Sirius NFL Radio (1 Viewer)

[hitmenssharpshooters]

They are on right now.

1. Miami - Chris Long T Ryan

2. St Louis - Glen Dorsey Kirwan

3. Atlanta - Vernon Gholston T Ryan

4. Oakland- Sedrick Ellis Kirwan

5. KC - Jake Long T Ryan

6. NY Jets - Darren McFadden Kirwan

7. NE - Leodis McKlevin T Ryan

8. Bal - Matt Ryan Kirwan

9. Cin - Derrick Harvey T Ryan

10 NO - Keith Rivers Kirwan

11. Buff - Devin Thomas T Ryan

12. Den - Ryan Clady Kirwan

13. Car - Brandon Albert T Ryan

14. Chi - Brian Brohm Kirwan

15. Det - Rashard Mendenhall T Ryan

16. Ariz - Dominique Rogers Cromartie Kirwan

17. Minn - Calais Campbell T Ryan

18. Hou - Chris Williams Kirwan

19. Phi - Kenny Phillips T Ryan

20. TB - James Hardy Kirwan

21. Was - Mike Jenkins T Ryan

22. Dal - Jonathon Stewart Kirwan

23. Pitt- Jeff Otah T Ryan

24. Tenn - Philip Merling Kirwan

25. Sea - Kantwan Balmer T Ryan

26. Jax - Quentin Groves Kirwan

27. SD - Aqib Talib T Ryan

28. Dal - Antoine Cason Kirwan

29. SF - Dan Connor T Ryan

30. GB - Gosder Cherlius Kirwan

31. NY G - Jerod Mayo T Ryan

 

[Buddy Ball 2K3]

LOL, Tim told Pat he wouldnt be doing any trades in this mock draft. I also think they are doing 2 rounds today and are gonna do 15 picks per hour.

 

[SugarNuts]

Theyre doing it 1-15 right now... Not like before 1-10, 11 -20, etc...

 

[Chachi]

This thread is lacking in actual content. Any picks up?

 

[RBM]

Just put it on

They had Denver picking Clady and Carolina picking Brandon Albert

 

[Buddy Ball 2K3]

Guess we should like the OP update his thread.

 

[RBM]

Bears taking Brohm. Awful

Lions taking Mendenhall

 

[Chachi]

Just put it onThey had Denver picking Clady and Carolina picking Brandon Albert

Brandon Albert is shooting up peoples boards, seen him as high as #5 in some mocks.

 

[hitmenssharpshooters]

Please be patient...it takes time.

 

[CBSDR]

It's Pat KirwAn

 

[Chachi]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

 

[SugarNuts]

Bears taking Brohm. AwfulLions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

 

[hitmenssharpshooters]

It's Pat KirwAn

And?

 

[SugarNuts]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

 

[RBM]

Bears taking Brohm. AwfulLions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

Im a Bear fan and would throw my shoe at the tv if they wasted this pick on Brohm. Get help on the line first, then worry about qb. Plus, Brohm just isnt that good.

 

[Buddy Ball 2K3]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

 

[bcr8f]

T5. KC - Jake Long T Ryan

Chiefs would be happy.

 

[Chachi]

It's Pat KirwAn

:( And?

It's not like he spelled God, Jesus or Obama wrong, Chill out.

 

[SugarNuts]

Bears taking Brohm. AwfulLions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

Im a Bear fan and would throw my shoe at the tv if they wasted this pick on Brohm. Get help on the line first, then worry about qb. Plus, Brohm just isnt that good.

Well, you (Bears fans) sure havent been saying that the past several years. Brohm isnt that good? What facts do you have that say he isnt "good"?

 

[Chachi]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

Well, Chicago comes out looking like chumps because they could trade their pick, move down and get the same guy and pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. Therefore they look like chumps.

 

[Chachi]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

So you're saying they are just doing these mocks to spark debate/conversation. Sounds very childish, maybe they should preface their mocks with an announcement "We are just playing a game, we don't believe anything we are about to say, but we wanna get the crowd riled up".

 

[SugarNuts]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

Well, Chicago comes out looking like chumps because they could trade their pick, move down and get the same guy and pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. Therefore they look like chumps.

A crystal ball reader eh? Im not saying they will draft him, but to get what they would be drafting as a franchise QB to replace Rex will certainly help them. Do they need OL help? Sure. But theyve been hurting at QB a lot longer than OL.

 

[RBM]

Bears taking Brohm. AwfulLions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

Im a Bear fan and would throw my shoe at the tv if they wasted this pick on Brohm. Get help on the line first, then worry about qb. Plus, Brohm just isnt that good.

Well, you (Bears fans) sure havent been saying that the past several years. Brohm isnt that good? What facts do you have that say he isnt "good"?

I dont want it to sound like I dislike Brohm, because I dont. Ive seen alot of him and he never jumped out as being a sure-thing in the NFL. I prefer a bigger arm also. He will struggle fitting the ball into tight spots with that arm.Seems like he has the head for the position though, which is half the battle.Just not the right pick for the Bears in this spot. The o-line problems are in code red right now.

 

[Chachi]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

Well, Chicago comes out looking like chumps because they could trade their pick, move down and get the same guy and pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. Therefore they look like chumps.

A crystal ball reader eh? Im not saying they will draft him, but to get what they would be drafting as a franchise QB to replace Rex will certainly help them. Do they need OL help? Sure. But theyve been hurting at QB a lot longer than OL.

You are missing the point. Why would they not trade down, that is my point.

 

[SugarNuts]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

So you're saying they are just doing these mocks to spark debate/conversation. Sounds very childish, maybe they should preface their mocks with an announcement "We are just playing a game, we don't believe anything we are about to say, but we wanna get the crowd riled up".

Heres a thought... If you dont like the idea of doing a MOCK draft, then dont click the thread that says " Sirius NFL Radio Tim Ryan and Pat Kirwin Mock Draft 3 4/4/08"

 

[SugarNuts]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

Well, Chicago comes out looking like chumps because they could trade their pick, move down and get the same guy and pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. Therefore they look like chumps.

A crystal ball reader eh? Im not saying they will draft him, but to get what they would be drafting as a franchise QB to replace Rex will certainly help them. Do they need OL help? Sure. But theyve been hurting at QB a lot longer than OL.

You are missing the point. Why would they not trade down, that is my point.

Because when a team sees a talent they WANT, they get it. Can they trade down? Sure. But trading down is gambling. Im a Bills fan, and theyve had questionable picks in the past, but looking back, I dont regret them taking anyone they have taken in round 1 since Mike Williams. Eww.... I think I just threw up in my mouth a little...

 

[Chachi]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

So you're saying they are just doing these mocks to spark debate/conversation. Sounds very childish, maybe they should preface their mocks with an announcement "We are just playing a game, we don't believe anything we are about to say, but we wanna get the crowd riled up".

Heres a thought... If you dont like the idea of doing a MOCK draft, then dont click the thread that says " Sirius NFL Radio Tim Ryan and Pat Kirwin Mock Draft 3 4/4/08"

Wait a second, you want them to spark debate/conversation. So when I debate, you wanna shut me down? Show some consistency.

 

[RBM]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

Well, Chicago comes out looking like chumps because they could trade their pick, move down and get the same guy and pick up a 2nd rounder in the process. Therefore they look like chumps.

A crystal ball reader eh? Im not saying they will draft him, but to get what they would be drafting as a franchise QB to replace Rex will certainly help them. Do they need OL help? Sure. But theyve been hurting at QB a lot longer than OL.

You are missing the point. Why would they not trade down, that is my point.

You've got to have another team willing to give up alot to trade up with you. You dont just snap your fingers and say, "I want to trade down", and have a bunch of teams lining up.

 

[SugarNuts]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

So you're saying they are just doing these mocks to spark debate/conversation. Sounds very childish, maybe they should preface their mocks with an announcement "We are just playing a game, we don't believe anything we are about to say, but we wanna get the crowd riled up".

Heres a thought... If you dont like the idea of doing a MOCK draft, then dont click the thread that says " Sirius NFL Radio Tim Ryan and Pat Kirwin Mock Draft 3 4/4/08"

Wait a second, you want them to spark debate/conversation. So when I debate, you wanna shut me down? Show some consistency.

Im not shutting you down. Ill go at it all day. One thing they are doing with the mock is giving reasons why they are taking each pick. That info isnt given here. If I could type that fast, Id post their thoughts... They have more than one valid point on each pick. Chicago QBs on the current roster only have 1 year contracts. Yeah if they want, they can extend Rex, but would YOU do that?

 

[SugarNuts]

They just referred to their show as "Fool Around Friday", so maybe thats all they have to do today... haha

 

[Buddy Ball 2K3]

In a way, this mock sucks. Buffalo and Chicago come out looking like major chumps, they could trade down 10 spots each and get the same player in all liklihood. Not too hot on the NO pick either, otherwise, it's not horrible.

They come out looking like chumps why? Because they do things a little different? If they stuck with the same mock every time, what fun would that be?

No kidding...Try doing 5+ mocks that gotta be different and spark debate/conversation on a talk show.

So you're saying they are just doing these mocks to spark debate/conversation. Sounds very childish, maybe they should preface their mocks with an announcement "We are just playing a game, we don't believe anything we are about to say, but we wanna get the crowd riled up".

I love guys like this.Let me explain something to you, these guys do a radio show for 20 hours a week. They talk about one subject and thats NFL football. They are on the radio to entertain their listeners, if people do not listen and call they wont have jobs. They do mock drafts to entertain these listeners, there is a reason they are going to do 5+ mocks see if you can figure out why.

 

[Max Power]

Bears taking Brohm. Awful

Lions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

Im a Bear fan and would throw my shoe at the tv if they wasted this pick on Brohm. Get help on the line first, then worry about qb. Plus, Brohm just isnt that good.

Well, you (Bears fans) sure havent been saying that the past several years. Brohm isnt that good? What facts do you have that say he isnt "good"?

I dont want it to sound like I dislike Brohm, because I dont. Ive seen alot of him and he never jumped out as being a sure-thing in the NFL. I prefer a bigger arm also. He will struggle fitting the ball into tight spots with that arm.Seems like he has the head for the position though, which is half the battle.

Just not the right pick for the Bears in this spot. The o-line problems are in code red right now.

JA really screwed up on this one. A guy who got so cought up on taking the BPA for years has now locked himself into taking an OL in rd 1 regardless of what else is on the board.

 

[RBM]

Bears taking Brohm. Awful

Lions taking Mendenhall

I disagree. Brohm was a top 3 pick this time last year. Why would he have fallen? Im sure Bears fans would be happy with this. Now they dont have to rely on Rexy...

Im a Bear fan and would throw my shoe at the tv if they wasted this pick on Brohm. Get help on the line first, then worry about qb. Plus, Brohm just isnt that good.

Well, you (Bears fans) sure havent been saying that the past several years. Brohm isnt that good? What facts do you have that say he isnt "good"?

I dont want it to sound like I dislike Brohm, because I dont. Ive seen alot of him and he never jumped out as being a sure-thing in the NFL. I prefer a bigger arm also. He will struggle fitting the ball into tight spots with that arm.Seems like he has the head for the position though, which is half the battle.

Just not the right pick for the Bears in this spot. The o-line problems are in code red right now.

JA really screwed up on this one. A guy who got so cought up on taking the BPA for years has now locked himself into taking an OL in rd 1 regardless of what else is on the board.

Yup. Very annoying, although it seems like this is a good year to have that problem

 

[CBSDR]

It's Pat KirwAn

And?

And ... you edited it. Nice job by you.

 

[hitmenssharpshooters]

It's Pat KirwAn

And?

And ... you edited it. Nice job by you.

Thanx..appreciate it. In a hurry at work trying to type these in.

 

[trader jake]

16. Ariz - Dominique Rogers Cromartie Kirwan

At first I thought this was low for a corner who is #1 on many team boards (right Dallas!?!). Than again the top corners dropped to #14 and #18 last year.