Goes from a 6-7th round pick in drafts to a 3rd round pick. In the last 10 minutes I have received 3 offers from different teams in my dynasty league. Sell high or hold?
To each his own. By the way your avatar is offensive.Goes from a 6-7th round pick in drafts to a 3rd round pick. In the last 10 minutes I have received 3 offers from different teams in my dynasty league. Sell high or hold?I'll let someone else take him with their 3rd and laugh.
D bro's or d ho's?To each his own. By the way your avatar is offensive.Goes from a 6-7th round pick in drafts to a 3rd round pick. In the last 10 minutes I have received 3 offers from different teams in my dynasty league. Sell high or hold?I'll let someone else take him with their 3rd and laugh.
Ok, in compliance.hey guys let's keep this on topic ... please.
Dude has 9 catches for 131 yards and 2 more long gainers that I remember called back on penalty. That's more than a "decent" game.Oh, and I traded for him in dynasty at about noon today!Guy underperformed his draft position all year but had a decent Super Bowl. I'd be selling as quickly as possible if I was in a dynasty league.
I know, no one cares about my team but 
He was able to come through with 9 receptions when Ward appeared unable to be more than a diversion. I love Ward and will never believe he was 100% for today and Pittsburgh needed Holmes to step up and that is what he did.How did his value go up tonight? Because he had 1 long catch early on basically a screen pass, another long pass in the 4th because the defense botched the play, and then finally had one superb TD catch that will never be repeated again?I'd sell high if he's anywhere near worth a 3rd rounder.
Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
I thought this for a while as well. Until he #####-slapped the Cardinal in the penalty that could have gotten him ejected. If a defender had a prayer of getting it, he lost it then.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
That's the whole point. He had 9 receptions - because Ward was playing on one leg. I really don't see how this game should dramatically change anyone's perception of Holmes - or Ward.He was able to come through with 9 receptions when Ward appeared unable to be more than a diversion. I love Ward and will never believe he was 100% for today and Pittsburgh needed Holmes to step up and that is what he did.How did his value go up tonight? Because he had 1 long catch early on basically a screen pass, another long pass in the 4th because the defense botched the play, and then finally had one superb TD catch that will never be repeated again?I'd sell high if he's anywhere near worth a 3rd rounder.
Thanks, this is helpful for evaluating Holmes' future value.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
I neglected to answser the OP question regarding Holmes value in my earlier post. But, I think without question Holmes value has taken an upturn after today's game. Probably in the top 15 WR dynasty wise I would say, not top 10, but not too far off.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
How about because Ward's getting older and Santonio's getting better after three years in the league?We're talking dynasty here and skills aren't static they progress and digress across a career.That's the whole point. He had 9 receptions - because Ward was playing on one leg. I really don't see how this game should dramatically change anyone's perception of Holmes - or Ward.He was able to come through with 9 receptions when Ward appeared unable to be more than a diversion. I love Ward and will never believe he was 100% for today and Pittsburgh needed Holmes to step up and that is what he did.How did his value go up tonight? Because he had 1 long catch early on basically a screen pass, another long pass in the 4th because the defense botched the play, and then finally had one superb TD catch that will never be repeated again?
I'd sell high if he's anywhere near worth a 3rd rounder.
Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
Yeah, the Super Bowl part of your argument is BS.If you want to say he's a player on the rise because he's younger and Ward has showed signs of decline throughout the year, that's one thing. But to say that winning the Super Bowl MVP magically makes a player better when there's absolutely zero evidence of that happening over the last fifteen years is a foolish argument.See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
I never said there should be "dramatic" change but I don't see why it is hard to see that Holmes proved he is able and willing to step up if needed and can be relied upon.That's the whole point. He had 9 receptions - because Ward was playing on one leg. I really don't see how this game should dramatically change anyone's perception of Holmes - or Ward.He was able to come through with 9 receptions when Ward appeared unable to be more than a diversion. I love Ward and will never believe he was 100% for today and Pittsburgh needed Holmes to step up and that is what he did.How did his value go up tonight? Because he had 1 long catch early on basically a screen pass, another long pass in the 4th because the defense botched the play, and then finally had one superb TD catch that will never be repeated again?I'd sell high if he's anywhere near worth a 3rd rounder.
Much like your response? Get over yourself and allow conversations to proceed w/o turning into the thread title policeThanks, this is helpful for evaluating Holmes' future value.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interceptionRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
2. The return
3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him
4. The tackles
I actually didn't even mention the MVP but you seem to be focusing on it for some reason. I do think, however, that a player coming up big in a big game, especially a young up and coming player, is a good sign for that players future. Shows he can handle the pressure and play well against a team that is one of the best in the league.It could well be fool's gold, and Holmes could digress next year but I can not think of a better way of helping your value then ending the season with your best performance of the year.Yeah, the Super Bowl part of your argument is BS.If you want to say he's a player on the rise because he's younger and Ward has showed signs of decline throughout the year, that's one thing. But to say that winning the Super Bowl MVP magically makes a player better when there's absolutely zero evidence of that happening over the last fifteen years is a foolish argument.See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
Well, I disagree. And I'm pretty sure the numbers are on my side.I actually didn't even mention the MVP but you seem to be focusing on it for some reason. I do think, however, that a player coming up big in a big game, especially a young up and coming player, is a good sign for that players future. Shows he can handle the pressure and play well against a team that is one of the best in the league.It could well be fool's gold, and Holmes could digress next year but I can not think of a better way of helping your value then ending the season with your best performance of the year.Yeah, the Super Bowl part of your argument is BS.If you want to say he's a player on the rise because he's younger and Ward has showed signs of decline throughout the year, that's one thing. But to say that winning the Super Bowl MVP magically makes a player better when there's absolutely zero evidence of that happening over the last fifteen years is a foolish argument.See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
How about because Ward's getting older and Santonio's getting better after three years in the league?We're talking dynasty here and skills aren't static they progress and digress across a career.That's the whole point. He had 9 receptions - because Ward was playing on one leg. I really don't see how this game should dramatically change anyone's perception of Holmes - or Ward.He was able to come through with 9 receptions when Ward appeared unable to be more than a diversion. I love Ward and will never believe he was 100% for today and Pittsburgh needed Holmes to step up and that is what he did.How did his value go up tonight? Because he had 1 long catch early on basically a screen pass, another long pass in the 4th because the defense botched the play, and then finally had one superb TD catch that will never be repeated again?
I'd sell high if he's anywhere near worth a 3rd rounder.
Additionally, it shouldn't be ignored that Holmes has definitely earned Ben's trust after tonight. An important point to remember as Ben scrambles around with his schoolyard style of play looking for someone to throw to.
Because of that trust I would expect Holmes to be the primary target more regularly now.The number of what?Well, I disagree. And I'm pretty sure the numbers are on my side.I actually didn't even mention the MVP but you seem to be focusing on it for some reason. I do think, however, that a player coming up big in a big game, especially a young up and coming player, is a good sign for that players future. Shows he can handle the pressure and play well against a team that is one of the best in the league.It could well be fool's gold, and Holmes could digress next year but I can not think of a better way of helping your value then ending the season with your best performance of the year.Yeah, the Super Bowl part of your argument is BS.If you want to say he's a player on the rise because he's younger and Ward has showed signs of decline throughout the year, that's one thing. But to say that winning the Super Bowl MVP magically makes a player better when there's absolutely zero evidence of that happening over the last fifteen years is a foolish argument.See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!
... or are you still focused on the MVP thing that haven't addressed and don't really see as the issue here either way.Find some other way to define a great performance in a Super Bowl and then see if it had any effect if MVP doesn't work for you. He may be better than the disappointment he was this year because he learns the game more but tonight's performance won't affect his on field performance one bit next year. On second thought, you must be right because David Tyree was fantastic this year.The number of what?Well, I disagree. And I'm pretty sure the numbers are on my side.I actually didn't even mention the MVP but you seem to be focusing on it for some reason. I do think, however, that a player coming up big in a big game, especially a young up and coming player, is a good sign for that players future. Shows he can handle the pressure and play well against a team that is one of the best in the league.It could well be fool's gold, and Holmes could digress next year but I can not think of a better way of helping your value then ending the season with your best performance of the year.Yeah, the Super Bowl part of your argument is BS.If you want to say he's a player on the rise because he's younger and Ward has showed signs of decline throughout the year, that's one thing. But to say that winning the Super Bowl MVP magically makes a player better when there's absolutely zero evidence of that happening over the last fifteen years is a foolish argument.See post above.Why should it? Was Larry Brown better after winning a Super Bowl MVP? Doug Williams? Dexter Jackson? Desmond Howard? Heck, even Peyton Manning had fewer fantasy points in each of the two years since he won the SB MVP.They both played great games and were worthy of consideration. I think it's arguable either way and a tie generally goes to the offensive player.Back to the topic, I don't understand how Holmes stepping up with a huge game in the Superbowl wouldn't and shouldn't raise his value, as some have suggested it shouldn't.Harrison deserved the MVP 1. The interception2. The return3. The repeated penalties on Ari's OL trying to stop him4. The tacklesRegarding Santonio's winning TD, that was an awesome play, much harder I think then the pass that went between his hands prior that would have been probably the winning TD also. I thought that was a catchable ball, only thing that I saw that might have given Holmes trouble was the height that he obtain on the play, and that might have messed up his timing of the ball. He deserved MVP, what a great game he played!... or are you still focused on the MVP thing that haven't addressed and don't really see as the issue here either way.
Terrible and nonsensical analogy.Again, you may be right and he might do squat in the future, but what I see is a young 1st round pick who the Steelers traded up to get play great in a big game.Find some other way to define a great performance in a Super Bowl and then see if it had any effect if MVP doesn't work for you. He may be better than the disappointment he was this year because he learns the game more but tonight's performance won't affect his on field performance one bit next year. On second thought, you must be right because David Tyree was fantastic this year.
Holmes is far better than Branch. He was for sure a buy low guy before the playoffs. He didn't get the ball near enough this season, partly due to gameplan, but more importantly due to the fact that Ben had zero time to throw. The playoffs were the first time the Steelers didn't primarily send Holmes deep, and it paid off. Let this kid get the ball in space some. If corners are not going to let him beat them deep, and give him a large cushion, then give him the ball right away and let him make plays. I had planned on grabbing him in the 4th as a "steal" this offseason, but looks like I will have to now spend a 3rd to lock him up.Deion Branch was the first thing that came to my mind too.
Oh no you didn't. Show me ANY statistics that show Holmes has equalled Branch's production. He hasn't. He has more potential than Branch ever had, but yesterday's game was a breakout performance from someone who has teetered on underperforming since he was drafted. Holmes will pull a Branch and follow the money to another (unsuspecting) team within two years.Holmes is far better than Branch. He was for sure a buy low guy before the playoffs. He didn't get the ball near enough this season, partly due to gameplan, but more importantly due to the fact that Ben had zero time to throw. The playoffs were the first time the Steelers didn't primarily send Holmes deep, and it paid off. Let this kid get the ball in space some. If corners are not going to let him beat them deep, and give him a large cushion, then give him the ball right away and let him make plays. I had planned on grabbing him in the 4th as a "steal" this offseason, but looks like I will have to now spend a 3rd to lock him up.Deion Branch was the first thing that came to my mind too.
Not sure its his fault though. Not in the Steelers gameplan to get him the ball that much. Ward was hobbled so both he and Miller saw increased looks. Still.......he has some of the sickest open field moves in the NFL.Oh no you didn't. Show me ANY statistics that show Holmes has equalled Branch's production. He hasn't. He has more potential than Branch ever had, but yesterday's game was a breakout performance from someone who has teetered on underperforming since he was drafted. Holmes will pull a Branch and follow the money to another (unsuspecting) team within two years.Holmes is far better than Branch. He was for sure a buy low guy before the playoffs. He didn't get the ball near enough this season, partly due to gameplan, but more importantly due to the fact that Ben had zero time to throw. The playoffs were the first time the Steelers didn't primarily send Holmes deep, and it paid off. Let this kid get the ball in space some. If corners are not going to let him beat them deep, and give him a large cushion, then give him the ball right away and let him make plays. I had planned on grabbing him in the 4th as a "steal" this offseason, but looks like I will have to now spend a 3rd to lock him up.Deion Branch was the first thing that came to my mind too.
Not sure its his fault though. Not in the Steelers gameplan to get him the ball that much. Ward was hobbled so both he and Miller saw increased looks. Still.......he has some of the sickest open field moves in the NFL.Oh no you didn't. Show me ANY statistics that show Holmes has equalled Branch's production. He hasn't. He has more potential than Branch ever had, but yesterday's game was a breakout performance from someone who has teetered on underperforming since he was drafted. Holmes will pull a Branch and follow the money to another (unsuspecting) team within two years.Holmes is far better than Branch. He was for sure a buy low guy before the playoffs. He didn't get the ball near enough this season, partly due to gameplan, but more importantly due to the fact that Ben had zero time to throw. The playoffs were the first time the Steelers didn't primarily send Holmes deep, and it paid off. Let this kid get the ball in space some. If corners are not going to let him beat them deep, and give him a large cushion, then give him the ball right away and let him make plays. I had planned on grabbing him in the 4th as a "steal" this offseason, but looks like I will have to now spend a 3rd to lock him up.Deion Branch was the first thing that came to my mind too.
Depending on what's being offered, I'd absolutely consider selling high. Get while the getting's good imo.By the way, your avatar offends me.To each his own. By the way your avatar is offensive.Goes from a 6-7th round pick in drafts to a 3rd round pick. In the last 10 minutes I have received 3 offers from different teams in my dynasty league. Sell high or hold?I'll let someone else take him with their 3rd and laugh.
