What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seattle at San Francisco (1 Viewer)

Kaep can find the open receivers on the opposing team just fine...maybe our WRs should be wearing seahawks jerseys.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
None of those teams have a defense.
Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.
Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?
Same amount as he had catches.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?
Same amount as he had catches.
He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick return

 
Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.

 
So far this game is going exactly like I wanted, low scoring from the 49ers and Russell Wilson has been ok but not great. Also very glad I started the seahawks over the ravens so far.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
None of those teams have a defense.
Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.
Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.
DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.

 
Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.
I agree with this. Never shuts the #### up. Even when Peterson was going after a new contract, he has to open his mouth like an #######... Personally I'd take PP over him anyways.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?
Same amount as he had catches.
He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick return
Yeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?
Same amount as he had catches.
He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick return
Yeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.
7 is greater than none

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Yeah you don't want RGIII though.
I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.
He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong.

I hope he goes to SF though, it's gonna be a :tfp:

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
None of those teams have a defense.
Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.
Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.
DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.
Seattle has GB's number.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
People were saying the same thing last year.
I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and Harvin
They did?
Pretty sure
0 catches in NFC playoffs.

Zero is one less than one.
How many TDs did he have?
Same amount as he had catches.
He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick return
Yeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.
7 is greater than none
You can't argue with ignorance / ITS.

 
Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.
I agree with this. Never shuts the #### up. Even when Peterson was going after a new contract, he has to open his mouth like an #######... Personally I'd take PP over him anyways.
This stuff only makes the victory more sweet for Seahawks fans. Peterson isn't a top 5 CB this year.

 
If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
None of those teams have a defense.
Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.
Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.
DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.
Seattle has GB's number.
How so?

 
Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Yeah you don't want RGIII though.
I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.
He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong.
No but the coaching staff makes the difference (as well as a.much better defense). Gruden hasn't shown much as a HC. Harbaugh and company has.
 
Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Yeah you don't want RGIII though.
I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.
He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong. I hope he goes to SF though, it's gonna be a :tfp:
VD is so misused it is frightening. Him, Crab, Boldin, Stevie, Gore, & Hyde are a capable group.

Kaep is already a massive train wreck.

In all reality they need to draft a QB.

 
7 is greater than none
How does that support your original thought? :lmao:

So the Seahawks beat the best offensive team in NFL by 38 in the Super Bowl, were led in receiving by two guys on their current roster, and Harvin had all of 7 touches and yet he's the difference between this year's team and last years. Great argument Shady, stellar even.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top