Link? I don't mind being wrong, I would just like to see the wording of the rule.If the ball is moving before the player is down it's a fumble.So you are saying that the ball moving a little bit constitutes loss of control?As we all saw. The ball was moving a little bit prior to the forearm touching. The rules say the evidence has to be IRREFUTABLE. The call was fumble. That should be enough to say its not irrefutable.NFL has already tweeted multiple times that it is the forearm that was down hence why it was not a fumble.
but he's bound to break 1 of them off.....Yeah cmon its not workingAnd again...they need to stop thatThey need to stop trying so hard to get it to Oliver
At least it doesn't look like it will affect the outcome of the game.Link? I don't mind being wrong, I would just like to see the wording of the rule.If the ball is moving before the player is down it's a fumble.So you are saying that the ball moving a little bit constitutes loss of control?As we all saw. The ball was moving a little bit prior to the forearm touching. The rules say the evidence has to be IRREFUTABLE. The call was fumble. That should be enough to say its not irrefutable.NFL has already tweeted multiple times that it is the forearm that was down hence why it was not a fumble.
Just look it up. It's always been this way.Link? I don't mind being wrong, I would just like to see the wording of the rule.If the ball is moving before the player is down it's a fumble.So you are saying that the ball moving a little bit constitutes loss of control?As we all saw. The ball was moving a little bit prior to the forearm touching. The rules say the evidence has to be IRREFUTABLE. The call was fumble. That should be enough to say its not irrefutable.NFL has already tweeted multiple times that it is the forearm that was down hence why it was not a fumble.
I'd tell you what's getting broken off ... and where ... but this is a PG-rated message board.but he's bound to break 1 of them off.....Yeah cmon its not workingAnd again...they need to stop thatThey need to stop trying so hard to get it to Oliver
Yeah, if it ends up being a blowout a call in the first half is pretty meaningless.At least it doesn't look like it will affect the outcome of the game.Link? I don't mind being wrong, I would just like to see the wording of the rule.If the ball is moving before the player is down it's a fumble.So you are saying that the ball moving a little bit constitutes loss of control?As we all saw. The ball was moving a little bit prior to the forearm touching. The rules say the evidence has to be IRREFUTABLE. The call was fumble. That should be enough to say its not irrefutable.NFL has already tweeted multiple times that it is the forearm that was down hence why it was not a fumble.
Exactly. They need to go big, or literally go home.Really can't understand the SD play calling, it's like they are trying to get in third and longs.
Don't worry -- time out.Just glad sanders is off the field here.
Yeah this is frustrating. Hillman too. And Gates actually. All starting and all stopped short.Twice DT's been tackled at the two.
Just looked at my other league. Knew he had Peyton. He has sanders too.Just glad sanders is off the field here.