What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Report Card Grades for Every Team's Rookie Class After NFL Preseas (1 Viewer)

Bracie Smathers

Footballguy
Nice update of every NFL team's rookie class.

What grade did your team receive and do you generally agree/disagree?

My link

Report Card Grades for Every Team's Rookie Class After NFL Preseason Week 2

The most exciting part of the NFL preseason, for me at least, is watching the rookies. These are the guys we haven't seen on an NFL field yet, and every game is a glimpse at a potential future—or lack of one.

Sure, it's still early but already we can begin to formulate some idea of how draft classes are going to turn out. Of course, many of them will be completely wrong, but that's to be expected.

How well did your team do drafting in 2012? Here's grades for all 32 teams.

===========================================================================

New England Patriots

So far, Chandler Jones has looked like a bit of a freak. The Syracuse product is already starting, and he's making quite the impression. He's dominating frequently.

Fellow first-round pick Dont'a Hightower is also starting along the defensive front-seven. Hightower hasn't earned quite the reviews Jones has, but he has impressed nonetheless.

With Jake Bequette and Tavon Wilson also flashing, New England looks to get some immediate contributors out of its draft class. That's a good start.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

New York Jets

Quinton Coples has earned both praise and scorn in his first NFL preseason. He has been criticized for his practice habits at time, but he's also dominated on the field.

Second-round pick Stephen Hill looks to start at wide receiver, and, as a high-upside but raw player, that's a great sign. Hill is already playing, and he still has a ton of potential.

Demario Davis has also impressed, and seventh-round S Antonio Allen has been brilliant in the preseason. This draft class has a lot of potential.

Grade: A-

---------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins

No. 8 overall pick Ryan Tannehill will be Miami's starting quarterback in 2012. That's a great start for Tannehill and the Dolphins.

The rest of the draft class, however, hasn't been so excellent. Second-round pick Jonathan Martin has struggled, and only Lamar Miller has really shown much.

A franchise quarterback is a huge piece, but the lack of contribution from Miami's other rookies is disappointing.

Grade: C-

---------------------------------------------------------

Buffalo Bills

Stephon Gilmore is already Buffalo's top cornerback, and despite some early struggles, No. 41 overall pick Cordy Glenn will be starting at left tackle. That's getting something out of your early picks.

T.J. Graham should contribute some at wide receiver, as well. Nigel Bradham has also risen up the depth chart and could receive some playing time.

It remains to be seen how good these guys will be, but they are at least getting on the field and playing.

Grade: B

---------------------------------------------------------

New York Giants

Though he won't be starting, David Wilson looks to contribute in 2012 as a change-of-pace running back. His speed and explosiveness will add a new dimension to New York's offense.

Likewise, Rueben Randle should see the field often. He won't put up staggering numbers but he will contribute.

Most of the Giants' other picks were upside or depth selections. They won't be doing much in 2012, as you would expect from a rookie on the defending Super Bowl champions.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

Washington Redskins

The Washington Redskins' 2012 draft class is essentially Robert Griffin III. Thus far, Griffin has struggled some with pressure, which was a problem of his in college too.

As of yet, no other Redskins are expected to see significant playing time. This isn't necessarily an indictment, given Washington's lack of early draft picks, but it isn't good either. Kirk Cousins has looked good as a backup quarterback, though.

However, the simple fact remains that the evaluation of Washington's draft class lies solely on Griffin's success.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

Dallas Cowboys

When the Cowboys traded up for Morris Claiborne, it was expected that the No. 6 overall pick would start.

Claiborne probably still will start, but he's had some injury problems and hasn't quite met expectations thus far.

No other Dallas rookies are really expected to contribute much. The team bet on Claiborne, and now the LSU product needs to live up to his draft status.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

Philadelphia Eagles

First-round DT Fletcher Cox seems likely to start, and second-round LB Mychal Kendricks will join him. Two picks, two starters. Not bad.

Both Cox and Kendricks have impressed in their roles, and third-round QB Nick Foles has also shown flashes of brilliance. He may actually be Philadelphia's backup behind Michael Vick.

Vinny Curry has impressed at defensive end, and Brandon Boykin may have a shot at the Eagle's nickelback job. It's safe to say that Philadelphia may have found a few players.

Grade: A

---------------------------------------------------------

Indianapolis Colts

Andrew Luck has looked simply fantastic. Everything that Luck has done so far makes the Colts look brilliant for making the easy pick.

Coby Fleener has had his ups and downs, but Dwayne Allen has looked solid. Outside of Luck, none of the Colts rookies is looking like a superstar, but some look like they can contribute.

The key here is Luck. If he plays as well as he has so far, Indianapolis will look back on the 2012 draft with a smile.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

Jacksonville Jaguars

The Jaguars' first three draft picks are starting. Granted, one of those players is a punter.

Justin Blackmon has impressed since joining Jacksonville, and Andre Branch has flashed the ability that made him a high-upside second-round pick.

No one outside of the team's first three picks is expected to contribute much in 2012. The team's first two picks are looking good, but the others are lagging behind.

Grade: C

---------------------------------------------------------

Houston Texans

Whitney Mercilus has drawn praise for his excellent play, but the Texans' other rookies aren't standing out.

Mercilus flashes explosiveness and has good pass-rush skills. Houston's talent at outside linebacker may limit his playing time, though.

After Mercilus, third-round pick DeVier Posey has struggled, not catching a ball in his first two preseason games. Keshawn Martin has stood out some, however.

Though Mercilus has impressed, no one else has joined him as a standout. The lack of depth here hurts the team's grade.

Grade: C-

---------------------------------------------------------

Tennessee Titans

Kendall Wright, the No. 21 overall pick, has quickly stepped in for Kenny Britt as Tennessee's primary wide receiver. Second-round pick Zach Brown may soon be starting at outside linebacker.

Third-round DT Mike Martin is third on the team's depth chart, and he should see plenty of playing time as a rookie. Three rookie Titans should contribute in 2012.

There isn't a ton of star power here, but Tennessee has three early contributors and potential above-average to good starters.

Grade: A-

---------------------------------------------------------

San Francisco 49ers

Not a single rookie 49er is currently in line to start or even contribute very much. LaMichael James is closest, and even he isn't one of San Francisco's top two running backs.

First-round pick A.J. Jenkins has struggled, and though he could still be good in the future, he hasn't shown many good signs so far.

As of now, San Francisco's draft class looks pretty bleak. There isn't a whole lot of upside, and the players aren't even playing right now.

Grade: D

---------------------------------------------------------

Arizona Cardinals

Not even No. 13 overall pick Michael Floyd is currently starting for the Cardinals. Floyd has struggled in the preseason and hasn't done much to earn a starting position.

Floyd's fellow rookies haven't done much better, though Justin Bethel is apparently a kick-blocking demon. Bobby Massie has perhaps the best chance of playing time following Levi Brown's season-ending injury.

Senio Kelemete has shown that he is raw but talented, which was expected. As of now, Arizona's rookies simply aren't showing a whole lot, though. There is some potential, but it is deeply covered by rawness.

Grade: D+

---------------------------------------------------------

Seattle Seahawks

Surprise first-round pick Bruce Irvin hasn't lit the world on fire yet, but a few other Seattle rookies have stepped up. Despite switching positions from defensive line, J.R. Sweezy is working with the first team at guard.

LB Bobby Wagner is also starting, and Robert Turbin looks to get some playing time at linebacker. The Seahawks should have four rookies see significant action.

Russell Wilson is surprisingly still competing with Matt Flynn and could be the team's quarterback in the near future.

If Irvin starts to come around, this class has the makings of a potentially excellent group. That might be a big if, though.

Grade: B

---------------------------------------------------------

St. Louis Rams

After trading back twice in the first round, the Rams ended up with quite a few draft picks. First-round defensive tackle Michael Brockers has shown some flashes, and several other rookies will contribute.

Despite being a bit raw, Brian Quick will see plenty of playing time at wide receiver. Janoris Jenkins fell due to off-the-field issues, but he is starting and playing well for St. Louis.

Isaiah Pead will also see time spelling Steven Jackson. All these players have significant upside, and they are already contributing. This could be a great draft class.

Grade: A-

---------------------------------------------------------

Cleveland Browns

Despite Trent Richardson suffering a knee injury, Cleveland's rookie class is looking great. QB Brandon Weeden easily won the job from Colt McCoy, and Mitchell Schwartz also won his competition at right tackle.

LB James Michael-Johnson will start the season, and CB Trevin Wade will see time at cornerback. DT John Hughes could start due to injuries. Cleveland has a plethora of rookies ready to contribute.

Richardson should return from his injury and play at a high level. The other rookies may not dominate like he does, but they shouldn't be awful either.

Grade: A

---------------------------------------------------------

Baltimore Ravens

Right now, it seems that Courtney Upshaw is the only Ravens' rookie who will seriously contribute as a rookie, though Bernard Pierce could see some time spelling Ray Rice.

Upshaw won't be dynamic, but he should offer solid play. In the event of injury, Kelechi Osemele could step in nearly anywhere along the offensive line.

Baltimore added some potential in the draft, but the team's overall talent level keeps many of the new players from busting through right away.

Grade: B

---------------------------------------------------------

Cincinnati Bengals

The Bengals' draft class was praised by many, but for the moment, only one rookie is starting. Kevin Zeitler is starting at right guard, but he has struggled in the team's first two preseason games.

Dre Kirkpatrick has largely been inactive due to injury. Rookies Devon Still, Marvin Jones, Mohamed Sanu and Vontaze Burfict seem likely to buy playing time.

This draft class has a ton of potential, and several rookies will contribute immediately. Only the team's two first-round picks' lack of success is disappointing.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

Pittsburgh Steelers

In 2012, the Steelers will start two rookie offensive linemen. Mike Adams has disappointed some, but he will likely be the team's starting left tackle. And, as expected, David DeCastro will man the right guard position.

Adams may not be great, but he has a ton of potential moving forward. DeCastro will probably be great. Alameda Ta'amu will serve as Pittsburgh's backup nose tackle and should get on the field spelling Steve McLendon, until Casey Hampton is ready to return.

Other players like Chris Rainey and Sean Spence offer long-term value, as well as immediate returns. There is upside and depth in this class to go along with the rookie contributors.

Grade: A-

---------------------------------------------------------

New Orleans Saints

Because of the Mark Ingram trade and Bountygate repercussions, the Saints didn't pick until the third round. Akiem Hicks has flashed the ability that made him a third-round selection, and he could see some playing time in 2012.

Though Marcel Jones has impressed, he will serve as a backup for the Saints. Nick Toon could contribute at wide receiver if he can stay healthy.

The Saints didn't have many early picks in 2012, but they added some potential players. There is no guarantee of success, and none of the players will likely be great, though.

Grade: C

---------------------------------------------------------

Atlanta Falcons

It doesn't look like Atlanta will get much out of its rookies in 2012. Because they traded their 2012 first-round pick to acquire Julio Jones, the Falcons didn't pick until the second round.

In the second, Atlanta selected Peter Konz, who appears to have lost the right guard position battle. No other rookie Falcon is close to winning a starting spot.

In fact, not only are no rookies close to starting, they really aren't even close to contributing. Atlanta is essentially playing without rookies in 2012.

That doesn't mean there isn't still some potential in the class, though.

Grade: D-

---------------------------------------------------------

Carolina Panthers

Luke Kuechly has exceeded the high expectations set for him. The Boston College product has flown around the field, making play after play.

Second-round G Amini Silatolu is playing surprisingly well for a player with no Division-I football experience. No other rookies seem likely to start for the Panthers.

CB Josh Normon could see some playing time, though he probably won't start. The first two picks here are looking good, but the draft is more questionable at the bottom.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Come Week 1, the Buccaneers will likely be starting three rookies. Doug Martin should get the bulk of the carries at running back, and of course No. 7 overall pick Mark Barron will start at safety.

However, LB Lavonte David will also start. These three players all have the ability to be great at their positions.

There isn't a ton more talent in the draft class, but those three could easily make up for it. It remains to be seen just how talented the trio is.

Grade: B

---------------------------------------------------------

San Diego Chargers

Melvin Ingram has shocked nearly everyone with his excellent play. He has excelled defending the run, rushing the passer and playing in coverage.

Second- and third-round picks Kendall Reyes and Brandon Taylor aren't yet starting but should frequently see the field. The two will likely be starting in a year.

The Chargers added some more potential in Ladarius Green and David Molk. Edwin Baker could also develop into a role player. This is a potentially dynamic class.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

Kansas City Chiefs

As of now, no Kansas City rookies are starting. Dontari Poe may be third at nose tackle, and Jeff Allen is backing up Ryan Lilja at guard.

However, the Chiefs' draft class still offers long-term value. Poe and Allen should develop into good starters, and Devon Wylie is already seeing playing time at wide receiver.

It may take time for this class to find its worth, but it should happen eventually. Unfortunately, Kansas City could use the help now.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

Oakland Raiders

Because they did not pick until the last pick of the third round, Oakland could have a hard time getting too much out of this class. Fourth-round pick Miles Burris is currently starting, though.

In time, Tony Berstrom will likely start at guard, as well. Unfortunately for Oakland, the lack of picks here ruined any chances the team had at a true impact draft.

There isn't much upside or probability here. It's hard to say any of these players will make it at all, and it's nearly impossible to predict any of them becoming stars.

Grade: D-

---------------------------------------------------------

Denver Broncos

After trading back twice, the Broncos were left without a first-round pick. Derek Wolfe has dominated at defensive tackle thus far, but the team's other picks haven't gone quite as well.

Ronnie Hillman is a bit of a disappointment thus far, but he still has potential as a playmaking running back. QB Brock Osweiler was drafted as a high-upside guy, as well.

So far, Wolfe is the only rookie really contributing for Denver. Others could in time, but that is unpredictable.

Grade: C-

---------------------------------------------------------

Detroit Lions

Riley Reiff was expected to supplant either Jeff Backus or Gosder Cherilus, but he is currently working as a backup. Fortunately, Detroit has other rookies who are doing a better job of impressing.

CB Bill Bentley has been excellent in the preseason and could see serious playing time in 2012. WR Ryan Broyles should also see the field often.

Eventually, Reiff will start at tackle, and the Lions have other rookies to complement him across the roster. This class could be good, but it probably won't be great.

Grade: B-

---------------------------------------------------------

Green Bay Packers

First-round pick Nick Perry is starting at outside linebacker opposite Clay Matthews and could, in time, be a special player. Second-round pick Jerel Worthy will rotate in at defensive end.

CB Casey Hayward has impressed and worked his way up the depth chart. He will be on the field in many passing situations. Jerron McMillian should also see playing time.

Green Bay already has several rookies contributing on an extremely talented roster. With time, these players could develop into key pieces.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

Chicago Bears

The Bears' first two picks—Shea McClellin and Alshon Jeffery—will be seeing plenty of playing time. McClellin will rotate in on passing downs, and Jeffery will rarely be off the field.

Jeffery has earned praise for his play, and especially catching ability throughout training camp and the preseason. Brandon Hardin has also turned some heads, and he could be the team's starting safety by the season's end.

McClellin and Jeffery should both offer significant contributions as rookies, and both have Pro Bowl potential down the line. If any other rookies can contribute, that's icing on the cake.

Grade: B+

---------------------------------------------------------

Minnesota Vikings

No. 4 overall pick Matt Kalil will be manning Minnesota's left tackle position, and he will, in all likelihood, do an excellent job there. First-round S Harrison Smith seems likely to start.

CB Josh Robinson could eventually earn playing time, but he's buried on the depth chart at the moment. Seventh-round LB Audie Cole has shocked many with his play, as he picked up two pick-sixes on back-to-back defensive plays.

Cole could end up contributing for the Vikings along with Kalil, Smith and Robinson. This unit has some immediate contributors, but there isn't a ton of upside after Kalil. Most of the Vikings' rookies will be average starters at best.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------

 
Philadelphia EaglesFirst-round DT Fletcher Cox seems likely to start, and second-round LB Mychal Kendricks will join him. Two picks, two starters. Not bad.Both Cox and Kendricks have impressed in their roles, and third-round QB Nick Foles has also shown flashes of brilliance. He may actually be Philadelphia's backup behind Michael Vick.Vinny Curry has impressed at defensive end, and Brandon Boykin may have a shot at the Eagle's nickelback job. It's safe to say that Philadelphia may have found a few players.Grade: A
And they didnt mention Brown who has looked very good running and reciving so far.
 
The C+ for Carolina seems a little low to me. They are getting two opening day starters in Luke Keuchly (who looks fantastic) and Amini Silatolu (who also looks really good for a rookie O-lineman). They didn't have a third round pick, and in the fourth they got Joe Adams, who looks absolutely electric in the return game (which is what they brought him in for).

Josh Norman (5th round) is also turning a lot of heads at CB, since being cleared to play last week. He's likely to be a starter at CB by next season, if not thois year, and Brad Nortman is looking good with his punts, as a 6th rounder...which was a position of need.

The only other players are Frank Alexander (4th round DE) who has had a few bright spots and willsurely make the team, and DJ Campbell, a 7th rounder who will probably not make the team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They think the Colts nailed the #1 overall pick, and got a sure fire franchise cornerstone QB, and a bunch of other "contributors", and this doesn't merit an A? Geez. Tough grader.

 
Good feedback.

When naming draftees could folks list the first and last name along with position? Helps to have a program when dealing with virtually every rookie drafted.

And this is only the drafted rookies for this year so the free agent gems are not listed.

It is a pretty difficult task to try and keep up with every rookie so feedback helps for guys who were not named but you have to give the guy credit for at least making a serious attempt.

 
Thanks for the post, Always enjoy hearing about the rookies after Training Camp and preseason. Helps to start drawing own conclusions on players

 
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".

 
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
:goodposting:
 
'Donnybrook said:
'Fullback Fro said:
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
:goodposting:
You can do better huh?Go ahead, enthrall us with your accumen.I'm sure you know every single player drafted and how they have been doing and you can come up with far superior grades two weeks into the preseason.I thought it was worth passing along to get feedback for the reason that people do know their teams better and could post something worth while.
 
I am sorry but you asked for it. When you are a Browns fan and you give them an A - it tells me all I need to know. It makes me question your objectivity especially with the grade you have given Atlanta. It screams look we won the Julio Jones trade.

It doesn't make sense to judge a draft a 6 months after it is held. It takes years for players to reach their full potential. See Aaron Rodgers and DeAnglo Williams.

 
I am sorry but you asked for it. When you are a Browns fan and you give them an A - it tells me all I need to know. It makes me question your objectivity especially with the grade you have given Atlanta. It screams look we won the Julio Jones trade. It doesn't make sense to judge a draft a 6 months after it is held. It takes years for players to reach their full potential. See Aaron Rodgers and DeAnglo Williams.
Hey Donny maybe you should check what you post but since you didn't and need an explanation here ya go. I didn't write the article. I shared it for those who have the capacity to comment anything worth while that can provide insight into their teams because some folks actually know how their draft picks have performed to dateBut if you can't decipher a report written by someone else and feel the need to attack someone who shares it because you didn't even bother to read that much then I'm sorry but YOU ASKED FOR IT.
 
'Donnybrook said:
'Fullback Fro said:
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
:goodposting:
You can do better huh?Go ahead, enthrall us with your accumen.I'm sure you know every single player drafted and how they have been doing and you can come up with far superior grades two weeks into the preseason.I thought it was worth passing along to get feedback for the reason that people do know their teams better and could post something worth while.
Just posting a criticism of the scale the guy is using to grade teams. Lighten up.
 
I am sorry but you asked for it. When you are a Browns fan and you give them an A - it tells me all I need to know. It makes me question your objectivity especially with the grade you have given Atlanta. It screams look we won the Julio Jones trade. It doesn't make sense to judge a draft a 6 months after it is held. It takes years for players to reach their full potential. See Aaron Rodgers and DeAnglo Williams.
Hey Donny maybe you should check what you post but since you didn't and need an explanation here ya go. I didn't write the article. I shared it for those who have the capacity to comment anything worth while that can provide insight into their teams because some folks actually know how their draft picks have performed to dateBut if you can't decipher a report written by someone else and feel the need to attack someone who shares it because you didn't even bother to read that much then I'm sorry but YOU ASKED FOR IT.
I apologize BS I thought you wrote it. My comments about judging a draft too early still apply.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Philadelphia EaglesFirst-round DT Fletcher Cox seems likely to start, and second-round LB Mychal Kendricks will join him. Two picks, two starters. Not bad.Both Cox and Kendricks have impressed in their roles, and third-round QB Nick Foles has also shown flashes of brilliance. He may actually be Philadelphia's backup behind Michael Vick.Vinny Curry has impressed at defensive end, and Brandon Boykin may have a shot at the Eagle's nickelback job. It's safe to say that Philadelphia may have found a few players.Grade: A
And they didnt mention Brown who has looked very good running and reciving so far.
Foles and Kendricks are the top players from the Eagles draft. Foles was the 3rd best qb in the draft and Kendricks is a game changer. Cox is solid. McNutt was a value pick that won't see the field. Curry is also a nice project. I loved the Eagles draft.
 
I am sorry but you asked for it. When you are a Browns fan and you give them an A - it tells me all I need to know. It makes me question your objectivity especially with the grade you have given Atlanta. It screams look we won the Julio Jones trade. It doesn't make sense to judge a draft a 6 months after it is held. It takes years for players to reach their full potential. See Aaron Rodgers and DeAnglo Williams.
Hey Donny maybe you should check what you post but since you didn't and need an explanation here ya go. I didn't write the article. I shared it for those who have the capacity to comment anything worth while that can provide insight into their teams because some folks actually know how their draft picks have performed to dateBut if you can't decipher a report written by someone else and feel the need to attack someone who shares it because you didn't even bother to read that much then I'm sorry but YOU ASKED FOR IT.
I apologize BR I thought you wrote it. My comments about judging a draft too early still apply.
No problem.People can give updates and if the update is the form of a grade or any sort of opinion that designates how they view a player then is a sense, they are grading the player with opinion.I was hoping that people would chime in with their opinions of how well their rookies have been doing.
 
"and Robert Turbin looks to get some playing time at linebacker"

That had me scratching my head a bit.

 
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Philadelphia EaglesFirst-round DT Fletcher Cox seems likely to start, and second-round LB Mychal Kendricks will join him. Two picks, two starters. Not bad.Both Cox and Kendricks have impressed in their roles, and third-round QB Nick Foles has also shown flashes of brilliance. He may actually be Philadelphia's backup behind Michael Vick.Vinny Curry has impressed at defensive end, and Brandon Boykin may have a shot at the Eagle's nickelback job. It's safe to say that Philadelphia may have found a few players.Grade: A
And they didnt mention Brown who has looked very good running and reciving so far.
Foles and Kendricks are the top players from the Eagles draft. Foles was the 3rd best qb in the draft and Kendricks is a game changer. Cox is solid. McNutt was a value pick that won't see the field. Curry is also a nice project. I loved the Eagles draft.
The Eagles, outside of a ding or two to Vic, look really good this preseason and I would imagine their rookie class is part of the reason they look so good.I was also impressed with the free agent DE they got from Canada.Philly looks loaded for bear this year and their rookie class turn out to be very good.
 
Hard to imagine giving just a "B" grade to Tampa. They drafted impact starters in Barron and David at two of their biggest position needs. That alone is worth a "B" IMO. Add in Martin , who if nothing else becomes a contributor to a RBBC, the Bucs get an "A" out of this.

 
These are horrible grades. You obviously didn't take training camp news and pre-season games to make these grades. You graded them by how big the names they drafted were.

 
---------------------------------------------------------

Washington Redskins

The Washington Redskins' 2012 draft class is essentially Robert Griffin III. Thus far, Griffin has struggled some with pressure, which was a problem of his in college too.



As of yet, no other Redskins are expected to see significant playing time. This isn't necessarily an indictment, given Washington's lack of early draft picks, but it isn't good either. Kirk Cousins has looked good as a backup quarterback, though.

However, the simple fact remains that the evaluation of Washington's draft class lies solely on Griffin's success.

Grade: C+

---------------------------------------------------------
Crawford, the DB, is likely to get significant playing time this year, as are Gettis and LeRibeus on the O-line. Robinson at LB and Morris at RB may as well. That doesn't mean they'll be good, but the premise of rating the entire Redskin draft on Griffin alone is wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Fullback Fro said:
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
I disagree with you here...First of all, if a rookie wins an NFL job four weeks into camp, that is a victory, even if they were expected to get one. This isn't high school. This is the NFL. There are pretty much no coaches who will put a rookie out there if they are not the best option for the team. Also, some of the best grades came from teams with very few holes to plug....As and high Bs for such loaded teams as New England, Pitt, Green Bay, Jets, Eagles, Bengals, Titans and Bears. Those are all playoff contenders for sure. Your team may have gotten a bad grade, because their draft sucked.
 
I am sorry but you asked for it. When you are a Browns fan and you give them an A - it tells me all I need to know. It makes me question your objectivity especially with the grade you have given Atlanta. It screams look we won the Julio Jones trade.

It doesn't make sense to judge a draft a 6 months after it is held. It takes years for players to reach their full potential. See Aaron Rodgers and DeAnglo Williams.
I felt bad that I got Bracie mixed up with the Author of the article. However, I don't feel as bad now knowing that the author is in fact a diehard Browns fan as it states in his bio: http://bleacherreport.com/users/622174-wes-stueveI hate Bleacher Reports soo much that every time I do a Google search on NFL Player I have to include "-Bleacherreports".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Fullback Fro said:
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
I disagree with you here...First of all, if a rookie wins an NFL job four weeks into camp, that is a victory, even if they were expected to get one. This isn't high school. This is the NFL. There are pretty much no coaches who will put a rookie out there if they are not the best option for the team. Also, some of the best grades came from teams with very few holes to plug....As and high Bs for such loaded teams as New England, Pitt, Green Bay, Jets, Eagles, Bengals, Titans and Bears. Those are all playoff contenders for sure. Your team may have gotten a bad grade, because their draft sucked.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? They do it ALL THE TIME. Most recent example: CASEY MATTHEWS.He gave Cleveland an A because a couple of rookies are starting. That's a horrible way to rate a draft. Let's consider this...

Team A has a top 5 offensive tackle in the league. They trade up and draft the top prospect at offensive tackle.

Team B has the worse offensive tackle in the league. They don't bother trying to trade up and draft and take the 10th best offensive tackle.

Team A's rookie offensive tackle doesn't start this year, but their veteran offensive tackle does but has only 2 years left on his contract and he's 34.

Team B's rookie offensive tackle will start because he beat one of the worse offensive lineman ever.

Therefore since Team B's rookie is starting, Team B gets the A for their draft while Team A gets the C for their draft. WHAT?

That's basically how he graded teams, which is stupid.

 
'Fullback Fro said:
These grade are horrible. Just because a rookie has a chance to start does not equate to good drafting. If a team is so strong before the draft and they don't need starters, they are getting bad grades. I don't get it. These grades should be for "What teams have the most holes to plug".
I disagree with you here...First of all, if a rookie wins an NFL job four weeks into camp, that is a victory, even if they were expected to get one. This isn't high school. This is the NFL. There are pretty much no coaches who will put a rookie out there if they are not the best option for the team. Also, some of the best grades came from teams with very few holes to plug....As and high Bs for such loaded teams as New England, Pitt, Green Bay, Jets, Eagles, Bengals, Titans and Bears. Those are all playoff contenders for sure. Your team may have gotten a bad grade, because their draft sucked.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? They do it ALL THE TIME. Most recent example: CASEY MATTHEWS.He gave Cleveland an A because a couple of rookies are starting. That's a horrible way to rate a draft. Let's consider this...

Team A has a top 5 offensive tackle in the league. They trade up and draft the top prospect at offensive tackle.

Team B has the worse offensive tackle in the league. They don't bother trying to trade up and draft and take the 10th best offensive tackle.

Team A's rookie offensive tackle doesn't start this year, but their veteran offensive tackle does but has only 2 years left on his contract and he's 34.

Team B's rookie offensive tackle will start because he beat one of the worse offensive lineman ever.

Therefore since Team B's rookie is starting, Team B gets the A for their draft while Team A gets the C for their draft. WHAT?

That's basically how he graded teams, which is stupid.
Calm down, its only an article.Per your dismissive assessment of the Cleveland draft, I not only disagree with you but I have reasons to hold a different position.

Here is the entire Cleveland rookie draft class.

2012

1 Trent Richardson RB Alabama

Plan has always been to feature Trent from game-one. He shinced in mini-camp, OTAs, and training camp. He had a piece of catiledge cleaned out and is ahead of schedule to start and yesterday the coach said he anticipates 20-25 touches in the first game. I expect big things from T-Rich his rookie season so he is not only expected to start but the team plans to feature him and from all accounts he is on track to have a big year. STARTER

1 Brandon Weeden QB Oklahoma State

Named starter, got all first team reps, shows a superior arm to Colt McCoy and makes throws that Colt simply can not make. Had the full playbook thrown at him after not even having a playbook at Oklahoma State and he struggled in the first preseason game. In the second preseason game the playbook was scaled back and he showed an improvement and was effective. I don't expect huge things from him but I know he can make throws that Colt cannot make. He has a big arm and late in the season, in the bitterly cold air right off of Lake Erie at Cleveland Browns Stadium the ball dies in the air. Colt had his worst games late in the season where his passes died on the vine. The Browns will get enough out of Weeden and a solid rushing attack where Brandon can be an effective starter. STARTER

2 Mitchell Schwartz T California

Ranked the best ORT of this entire draft class. Not overly athletic but has the size and strength and desire/aggressiveness to be a very good right tackle. He struggled in his first preseason game but that was expected. He showed a vast improvement in his second game and looks like he will be very good. Right tackle has been the biggest weakness on the Browns for years so I think Mitchell will have a huge impact that many Browns fans simply don't realize. STARTER

3 John Hughes DT Cincinnati

When this pick was made I was perplexed. I felt it was a mistake and didn't feel adding another DT was a priority. Not long after Hughes was drafted starting DT Phil Taylor tore a pec muscle and was placed on the PUP. He's not expected back until late October. All eyes turned to Hughes and the kid has looked far better than I ever expected. He has incredible strength and anchors the line and he has burst to penetrate and push the pocket. He's looked good in both preseason games and looks like a true find. The plan was to have John as part of a heavy rotatin but he is the STARTER for the first two months of this year.

4 Travis Benjamin WR Miami (FL)

I didn't like this pick when it was made. Travis was tied as the fastest player at the combine but he's only 187lbs and his frame looks thin so I discounted him as a speed guy. I was wrong. He is much tougher than I gave him credit for and I think he is a fantasy sleeper. He would seem a natural in the slot but he's being lined up all over the place so I think the coaches plan to use him a lot. He's not listed as a starter but he will get a more work than I expected.

4 James-Michael Johnson LB Nevada

Flashed in camp and with the suspension of starting LB Scott Fujita he will start for the first three games. The Browns linebacking corps has lacked the speed that JMH brings and Fujita is getting up there so he has a great opportunity to showcase what he can do in the first three games to challenge for a starting position next year and if he really blows up he probably would move over to the weakside and take over for IRed LB Chris Gocong and be a starter this year.

5 Ryan Miller G Colorado

For some reason the coaches have decided to move Ryan from G to OT. He's done ok but he is not going to challenge either OT Joe Thomas or OT Mitchell Schwartz for a starting job anytime soon.

6 Emmanuel Acho LB Texas

Has done ok but not nearly as well as JMJ and the Browns have unearthed two free agents who have looked good in camp so he's on the bubble to make the team.

6 Billy Winn DT Boise State

Looked ok, has versatility to play either DT or DE so that gives him an edge over other fringe players but he's on the bubble.

7 Trevin Wade DB Arizona

I didn't give Wade a shot to make the squad when he was drafted, boy was I wrong. He has looked great and is seriously challenging to win the nickel back job.

7 Brad Smelley TE Alabama

A guy who blocked for T-Rich in college so I thought this was a sympathetic pick to help Richardson acclimate to the NFL. I was wrong to dismiss Smelley. Camp reports were glowing and then he flashed in the first preseason game when he scored on a pass. The second game he showed he can be more than an effective lead blocker. He's listed as a FB/HB,TE. The Browns are loaded at TE so his only shot to secure a starting spot is to beat out FB Owen Marecic and from my vantage I think he looks better than Marecic so I wouldn't be shocked if he made the team and won the starting FB job.

I've been following the Browns for a long time and this is the best rookie class that I have ever seen.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top