Sidney rice moving forward..startable? (1 Viewer)

[unckeyherb]

He blew up last week with 5/80/2...

I didn't see any of the game and haven't been following Seattle. Anyone have any insight into the WR situation up there? Rice was very study once upon a time, many years ago. Can he be fantasy relevant again or was this a complete aberration?

 

[ImTheScientist]

Depends on how many WR's you start. I would consider him a WR#4. In more than a 12 team league a WR#3.

 

[HurryUpSundays]

He blew up last week with 5/80/2...

I didn't see any of the game and haven't been following Seattle. Anyone have any insight into the WR situation up there? Rice was very study once upon a time, many years ago. Can he be fantasy relevant again or was this a complete aberration?

With 1,800 posts you should know better, brah.

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=681238&hl=%2Bsidney+%2Brice#entry15775139

 

[unckeyherb]

He blew up last week with 5/80/2...

I didn't see any of the game and haven't been following Seattle. Anyone have any insight into the WR situation up there? Rice was very study once upon a time, many years ago. Can he be fantasy relevant again or was this a complete aberration?

With 1,800 posts you should know better, brah.

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=681238&hl=%2Bsidney+%2Brice#entry15775139

gotcha..to be fair, I searched "Sidney Rice" and didn't see anything relating specifically to him. I just re-searched and realized its because that thread is listed under 22 others..either way-

Thanks!

Mods-Please Delete!

 

[seahawk 17]

3/5 of Seattle's starting line up are out this week so I wouldn't think so this game. Going forward I would say WR#4, Seattle is a run first team for the most part, Seattle was taking advantage of a poor Jax defense to work out some kinks in the passing game.