You have 70 posts and you seem to have run out of steam already.Oof... Internet nerd huh? It's ok. Not everyone can post 70k times on a website.Double post? Don't understand how to use the internet? Tough concept for newcomers to grasp.Don't understand the rules huh? It's ok. Tough game for newcomers to grasp.What bull####![]()
0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
That isn't saying much. Anyone he throws at enough shouldn't have a hard time owning him.Sherman owns Kaep
Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.None of those teams have a defense.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Boring gamestodaythis season without the RZ channel.
How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
Same amount as he had catches.How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick returnSame amount as he had catches.How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.None of those teams have a defense.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
I agree with this. Never shuts the #### up. Even when Peterson was going after a new contract, he has to open his mouth like an #######... Personally I'd take PP over him anyways.Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.
Yeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick returnSame amount as he had catches.How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
U mad bro?Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.
Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Nope. A good QB makes good WRs better. If we had a good QB we'd be contenders, no question.It must just kill you guys that Sherman is so much better than anything Santa Clara can run out there at WR.
You guys are contenders. 2nd best team in football last year with the same guy.Nope. A good QB makes good WRs better. If we had a good QB we'd be contenders, no question.It must just kill you guys that Sherman is so much better than anything Santa Clara can run out there at WR.
I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Someone tried to tell you this.Nope. A good QB makes good WRs better. If we had a good QB we'd be contenders, no question.It must just kill you guys that Sherman is so much better than anything Santa Clara can run out there at WR.
Absolutely. Niners look awful and can't get it together. But you know I'm rightU mad bro?Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.

7 is greater than noneYeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick returnSame amount as he had catches.How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
You really think Tree, Boldin and Gore is some huge upgrade over DJax, Garcon and Morris?I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong.I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
Seattle has GB's number.DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.None of those teams have a defense.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
I wasn't ready to bail, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. That chapter of my life is over, I've turned the page since then. Weeks ago actually.Someone tried to tell you this.Nope. A good QB makes good WRs better. If we had a good QB we'd be contenders, no question.It must just kill you guys that Sherman is so much better than anything Santa Clara can run out there at WR.
You can't argue with ignorance / ITS.7 is greater than noneYeah, amazing production there. The KO return was in the Super Bowl. He had 7 offensive touches in two games and missed the NFC Championship.He had 3 carries for 54 yards, 4 catches for 21 yards and 1 TD on a kick returnSame amount as he had catches.How many TDs did he have?0 catches in NFC playoffs.Pretty sureThey did?I know but in the playoffs they had Tate and HarvinPeople were saying the same thing last year.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
Zero is one less than one.
This stuff only makes the victory more sweet for Seahawks fans. Peterson isn't a top 5 CB this year.I agree with this. Never shuts the #### up. Even when Peterson was going after a new contract, he has to open his mouth like an #######... Personally I'd take PP over him anyways.Sherman is easy to hate. He's an ### and an unprofessional loudmouth. He's not a thug, he's not unintelligent, he's not a bad player, he's just an ###.
Unlikely? More like 0% chance Kap goes the length of the field -- twice, AND gets two 2-pointers.No FG? It's a 2 score game? Unlikely, but still. Go up 3 scores?
How so?Seattle has GB's number.DEN looks kind of meh but I don't think SEA could beat GB/NE right now. To be fair, I don't think many teams could beat GB/NE right now.Hawks have owned all three of those teams over the last year and a half.Those three aforementioned teams are top 5 in point differential per game. Although they're defenses may be middling, they do enough in conjunction with their top scoring offenses to be better than a team like SEA, who is holding opposing teams to about a FG less per game but also scoring about a TD less per game. This is why hyperbole sucks.None of those teams have a defense.If the Seahawks had even a single weapon in their receiving core I think theyd be headed to another SB. FGs arent gonna beat the Packers, Pats, or Broncos
No but the coaching staff makes the difference (as well as a.much better defense). Gruden hasn't shown much as a HC. Harbaugh and company has.He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong.I'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.
VD is so misused it is frightening. Him, Crab, Boldin, Stevie, Gore, & Hyde are a capable group.He's got more weapons in DC. Garcon, Desean and Morris? Gruden is also an offensive genius, you're way wrong. I hope he goes to SF though, it's gonna be aI'd take him in a heartbeat. He's had doo-doo for coaches so far. Put him on a team with weapons and a real coaching staff and I think hed be a huge upgrade over Kaep.Yeah you don't want RGIII though.Looking forward to the day we cut Kaep.![]()
How does that support your original thought?7 is greater than none