the 1st time tonight. I've always had a thing for Jennifer Tilly and she looked good. The dialogue was pretty stilted, but the story kept my interest. Definitely worth a rental.
Idiocracy really, really disappointed me. Found it funnier glancing at it the second time while it played in the background (the car with the dildo, etc).Idiocracy - Really interesting premise I thought, it had a few funny moments, but overall it fell flat. They could have done a lot more with it. But was worth 80 minutes I thought.
As long as a kids movie is relatively entertaining and not intellectually insulting, it's not a bad movie.
I kept expecting more. I thought there would be more humor. Sarandon was the wrong choice for the witch.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
I agree with all of this. I loved the ending's confounding wackiness, too.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
DDL is a tremendous actor. He was great in My Left Foot.But in TWBB, all he did was talk interestingly. And that was simply based on other people:DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
Daniel Day-Lewis based his voice for and characterization of Daniel Plainview in part on old recordings of the director, writer, and actor John Huston. An article by Christopher Goodwin in the Sunday Times (of London) revealed Paul Thomas Anderson sent Day-Lewis documentaries about Huston while Day-Lewis was preparing to play the role.
I'm just not impressed. I know I'm in the minority.That's an accurate summary, I believe. I guess I just didn't find it all that compelling. Just my opinion, though.Andy - as for your spoilers, I'll take a stab at what all that meant
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("
I don't think HW's adoption or Eli and Paul being twins is meant to be any kind of surprise. Both are presented pretty obviously early on.
The title "There Will Be Blood" is a play on both the ending of the movie (you know violence was coming - the movie's soundtrack, the title, everything was letting you know that at the end of the movie there would be blood), as well as Plainview's obsession with finding family. He adopts HW when HW's father is killed as an effort to assauge that lonliness in him but when HW becomes damaged goods he's quick to abandon him in favor of the man who he thinks is his brother.
This obsession with family is why Plainview freaks out when he thinks the man from the big oil company is telling him how to run his family
When the brother turns out to be false, Plainview kills him despite the man's insistence that he didn't intend to do any harm, because to Plainview there could have been no deeper harm done.
The significance of Eli and Paul being brothers is that even amongst blood, there is still competition and betrayal. Also, I'm not sure if I am remembering correctly but when Plainview is chasing Eli around the bowling alley doesn't Eli try and insist that they are brothers? (Figuratively, of course)
Essentially the movie is a study of a man who is both obsessed with winning and taking out the competition as well as an obsession with the family that he does not have. He needs to be on top so he is desperate to have family because he thinks those are the only ones he's able to stomach having close to him at the top.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
Andy - as for your spoilers, I'll take a stab at what all that meant
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("
I don't think HW's adoption or Eli and Paul being twins is meant to be any kind of surprise. Both are presented pretty obviously early on.
The title "There Will Be Blood" is a play on both the ending of the movie (you know violence was coming - the movie's soundtrack, the title, everything was letting you know that at the end of the movie there would be blood), as well as Plainview's obsession with finding family. He adopts HW when HW's father is killed as an effort to assauge that lonliness in him but when HW becomes damaged goods he's quick to abandon him in favor of the man who he thinks is his brother.
This obsession with family is why Plainview freaks out when he thinks the man from the big oil company is telling him how to run his family
When the brother turns out to be false, Plainview kills him despite the man's insistence that he didn't intend to do any harm, because to Plainview there could have been no deeper harm done.
The significance of Eli and Paul being brothers is that even amongst blood, there is still competition and betrayal. Also, I'm not sure if I am remembering correctly but when Plainview is chasing Eli around the bowling alley doesn't Eli try and insist that they are brothers? (Figuratively, of course)
Essentially the movie is a study of a man who is both obsessed with winning and taking out the competition as well as an obsession with the family that he does not have. He needs to be on top so he is desperate to have family because he thinks those are the only ones he's able to stomach having close to him at the top.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

Agree, again. I just bought NCFOM yesterday.One more thing. I doubt I'll ever watch that movie again whereas, I am quite positive No Country for Old Men will be one I'll watch many times in future years.
That older blonde buxom stripper was on an episode of Seinfeld. Guess which one.Fallerjw said:Put Carnivale in my netflix que based on recommendations here. So far my only regret is that I only had the first 2 discs. I finished them and am looking forward to the rest of them showing up.I'm definitely waiting to find out how it all unravels, plus it's nice that they throw in a little toplessness from time to time.
For that concept, I think there are twice as many good jokes in any random episode of Futurama.El Floppo said:Idiocracy really, really disappointed me. Found it funnier glancing at it the second time while it played in the background (the car with the dildo, etc).John Stamos said:Idiocracy - Really interesting premise I thought, it had a few funny moments, but overall it fell flat. They could have done a lot more with it. But was worth 80 minutes I thought.
older blonde buxom stripper - anything interesting coming up involving her?Seinfeld - Parking Garage?That older blonde buxom stripper was on an episode of Seinfeld. Guess which one.Fallerjw said:Put Carnivale in my netflix que based on recommendations here. So far my only regret is that I only had the first 2 discs. I finished them and am looking forward to the rest of them showing up.I'm definitely waiting to find out how it all unravels, plus it's nice that they throw in a little toplessness from time to time.
I don't want to give anything away, but it seems like every character is pretty important in Carnivale.Yep, parking garage.older blonde buxom stripper - anything interesting coming up involving her?Seinfeld - Parking Garage?That older blonde buxom stripper was on an episode of Seinfeld. Guess which one.Fallerjw said:Put Carnivale in my netflix que based on recommendations here. So far my only regret is that I only had the first 2 discs. I finished them and am looking forward to the rest of them showing up.I'm definitely waiting to find out how it all unravels, plus it's nice that they throw in a little toplessness from time to time.
Yep. That's one of the reasons that I thought OCfOM was >>>> TWWB. Right after the movie ended I had the desire to watch it again. After TWWB ended it was more of glad I watched it, but probably won't ever watch it again.Nigel Tufnel said:Agree, again. I just bought NCFOM yesterday.Drifter said:One more thing. I doubt I'll ever watch that movie again whereas, I am quite positive No Country for Old Men will be one I'll watch many times in future years.
Bah. I put new movie reviews in here, as well. Too lazy to look for another thread.I deleted my post because I realized this one is "the rental edition".. can someone point me to the "other" edition?? TIA.
Works for me for now:Viewed Street Kings on Saturday.Bah. I put new movie reviews in here, as well. Too lazy to look for another thread.I deleted my post because I realized this one is "the rental edition".. can someone point me to the "other" edition?? TIA.
moment when he looks like he is playing his doctor role) & Sucre from Prison Break.I've been reading this thread forever and finally decided to chime in...This was a very well made movie. The scenery was great, the story was great, the acting was good for the most part (especially the supporting cast - the lead actor was just OK) - but what really made the movie for me was the music. Probably Eddie Vedder's best work since the second PJ CD. I didn't have many expectations going in, and ordinarily I am not a fan of Penn at all, but maybe he's better behind the camera than in front of it.Just got done watching Into the Wild.
Absolutely loved the movie. Couple cheesy moments (ala Castaway) when he is interacting with himself, but other than that it was great. Beautiful scenery, great story, etc... Highly recommended.![]()
Veder does great work on the Dead Man Walking soundtrack.I've been reading this thread forever and finally decided to chime in...This was a very well made movie. The scenery was great, the story was great, the acting was good for the most part (especially the supporting cast - the lead actor was just OK) - but what really made the movie for me was the music. Probably Eddie Vedder's best work since the second PJ CD. I didn't have many expectations going in, and ordinarily I am not a fan of Penn at all, but maybe he's better behind the camera than in front of it.Just got done watching Into the Wild.
Absolutely loved the movie. Couple cheesy moments (ala Castaway) when he is interacting with himself, but other than that it was great. Beautiful scenery, great story, etc... Highly recommended.![]()
He didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
She's who I thought of when that "Women You're Strangely Attracted To" thread was floating around. She's a brick ####house fo sho, but there was just something about her in Carnivale that gave me a tingling sensation in my loins.That older blonde buxom stripper was on an episode of Seinfeld. Guess which one.Put Carnivale in my netflix que based on recommendations here. So far my only regret is that I only had the first 2 discs. I finished them and am looking forward to the rest of them showing up.I'm definitely waiting to find out how it all unravels, plus it's nice that they throw in a little toplessness from time to time.
I guess it's all subjective, since I loved Lewis in GangsHe didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
Oh HELLS yeah. I'd totally do that broad.She's who I thought of when that "Women You're Strangely Attracted To" thread was floating around. She's a brick ####house fo sho, but there was just something about her in Carnivale that gave me a tingling sensation in my loins.That older blonde buxom stripper was on an episode of Seinfeld. Guess which one.Put Carnivale in my netflix que based on recommendations here. So far my only regret is that I only had the first 2 discs. I finished them and am looking forward to the rest of them showing up.I'm definitely waiting to find out how it all unravels, plus it's nice that they throw in a little toplessness from time to time.![]()
Me too.I guess it's all subjective, since I loved Lewis in GangsHe didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.![]()
Is it not cool to like the performance because it got so much mainstream love?? The Butcher is one of my favorite characters ever. mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("I don't know if this is really a spoiler, but just to be safe...I thought he was terrific in the movie. He didn't even need to speak.I think Jones is a fantastic actor, but certainly that's an understated role for him. If you put a mediocre actor in that spot, Jones' gifts do seem obvious. He seems to have a lot of subtext in his acting.In the Valley of Elah
Liked this movie quite a bit. Some people might be annoyed with the director's "message" not being very subtle, but still worth a watch. I did feel that the ending lacked the punch that the rest of the movie was building up to - seemed to fizzle a little bit at the end.
On kind of a tangent here, but this is another example for me ofwhen I look at acting nominations for the AWs. I am pretty sure that Tommy Lee Jones is up for best actor, but he was exactly the same throughout the whole movie. Sure his character had a presence and you did feel for him, but there really wasn't much to him, IMO. Don't know why acting exactly the same throughout all the scenes warrants a best actor nod.
Certainly. Here's another take:mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("I don't know if this is really a spoiler, but just to be safe...I thought he was terrific in the movie. He didn't even need to speak.I think Jones is a fantastic actor, but certainly that's an understated role for him. If you put a mediocre actor in that spot, Jones' gifts do seem obvious. He seems to have a lot of subtext in his acting.In the Valley of Elah
Liked this movie quite a bit. Some people might be annoyed with the director's "message" not being very subtle, but still worth a watch. I did feel that the ending lacked the punch that the rest of the movie was building up to - seemed to fizzle a little bit at the end.
On kind of a tangent here, but this is another example for me ofwhen I look at acting nominations for the AWs. I am pretty sure that Tommy Lee Jones is up for best actor, but he was exactly the same throughout the whole movie. Sure his character had a presence and you did feel for him, but there really wasn't much to him, IMO. Don't know why acting exactly the same throughout all the scenes warrants a best actor nod.
So the Valley of Elah is in Israel, and in the Bible is the valley in which David fought Goliath. Is the title simply symbolic of Jones' (the little guy) struggle to wrest truth from the big guy (government, military, whatever)? Or is there more meaning behind the title than that?
I haven't seen the movie, but I noticed "Elah" in my Bible and became curious.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
");document.close();
To be fair, a lot of that has to fall on the director's shoulders. I would that that any decent director would reign him in a little if that wasn't what they were going for in the movie/character. Judging by his other movies, I would say that PTA tends to toe the line of overboard for some of the characters in his movies. I guess we'll see in about 5 years when DDL pokes his head out and does another movie.He didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
I think PT Anderson is a fine director, but I wouldn't credit or blame him for Lewis' performance. I don't picture guys like Anderson and Scorsese giving Lewis a lot of direction regarding the tone of his performance. I think Lewis is the final decider for his own intensity.To be fair, a lot of that has to fall on the director's shoulders. I would that that any decent director would reign him in a little if that wasn't what they were going for in the movie/character. Judging by his other movies, I would say that PTA tends to toe the line of overboard for some of the characters in his movies. I guess we'll see in about 5 years when DDL pokes his head out and does another movie.He didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.
Speaking of PT -- I know this has been discussed before but did y'all really like the TWBB score? I thought it was distracting.I think PT Anderson is a fine director, but I wouldn't credit or blame him for Lewis' performance. I don't picture guys like Anderson and Scorsese giving Lewis a lot of direction regarding the tone of his performance. I think Lewis is the final decider for his own intensity.To be fair, a lot of that has to fall on the director's shoulders. I would that that any decent director would reign him in a little if that wasn't what they were going for in the movie/character. Judging by his other movies, I would say that PTA tends to toe the line of overboard for some of the characters in his movies. I guess we'll see in about 5 years when DDL pokes his head out and does another movie.He didn't used to be that way. Watch something like The Boxer or The Age of Innocence or even My Beautiful Laundrette.DDL didn't used to have constantly chew the scenery to disappear into a role. I've said it before. I fear that all the acclaim for his ridiculous, over the top turn in Gangs of New York was a bad omen.DDL is the opposite of subtle, which I usually go for, but I think he's great. Hammy, emotive, maybe even an overactor, but brilliant.I just don't think that mimicking old speech patterns constitutes great acting.Saw There Will be Blood. I agree that the story wasn't that great, but I can't agree that DDL's acting was overrated. He was pretty fantastic in the movie. The movie was also brilliantly shot. Unfortunately, it was basically just a character portrait and really didn't have that much going for it in terms of story and plot.