He is a promising young talent, I expect big things in 2007.
but he's a BIG 10 Player, that has to knock him down a few notches.He is a promising young talent, I expect big things in 2007.![]()
Again, that shtick stays in the FFA...I was the first to inform this board that Chris Henry sucks and I'm pretty sure he went to the school I graduated from which is a Pac10 school...I also liked Ginn Jr. and Stanton this year.but he's a BIG 10 Player, that has to knock him down a few notches.He is a promising young talent, I expect big things in 2007.![]()
Nobody is extrapolating, just noting a statistical trend.Looks a little Lee Evans'esqe - except for the lack of TDs. A little leery of extrapolating this kind of production (few receptions, many yards) for 16 games though.
Also see Javon Walkers last handfull of games before he broke out a few years ago.Looks a little Lee Evans'esqe - except for the lack of TDs. A little leery of extrapolating this kind of production (few receptions, many yards) for 16 games though.
Agreed, but he's still worth picking up late in a redraft. Sure he'll have those 3 for 25 games. But he'll also have those 4 for 125 and a TD games. Mid-to-late round acceptable risk, if you ask me.Looks a little Lee Evans'esqe - except for the lack of TDs. A little leery of extrapolating this kind of production (few receptions, many yards) for 16 games though.
I drafted Evans as a rookie (and still have him on contract) so I know about the risk reward bit.Agreed, but he's still worth picking up late in a redraft. Sure he'll have those 3 for 25 games. But he'll also have those 4 for 125 and a TD games. Mid-to-late round acceptable risk, if you ask me.Looks a little Lee Evans'esqe - except for the lack of TDs. A little leery of extrapolating this kind of production (few receptions, many yards) for 16 games though.
I grabbed him off waivers about week 9 last year in my dynasty league. Color me happyNot a bad YPC and not a bad YPG.Code:| 14 cle | 0 | 4 81 | 0 || 15 car | 0 | 3 25 | 0 || 16 bal | 0 | 5 90 | 0 || 17 cin | 0 | 4 124 | 1 |+----------+--------+-------------+----+
You're welcome.
it's just shtick dudeyou're welcome?last 3 weeks or last 6 weeks stat sorting on mfl down?
sorry not enough sleep last nightit's just shtick dudeyou're welcome?last 3 weeks or last 6 weeks stat sorting on mfl down?![]()
Never said it was a surefire indicator.Drew Bennett was the #1 fantasy WR the last 4 weeks of 2004. How did that turn out?
except Holmes may be in a more pass-friendly offense with a far better QB.Great dynasty pickup right now. Reminds me of Mark Clayton's situation last year.
Agreed. If possible, this will be the last time he can be had on the cheap. Holmes has a very solid, all around game and my feeling is that the Steelers offense could be a little to a lot different under a new coaching staff. Holmes will be a primary benefactor if and when things open up a little.EBF said:Great dynasty pickup right now. Reminds me of Mark Clayton's situation last year.
WRs are not RBs. 3 of last year's Top 5 were 31 or older as were 8 of the Top 30. In the past 10 years, there have been 37 times when a WR 31 or older scored 150+ fantasy points (which is normally around the Top 15).Also have to add that a 31 year old Ward hasnt played a full season in 2 years and isnt getting any younger.
Roeth can fling the rock when he's playing 100% healthy.Well with their lack of a passing QB
Patrick Jeffers wasn't a first round pick.See Patrick Jeffers.In 1999, he had something like 800 yards and 8 td's in his last 8 games.The next year he was a floperoo.
That's right, I forgot. First round players never flop.Patrick Jeffers wasn't a first round pick.See Patrick Jeffers.In 1999, he had something like 800 yards and 8 td's in his last 8 games.The next year he was a floperoo.
I have a hard time believing Cowher's lame duck season will be comparable to 2007. I am thinking this team will be performing at their 2005 , maybe even 2004 level. And I believe that was the same QB at the helm....So before you call a guy a terrible passing QB why dont you look at the stats.