THE UNDERCOVER BROTHA
Footballguy
they say it unofficial...but someone leaked out he was on da cover.
is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?
is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?
Man..after this year you would've thought it would be LT on the cover. And yes I do own Bush in my dynasty leaguethey say it unofficial...but someone leaked out he was on da cover.is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?
LT has refused to be on the cover. He said it gives him all the credit when he owes it to his line.Man..after this year you would've thought it would be LT on the cover. And yes I do own Bush in my dynasty leaguethey say it unofficial...but someone leaked out he was on da cover.is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?![]()
Fo shizlle!If I was LT I would PAY EA Sports to keep me off the cover. I never believed in it but after the injury prone year the Hawks had last year, sadly, I have been converted. Fingers are still crossed it's not LT.Course, I have Bush too so I'm not happy about it but I'd rather lose him than LT!from an LT owner...
Banger said:from an LT owner...
Well, as we all know, LT is a classy guy... just ask him.TheLastDispatch said:LT has refused to be on the cover. He said it gives him all the credit when he owes it to his line.sib said:Man..after this year you would've thought it would be LT on the cover. And yes I do own Bush in my dynasty leagueTHE UNDERCOVER BROTHA said:they say it unofficial...but someone leaked out he was on da cover.is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?![]()
Yup, he is classy. He's just not modest.Well, as we all know, LT is a classy guy... just ask him.TheLastDispatch said:LT has refused to be on the cover. He said it gives him all the credit when he owes it to his line.sib said:Man..after this year you would've thought it would be LT on the cover. And yes I do own Bush in my dynasty leagueTHE UNDERCOVER BROTHA said:they say it unofficial...but someone leaked out he was on da cover.is this BS? or have anyone else heard of this?![]()
![]()
:XBanger said::X from an LT owner...
Banger said:from an LT owner...
![]()
Peyton would be my other choice, perhaps a better option. Of course, if Peyton got the cover, then got injured, no NFL player would let themselves be on it.I don't thiink that Bush make sense at all. The Saints were a great feel-good story, and a very improved team. I would have thought that for most of the year that it would have been LT. But IMO, I think that it will be Peyton Manning. He is already one of the biggest icons in the sport, and he is coming off of a Superbowl victory that could help to establish his "legacy". Also, the fact that he hasn't been hurt, could help to make the Madden curse less believable.
Peyton would be my other choice, perhaps a better option. Of course, if Peyton got the cover, then got injured, no NFL player would let themselves be on it.I don't thiink that Bush make sense at all. The Saints were a great feel-good story, and a very improved team. I would have thought that for most of the year that it would have been LT. But IMO, I think that it will be Peyton Manning. He is already one of the biggest icons in the sport, and he is coming off of a Superbowl victory that could help to establish his "legacy". Also, the fact that he hasn't been hurt, could help to make the Madden curse less believable.
Not just LT owners, but anyone other than Bush owners areBanger said:from an LT owner...
As always, this is complete and utter rubbish. Eddie George was the first athlete on the cover; before that, it had always been Madden on the cover. George went for 1500 yards and 14 TDs.Just some fun info:
History of The Madden Curse
Barry Sanders and Dorsey Levens (2000) Sanders retires, Levens replaces him on cover, 224 yards from scrimmage in 2000
Eddie George (2001) 939 yards and 5 touchdowns in the 2001
Daunte Culpepper (2002) 4-7 record until Culpepper suffers season-ending knee injury
Marshall Faulk (2003) Ankle injury, misses 5 games.
Michael Vick (2004) Missed 11 games, only 585 passing yards.
Ray Lewis (2005) Season ending injury in week 6.
Donovan McNabb (2006) Tears ACL , ends season.
Shaun Alexander (2007) Out the whole season, costing me big time in FF..
You need to check your facts.Snopes has a good summary:Just some fun info:
History of The Madden Curse
Barry Sanders and Dorsey Levens (2000) Sanders retires, Levens replaces him on cover, 224 yards from scrimmage in 2000
Eddie George (2001) 939 yards and 5 touchdowns in the 2001
Daunte Culpepper (2002) 4-7 record until Culpepper suffers season-ending knee injury
Marshall Faulk (2003) Ankle injury, misses 5 games.
Michael Vick (2004) Missed 11 games, only 585 passing yards.
Ray Lewis (2005) Season ending injury in week 6.
Donovan McNabb (2006) Tears ACL , ends season.
Shaun Alexander (2007) Out the whole season, costing me big time in FF..
George didn't go for 1500 and 14 in 01. He went for 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC.Faulk only played 11 games and had only 818 yards.As always, this is complete and utter rubbish. Eddie George was the first athlete on the cover; before that, it had always been Madden on the cover. George went for 1500 yards and 14 TDs.Just some fun info:
History of The Madden Curse
Barry Sanders and Dorsey Levens (2000) Sanders retires, Levens replaces him on cover, 224 yards from scrimmage in 2000
Eddie George (2001) 939 yards and 5 touchdowns in the 2001
Daunte Culpepper (2002) 4-7 record until Culpepper suffers season-ending knee injury
Marshall Faulk (2003) Ankle injury, misses 5 games.
Michael Vick (2004) Missed 11 games, only 585 passing yards.
Ray Lewis (2005) Season ending injury in week 6.
Donovan McNabb (2006) Tears ACL , ends season.
Shaun Alexander (2007) Out the whole season, costing me big time in FF..
Culpepper got hurt.
Faulk played 14 games, the same he'd played the previous two years.
Vick got hurt.
Lewis was fine.
McNabb got hurt
Alexander got hurt.
That sounds like football to me.
Barry Sanders and Dorsey Levens (2000)The very first NFL player to be on a Madden NFL cover was Barry Sanders in 1999, for Madden NFL 2000. He shared the cover with the then-customary picture of John Madden. However, a week before training camp began in 1999, Sanders abruptly retired - ending his career and leaving the Detroit Lions without their star running back of the previous 10 years. Sanders' part in the curse is debated because he is not pictured alone on the box, and he had willingly retired. Dorsey Levens was featured on the 2000 cover that was released in PAL regions. After rushing for 1,034 yards in 1999, he gained only 224 yards from scrimmage in 2000. Ultimately, Levens was cut by the Green Bay Packers in 2001, and retired, as a Packer, in 2004, after playing as a journeyman who had 1-season stints with both the Philadelphia Eagles and New York Giants.As always, this is complete and utter rubbish. Eddie George was the first athlete on the cover; before that, it had always been Madden on the cover. George went for 1500 yards and 14 TDs.Just some fun info:
History of The Madden Curse
Barry Sanders and Dorsey Levens (2000) Sanders retires, Levens replaces him on cover, 224 yards from scrimmage in 2000
Eddie George (2001) 939 yards and 5 touchdowns in the 2001
Daunte Culpepper (2002) 4-7 record until Culpepper suffers season-ending knee injury
Marshall Faulk (2003) Ankle injury, misses 5 games.
Michael Vick (2004) Missed 11 games, only 585 passing yards.
Ray Lewis (2005) Season ending injury in week 6.
Donovan McNabb (2006) Tears ACL , ends season.
Shaun Alexander (2007) Out the whole season, costing me big time in FF..
Culpepper got hurt.
Faulk played 14 games, the same he'd played the previous two years.
Vick got hurt.
Lewis was fine.
McNabb got hurt
Alexander got hurt.
That sounds like football to me.
I am looking at the correct years. The idiots who believe in the Madden Curse are looking at the wrong years.George didn't go for 1500 and 14 in 01. He went for 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC.Faulk only played 11 games and had only 818 yards.Ray Lewis only played 6 games before being hurt for the season.I think you might have been looking at the wrong years.
...Recheck. If you're right then NFL.com, profootballreference.com, plus the websites that other people posted after quoting you are all wrong. Unlikely.I am looking at the correct years. The idiots who believe in the Madden Curse are looking at the wrong years.George didn't go for 1500 and 14 in 01. He went for 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC.Faulk only played 11 games and had only 818 yards.Ray Lewis only played 6 games before being hurt for the season.I think you might have been looking at the wrong years.
"Madden 2001" came out in 2000, when Eddie George had the best season of his career. Similarly, Shaun Alexander was on the cover of Madden 2007 when he was injured in 2006.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1174/gamelogs/2001
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/3505/
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/games/GeorEd00.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_George
http://sportsline.com/nfl/players/playerpage/1174
http://www.databasefootball.com/teams/team...nfl&yr=2001
There's 6 sites that agree with the "idiots" Cal.
Point taken. All of those players also had bad years or were hurt the year of the cover though. McNabb was hurt in 06, Lewis was hurt in 05, Vick had a career high in fumbles and lowest yards and tds when he played a near-full season, Faulk missed 5 games, Culpepper was hurt, and George had 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC."Madden 2001" came out in 2000, when Eddie George had the best season of his career. Similarly, Shaun Alexander was on the cover of Madden 2007 when he was injured in 2006.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1174/gamelogs/2001
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/3505/
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/games/GeorEd00.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_George
http://sportsline.com/nfl/players/playerpage/1174
http://www.databasefootball.com/teams/team...nfl&yr=2001
There's 6 sites that agree with the "idiots" Cal.
Wrong again. Culpepper played 16 games in 2002 and scored 10 rushing TDs and Vick had his typical season in 2004. We don't know whether Alexander will get hurt in 2007. It's ridiculous to discuss it, but even more ridiculous to jam patterns that don't fit into a silly superstition.All of those players also had bad years or were hurt the year of the cover though. McNabb was hurt in 06, Lewis was hurt in 05, Vick had a career high in fumbles and lowest yards and tds when he played a near-full season, Faulk missed 5 games, Culpepper was hurt, and George had 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC.If it doesn't look like a curse to you in the year the game comes out, that certainly looks like a curse for the player during the following year (year number on box)
Peep It Yo! said:I sure hope not. Not only will being on the Madden cover cause Reggie to tear his ACL in camp, but it will also ensure that USC is put on probation for his "alleged" rules violations when he played there. Furthermore, the Saints would also be punished as they would finish 2-14 next year.
Vick had his most ever fumbles in a season, least ever yards in a season with 15+ games, and least ever TDs in a season with 15+ games. So no, I wasn't wrong on that.Culpepper threw 6 more picks than TDs that season. First time he ever threw more picks than TDs. Lowest QB rating of his career as of then and career record for fumbles. I'd still count that as a bad season.So we're still at 5 players having a bad season or getting hurt the year of, and all 7 the year after (minus alexander).Wrong again. Culpepper played 16 games in 2002 and scored 10 rushing TDs and Vick had his typical season in 2004. We don't know whether Alexander will get hurt in 2007. It's ridiculous to discuss it, but even more ridiculous to jam patterns that don't fit into a silly superstition.All of those players also had bad years or were hurt the year of the cover though. McNabb was hurt in 06, Lewis was hurt in 05, Vick had a career high in fumbles and lowest yards and tds when he played a near-full season, Faulk missed 5 games, Culpepper was hurt, and George had 939 and 4 on 3.0 YPC.If it doesn't look like a curse to you in the year the game comes out, that certainly looks like a curse for the player during the following year (year number on box)
Also, Dorsey Levens only played in 7 games in 1998! It must have been the Madden Curse propagating backwards through time!So we're still at 5 players having a bad season or getting hurt the year of, and all 7 the year after (minus alexander).
Also, Dorsey Levens only played in 7 games in 1998! It must have been the Madden Curse propagating backwards through time!So we're still at 5 players having a bad season or getting hurt the year of, and all 7 the year after (minus alexander).
Vick had his highest completion percentage, highest yards per attempt, nearly broke the QB rushing yardage record, and went to the NFC Championship game in 2004. If you're willing to call that a bad season just to make it fit your superstition, you should be posting on astrology.com instead.I don't see what that has to do with it unless you're just trying to change the subject that 5 of 8 were hurt/had bad years year of and all 7 so far were hurt/had bad years the year after.You don't have to believe in it, a lot of people don't. It could very well be coincidence. But to deny their is even a pattern is ridiculous.
He also had his least number of attempts, which I think affects completion percentage and possibly yards per attempt. ALMOST doesn't count in my book, and the NFC championship game is a team effort.As for twisting the stats, it could also be viewed that you're overlooking his career high fumbles, career low yards, and career low TDs to make it fit your views.And even if we say that he didn't have a bad year(which personally I wouldn't say), that puts us at 5/8 had a bad year/were hurt year of and 6/7 had a bad year/were hurt year after. If you can't see any trend there, that's fine. To me, that still looks like a trend.Let's just agree to disagree here.Vick had his highest completion percentage, highest yards per attempt, nearly broke the QB rushing yardage record, and went to the NFC Championship game in 2004. If you're willing to call that a bad season just to make it fit your superstition, you should be posting on astrology.com instead.I don't see what that has to do with it unless you're just trying to change the subject that 5 of 8 were hurt/had bad years year of and all 7 so far were hurt/had bad years the year after.You don't have to believe in it, a lot of people don't. It could very well be coincidence. But to deny their is even a pattern is ridiculous.
It's a completely meaningless trend. Basically what you're saying is, "when a player has an exceptional season, sometime within the next two years he's likely to have a disappointing season." This is not news. It's not interesting. It's a waste of time. And to think that the cover of some video game has anything to do with whether a football player breaks his foot...well, maybe you've had one too many blows to the head.And even if we say that he didn't have a bad year(which personally I wouldn't say), that puts us at 5/8 had a bad year/were hurt year of and 6/7 had a bad year/were hurt year after. If you can't see any trend there, that's fine. To me, that still looks like a trend.
Nice to see you've had to result to insults in every single one of your posts with just 1 exception. Feel better about yourself now? Or do you just have a problem with anyone who disagrees with you?Like I said, let's just agree to disagree.It's a completely meaningless trend. Basically what you're saying is, "when a player has an exceptional season, sometime within the next two years he's likely to have a disappointing season." This is not news. It's not interesting. It's a waste of time. And to think that the cover of some video game has anything to do with whether a football player breaks his foot...well, maybe you've had one too many blows to the head.And even if we say that he didn't have a bad year(which personally I wouldn't say), that puts us at 5/8 had a bad year/were hurt year of and 6/7 had a bad year/were hurt year after. If you can't see any trend there, that's fine. To me, that still looks like a trend.
They weren't?Culpepper had one of the most amazing statistical seasons in NFL history in 2004.I took all said info about the curse from Wikipedia, so if its wrong I will no longer stand by it...Still kind of intriguing how most the guys were never the same after.
They weren't?Culpepper had one of the most amazing statistical seasons in NFL history in 2004.I took all said info about the curse from Wikipedia, so if its wrong I will no longer stand by it...Still kind of intriguing how most the guys were never the same after.
Your facts are wrong. The year on the Madden game is for the actual year that the Superbowl will be in. So SA being on the cover of '07 was for the '06-'07 season. Why do you think that they got on the cover? It is because of their big years the year before."Madden 2001" came out in 2000, when Eddie George had the best season of his career. Similarly, Shaun Alexander was on the cover of Madden 2007 when he was injured in 2006.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1174/gamelogs/2001
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/3505/
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/games/GeorEd00.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_George
http://sportsline.com/nfl/players/playerpage/1174
http://www.databasefootball.com/teams/team...nfl&yr=2001
There's 6 sites that agree with the "idiots" Cal.
Really?It's amazing anyone REALLY believes there's a connection. Honestly.Correlation and causation are two different things. They really are.Peep It Yo! said:I sure hope not.
pffft.....only idiots believe in the Madden Curse......Everyone knows it's really the Campbell's Soup commercials that you need to worry about.Really?It's amazing anyone REALLY believes there's a connection. Honestly.Correlation and causation are two different things. They really are.Peep It Yo! said:I sure hope not.
Peep It Yo! said:I sure hope not. Not only will being on the Madden cover cause Reggie to tear his ACL in camp, but it will also ensure that USC is put on probation for his "alleged" rules violations when he played there. Furthermore, the Saints would also be punished as they would finish 2-14 next year.
Uh, yes, exactly. Eddie George was on Madden 2001, for the 00-01 season, after being in the Super Bowl the year before. That year, he had almost 2000 total yards and 16 TDs, both career highs.Your facts are wrong. The year on the Madden game is for the actual year that the Superbowl will be in. So SA being on the cover of '07 was for the '06-'07 season. Why do you think that they got on the cover? It is because of their big years the year before.