What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Should we forcibly inject a 17 yr old with an erection inducing drug? (1 Viewer)

Ilov80s

Ilov80s

Footballguy
http://theatln.tc/1jkqQQc

This is absolute madness. A 17 year old boy received nude pics from his 15 year old girlfriend. He sent her a nude video. He now faces 4 years in prison for possessing and creating child pornography. He has already been photographed nude by the courts so as to compare his penis with the penis in the video. Now, the court is being asked to inject him with a drug that will induce an erection so that they can get some pictures of that. Who are the criminals here? What the hell are we thinking with some of these laws?

 
They need a shot to get an erection out of a 17-year-old?

At 17, it would have taken two people: one to have the camera ready and one to tap me on the shoulder.

 
The girl (15) has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video."
Click to expand...
Maybe underage girls would stop making child porn if they got charged for it.

 
Does the camera adds 10 lbs apply here too? I may need to test this out sans 15 year old girl. Anybody willing to accept a #### pic?

 
I clicked on the link and didn't get past the giant picture at the top of story of the blurry crotchal region of some dude.

Sounds like a messed up story though.

 
I believe the prosecutors have already backed down. As they should have.

What may have actually deterred them finally is the fact that the law is so strictly written that they could have been prosecutd for creating child pornography under the same statute if they fiollowed through.

 
The boy is being charged with possession of child porn (because his girlfriend sent pics to him) and manufacturing of child porn (because he took pics of himself).

Why is the girlfriend not being charged with the exact same crimes?

And why aren't the police demanding to take pictures of her naked body?

 
It's kind of messed up to tell someone they can't take a picture of them self naked. It's a pretty odd thing to be illegal. If anything shouldn't we make it illegal for people over 60 to take naked pictures?

 
This thread is old news, the police backed down on Thursday after the story started making waves: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-back-off-on-plan-to-take-explicit-photo-of-accused-teen-sexter/

Police in Virginia said Thursday that they no longer will pursue efforts to take sexually explicit photos of a 17-year-old in an effort to prove a sexting case against him.

Police and prosecutors faced a wave of criticism following media reports that they had obtained a warrant to take photos of the teen's erect penis. Police wanted the pictures to compare against photos he is accused of sending to his 15-year-old girlfriend at the time.

On Thursday, Manassas Police Lt. Brian Larkin said the Police Department will not proceed with the plan to take the pictures and will let a search warrant authorizing the photos to expire.

Police had threatened to take the teenager to a hospital and medically induce an erection, defense lawyer Jessica Harbeson Foster told The Washington Post.

Privacy advocates had criticized the plan as a violation of the teen's constitutional rights.

The teen's aunt, who serves as his legal guardian, said she had not heard of the police department's reversal until contacted by an Associated Press reporter Thursday afternoon. She said she would be ecstatic if police follow through on their statement that they will no longer pursue the photos. But she said she won't be fully satisfied until the case against her nephew is dropped entirely.

The teen is charged in juvenile court with felony counts of possession and manufacture of child pornography. The aunt maintains that the charges are overblown and said the plan to pursue photos of her nephew in an aroused state came about only after she and her nephew refused to accept a plea bargain that had been offered.

Larkin said he had no information on why the department no longer plans to pursue the photos. On Wednesday night, the department issued a statement saying it was not their policy "to authorize invasive search procedures of suspects in cases of this nature" but made no definitive statements about whether they would continue to pursue the photos that had been specifically authorized in the search warrant.

Foster told the Washington Post that the 17-year-old "sexted" a video to his then-girlfriend after she sent photos of herself to him.
Click to expand...
 
If the police need to get to the bottom of this, this is what they need to do. It sounds yo me like there may have been racism involved. In that case, any federal intervention or lack thereof is warranted.

 
GroveDiesel said:
I believe the prosecutors have already backed down. As they should have.

What may have actually deterred them finally is the fact that the law is so strictly written that they could have been prosecutd for creating child pornography under the same statute if they fiollowed through.
Click to expand...
and rightfully so

there isn't even a logical basis for what they wanted to do. As if there are some characteristics that would deterministically ID the weiner. Back in my generation, we laughed at the very notion (Porky's). Nowadays, what used to be farce is all too real.

.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ilov80s said:
http://theatln.tc/1jkqQQc

This is absolute madness. A 17 year old boy received nude pics from his 15 year old girlfriend. He sent her a nude video. He now faces 4 years in prison for possessing and creating child pornography. He has already been photographed nude by the courts so as to compare his penis with the penis in the video. Now, the court is being asked to inject him with a drug that will induce an erection so that they can get some pictures of that. Who are the criminals here? What the hell are we thinking with some of these laws?
Click to expand...
Outdated laws coupled with prosecutors who need to be removed from their position.

Edit: Also, this isn't the first time a teenager has been prosecuted under child porn laws for sexting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There should be a Reddit where kids can sext each other without fear of prosecution. Make people affirm they are under 18 to view the page.

 
ClownCausedChaos2 said:
They need a shot to get an erection out of a 17-year-old?

At 17, it would have taken two people: one to have the camera ready and one to tap me on the shoulder.
Click to expand...
No ####. If there is any question, pop him a Viagra, wait an hour and have Chanel Preston just look at him.

 
Are Virginia and Missouri in the south? It is hard to make the case that West Virginia is in the south, but they are probably the most backward state there is.

 
GroveDiesel said:
I believe the prosecutors have already backed down. As they should have.

What may have actually deterred them finally is

the fact that the law is so strictly written that they could have been prosecutd for creating child pornography under the same statute if they fiollowed through.
Click to expand...
No
 
jon_mx said:
Are Virginia and Missouri in the south? It is hard to make the case that West Virginia is in the south, but they are probably the most backward state there is.
Click to expand...
Have you heard a West Virginian talk? If they're not southern, they might as well be...

 
I don't understand the lack of 'legal' repercussions for the girl. I believe that by sending such pictures, she has damaged herself, but it makes no sense that she's not being charged as well. For example, a kid at my son's HS got kicked off the JV baseball team because he posted on a private groupchat a nude pic a female classmate had taken of herself and sent to a bunch of the boys on the team. He wasn't the only one to receive it but was the only one who posted it, so he took the fall. The girl's only punishment was that her parents disabled the camera feature of her phone. She also played a team sport, but because their season hadn't started when she did it, she didn't get kicked off the team. The boy's parents were so upset about the school's response that they are sending him to a private school now.

 
Only heard about this briefly on the radio, but I didn't think the girl in this was his "girlfriend". Do they go to school together, or did they meet online?

 
matttyl said:
Only heard about this briefly on the radio, but I didn't think the girl in this was his "girlfriend". Do they go to school together, or did they meet online?
Click to expand...
Maybe not, but if she sent him a nude, does it matter exactly what their relationship was? The guy should stopped when he was told to, but to call this child porn is BS.

 
Imagine the outrage if prosecutors demanded to see pictures of the girl's vaginal area.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
McGarnicle said:
There should be a Reddit where kids can sext each other without fear of prosecution. Make people affirm they are under 18 to view the page.
Click to expand...
Its called Tumblr

 
jon_mx said:
Are Virginia and Missouri in the south? It is hard to make the case that West Virginia is in the south, but they are probably the most backward state there is.
Click to expand...
Southeast Missouri is as southern as it gets being across the Missouri river from Kentucky & Tennessee.

The rest of the state not so much.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

GordonGekko
Should Minors Be Legally Banned/Restricted From Using Social Media? (6/11/22 17:47 PST)
Replies
20
Views
1K
moleculo
moleculo

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top