But are you trading?What if you're rebuilding a rebuild? Or maybe building from something that's been torn down so long that it's kinda considered a fresh build all over again?
I guess what I'm saying is: dibs on a top 5 pick again in 2024 comp draft.
Has anybody in this league ever done a successful rebuild driven primarily by prospects?
There have been teams that have come up from the bottom of the standings but I think they've all done it with a mix of prospects, vets and trades.
We had an entire roster of prospects at one point a couple of years back. That is always step one. Kraft did the same if I remember right. Once you get enough hits to get a good mlb core, you can "Jeffersons" your roster with some vets through drafts or trades. That's where we are now imo.Has anybody in this league ever done a successful rebuild driven primarily by prospects?
There have been teams that have come up from the bottom of the standings but I think they've all done it with a mix of prospects, vets and trades.
I liked that fwiw. Gets rid of that west coast bias.I've opened a ticket with Fantrax to see how to change the time of day that waivers runs. I don't know why they're currently running in the afternoon instead of the middle of the night.
Am I missing something with Saves/Holds? There are a hundred holds guys still on waivers. Why chase any bullpen at this point? Maybe I'm missing something.
NODA=SOWaivers!
I can get on board if we have a year to phase in. We finally have closers!SV + HLD for me as well, but I'll let @PIK95 cast our team's vote.
The race for speculative holds is gonna be a gas.
I liked that fwiw. Gets rid of that west coast bias.I've opened a ticket with Fantrax to see how to change the time of day that waivers runs. I don't know why they're currently running in the afternoon instead of the middle of the night.
That didn't mean I understand it? I'm just agreeable.Am I missing something with Saves/Holds? There are a hundred holds guys still on waivers. Why chase any bullpen at this point? Maybe I'm missing something.
NODA=SOWaivers!
You voted in favor of it last year
I can get on board if we have a year to phase in. We finally have closers!SV + HLD for me as well, but I'll let @PIK95 cast our team's vote.
The race for speculative holds is gonna be a gas.
They don't run at any specific time of day. When the waiver time is set to 2 days, players clear 48 hours after they're dropped. It was that way last year.I've opened a ticket with Fantrax to see how to change the time of day that waivers runs. I don't know why they're currently running in the afternoon instead of the middle of the night.
They don't run at any specific time of day. When the waiver time is set to 2 days, players clear 48 hours after they're dropped. It was that way last year.
You can see the exact time a player will come off waivers on his profile page.
I read Morel is probably gonna get sent down, and after a hot start he kinda sucked after that. We don't regret it.Christopher Morel, Nick Madrigal and Patrick Wisdom all dropped today.
The Cubs' 3B battle is not Serious Business
Do we need 48 hour waivers/is that standard? I'm used to 24.They don't run at any specific time of day. When the waiver time is set to 2 days, players clear 48 hours after they're dropped. It was that way last year.I've opened a ticket with Fantrax to see how to change the time of day that waivers runs. I don't know why they're currently running in the afternoon instead of the middle of the night.
You can see the exact time a player will come off waivers on his profile page.
I think saves+holds makes things less interesting. Pretty much anyone can lead the category if you devote enough roster space to it. I voted yes I think, more as a curiosity.Am I missing something with Saves/Holds? There are a hundred holds guys still on waivers. Why chase any bullpen at this point? Maybe I'm missing something.
NODA=SOWaivers!
Do we need 48 hour waivers/is that standard? I'm used to 24.
There was some discussion last year about how only a few teams were really competing and half the league or more was rebuilding and hoarding prospects. Saves were part of the reason why. They're a barrier to entry for teams looking to switch from rebuild mode to being competitive. You either had to win races to the wire on closer changes, pay a steep prospect price in trade, or try to compete while punting saves. All of those are really hard.
I think saves + holds will be a category teams can put up a fight in without messing up their rebuilds, and that will be a positive for the league as a whole.
We built a decent staff in a couple of weeks over here. But I basically agree with what your selling.There was some discussion last year about how only a few teams were really competing and half the league or more was rebuilding and hoarding prospects. Saves were part of the reason why. They're a barrier to entry for teams looking to switch from rebuild mode to being competitive. You either had to win races to the wire on closer changes, pay a steep prospect price in trade, or try to compete while punting saves. All of those are really hard.
I think saves + holds will be a category teams can put up a fight in without messing up their rebuilds, and that will be a positive for the league as a whole.
I don't see a reason for rebuilding teams to punt pitching categories in general. Every year there are pitchers who break out at the major league level while there are SB teams who rack up less than 1000 IP. You're going to need pitching when your hitting prospects reach the bigs and it's easier to do that if you at least have the core of a pitching staff assembled.
I’m too dumb to find the pay function on Fantrax. Where do we pay?
From their FAQ:I think the only issue is how to handle the carryover payments from last season's winners.
$50? I can't remember all the leaguesFantrax Treasurer has been enabled. There's a Pay Now button on the league homepage. Let me know if you have any issues with payment.
$50? I can't remember all the leagues
I don’t think it will change much , imo teams will just add 1-2 more prospects and things will be business as usualCan we talk about adding 1-2 IR in season spots next year, in addition to where we are now roster wise. These dudes are made of glass. There are a ton of guys on waivers, prospects, RP's, and even some SP's. I think it will add to the fun and encourage people to play for this year instead of throwing in the towel for yet another "rebuild"..... Verlander, WAIT!
That's not a bad thing. Some teams may decide to add vets and try and win.I don’t think it will change much , imo teams will just add 1-2 more prospects and things will be business as usualCan we talk about adding 1-2 IR in season spots next year, in addition to where we are now roster wise. These dudes are made of glass. There are a ton of guys on waivers, prospects, RP's, and even some SP's. I think it will add to the fun and encourage people to play for this year instead of throwing in the towel for yet another "rebuild"..... Verlander, WAIT!
He stinks and he sucks. He’s an albatross. What a stupid pick. I’ve never given up on somebody this fast but here I am.Why?3.06 Javier Baez DD
I laugh, but I blew my first rounder on Jack Flaherty, whose pitches are so far outside the zone that even Baez wouldn't swing at them.He stinks and he sucks. He’s an albatross. What a stupid pick. I’ve never given up on somebody this fast but here I am.Why?3.06 Javier Baez DD
I'd vote for it. Gives some relief to the unlucky, plus the mad dashes to the wire to pick up the guy who felt tightness in his forearm would be hilarious.Can I propose that "Tommy John Surgeries" becomes a scoring category? I would dominate
Position limits. 162 games per starting position. Not 10,000 waiver transactions to fill the roster every day and get 182 per position or whatever.
Position limits. 162 games per starting position. Not 10,000 waiver transactions to fill the roster every day and get 182 per position or whatever.
I don't know if anyone is actually doing this but implementing 162/starting spot is a no brainer IMO.
I'm too competitive not to shuffle guys in and out of the lineup if the rules allow it, but I don't love doing it. It's a lot of work for a small edge, and it encourages the rostering of platoon bats over prospects, which I don't think is ideal for a dynasty league.Sparty's CI slot had the most games played at 179.