What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seven Round Mock Final Version (1 Viewer)

Teams' draft I like

Buffalo

Miami

Cleveland

Cincinnati

Jax

Detroit

Green Bay

Seattle

SF

Teams' draft I don't like

Balt

Tenn

KC

Minn

Teams' draft I love

New England

Arizona

Teams' draft I strongly dislike

NYJ

TB

 
Thanks for all the time you put into this. I have to ask the question......Why Pettigrew to the NYJ?

They just took Keller last year.

I would think with their lack of talent at the qb and the wr positon that if offense got the call it would maybe go in that direction or maybe even rb but the te position threw me for a loop.

Thanks anyways for the hard work

 
Thanks for all the time you put into this. I have to ask the question......Why Pettigrew to the NYJ?They just took Keller last year.I would think with their lack of talent at the qb and the wr positon that if offense got the call it would maybe go in that direction or maybe even rb but the te position threw me for a loop.Thanks anyways for the hard work
Totally different kind of player. Keller is basically a supersized slot receiver. Pettigrew is a traditional three down TE. I expect Keller to be the de facto WR2 this year.
 
Houston takes a safety in the 2nd & the 3rd? And no RB anywhere?
I stand by the two safeties - they dont have an experienced SS, and McBath can be a great centerfield, I think Eugene Wilson is just average there at best. the lack of an RB was an oversight and im about to fix it - danke
 
I'm really, really hating this Dirty Sanchez to SF nonsense. Please, please, please don't let it actually happen.

ETA - Though I dig the rest of their mock picks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope the Colts draft is something like this. Lots of D-Line help, WR help and a RB that fits the system. I like it.

 
It's hard to believe Alex Boone has fallen as far as he has, from rounds 2-3 to out of the draft in just a year. He seems like he'd be a good 7th round risk for someone.

 
Seven Round Mock

Picks By Team

This first round is going to be filled with suspense from top to bottom. I don't remember another year where we don't know more than 1 or 2 picks with reasonable certainty.
No WRs to Miami, but Wells in the 1st? Interesting. Pretty crowded backfield, with no WRs. I know a lot of people will agree with a RB to Miami, but I do not see it in the first round. Maybe with one of their second rounders or a third (Peerman/A.Brown?), but I just dont see it happening in the first no matter who falls.Love to look at this stuff though. Will even love it more when the real one comes out on Saturday!

 
Seven Round Mock

Picks By Team

This first round is going to be filled with suspense from top to bottom. I don't remember another year where we don't know more than 1 or 2 picks with reasonable certainty.
No WRs to Miami, but Wells in the 1st? Interesting. Pretty crowded backfield, with no WRs. I know a lot of people will agree with a RB to Miami, but I do not see it in the first round. Maybe with one of their second rounders or a third (Peerman/A.Brown?), but I just dont see it happening in the first no matter who falls.Love to look at this stuff though. Will even love it more when the real one comes out on Saturday!
More of a BPA pick than anything else - a la Mendenhall to Pittsburgh last yearI was probably remiss to not put a WR in there... another last second adjustment, hold on...

 
Seven Round Mock

Picks By Team

This first round is going to be filled with suspense from top to bottom. I don't remember another year where we don't know more than 1 or 2 picks with reasonable certainty.
No WRs to Miami, but Wells in the 1st? Interesting. Pretty crowded backfield, with no WRs. I know a lot of people will agree with a RB to Miami, but I do not see it in the first round. Maybe with one of their second rounders or a third (Peerman/A.Brown?), but I just dont see it happening in the first no matter who falls.Love to look at this stuff though. Will even love it more when the real one comes out on Saturday!
More of a BPA pick than anything else - a la Mendenhall to Pittsburgh last yearI was probably remiss to not put a WR in there... another last second adjustment, hold on...
The way this mock shook out, there really was not a great pick there for Miami. I know it is easy to say and difficult to do, but if it went this way I could see them finding a team that covets Wells and trading down. Arizona jumps out. Swap 1st round picks, and pick up a 4th - grab V.Davis or Butler - maybe English, Britt, or Laurinitis at that spot. If they stay put and the draft unfolds like this, I think they reluctantly go WR in the first. My guess would be Nicks. Pittsburgh had the luxury to be able to draft Mendy last year. Miami does not have that same luxury. Too many true needs to fill. Ronnie/Ricky/Cobbs is a solid trio already. Wells is simply unnecessary in this draft.

 
1(16) Rey Maualuga, LB, USC

3(78) Mike Thomas, WR, Arizona

4(113) Lydon Murtha, OT, Nebraska

4(133) Kyle Moore, DE, USC

4(134) Terrance Taylor, DT, Michigan

5(148) Courtney Greene, S, Rutgers

6(189) Ian Johnson, RB, Boise State

7(224) Pierre Walters, DE/OLB, Eastern Illinois

great effort Bloom, I dont see how SD takes a WR in round3.

To me a player like - Fili Moala makes much more sense at that pick they dont have a replacement for Igor and you have him going at the very next pick.

 
Not sure what to think about the Vikings drafting Freeman. At first I thought you were crazy, but he would be a value there and Jackson is in the last year of his contract, so it could make some sense. I also think that they could also be eager to trade down with a team that covets Freeman.

 
Bloom....I've been critical of few of your previous attempts from a Dallas perspective. I've got to say this effort was your best, by far.

I could certainly live with it.

2(51) Rashad Johnson, S, Alabama

3(69) Herman Johnson, OG, LSU

4(101) Kenny McKinley, WR, South Carolina

4(117) Corvey Irvin, DT, Georgia

5(156) Jonathan Luigs, C, Arkansas

5(166) Nate Davis, QB, Ball State

5(172) Cornelius Lewis, OT, Tennessee State

6(197) Patrick Turner, WR, USC

6(208) Terrance Knighton, DT, Temple

7(210) Phillip Hunt, DE/OLB, Houston

I love Rashad and have no problem with you drafting him for us, I would just say I think he's there at 69. Freeing us up to take something different at 51.

Thanks for all of your mocks...I have learned a lot about some players I wasn't real familiar with.

 
1(16) Rey Maualuga, LB, USC3(78) Mike Thomas, WR, Arizona4(113) Lydon Murtha, OT, Nebraska4(133) Kyle Moore, DE, USC4(134) Terrance Taylor, DT, Michigan5(148) Courtney Greene, S, Rutgers6(189) Ian Johnson, RB, Boise State7(224) Pierre Walters, DE/OLB, Eastern Illinoisgreat effort Bloom, I dont see how SD takes a WR in round3. To me a player like - Fili Moala makes much more sense at that pick they dont have a replacement for Igor and you have him going at the very next pick.
I have them going for a possible 3-4 end (from USC even ;) )in the next round. My logic on the WR pick is that Chambers contract is up, they don't seem to be looking to make a long term commitment to Floyd (and he's not that durable), Craig Davis :popcorn: , Naanee seems like a #3/novelty guy at best. They need to make some plans for the future, and Thomas can be a slot receiver right now.
 
Bloom....I've been critical of few of your previous attempts from a Dallas perspective. I've got to say this effort was your best, by far.I could certainly live with it.2(51) Rashad Johnson, S, Alabama3(69) Herman Johnson, OG, LSU4(101) Kenny McKinley, WR, South Carolina4(117) Corvey Irvin, DT, Georgia5(156) Jonathan Luigs, C, Arkansas5(166) Nate Davis, QB, Ball State5(172) Cornelius Lewis, OT, Tennessee State6(197) Patrick Turner, WR, USC6(208) Terrance Knighton, DT, Temple7(210) Phillip Hunt, DE/OLB, HoustonI love Rashad and have no problem with you drafting him for us, I would just say I think he's there at 69. Freeing us up to take something different at 51.
I agree, for the most part. The only part that doesn't sit right with me is two selections of a DT before the last selection of a DE/OLB.I would flip those selections, as far as the position themselves are concerned. From what I learned just yesterday, DT isn't all that high on their board, whereas DE/OLB is much higher. In fact, I could see them selecting one at #51 if Robiskie is gone and still land a safety at #69.
 
Houston takes a safety in the 2nd & the 3rd? And no RB anywhere?
I stand by the two safeties - they dont have an experienced SS, and McBath can be a great centerfield, I think Eugene Wilson is just average there at best. the lack of an RB was an oversight and im about to fix it - danke
first off Bloom you know i'm a big fan of your work but........R U a cowboy fan? U R killing the Texans. You gave us a bunch of Mediocre players at best. We dont draft like that any more. In the 4th I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't come out of that round with both Murtha and Knox. 2 Safeties in B-2-B rounds?? I've come around to Chung in the 2nd but if we take another S in the 3rd with the amount of value that will be there he had better be an athletic freak or something. Also I see you starting to raise McGee up to the 3rd is he starting to get more buzz? I agree with u but many have him as 4-8th qb in a weak class. And by the way the QBs are taking alot of heat in this draft but the LBs after Curry dont do anything for me at all. Overall its great, way to grind it out man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for all the time you put into this. I have to ask the question......Why Pettigrew to the NYJ?They just took Keller last year.I would think with their lack of talent at the qb and the wr positon that if offense got the call it would maybe go in that direction or maybe even rb but the te position threw me for a loop.Thanks anyways for the hard work
Totally different kind of player. Keller is basically a supersized slot receiver. Pettigrew is a traditional three down TE. I expect Keller to be the de facto WR2 this year.
I'd like that. A TE playing like a WR.
 
Bloom....I've been critical of few of your previous attempts from a Dallas perspective. I've got to say this effort was your best, by far.I could certainly live with it.2(51) Rashad Johnson, S, Alabama3(69) Herman Johnson, OG, LSU4(101) Kenny McKinley, WR, South Carolina4(117) Corvey Irvin, DT, Georgia5(156) Jonathan Luigs, C, Arkansas5(166) Nate Davis, QB, Ball State5(172) Cornelius Lewis, OT, Tennessee State6(197) Patrick Turner, WR, USC6(208) Terrance Knighton, DT, Temple7(210) Phillip Hunt, DE/OLB, HoustonI love Rashad and have no problem with you drafting him for us, I would just say I think he's there at 69. Freeing us up to take something different at 51.
I agree, for the most part. The only part that doesn't sit right with me is two selections of a DT before the last selection of a DE/OLB.I would flip those selections, as far as the position themselves are concerned. From what I learned just yesterday, DT isn't all that high on their board, whereas DE/OLB is much higher. In fact, I could see them selecting one at #51 if Robiskie is gone and still land a safety at #69.
I might be underestimating the DE/OLB need - although I like Spencer a lot - but I do want to say that Irvin is more of a 3-4 DE and Knighton is more of a NT (although he might be decent at DE too) - so these picks address depth at different positions.
 
19. Tampa Bay - Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech

I think you nailed that pick. It'll either be him or Brian Orakpo for the Bucs IMO.

God help me if they select Josh Freeman.

 
Detroit

1(1) Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia

1(20) Alphonso Smith, CB, Wake Forest

2(33) James Laurinaitis, LB, Ohio State

3(65) Lawrence Sidbury, DE, Richmond

3(82) Chip Vaughn, S, Wake Forest

6(174) Dudley Guice, WR, Northwestern State (La.)

6(192) Kory Sheets, RB, Purdue

7(255) Maurice Evans, DE, Penn State

I will probably break something if they don't address the line (preferably both lines) with 2 of the first 3 picks.

 
As a Titans fan, I'm not supposed to like the Colts. But I like your thinking with Indy and if they wind up with those players I think it will be a fantasy draft for them.

 
Ringer in the 2nd ahead of Greene and Brown? :X
:lmao: Ringer seems like more of a 4th rounder to me. If the Jets 1st 3 picks are Pettigrew, Ringer and Barden, I fully expect the need for the National Guard to be called in to get Jets fans from rioting.According to the mock I think they have BY FAR the worst draft of any team.I like the Colts draft a lot, especially Casey since he seems very much like an Indy type player and they could use another pass catcher.The Jags draft looks good, I think they may address WR a little earlier, although when healthy I think Tate is one of the 5 best WRs in this class, and better than Nicks.Beanie to Miami is very interesting, doesn't seem like a Parcells move or a need, but if they are truly unhappy with Brown it would make sense.For not having a 1st rounder, I like Carolina's draft. Pat White could be very interesting there, possible wishbone set with him, D-Will and Stewart? Could be this year's wildcat.The best draft in my eyes, belongs to Atlanta, Ayers, Nelson and Dillard could all go about a dozen picks higher so if Atlanta gets all 3 they'd be pretty thrilled, especially Nelson who I believe is the best receiving TE in the draft.
 
Great effort as always, Sig.

As for the Lions, I have to agree with Balance from above. They simply have to use more than 1 pick in their first three rounds (5 picks) on their lines (offensive and defensive). Granted, MLB is a gaping hole, so that and QB are a near certainty for two of those picks.

However, if they use a 1st on a corner and then draft (another) safety in the first three rounds, the fans will revolt. :) They've always wasted two 2nd rounders on Alexander and Bullocks and have little to show for it.

I'd be stoked if they walked away with Curry (sorry Stafford fans), a d-linemen and a MLB in their first three picks. The Lions defense was one of the worst in NFL history. Adding three young, quality players to the front seven is a great place to start building something.

I still expect them to take Stafford #1, then a DL/LB/OT at 20 and LB/DB at 33. I'd personally rather have them take Curry or Jason Smith at #1, wait to get a QB next year or at least grab Pat White since he can extend plays and has a decent deep ball (hello Calvin!).

Can't wait until this weekend. Have fun at the big show in NY!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top