Details please.Brunell is looking pretty sharp in 7 on 7 drills.
Brunell to Cooley all day.McNair to Mason all day.Although it is 7 on 7 and the defense is at a clear disadvantage with no pass rush.Details please.Brunell is looking pretty sharp in 7 on 7 drills.![]()
Brunell to Cooley all day.Details please.Brunell is looking pretty sharp in 7 on 7 drills.![]()
Good point, but I'm just noticing that he is putting the ball in the perfect spot every time where the receiver can only get it...Cooley isn't running wide open...the coverage was actually pretty tight.Brunell has always been a great QB when nobody goes after him and puts the fear of god in him.
I didn't see who hit him. I just heard he was "slow to get up". Anyone know what happened?Who hit Mike Anderson when he got the concussion? I saw him in pass protection picking up a block on the corner of the screen, and that's about it. Sean Taylor really hits, by the way.
Baltimore SunMike Anderson - mild concussion. No word how long he'll be out.fatness said:He was picking up a blitzing LB or DB on the left side, and kind of slid off the screen as the play developed. It seemed like Anderson met the defender head on, and then perhaps was being lifted upward as he went off camera. Word I read elsewhere (Baltimore Sun maybe?) was "mild concussion, out 2-3 days".
I agree with Kenlin. Sean Taylor laid a pretty nasty hit on Anderson knocking him flat on his back. I think that played a big part in the concussion.Sean Taylor but a pretty good hit on Anderson the play before so the concussion could be a combination of the two plays.ETA: I saw the scrimmage live and Anderson was down for 1-2 minutes before being helped off the field.
Former Denver Broncos running back Mike Anderson, who was signed to an $8.1 million contract in the offseason, sustained a mild concussion while picking up a blitz on the play that McNair threw an interception.
On a separate play, Anderson was drilled by hard-hitting Redskins safety Sean Taylor when he went airborne to clear a pile of bodies.
“It’s kind of like getting your bell rung and I never had that happen before,” said Anderson, who was held to three yards on three carries. “I’ll be fine. I’ll take a day off and I’ll be back out there.”
The guy has unreal range as a saftey. Matched only by Reed.The thing that stands out about Taylor is that, in addition to hitting like a linebacker, he's good in pass coverage.
I've been saying this for months and nobody seems to want to listen. Saunders throws to his RBs folks, get used to it.there looks to be an abundance of screen passes (hint, hint to those in ppr leagues drafting @ the 4th or 5th spot).
hammerva said:Brunell has always been a great QB when nobody goes after him and puts the fear of god in him.
Fortunately, those short passes are the easiest ones to learn. I'm relieved (both as a 'Skins fan and also as a Cambpell dynasty drafter last year) that Campbell seems to be developing nicely. Gibbs likes to take his time with young QB's, and honestly I wouldn't mind it if Brunell can stay healthy and effective enough to remain the starter for two more seasons. Campbell seems like he could turn into a guy like Rypien, who with a good team around him is good for 20+ TD's, 3500+ yards, and a 3:2 TD-to-INT ratio (if not better). As for Taylor, yeah he's pretty much of a freak. He runs like a CB and hits like a LB; he also has excellent hands. I'm convinced that he could be a Pro Bowl caliber CB if they played him there. Someone posted a quote on Extremeskins.com yesterday that had Brandon Lloyd recounting a conversation he had with Moss on the sidelines. Lloyd was saying to Moss that he was sure glad he didn't have to face Taylor, and Moss replied that he'd said the exact same thing last year.J.Campbell looked O.K., but was putting all the short hitches and swing passes in the dirt. Seemed to me he was hanging on too tight (Cougar from Top Gun). The other throws down the field did look O.K. and he showed good mobility getting out of the pocket and seemed to have a pretty good pocket presense for a 2nd year QB.
There is film of the first hit, where Taylor picked up Anderson and planted him, on redskins.com under the video "Scrimmage Wrap-Up". You can also see the beginning of the next play where Anderson was in pass protection blocking someone, but you can't see who it was or what happened. His concussion may have been caused by the previous hit.linkOn defense, safety Sean Taylor continued to cement his reputation as one of the league's hardest hitters: on back-to-back plays, he leveled two punishing tackles on Baltimore running back Mike Anderson. Shortly afterwards, Anderson left the scrimmage with a mild concussion.
"He definitely flashed out there on some plays," Gibbs said. "I'm always cautious because I want to look at films, but I think at this point Sean is rocking and rolling."
I agree that he could be that good, but the boy's got some catching up to do.IMO, Taylor is the closest thing we'll ever see again to LT, in regards to a defensive player DOMINATING at his position.
I agree that he could be that good, but the boy's got some catching up to do.IMO, Taylor is the closest thing we'll ever see again to LT, in regards to a defensive player DOMINATING at his position.
Lumsden did look pretty good and he got some plays against either first or second team guys. He was excellent at using his blockers. Anyone know if he can play special teams?I was however pleased w/ Musa and P.J., but I thought the best RBs on the field were Lumsden and #37 (D.Carter?).
The only problem is that this is some kind of "golden age" for safeties. You've got guys in Baltimore and Pittsburgh that may not hit quite as hard, but have equally impressive skill sets overall. (And then there's the guy in Dallas who is somehow getting paid more than all of them.I agree that he could be that good, but the boy's got some catching up to do.IMO, Taylor is the closest thing we'll ever see again to LT, in regards to a defensive player DOMINATING at his position.The reason for the LT comparison (potentially, if he holds it together for five more years or so at a minimum) for me is that he has unique and terrifying athletic talent, and he's got a mean on-field mentality and persona. I've seen more alligator arms in the last two years among receivers playing the Redskins than I've seen in the ten years previous, and I attribute that to him primarily. Even Pinkston's "alligator body" on that Sunday night game, when Taylor wasn't even near him, may have been due to Pinky thinking Taylor was lurking.
I know that I may sound like a homer talking about him like this, but the guy truly has rare talent, and unlike Lavar he doesn't freelance and play stupid (other than spitting).
I really hope there aren't too many people who seriously consider Roy Williams to be better than Sean Taylor.The only problem is that this is some kind of "golden age" for safeties. You've got guys in Baltimore and Pittsburgh that may not hit quite as hard, but have equally impressive skill sets overall. (And then there's the guy in Dallas who is somehow getting paid more than all of them.)It's going to be really hard for ANY of these safeties to stand head and shoulders above each other.
You've only named four, and of those four one doesn't deserve to be mentioned as being part of any "golden age", unless you mean for that to include meritless hype (Roy Williams - learn to cover someone in pass coverage past your rookie year if you want to color me impressed). I agree that Reed and Polamalu deserve mention with Taylor, however I don't think Polamalu's coverage skills quite rate with Reed's or Taylor's; all of them are definitely play-makers and ball-hawks.The only problem is that this is some kind of "golden age" for safeties. You've got guys in Baltimore and Pittsburgh that may not hit quite as hard, but have equally impressive skill sets overall. (And then there's the guy in Dallas who is somehow getting paid more than all of them.I agree that he could be that good, but the boy's got some catching up to do.IMO, Taylor is the closest thing we'll ever see again to LT, in regards to a defensive player DOMINATING at his position.The reason for the LT comparison (potentially, if he holds it together for five more years or so at a minimum) for me is that he has unique and terrifying athletic talent, and he's got a mean on-field mentality and persona. I've seen more alligator arms in the last two years among receivers playing the Redskins than I've seen in the ten years previous, and I attribute that to him primarily. Even Pinkston's "alligator body" on that Sunday night game, when Taylor wasn't even near him, may have been due to Pinky thinking Taylor was lurking.
I know that I may sound like a homer talking about him like this, but the guy truly has rare talent, and unlike Lavar he doesn't freelance and play stupid (other than spitting).
)It's going to be really hard for ANY of these safeties to stand head and shoulders above each other.
I certainly don't consider a guy whose only skill seems to be breaking players legs and blowing coverage to be on the same level as the others, but the fact that he is so hyped (and well paid) means the media will continue to cover him as if he were. I may be biased (both of us could be accused of homerism) but I would consider Reed to be superior in pass coverage, while Taylor is the biggest hitter. Polamalu's got a very good overall game and nose for the ball. I really don't know enough of where his real strengths lie, but he's definitely in the conversation as well. Each has his strength, and all are great.You've only named four, and of those four one doesn't deserve to be mentioned as being part of any "golden age", unless you mean for that to include meritless hype (Roy Williams - learn to cover someone in pass coverage past your rookie year if you want to color me impressed). I agree that Reed and Polamalu deserve mention with Taylor, however I don't think Polamalu's coverage skills quite rate with Reed's or Taylor's; all of them are definitely play-makers and ball-hawks.The only problem is that this is some kind of "golden age" for safeties. You've got guys in Baltimore and Pittsburgh that may not hit quite as hard, but have equally impressive skill sets overall. (And then there's the guy in Dallas who is somehow getting paid more than all of them.I agree that he could be that good, but the boy's got some catching up to do.IMO, Taylor is the closest thing we'll ever see again to LT, in regards to a defensive player DOMINATING at his position.The reason for the LT comparison (potentially, if he holds it together for five more years or so at a minimum) for me is that he has unique and terrifying athletic talent, and he's got a mean on-field mentality and persona. I've seen more alligator arms in the last two years among receivers playing the Redskins than I've seen in the ten years previous, and I attribute that to him primarily. Even Pinkston's "alligator body" on that Sunday night game, when Taylor wasn't even near him, may have been due to Pinky thinking Taylor was lurking.
I know that I may sound like a homer talking about him like this, but the guy truly has rare talent, and unlike Lavar he doesn't freelance and play stupid (other than spitting).
)It's going to be really hard for ANY of these safeties to stand head and shoulders above each other.
IIRC, his first couple plays were ugly, but he had some really nice throws as the scrimmage progressed. He's going to get plenty of action this preseason, so we'll get a better feel over the next few weeks.Jason Campbell is the next Donovan McNabb.And by that I mean a QB who completes plenty of passes to his WR's shoes.I was NOT happy with how he looked.
He didn't play.How did Jamal look?
Yes he did look good. Yes he does play special teams. And yes, Joe Gibbs singled him out for moderate praise after the game. I saw it on it TV so no link.Lumsden did look pretty good and he got some plays against either first or second team guys. He was excellent at using his blockers. Anyone know if he can play special teams?
He threw some nice deep passes that were on target, and he showed good pocket awareness. IMHO the short passes were just a product of nerves. I'm not at all upset by his performance, although I will certainly want to see improvement from him.IIRC, his first couple plays were ugly, but he had some really nice throws as the scrimmage progressed. He's going to get plenty of action this preseason, so we'll get a better feel over the next few weeks.Jason Campbell is the next Donovan McNabb.And by that I mean a QB who completes plenty of passes to his WR's shoes.I was NOT happy with how he looked.
he ran full speed at practice todayAny Mark Clayton sightings, or is the hammy keeping him out?