What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

San Francisco at New Orleans (1 Viewer)

Nasty injury. The leg is not supposed to bend that way. He's gotta be done for the season. Big loss for NO.

 
I still can't get over lance Moore dropping that kick, this is two weeks in a row this has happened to the Saints. Special teams needs some work .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just like that a gift turnover = an 97 yard extended scoring drive by the Saints. Thanks Lance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
once the foot stepped out of bounds...isnt play dead?
Not according to the rulebook.
so what's the difference if he catches a 5 yars. runs for a 40 yard td, then tosses it when he gets out of bounds?
So how many steps would that be? Pretty sure on a 40 yard run-after-catch the catch would already be complete when he is in the end zone.
I saw control, and two feet, the he stepped out of bounds, Should be TD. Stupid rule.

 
once the foot stepped out of bounds...isnt play dead?
Not according to the rulebook.
so what's the difference if he catches a 5 yars. runs for a 40 yard td, then tosses it when he gets out of bounds?
So how many steps would that be? Pretty sure on a 40 yard run-after-catch the catch would already be complete when he is in the end zone.
I saw control, and two feet, the he stepped out of bounds, Should be TD. Stupid rule.
I didn't see control as he took it to the ground, which is something he has to do. So under the current NFL rules it shouldn't be a touchdown. We see catches all the time that come loose after 2 steps ruled incomplete. Not trying to defend the rules, just the call. I'm not a huge fan of these rules either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Didn't the contact come before he came down to the ground with the INT? Meaning he wasn't touched after he possessed it. I actually didn't get a good look at the play, that's just what I'm assuming.

 
This is how it feels when your QB doesn't put up a ton of yards and TDs. The Brees Graham combo doesn't look so hot right now... good thing I am 9-1 and clinched the division already.

 
Can D/ST be charged with a Fumble? Or does the NO D/ST just get credit for INT, but not the subsequent fumble?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top