KarmaPolice
Footballguy
Being inclusive to out of shape dudes who can't act?I always thought Under Siege was the original DEI Die Hard ripoff.

Being inclusive to out of shape dudes who can't act?I always thought Under Siege was the original DEI Die Hard ripoff.
That's a fun movie but it sure is awkward when Erika Eleniak pops out of that cake. She goes from "Pretty Girl" in E.T. in '82 to Playmate of the Month in July of '89.Being inclusive to out of shape dudes who can't act?I always thought Under Siege was the original DEI Die Hard ripoff.
Guys with ponytailsBeing inclusive to out of shape dudes who can't act?I always thought Under Siege was the original DEI Die Hard ripoff.![]()
He did have fantastic one of those.Guys with ponytailsBeing inclusive to out of shape dudes who can't act?I always thought Under Siege was the original DEI Die Hard ripoff.![]()
Let it go, it was a ****ing jokeSooo... an action movie with a female lead = DEI movie? It looks like a typical crappy action movie from the trailer.Watch the trailer, seems pretty self evidentWhat does this even mean?Almost tee'd that up last night but watching the trailer it just looked like the DEI version of Die Hard, am I wrong?Cleaner with the star wars girl was a decent action flick![]()
![]()
So I was right.Let it go, it was a ****ing jokeSooo... an action movie with a female lead = DEI movie? It looks like a typical crappy action movie from the trailer.Watch the trailer, seems pretty self evidentWhat does this even mean?Almost tee'd that up last night but watching the trailer it just looked like the DEI version of Die Hard, am I wrong?Cleaner with the star wars girl was a decent action flick![]()
![]()
Love 'em, but I've seen them a bunch too. I am trying harder to get to new movies or ones I've just seen once and don't remember much.Gosling crazy stupid love and remember the titans
OMG....ME TOO!!!1!!!So I was right.Let it go, it was a ****ing jokeSooo... an action movie with a female lead = DEI movie? It looks like a typical crappy action movie from the trailer.Watch the trailer, seems pretty self evidentWhat does this even mean?Almost tee'd that up last night but watching the trailer it just looked like the DEI version of Die Hard, am I wrong?Cleaner with the star wars girl was a decent action flick![]()
![]()
Well since you asked...I thought we were letting it go.![]()
But since you brought it up again, what is the DEI part of that? Most of the time i have 0 clue what people mean by that, but it often seems to mean a reversal of roles in a movie for some reason. E.g. Daisey Ridley kicking *** in a skyscraper instead of Bruce Willis.
Cool. Past Lives was terrific.I saw The Materialists last Friday evening. I was a fan of director Celine Song's previous film, Past Lives. This one was much more upbeat in tone and accessible. I still prefer Past Lives, but if you are looking for something to watch with a loved one, this fits the bill.
I saw a trailer for a third one.Finished up watching Now You See Me and Now You See Me 2. These are the kind of mindless movies I use to cleanse my palette. Enjoyed both movies, some fun, some cool illusions, premise is meh but not why you watch and both movies have satisfied endings. For the most part the cast remained the same for both movies with Jessie Eisenberg, Mark Ruffalo, Woody Harrelson, Morgan Freeman and Michael Cain the mains who are in both. Isla Fischer is replaced by Lizzy Caplan in the 2nd and Daniel Radcliffe tried to break out of his Harry Potter character yet again.
If you're looking for a couple of fun movies you can watch with the kids, I'd recommend either. Helpful to watch the first before the second but they work as stand alones.
Um ..... spoiler alert they call her a cleaner for a reason that is not action relatedWell since you asked...I thought we were letting it go.
But since you brought it up again, what is the DEI part of that? Most of the time i have 0 clue what people mean by that, but it often seems to mean a reversal of roles in a movie for some reason. E.g. Daisey Ridley kicking *** in a skyscraper instead of Bruce Willis.
It was my old man, "get off my lawn" response to what is probably not a bad action movie but seemingly a blatant rip off of Die Hard just using a woman instead of a man to play the main lead and to make matters worse they label her a cleaner. I thought it was funny, obviously wasn't
Probably also related to my old man, "get off my lawn" attitude at this point in my life.
I've seen all the Indy movies but I just pretend that there's only 3.Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
Ugh. I'm only halfway through this movie!? Feels like I've been watching it for a week!
The opening 20 minutes actually showed promise - although I NEVER need to see another fight on top of a train ever again! Even the de-aging of Ford wasn't bad.
But then it tries to get way too cute with both the action scenes and the "witty" banter. And the redundant chase scenes (now we're on a horse, now we're in a motorbike taxi, etc.) rely way too much on convenience of geography - sure we peeled off for a SEPARATE chase scene with a new bad guy but now we need to somehow catch up with the original.... OH THERE HE IS!!
Good God why can't someone figure out how to make movies like this anymore? And how am I possibly going to finish this thing?
Edit: Oh eels! See, it's funny because they're like snakes! You remember how Indy feels about snakes, right?
Tried this one a few months ago...The Sugarland Express- cool to see this was on Netflix, didn't expect that. My first time watching the Spielberg debut. I am blown away by how good it looks and how well made it is. Spielberg sure is gifted visually. The opening shot just grabs your attention with a big zoom out revealing the highway setting, there's an accident and a perfectly timed bus that drops off Goldie Hawn. It's magical movie making. However, the characters are just ok. The quieter scenes don't work as well. Goldie Hawn is excellent but Atherton and Sacks can't match her. It's a good movie, full of great action and is a ridiculously strong debut but between this and Jaws he figures out how to get the dialogue, charater development, relationships right (or at least is able to hire better actors).
ETA: didn’t hurt that Spielberg had a team of true heavy hitters working with him. John Williams (though I didn’t care for the score), Verna Fields editing, Vilmos Zsigmond filming and a top end highly experienced stunt team that had done movies like The Searchers, Bullit, French Connection.
So there isI saw a trailer for a third one.Finished up watching Now You See Me and Now You See Me 2. These are the kind of mindless movies I use to cleanse my palette. Enjoyed both movies, some fun, some cool illusions, premise is meh but not why you watch and both movies have satisfied endings. For the most part the cast remained the same for both movies with Jessie Eisenberg, Mark Ruffalo, Woody Harrelson, Morgan Freeman and Michael Cain the mains who are in both. Isla Fischer is replaced by Lizzy Caplan in the 2nd and Daniel Radcliffe tried to break out of his Harry Potter character yet again.
If you're looking for a couple of fun movies you can watch with the kids, I'd recommend either. Helpful to watch the first before the second but they work as stand alones.
I watched it tonight and agree with this. I also thought the final battle was a little ridiculous but I get it.I just watched it and all I got is Brad Pitt and tanks too lol. It was fine, the usual little war crew with their war banter. The new guy, the religious guy, the crazy guy, the ethnic guy. But it was very entertaining except a dull spot in the middle where they do the mandatory meeting with a local German family and their young daughter aka the love interest. Good but not great.I know I watched it, but I don't remember a thing about it besides Brad Pitt and tanks. Curious for your take on it.it’s Memorial Day and all the frivolity and hard work is done. Time for a war movie. Going with Fury, that’s one that I’ve been meaning to get to for awhile. Tank time.
I was thinking maybe Zero Dark Thirty, The Pianist, or Dunkirk tonight but all seem a bit too heavy.
Can one even watch these MCU films nowadays if they haven't seen the 50 that came before? I don't have much interest in them in any case - just wondering if they make sense coming in cold.Got talked into watching Captain America: Brave New World last night. I'm not Team Marvel but enjoyed Thunderbolts* so I was hoping for the best from Cap.
The best I can say is that it was relatively short for a MCU movie. This Captain and Falcon didn't have any chemistry and the villain was almost non-existent. The fight scenes were generally OK but the big air/naval battle was dodgy CGI and intercut with events halfway around the world so it took forever to resolve. The movie also had entirely too much POTUS content for my current mindset. It would have been better in the theater of course but it still would have been poor.
Can one even watch these MCU films nowadays if they haven't seen the 50 that came before? I don't have much interest in them in any case - just wondering if they make sense coming in cold.Got talked into watching Captain America: Brave New World last night. I'm not Team Marvel but enjoyed Thunderbolts* so I was hoping for the best from Cap.
The best I can say is that it was relatively short for a MCU movie. This Captain and Falcon didn't have any chemistry and the villain was almost non-existent. The fight scenes were generally OK but the big air/naval battle was dodgy CGI and intercut with events halfway around the world so it took forever to resolve. The movie also had entirely too much POTUS content for my current mindset. It would have been better in the theater of course but it still would have been poor.
Waiting for Guffman is a top 50 for me and Best in Show is also pretty great. I didn't enjoy A Mighty Wind or For Your Consideration nearly as much, though.Some random ones for research the last few days: Spirited Away, Hugo, For Your Consideration, TMNT: Mutant Mayhem, and The Third Murder.
No idea why i have slept so long on Christopher Guest movies. After watching Best in Show, i realized i still hadn't seen a couple of his movies. TMNT was a blast, and had no right being as good as it was. I would have liked it more with a stronger April though. The more i watch Hugo and older movies, the more I like the movie. It failed to grab my daughter's attention though.
Imo Consideration had too many different set pieces, so it wasn't as consistent as some of the others. Still some great stuff and worth the watch.Waiting for Guffman is a top 50 for me and Best in Show is also pretty great. I didn't enjoy A Mighty Wind or For Your Consideration nearly as much, though.Some random ones for research the last few days: Spirited Away, Hugo, For Your Consideration, TMNT: Mutant Mayhem, and The Third Murder.
No idea why i have slept so long on Christopher Guest movies. After watching Best in Show, i realized i still hadn't seen a couple of his movies. TMNT was a blast, and had no right being as good as it was. I would have liked it more with a stronger April though. The more i watch Hugo and older movies, the more I like the movie. It failed to grab my daughter's attention though.
Its a family movie made for classic cinema geeks. I would guess it is a hard sell for a lot of people. I didn't like it when it came out, but i appreciate it more now. Definitely a superior Scorsese movie to Goodfellas.i didn’t care for Hugo, turned it off maybe halfway through
Primer is a mind ####I had a pile of movies from the library and asked my daughter to pick a few out, so our next wave is: Howl's Moving Castle, Song of the Sea, and Secondhand Lions.
The pile for me looks like: Walk Hard, Primer, Amelie, Son of Rambow, The Brothers Bloom, A Mighty Wind, and Micheal Clayton.
Agreed. The whole feel if the movie is very "English" to me and didn't resonate. The main kid's performance was pretty good and there's a poignant scene about 2/3 of the way through that I liked. But overall it's kind of dull and really doesn't have much to say.Not sure if it's rental worthy for the thread, but just saw 28 Years Later.
Gotta say, not a huge fan. Didn't come close to any part of 28 Days, was maybe half as good as 28 Weeks.
I don't know why this didn't click with the public, maybe Tarantino's credo that the SECOND movie is when all great directors make it.The Sugarland Express- cool to see this was on Netflix, didn't expect that. My first time watching the Spielberg debut. I am blown away by how good it looks and how well made it is.
You can see the influences with the car chase scenes.ETA: didn’t hurt that Spielberg had a team of true heavy hitters working with him. ..and a top end highly experienced stunt team that had done movies like The Searchers, Bullit, French Connection.
I think the point of that is to demonstrate the dichotomy of aggressor versus protector.Saw 28 Years Later yesterday, and I went in with low expectations as the trailers were underwhelming, and it was quite a bit better than I expected. It was not a non-stop, edge of your chair action/zombie movie, but had plenty of pulse pounding, tense scenes, plenty of gore. Plenty of shlongs if you're into that sort of thing. And it gave a pretty good representation of what a society would have evolved (devolved) into should it be shunned by the rest of the world for a few decades. It was party of a longer story arc which I think you need to take into account, as the second movie was filmed simultaneously and will release early next year. And I know some will be detracted by the final scene, but I really liked it. I am sure it went over a lot crazier in the UK, as it would help if you knew a bit of back story on Jimmy Saville. My only nitpick is the fact that the kid went from a trembling, terrified, well, kid, even with his father, and the next day he is all of the sudden not afraid to stand in the most terrifying situation ever and make calm, rash decisions.
I don't believe you.Did me a search in this here thread and came up empty... doesn't mean none of you have seen/enjoyed the Kraven the Hunter flick. Watched it on my flight out to Texas last week and it did what it was supposed to... fill up about 2 hours of my "sittin' around time" with fairly mindless entertainment. Set up well for a second one, and hey, why not?
Solid 7.5/10 ... won't watch again, but would consider watching a sequel.