What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Set To Release "Hundreds of Hours" Of Newsroom Footage (1 Viewer)

I just want to say this is the first time anyone has linked to a link that has a video.

This link doesn't have it but JOK's twitter has them.

Here's one.

- Note I take the audio in the tweets are edited, which is exactly what JOK is accused of, but I get the need for snips on twitter.

- The bigger problem IMO is JOK telling people what to think about the clip. - Here JOK suggests that the CNN producer here is referring to "President Trump" - however these tapes as I understand it are from 2009, when Donald was a tv star and chasing tail (as he put it to Billy Bush himself).

- However what is wrong in general with this statement by the producer? Is there something wrong in stating that it's the job of news to bring uncomfortable facts? Free press is by definition saying things that people in power do not want to hear. If that is suppressed voluntarily or by the state then it's not free.

For JOK or Trump fans, what is the problem here?
Watching this clown's clips reminds me of those asinine "ghost hunter" shows.

"Now in this footage we see...for 3/10 of a second...something move in the upper left corner of the shot.  Now it could be a cobweb but it could also be something much more sinister"

 
Watching this clown's clips reminds me of those asinine "ghost hunter" shows.

"Now in this footage we see...for 3/10 of a second...something move in the upper left corner of the shot.  Now it could be a cobweb but it could also be something much more sinister"
"It could be a door to a basement!"

 
Watching this clown's clips reminds me of those asinine "ghost hunter" shows.

"Now in this footage we see...for 3/10 of a second...something move in the upper left corner of the shot.  Now it could be a cobweb but it could also be something much more sinister"
"Is this the 300-year-old spirit of a Native American, back from the grave to claim our lives in retribution for the deaths of her entire family?  Or is it the glare from the off-camera cell phone of a producer who was watching porn?  We'll leave that to you to decide."

 
"Is this the 300-year-old spirit of a Native American, back from the grave to claim our lives in retribution for the deaths of her entire family?  Or is it the glare from the off-camera cell phone of a producer who was watching porn?  We'll leave that to you to decide."
"So this senior editor at CNN just said 'no government ought to be without censors'.  Now was he quoting Jefferson or was that code for 'the basement pedo orgy room at Cosmic Ping Pong is back open'...."

 
For one thing, the recordings are from 2009,
Again, when Obama was President, not Trump.

“Aid the afflicted and afflict the comfortable” is a reference to a line from the 1960 film “Inherit the Wind" ("Mr. Brady, it is the duty of a newspaper to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable"). Griffiths's contention that the old saying is true “to a degree” is hardly scandalous.
- Great movie. I thought I had heard that line before.

 
Watching this clown's clips reminds me of those asinine "ghost hunter" shows.

"Now in this footage we see...for 3/10 of a second...something move in the upper left corner of the shot.  Now it could be a cobweb but it could also be something much more sinister"
If you listen very closely, you can hear an EVP saying "Rasmussen polls are unreliable".  <static white noise>

 
Project Veritas is asking for “help transcribing, investigating and connecting the dots” in the CNN recordings.
New request added - Could you guys maybe help us find some actual dots first?

 
So they basically released these tapes, knowing there was nothing in them, in the hopes that the same type of whackos who broke the Pizzagate scandal would propagate internet conspiracy theories based on turkey sandwiches that somehow discredits the free press? Am I interpreting this correctly?

 
So they basically released these tapes, knowing there was nothing in them, in the hopes that the same type of whackos who broke the Pizzagate scandal would propagate internet conspiracy theories based on turkey sandwiches that somehow discredits the free press? Am I interpreting this correctly?
Probably

 
So they basically released these tapes, knowing there was nothing in them, in the hopes that the same type of whackos who broke the Pizzagate scandal would propagate internet conspiracy theories based on turkey sandwiches that somehow discredits the free press? Am I interpreting this correctly?
Yes.

 
So they basically released these tapes, knowing there was nothing in them, in the hopes that the same type of whackos who broke the Pizzagate scandal would propagate internet conspiracy theories based on turkey sandwiches that somehow discredits the free press? Am I interpreting this correctly?
Probably, as with the Pizzagate supposedly related emails there are probably a lot of things that are ambiguous and capable of another interpretation, such as the Podesta email where he talked about "Opening a hot dog stand in Hawaii" - that was jumped as code for saying it was either a gay brothel or an internet sex ring trafficking in underage boys. Truth was Podesta has had a long running joke with friends going back at least a decade about retiring to Hawaii to run a hot dog stand. :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For his first video, he and other Centurion writers met with Rutgers dining staff to demand the banning of the cereal Lucky Charms from dining halls because of its offense to Irish Americans. O'Keefe said the leprechaun mascot presented a stereotype. He intended to have officials lose either way: to appear insensitive to an ethnic group, or to look silly by agreeing to ban Lucky Charms.[13] They expected to be thrown out of school,[14] but the Rutgers official was courteous, took notes, and said their concerns would be considered. Rutgers staff say the cereal was never taken off the menu.[10]
What a loser. Why do we pay this guy a lick of attention again?  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top