What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reggie Bush to sue St. Louis (1 Viewer)

I'm not a fan of the sue happy mentality at all but with what is at stake I think he might have a case.

Every time I see these guys running out of bounds at NFL full speed it seems like there should be a better way to avoid possible injuries.

 
I don't think this is a case of negligence such that Bush would win in court but you would think they would cover that area with turf or some other composite that would provide some traction. Football cleats on concrete = forget about stopping quickly.

 
He should sue. His career is likely over by the time he recovers. The other interesting angle is that the city is responsible for it, not the Rams owner or the NFL. Maybe this case will have the added benefit of making cities think twice before financing new stadium deals. They are bad public investments.

 
I don't think this is a case of negligence such that Bush would win in court but you would think they would cover that area with turf or some other composite that would provide some traction. Football cleats on concrete = forget about stopping quickly.
So the reason for covering the concrete area is that it is foreseeable that someone could get injured by not being able to stop quickly?

 
I don't think this is a case of negligence such that Bush would win in court but you would think they would cover that area with turf or some other composite that would provide some traction. Football cleats on concrete = forget about stopping quickly.
So the reason for covering the concrete area is that it is foreseeable that someone could get injured by not being able to stop quickly?
You ain't tricking me with your fancy law-talking ways.

 
He should sue. His career is likely over by the time he recovers. The other interesting angle is that the city is responsible for it, not the Rams owner or the NFL. Maybe this case will have the added benefit of making cities think twice before financing new stadium deals. They are bad public investments.
This xTen!
 
We've had this discussion in my office before. Where are the Risk Managers for these teams? Other stadiums have similar problems. Players shouldn't have to leap over benches either. Foreseeable risk that could've been mitigated.

Maybe the guys like Greg Coleman who make sure your socks are correct can report sideline risks to the NFL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Give him 1 week of pay.

That's how long he would have lasted before a different season-ending injury would have occurred.

 
Right before you lose your football team you get sued :lmao:

Just waiting for an email to surface between a maintenance supervisor and whoever approves expenses...

'Hey, McCown slipped hard on that concrete around the sidelines. We should cover it with turf or carpet. '

'Hell no, we are losing the team anyway. I'm not paying for improvements 10 weeks before the stadium becomes useless. '

 
Not really. Generally, steps taken to fix a potentially dangerous condition are not admissible to prove negligence with respect to the condition. But the bigger issue is that there is no question now that the condition is dangerous given McCown's and Bush's injury (they are now "on notice"). If someone suffers that injury on the concrete again this week, it's a whole lot worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top