What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sleeper Wide Receivers Revisited.. (1 Viewer)

ceo3west

Footballguy
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't. I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it. Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Every year we hear predictions being made about breakout wide receivers and guys who will come out of nowhere to become big-time players. There are many different reasons given for these predictions, such as the "third year theory" or the "contract year", etc. However, I've found that these theories are far too unpredictable to use as a basis for drafting a player. Sure, some guys will certainly break out in one of these situations, but it seems that more times than not these guys fail to live up to the hype. If this is news to you, sorry to break it to you. However, I'm here to tell you that there IS a way to consistently find the breakout wide receiver.

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper. All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league (with the exception of two which I will mention as they come up). As with any theory, it needs to be backed up with some kind of evidence. The only evidence I can offer is my own track record, but I feel that it speaks for itself. Let me start with the guys I've drafted that meet my definition of sleeper (including yards/TD's):

1995 Quinn Early (NO) 1,087 / 8

1996 Antonio Freeman (GB) 933 / 9

1997 Rod Smith (Den) 1,180 / 12 Terrell Owens (SF) 936 / 8

1998 Terrance Mathis (Atl) 1,136 / 11

1999 None

2000 None (out of fantasy football this year)

2001 Qadry Ismail (Bal) 1,059 / 7

2002 Peerless Price (Buf) 1,252 / 9

2003 Darryl Jackson (Sea) 1,137 / 9 Peter Warrick (Cin) 819 / 9

2004 None

2005 Joey Galloway (TB) 1,287 / 10 Donte Stallworth (NO) 945 / 7

Note that Warrick & Stallworth both finished in the top 25, however I mentioned them here because they both were ranked outside of the top 50. Also, note that Warrick's TD totals include two return TD's. Now, these players have several things in common, but not all of them share these traits:

* Some were very highly touted coming out of college, having a TON of talent, but had not lived up to expectiations to that point (Warrick, Stallworth, Price)

* Some were aging veterans who had previously had big years, but took a few years off (Mathis, Galloway, Ismail)

* Some were not so hyped coming out of college, but showed flashes in the NFL and were primed for breakouts (Smith, Early, Owens, Jackson)

* And one came out of nowhere (Freeman)

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season. Here is the list again with the number one receiving target in parentheses:

1995 Quinn Early (Michael Haynes)

1996 Antonio Freeman (Robert Brooks)

1997 Rod Smith (Sharpe/McCaffrey) Terrell Owens (Jerry Rice)

1998 Terrance Mathis (Tony Martin)

2001 Qadry Ismail (Sharpe/Taylor)

2002 Peerless Price (Eric Moulds)

2003 Darryl Jackson (Koren Robinson) Peter Warrick (Chad Johnson)

2005 Joey Galloway (Michael Clayton) Donte Stallworth (Joe Horn)

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses. So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together. Some #2's will be eliminated because they are already in the top 35 (Boldin, Wayne, Houshmandzadeh, Walker, Glenn, Stallworth). Also, I am not considering players on mediocre offenses, or players that are just mediocre themselves. Now, this is not an exact science - there is also "feel", as they say. You have to have a knack for picking WR's and know who has some talent. Guys that feel that David Givens or Robert Ferguson have superb talent and are primed for breakouts are probably not going to be able to pick sleepers even knowing this information that I am presenting.

Now to the best part - let's apply this knowledge to this year's player pool and pick out some sleepers (note that these rankings are based on the 7/10 VBD Application):

WR36 Jerry Porter - There's no questioning Porter's talent - he's got it. Not highly touted coming out of college, he has exceeded expectiations in the NFL. In my mind, Porter is a true #1 receiver in the NFL, the type of talent that can handle the double coverage a #1 receiver gets. Although he produced as a true #1 in 2004, Porter has been plagued with injuries and mediocre offensive situations throughout his career. I beleive this may be the year Porter puts it all togtether - there are two reasons for this. One, the Raiders are going to employ a vertical passing game this year - something Al Davis covets, and Porter should flourish in this system. Also, I beleive Aaron Brooks is an upgrade from Kerry Collins. Even though Brooks has been a poor decision-maker at times, in fantasy terms he was a perennial top-10 QB prior to last year. He can get the ball downfield and he throws TD's. Now, there is a good possiblity that Randy Moss gets the lion's share, but I'm not sold on the Top-5 hype for Moss this year. Note that Moss has only finished in the Top 5 once since 2000. It's not for lack of talent - this guy could finish top 5 every year with the talent he has. The problem is that he plays when he wants - as he has stated. When the Raiders are 2-6 and there is frustration setting in, you think Moss will be giving 100%? I like Moss, and he may end up with Top 5 numbers, but I don't think so. My money is on Porter as the better value - the guy with the chip on his shoulder that has everything to play for. Best case, I can envision this scenario playing out like Moulds-Price in 2002, where Moulds ended up with slighlty better numbers, but both guys ended up Top 10. Worst case (barring injury), Porter has another average year of 900 / 5. Lots of upside here.

WR41 Samie Parker - Parker has been a trendy pick so far in drafts, but for good reason. He is on an offensive juggernaut, his QB is an annual lock for 4,000 yards and 20-25 TD's, and the guys around him have already peaked. Im not buying into the Gonzalez comeback hype - he may have a good year but no way does he repeat the numbers he used to put up every year. I beleive Kennison's best years are behind him as well. In addition, he has shown flashes of brilliance and he is entering his third year (there, I said it). All this adds up to a potential breakout year. It may not happen, but worst case he outperforms his WR41 spot. Bank on it.

WR61 Brandon Stokely - Stokely is being overlooked this year, and reasonably so. He is a #3 WR and he had a lousy year last year. That will cause you to get overlooked. However, there's reason for optimism this year. First, look for Manning to get back to the 35-40 TD range this year. I say this for one reason - you don't lose a Top 5 NFL running back and improve in the running game. In addition, James is great in the red zone. As elusive as he is, he can pound down low with the best. Rhodes and Addai may be servicable, and one may even break out, but I beleive that their red zone ground production will be down. Also, although it doesn't look like it now, one of these years Harrison is going to hit a wall or get banged up. It happens to EVERY player. At 34, this may be that year. Im not saying it will be, but if it happens Stokely will be the steal of the year. Even if it doesn't, I look for Stokely to be closer to his 2004 numbers than his 2005 numbers. No #3 receiver has ever been in a better position than Stokely.

WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy. I can't say it enough. Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year. Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done. It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories. I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point. He can get it done. But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz. His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers. Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now. I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams. Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL. Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon. This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy. I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year.

WR89 Ashley Lelie - No one is being disrespected more in fanatasy drafts than Lelie. And for good reason - he's not in camp, his #2 WR job has been taken away, and has been written off. However, when the smoke clears this situation appears very intriguing. First, I dare you to find another player with a bigger chip on his shoulder this year. Second, the guy has talent and has shown flashes of brilliance. Third, I'm not sold that Javon Walker will be coming back at full strength. Walker's biggest asset was his breakaway speed - without it I think he will be nothing more than an average receiver this year. Also, as much as I love Rod Smith (had him last year too), he too will hit a wall or get banged up at some point - he's 36!! If you tell me that by week 8, Smith will be performing like the Smith of past years and Walker will be a solid #2 or #1a, I will eat crow, but I don't see it. I see Lelie coming in at some point and (possibly) living up to past hype. Worst case, I spend an 18th round pick on him and I drop him for a hot waiver-wire pickup. Note that all of this obviously assumes Lelie actually plays for Denver this year. If he goes somewhere else, he may still be considered a sleeper depending on where he lands.

WR100 Rod Gardner - Another guy I love this year. I know, he's been an annual disappointment since his breakout year in Washington. His next two years in Washington brought inconsistent QB play, and then injuries set in the next two. Gardner is finally healthy, is in a GREAT situation, he has the talent and has shown flashes of brilliance. Let me start by saying this - Brett Favre is a lock for 25-30 TD's this year (making him an oustanding value as well). It hasn't really been talked about much, but the only reason Favre came back is because he is 25 TD's from Marinos' record of 420 career TD's. Someone has to catch these TD's - Donald Driver? I don't think so. He may be good for 8 or 9, but in Driver's 7-year career he's only caught more than 5 twice (he's caught 9 twice). Honestly, Im not a big Driver fan - he always seems to end up Top 15, but I like guys that get in the end zone. They win championships for you. Also, there's Robert Ferguson. They begged this guy to take the #2 job last year when Walker went down, but he was never up to it. Bottom line - he is not that talented. If Gardner shows up this year and brings his A-game, I beleive that not only can he take the #2 job, but I will go out on a limb and say that he could outproduce Driver. It's not unimaginable. Just last year, Joey Galloway came back from the dead to retake his rightful place as a true #1 receiver. I'll take that chance with one of my last picks in the draft.

Now, although I like these guys and certainly have hyped them up, some will bust without a doubt. And I'm not saying I'll get all of these guys - with some luck I hope to have four or five of them rostered (in addition to probably two solid receivers in the first five rounds). But if I hit it big with one or two like I did with the guys above, I'll be dancin' in December.

 
WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy. I can't say it enough. Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year. Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done. It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories. I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point. He can get it done. But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz. His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers. Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now. I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams. Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL. Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon. This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy. I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year
Good attitude. No matter how many times you are wrong, you will eventually be right.
 
First of all, congratulations on getting an article published :thumbup:

These comments are meant to be constructive...

You say that you don't believe in the third year break out or contract year theories, but you don't really establish why you disregard them. If you mention them at all, be ready to say why you take that view.

I think your article is too personal. You are talking about your drafts and what you will do, rather than really giving many tips about how the reader can learn how to spot these sleepers.

What success rate can we expect using this method?

How many of your successes were due to an injury to the number one receiver? That was certainly true of your two finds last year. It seems to me that Parker will be behind Kennison/Gonzalez/Johnson unless injury hits. Why is he about to break out? Trent Green is not a lock for 20 TDs as he only had 17 last year. I think it is better to quote his actual achievements than make claims such as that. It might make the reader think you made a mistake.

The same is true of spelling errors and player names. Use a spell checker and take a close look at player names. It doesn't inspire confidence when your writing is full of little errors. Some people might even think if you are careless about that, you might be equally careless with your "facts".

Is Stokley really going to step into the Harrison role if injury hits? This hasn't been true in previous instances. I agree that his numbers can be expected to rise this year though.

Porter was reportedly unhappy with his role earlier this year and Williams does have some negatives too. Will the new coaching staff tolerate $400,000 of fines? I agree that if you take him as late as you suggest, it could be wirth the risk.

After claiming why Favre is a lock for 25-30 TDs, I think you should establish why. After all, he only had 20 last year. If you think a healthy running game will improve the passing game, then say so. Or state your reasons for making that claim.

My :2cents:

 
CEO -

Nice post and thoughts on WR.

Without the fan fare of explaining and analysis, guys with an ADP of WR60+ that I see as being able to rank in the top 50.

Robert Ferguson

Bobby Engram

Mark Bradley

Michael Jenkins

Reggie Williams

Eric Parker

Corey Bradford

Travis Taylor

Marty Booker

Justin McCareins

Arnaz Battle

 
WR100 Rod Gardner - Another guy I love this year. I know, he's been an annual disappointment since his breakout year in Washington. His next two years in Washington brought inconsistent QB play, and then injuries set in the next two. Gardner is finally healthy, is in a GREAT situation, he has the talent and has shown flashes of brilliance. Let me start by saying this - Brett Favre is a lock for 25-30 TD's this year (making him an oustanding value as well). It hasn't really been talked about much, but the only reason Favre came back is because he is 25 TD's from Marinos' record of 420 career TD's. Someone has to catch these TD's - Donald Driver? I don't think so. He may be good for 8 or 9, but in Driver's 7-year career he's only caught more than 5 twice (he's caught 9 twice). Honestly, Im not a big Driver fan - he always seems to end up Top 15, but I like guys that get in the end zone. They win championships for you. Also, there's Robert Ferguson. They begged this guy to take the #2 job last year when Walker went down, but he was never up to it. Bottom line - he is not that talented. If Gardner shows up this year and brings his A-game, I beleive that not only can he take the #2 job, but I will go out on a limb and say that he could outproduce Driver. It's not unimaginable. Just last year, Joey Galloway came back from the dead to retake his rightful place as a true #1 receiver. I'll take that chance with one of my last picks in the draft.
I don't find this a far stretch at all, although I have Favre much higher than most, and also think Driver's going to have a very solid year. I am sleeping on the Packers this year to sneak away with the division title :bag:
 
WR100 Rod Gardner - Another guy I love this year.  I know, he's been an annual disappointment since his breakout year in Washington.  His next two years in Washington brought inconsistent QB play, and then injuries set in the next two.  Gardner is finally healthy, is in a GREAT situation, he has the talent and has shown flashes of brilliance.  Let me start by saying this - Brett Favre is a lock for 25-30 TD's this year (making him an oustanding value as well).  It hasn't really been talked about much, but the only reason Favre came back is because he is 25 TD's from Marinos' record of 420 career TD's.  Someone has to catch these TD's - Donald Driver?  I don't think so.  He may be good for 8 or 9, but in Driver's 7-year career he's only caught more than 5 twice (he's caught 9 twice).  Honestly, Im not a big Driver fan - he always seems to end up Top 15, but I like guys that get in the end zone.  They win championships for you.  Also, there's Robert Ferguson.  They begged this guy to take the #2 job last year when Walker went down, but he was never up to it.  Bottom line - he is not that talented.  If Gardner shows up this year and brings his A-game, I beleive that not only can he take the #2 job, but I will go out on a limb and say that he could outproduce Driver.  It's not unimaginable.  Just last year, Joey Galloway came back from the dead to retake his rightful place as a true #1 receiver.  I'll take that chance with one of my last picks in the draft.
I don't find this a far stretch at all, although I have Favre much higher than most, and also think Driver's going to have a very solid year. I am sleeping on the Packers this year to sneak away with the division title :bag:
well my guy although now he may be in a comma state right now but I'm banking on Brad Smith for the NYJ. To me it seems every year one of these QB turned WR seem to breakout. so I picked him because other than Coles there really isn't much else there at wr. What do you guys think?

Also I totally agree with S. Parker breaking out

 
First of all, congratulations on getting an article published :thumbup:

These comments are meant to be constructive...

You say that you don't believe in the third year break out or contract year theories, but you don't really establish why you disregard them. If you mention them at all, be ready to say why you take that view.

I think your article is too personal. You are talking about your drafts and what you will do, rather than really giving many tips about how the reader can learn how to spot these sleepers.

What success rate can we expect using this method?

How many of your successes were due to an injury to the number one receiver? That was certainly true of your two finds last year. It seems to me that Parker will be behind Kennison/Gonzalez/Johnson unless injury hits. Why is he about to break out? Trent Green is not a lock for 20 TDs as he only had 17 last year. I think it is better to quote his actual achievements than make claims such as that. It might make the reader think you made a mistake.

The same is true of spelling errors and player names. Use a spell checker and take a close look at player names. It doesn't inspire confidence when your writing is full of little errors. Some people might even think if you are careless about that, you might be equally careless with your "facts".

Is Stokley really going to step into the Harrison role if injury hits? This hasn't been true in previous instances. I agree that his numbers can be expected to rise this year though.

Porter was reportedly unhappy with his role earlier this year and Williams does have some negatives too. Will the new coaching staff tolerate $400,000 of fines? I agree that if you take him as late as you suggest, it could be wirth the risk.

After claiming why Favre is a lock for 25-30 TDs, I think you should establish why. After all, he only had 20 last year. If you think a healthy running game will improve the passing game, then say so. Or state your reasons for making that claim.

My :2cents:
Thanks for the feedback. Some things I'd like to clarify--The artice is definitely personal - meant to be more of an editorial of sorts. However, the advice on spotting sleepers is more or less factual based on my personal experience. This is not an exact science. Ive found that by picking four or five guys that meet this criteria, one or two tend to break out. When I stated "So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together", this is about as close as you can get to picking the players for you without actually picking them. You can lead a horse to water as they say.. Bottom line is you need to take a look at guys that meet this criteria and determine for yourself if they are talented and "feel" that they may break out.

Also, as for spelling errors, my home PC is new and I dont have MS Office yet - had to use notepad which doesn't have a spellchecker, so I apologize for these errors.. However, I'm the type of person who likes to look at the value of the material presented rather than minor details. Don't take this personally, but to me, that is like rejecting a job candidate that has produced outstanding results for other employers just because a couple words are misspelled.

I certainly could have backed up some more of the statements I made, but I could have wrote a whole separate article on these items. So take this more as an opinion I suppose.. Again, use the concept I presented and pick your own sleepers - if you feel JP Losman will come in and throw 30 TD's, then pick Peerless Price as a sleeper candidate. Thats really the point of this.

Lastly, Galloway breaking out had little to do with Clayton getting injured. Clayton didn't get injured till week 5 and Galloway had established by that point that he was the number 1 receiver. Take a look back at the last five games of 2004 when Galloway was finally healthy again, thats when the trend started.

 
First of all, congratulations on getting an article published  :thumbup:

These comments are meant to be constructive...

You say that you don't believe in the third year break out or contract year theories, but you don't really establish why you disregard them. If you mention them at all, be ready to say why you take that view.

I think your article is too personal. You are talking about your drafts and what you will do, rather than really giving many tips about how the reader can learn how to spot these sleepers.

What success rate can we expect using this method?

How many of your successes were due to an injury to the number one receiver? That was certainly true of your two finds last year. It seems to me that Parker will be behind Kennison/Gonzalez/Johnson unless injury hits. Why is he about to break out? Trent Green is not a lock for 20 TDs as he only had 17 last year. I think it is better to quote his actual achievements than make claims such as that. It might make the reader think you made a mistake.

The same is true of spelling errors and player names. Use a spell checker and take a close look at player names. It doesn't inspire confidence when your writing is full of little errors. Some people might even think if you are careless about that, you might be equally careless with your "facts".

Is Stokley really going to step into the Harrison role if injury hits? This hasn't been true in previous instances. I agree that his numbers can be expected to rise this year though.

Porter was reportedly unhappy with his role earlier this year and Williams does have some negatives too. Will the new coaching staff tolerate $400,000 of fines? I agree that if you take him as late as you suggest, it could be wirth the risk.

After claiming why Favre is a lock for 25-30 TDs, I think you should establish why. After all, he only had 20 last year. If you think a healthy running game will improve the passing game, then say so. Or state your reasons for making that claim.

My  :2cents:
Thanks for the feedback. Some things I'd like to clarify--The artice is definitely personal - meant to be more of an editorial of sorts. However, the advice on spotting sleepers is more or less factual based on my personal experience. This is not an exact science. Ive found that by picking four or five guys that meet this criteria, one or two tend to break out. When I stated "So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together", this is about as close as you can get to picking the players for you without actually picking them. You can lead a horse to water as they say.. Bottom line is you need to take a look at guys that meet this criteria and determine for yourself if they are talented and "feel" that they may break out.

Also, as for spelling errors, my home PC is new and I dont have MS Office yet - had to use notepad which doesn't have a spellchecker, so I apologize for these errors.. However, I'm the type of person who likes to look at the value of the material presented rather than minor details. Don't take this personally, but to me, that is like rejecting a job candidate that has produced outstanding results for other employers just because a couple words are misspelled.

I certainly could have backed up some more of the statements I made, but I could have wrote a whole separate article on these items. So take this more as an opinion I suppose.. Again, use the concept I presented and pick your own sleepers - if you feel JP Losman will come in and throw 30 TD's, then pick Peerless Price as a sleeper candidate. Thats really the point of this.

Lastly, Galloway breaking out had little to do with Clayton getting injured. Clayton didn't get injured till week 5 and Galloway had established by that point that he was the number 1 receiver. Take a look back at the last five games of 2004 when Galloway was finally healthy again, thats when the trend started.
I didn't mean to rip everything apart. It was a well written piece. I was just trying to help polish a few things up. You obviously don't need help because your other piece was accepted.I liked what you tried to do. I agreed with some picks and disagreed with others, but appreciated the effort.

 
First of all, congratulations on getting an article published  :thumbup:

These comments are meant to be constructive...

You say that you don't believe in the third year break out or contract year theories, but you don't really establish why you disregard them. If you mention them at all, be ready to say why you take that view.

I think your article is too personal. You are talking about your drafts and what you will do, rather than really giving many tips about how the reader can learn how to spot these sleepers.

What success rate can we expect using this method?

How many of your successes were due to an injury to the number one receiver? That was certainly true of your two finds last year. It seems to me that Parker will be behind Kennison/Gonzalez/Johnson unless injury hits. Why is he about to break out? Trent Green is not a lock for 20 TDs as he only had 17 last year. I think it is better to quote his actual achievements than make claims such as that. It might make the reader think you made a mistake.

The same is true of spelling errors and player names. Use a spell checker and take a close look at player names. It doesn't inspire confidence when your writing is full of little errors. Some people might even think if you are careless about that, you might be equally careless with your "facts".

Is Stokley really going to step into the Harrison role if injury hits? This hasn't been true in previous instances. I agree that his numbers can be expected to rise this year though.

Porter was reportedly unhappy with his role earlier this year and Williams does have some negatives too. Will the new coaching staff tolerate $400,000 of fines? I agree that if you take him as late as you suggest, it could be wirth the risk.

After claiming why Favre is a lock for 25-30 TDs, I think you should establish why. After all, he only had 20 last year. If you think a healthy running game will improve the passing game, then say so. Or state your reasons for making that claim.

My  :2cents:
Thanks for the feedback. Some things I'd like to clarify--The artice is definitely personal - meant to be more of an editorial of sorts. However, the advice on spotting sleepers is more or less factual based on my personal experience. This is not an exact science. Ive found that by picking four or five guys that meet this criteria, one or two tend to break out. When I stated "So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together", this is about as close as you can get to picking the players for you without actually picking them. You can lead a horse to water as they say.. Bottom line is you need to take a look at guys that meet this criteria and determine for yourself if they are talented and "feel" that they may break out.

Also, as for spelling errors, my home PC is new and I dont have MS Office yet - had to use notepad which doesn't have a spellchecker, so I apologize for these errors.. However, I'm the type of person who likes to look at the value of the material presented rather than minor details. Don't take this personally, but to me, that is like rejecting a job candidate that has produced outstanding results for other employers just because a couple words are misspelled.

I certainly could have backed up some more of the statements I made, but I could have wrote a whole separate article on these items. So take this more as an opinion I suppose.. Again, use the concept I presented and pick your own sleepers - if you feel JP Losman will come in and throw 30 TD's, then pick Peerless Price as a sleeper candidate. Thats really the point of this.

Lastly, Galloway breaking out had little to do with Clayton getting injured. Clayton didn't get injured till week 5 and Galloway had established by that point that he was the number 1 receiver. Take a look back at the last five games of 2004 when Galloway was finally healthy again, thats when the trend started.
I didn't mean to rip everything apart. It was a well written piece. I was just trying to help polish a few things up. You obviously don't need help because your other piece was accepted.I liked what you tried to do. I agreed with some picks and disagreed with others, but appreciated the effort.
It's all good Muses, thanks again. :thumbup:
 
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't. I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it. Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper. All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league...

---

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season.

---

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses. So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together.
CEO - First of all, congrats on your other article being published - hopefully next to mine :P Not wanting to sound detrimental - I'm probably missing the point (or turning it around) - but if a guy is ranked WR35 or greater and he's in a good offensive team isn't he automatically the second or third target?...

Or, I'm I just reading the causes & consequences "the other way around"? That being the number 2 or 3 target is not the conclusion / the variable that you are looking for in a WR sleeper but rather just a consequence of the situation the WR is in?

 
Eagles | Gaffney wearing No. 80Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:27:41 -0700Zach Berman, of PhiladelphiaEagles.com, reports Philadelphia Eagles WR Jabar Gaffney is now wearing No. 80 instead of No. 84.
:whistle:
 
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't.  I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it.  Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper.  All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league...

---

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season.

---

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses.  So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together. 
CEO - First of all, congrats on your other article being published - hopefully next to mine :P Not wanting to sound detrimental - I'm probably missing the point (or turning it around) - but if a guy is ranked WR35 or greater and he's in a good offensive team isn't he automatically the second or third target?...

Or, I'm I just reading the causes & consequences "the other way around"? That being the number 2 or 3 target is not the conclusion / the variable that you are looking for in a WR sleeper but rather just a consequence of the situation the WR is in?
Thanks Jayman - congrats to you too.Im not sure I fully understand what youre asking but I'll take a stab at it. Some of these guys are #2's or 3's on offenses that turned out to be better than expected, meaning they werent considered to be really good offenses going into the year. Also, there are some good offenses where their #1 WR is not ranked in the top 35 such as San Diego, Tenessee & Atlanta (although two of these teams have stellar TE's I admit). The point is, a WR 35 or greater on a good offensive team doesnt necessarily mean he is the #2 or #3 guy. I think all the criteria needs to be met:

* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I hope this clarifies things although Im not sure it does..

 
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't.  I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it.  Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper.  All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league...

---

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season.

---

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses.  So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together. 
CEO - First of all, congrats on your other article being published - hopefully next to mine :P Not wanting to sound detrimental - I'm probably missing the point (or turning it around) - but if a guy is ranked WR35 or greater and he's in a good offensive team isn't he automatically the second or third target?...

Or, I'm I just reading the causes & consequences "the other way around"? That being the number 2 or 3 target is not the conclusion / the variable that you are looking for in a WR sleeper but rather just a consequence of the situation the WR is in?
Thanks Jayman - congrats to you too.Im not sure I fully understand what youre asking but I'll take a stab at it. Some of these guys are #2's or 3's on offenses that turned out to be better than expected, meaning they werent considered to be really good offenses going into the year. Also, there are some good offenses where their #1 WR is not ranked in the top 35 such as San Diego, Tenessee & Atlanta (although two of these teams have stellar TE's I admit). The point is, a WR 35 or greater on a good offensive team doesnt necessarily mean he is the #2 or #3 guy. I think all the criteria needs to be met:

* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I hope this clarifies things although Im not sure it does..
Thanks for the feedback CEO... I think the "offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season" is really important in your analysis...Otherwise, I'll try and be clearer - as I think the "he's a #2 or #3 guy" bullet should be nullify...

You are quoting San Diego - which is a good example...

If both McCardell and Parker are listed at WR35 or above... and McCardell is the WR1 (I think we agree on that)... than, wouldn't you want to go for McCardell and not Parker in your draft? (granted that both can be picked late because they are "sleepers")... thus nullyfing the "he has to be a #2 or #3 guy - if you can have the #1 - why not pick him instead?

 
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't.  I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it.  Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper.  All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league...

---

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season.

---

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses.  So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together. 
CEO - First of all, congrats on your other article being published - hopefully next to mine :P Not wanting to sound detrimental - I'm probably missing the point (or turning it around) - but if a guy is ranked WR35 or greater and he's in a good offensive team isn't he automatically the second or third target?...

Or, I'm I just reading the causes & consequences "the other way around"? That being the number 2 or 3 target is not the conclusion / the variable that you are looking for in a WR sleeper but rather just a consequence of the situation the WR is in?
Thanks Jayman - congrats to you too.Im not sure I fully understand what youre asking but I'll take a stab at it. Some of these guys are #2's or 3's on offenses that turned out to be better than expected, meaning they werent considered to be really good offenses going into the year. Also, there are some good offenses where their #1 WR is not ranked in the top 35 such as San Diego, Tenessee & Atlanta (although two of these teams have stellar TE's I admit). The point is, a WR 35 or greater on a good offensive team doesnt necessarily mean he is the #2 or #3 guy. I think all the criteria needs to be met:

* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I hope this clarifies things although Im not sure it does..
Thanks for the feedback CEO... I think the "offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season" is really important in your analysis...Otherwise, I'll try and be clearer - as I think the "he's a #2 or #3 guy" bullet should be nullify...

You are quoting San Diego - which is a good example...

If both McCardell and Parker are listed at WR35 or above... and McCardell is the WR1 (I think we agree on that)... than, wouldn't you want to go for McCardell and not Parker in your draft? (granted that both can be picked late because they are "sleepers")... thus nullyfing the "he has to be a #2 or #3 guy - if you can have the #1 - why not pick him instead?
You make a good point - you could make the arguement that you could pick a #1 WR that meet these criteria, however I have found that #1 WR's who are talented WR's on good to great offenses (or will be better than expected) are few and far between and are not overlooked. Also, I think part of it too (and I failed to mention this in my article unfortunately) is that the 2 or 3 WR that is talented and has the chance to break out is playing with a chip on their shoulder. I beleive many very talented #2's carry this chip if you will. In my opinion this was the case with Galloway, Price, and perhaps a few others on my list. I base this on my knowledge of the players personality and things Ive heard about these players from various sources. So being considered "second best" if you will is part of the drive that causes these players to break out. Just my theory...
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Mike Williams gets cut this year.
Me either. I'd be shocked. Wms is a loser but no way can they (literally) afford to cut him. Plus they have to hold out hope at least for a yr or 2 that he could come around. The ability is clearly there.

 
Good stuff.

What's your criteria for this?

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season
Mike Williams seems like the only player who fits that 2nd description.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Mike Williams gets cut this year.
Me either. I'd be shocked. Wms is a loser but no way can they (literally) afford to cut him. Plus they have to hold out hope at least for a yr or 2 that he could come around. The ability is clearly there.
Why don't they just make him a TE and be done with it. I'm not sure how his blocking is, but you would think he could be a very good receiving TE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good stuff.

What's your criteria for this?

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season
Mike Williams seems like the only player who fits that 2nd description.
There's no set criteria, I tend to look for a couple things:* Offseason acquisitions that will bolster the offense (i.e. with Price, Bledsoe came over in the offseason - in that situation, the Bills offense turned out to be much better than expected)

* Offenses that showed signs of starting to emerge the previous season but had not reached their full potential (i.e. Mathis in 1997; this one could also fall into the above category with the acquisition of Tony Martin)

Honestly, most of the guys Ive picked out were already on decent to great offenses but were just overlooked - partly because they are not the primary receiver. This year, Williams is really the only guy that falls in the category of "offense will be better than expected". These guys are tougher to pick because not only are you guessing that the offense will emerge, but the secondary receiving option will emerge as well.

 
WR36 Jerry Porter - There's no questioning Porter's talent - he's got it.  Not highly touted coming out of college, he has exceeded expectiations in the NFL.  In my mind, Porter is a true #1 receiver in the NFL, the type of talent that can handle the double coverage a #1 receiver gets.  Although he produced as a true #1 in 2004, Porter has been plagued with injuries and mediocre offensive situations throughout his career.  I beleive this may be the year Porter puts it all togtether - there are two reasons for this.  One, the Raiders are going to employ a  vertical passing game this year - something Al Davis covets, and Porter should flourish in this system.  Also, I beleive Aaron Brooks is an upgrade from Kerry Collins.  Even though Brooks has been a poor decision-maker at times, in fantasy terms he was a perennial top-10 QB prior to last year.  He can get the ball downfield and he throws TD's.  Now, there is a good possiblity that Randy Moss gets the lion's share, but I'm not sold on the Top-5 hype for Moss this year.  Note that Moss has only finished in the Top 5 once since 2000.  It's not for lack of talent - this guy could finish top 5 every year with the talent he has.  The problem is that he plays when he wants - as he has stated.  When the Raiders are 2-6 and there is frustration setting in, you think Moss will be giving 100%?  I like Moss, and he may end up with Top 5 numbers, but I don't think so.  My money is on Porter as the better value - the guy with the chip on his shoulder that has everything to play for.  Best case, I can envision this scenario playing out like Moulds-Price in 2002, where Moulds ended up with slighlty better numbers, but both guys ended up Top 10.  Worst case (barring injury), Porter has another average year of 900 / 5.  Lots of upside here.
Interesting article, not sure I agree with your selections either but interesting nonetheless.One note though as I was a little shocked by your quote on Randy Moss and had to look it up. In FBG's rankings, Moss finished:

2001 - #5 WR

2002 - #5 WR

2003 - #1 WR

So not sure where your 1 top 5 finish comes in, unless you are using a different scoring system. Either way, I think your statement is a little overstated. Even in 2004, he really only played 11 games and in those 11, his PPG would were top 5 numbers. 2005 really was the first non-Randy like year when you consider he was hurt in 2004.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
WR36 Jerry Porter - There's no questioning Porter's talent - he's got it.  Not highly touted coming out of college, he has exceeded expectiations in the NFL.  In my mind, Porter is a true #1 receiver in the NFL, the type of talent that can handle the double coverage a #1 receiver gets.  Although he produced as a true #1 in 2004, Porter has been plagued with injuries and mediocre offensive situations throughout his career.  I beleive this may be the year Porter puts it all togtether - there are two reasons for this.  One, the Raiders are going to employ a  vertical passing game this year - something Al Davis covets, and Porter should flourish in this system.  Also, I beleive Aaron Brooks is an upgrade from Kerry Collins.  Even though Brooks has been a poor decision-maker at times, in fantasy terms he was a perennial top-10 QB prior to last year.  He can get the ball downfield and he throws TD's.  Now, there is a good possiblity that Randy Moss gets the lion's share, but I'm not sold on the Top-5 hype for Moss this year.  Note that Moss has only finished in the Top 5 once since 2000.  It's not for lack of talent - this guy could finish top 5 every year with the talent he has.  The problem is that he plays when he wants - as he has stated.  When the Raiders are 2-6 and there is frustration setting in, you think Moss will be giving 100%?  I like Moss, and he may end up with Top 5 numbers, but I don't think so.  My money is on Porter as the better value - the guy with the chip on his shoulder that has everything to play for.  Best case, I can envision this scenario playing out like Moulds-Price in 2002, where Moulds ended up with slighlty better numbers, but both guys ended up Top 10.  Worst case (barring injury), Porter has another average year of 900 / 5.  Lots of upside here.
Interesting article, not sure I agree with your selections either but interesting nonetheless.One note though as I was a little shocked by your quote on Randy Moss and had to look it up. In FBG's rankings, Moss finished:

2001 - #5 WR

2002 - #5 WR

2003 - #1 WR

So not sure where your 1 top 5 finish comes in, unless you are using a different scoring system. Either way, I think your statement is a little overstated. Even in 2004, he really only played 11 games and in those 11, his PPG would were top 5 numbers. 2005 really was the first non-Randy like year when you consider he was hurt in 2004.
Moss finished outside of the top 5 in 2001 & 2002. If you add in his 38 rushing yards in 2001, he does land at number 5 but this is not considered in many scoring systems so it's arguable at best. In 2002, he is not in the top 5 even with rushing stats. The point is, he has not achieved value given that he was picked #1 or #2 most of these years.Would like to hear some of your sleepers and reasons for them..

always looking to get an edge..

 
If you add in his 38 rushing yards in 2001, he does land at number 5 but this is not considered in many scoring systems so it's arguable at best.
:confused: Not sure where you play ff, but every league I've ever seen counts both rushing and passing yards.

 
I firmly believe Moss lack of production in 2005 was due more to the fact that, I DRAFTED HIM for the first time ever. Wasn't able to secure him this year, so sleep well Moss owners. I was able to get Gonzo for the first time ever, so expect his slide to continue.

Oh ya, nice article. I like the thought process.

 
Would like to hear some of your sleepers and reasons for them..

always looking to get an edge..
First off.... Congrats on getting published! I realize you have taken alot of time and energy for this, making it a somewhat personal belief. I enjoyed the article and follow the theory. But did you consider the injury question applied to players who missed "the learning curve"? And an idea to cover players who are on new teams could be an interesting new feature to it.... OK... to answer the question you posed above.... my sleepers and why.... using the FBG Dynasty WR Ranking

I have 2: Koren Robinson (# 49) and Reggie Williams (#60)

Koren Robinson: Talent is clearly there. He was the #1 WR in Seattle before his off field issues interupted his on field playing ability. While at NC State, he broke many of Torry Holt's records. Talent and physical ability are there. He has overcome his drinking issues and has gotten his head on straight. He has listened to the wake up call since his departure from Seattle. He has an Offense Minded HC in Minn in Brad Childress. Projections for Minn Offense are way too low IMO. Childress witnessed first hand the issues of a voliatle WR (named TO) could interfere with his plans. You will not see that repeated in Minn. The stable QB Brad Johnson has the arm to make Koren a Top talent. The play calling will determine his overall rise. With Marcus Robinson & Travis Taylor the only WR competitive threats, Koren should be Top 10. Chester Taylor will only help Koren. Defenses will have to be honest to protect both Run & Pass.

Reggie Williams: after suffering a concussion in his rookie year, Reggie was displaced by Matt Jones and E Wilford. He was not the same when he returned. He has fully recovered from it's effect now. Last year, Reggie worked last off season with Byron Leftwich to develop chemistry plus put on 10 lbs of muscle. This off season, Jimmy Smith suprised all with his retirement. Filling that role will not be as simple as pluging in Matt. While a blessed physical talent, converting to WR from QB is not simply a learning new routes. The Defenses he faced last year will be able to overcome some of his traits and shut him down. When reviewing his tapes, he will be exposed. The position has many nuances that will require Matt the harsh learning experience of hard knocks - NFL Game Time. Reggie is a WR, always has been. He has the speed & physical ability to make the cuts and get separation. First round talent who has not had the chance to show his true ability. He has the hands and experience to know what to do. He has the chemistry, timing and physical abilty to excel. All the pieces of the puzzle are there for him. Reggie is currently listed ahead of Wilford. This will only change to see Reggis pass Matt Jones too. Fred Taylor, Greg Jones & the RBBC group in Jax all offer different threats to the Defense allowing Reggie to get his job done!

OK... tear them up if you like.. I have confidence they will out perform their current ranking.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you add in  his 38 rushing yards in 2001, he does land at number 5 but this is not considered in many scoring systems so it's arguable at best. 
:confused: Not sure where you play ff, but every league I've ever seen counts both rushing and passing yards.
Me too. Just going by FBG's rankings Moss has 3 top 5 finishes after his #1 ranking in 2000.Again, he missed a ton of time in 2004, but his PPG average for his 12 games played was easily top 5 as well. I missed one game with 1 target and no receptions and even with that game, he was still top 5 PPG. In those 12 games in 2004, he had 2 games with 0 TDs, 7 with 1 TD and 3 with 2TDs. 13 TDs in 12 games is nothing to sneeze at.

As to WR sleepers based on the WR35 or higher ranking, I would go with the following (I haven't paid for my membership yet ;) so I went with the last free projections:

Nate Burelson 54 (Bobby Engram 56): Not sold on Burelson yet, but one of these guys will be the #2 when the season breaks and without JJ, I think it is a good bet that one of these guys will get better stats than 600 yards and grab some of JJ's 10 TDs last year. I would watch Burelson quite a bit this pre-season to see if he entrenches himself as the #2. I also think SA comes back to his 16-20 TDs instead of 28 again, maybe jumping Hasslebeck up a couple more TDs.

I actually thought about Mark Clayton, but I just don't see him getting enough, unless Mason gets injured, although I like Clayton for the future and being in a keeper league I will definitely think about grabbing him in the late rounds. There are also a bunch of high 20s/low 30s ranked WRs that I like a lot and I would bet quite a bit that 1 or more of them will have a superb season, but they don't qualify under the WR35+ ranking.

Also, when looking for sleeper WRs, I tend to look for #1 WRs, like Roddy White/Michael Jenkins, Antonio Bryant, Joe Jurevicious, Bennett/Givens, and McCardell/Parker that can easily outperform their rankings with the amount of targets that they should get. I kind of like Bryant/JJ out of those groups since at this point in time, they would appear to have less competition. Again, these situations are ones to keep watching during pre-season as it is not that hard for a #1 WR on a team to get to WR3 status which in FBG's forecast requires only 800 yards and 5 TDs. I have kept Eddie Kennison for the past couple years just on the premise that he is the #1 WR in KC and even as the 3rd option, he still gets enough balls to be way more valuable than the 13-15th round picks that I have used on him.

Another guy to watch is Chad Jackson and how far the Deion Branch thing goes. Right now, I have no idea who is the #2 WR in NE, but if Branch holds out for any length of time, someone in NE will become the Eddie Kennison there, i.e. good TEs, decent running game, but more than enough WR targets.

 
Would like to hear some of your sleepers and reasons for them..

always looking to get an edge..
First off.... Congrats on getting published! I realize you have taken alot of time and energy for this, making it a somewhat personal belief. I enjoyed the article and follow the theory. But did you consider the injury question applied to players who missed "the learning curve"? And an idea to cover players who are on new teams could be an interesting new feature to it.... OK... to answer the question you posed above.... my sleepers and why.... using the FBG Dynasty WR Ranking

I have 2: Koren Robinson (# 49) and Reggie Williams (#60)

Koren Robinson: Talent is clearly there. He was the #1 WR in Seattle before his off field issues interupted his on field playing ability. While at NC State, he broke many of Torry Holt's records. Talent and physical ability are there. He has overcome his drinking issues and has gotten his head on straight. He has listened to the wake up call since his departure from Seattle. He has an Offense Minded HC in Minn in Brad Childress. Projections for Minn Offense are way too low IMO. Childress witnessed first hand the issues of a voliatle WR (named TO) could interfere with his plans. You will not see that repeated in Minn. The stable QB Brad Johnson has the arm to make Koren a Top talent. The play calling will determine his overall rise. With Marcus Robinson & Travis Taylor the only WR competitive threats, Koren should be Top 10. Chester Taylor will only help Koren. Defenses will have to be honest to protect both Run & Pass.

Reggie Williams: after suffering a concussion in his rookie year, Reggie was displaced by Matt Jones and E Wilford. He was not the same when he returned. He has fully recovered from it's effect now. Last year, Reggie worked last off season with Byron Leftwich to develop chemistry plus put on 10 lbs of muscle. This off season, Jimmy Smith suprised all with his retirement. Filling that role will not be as simple as pluging in Matt. While a blessed physical talent, converting to WR from QB is not simply a learning new routes. The Defenses he faced last year will be able to overcome some of his traits and shut him down. When reviewing his tapes, he will be exposed. The position has many nuances that will require Matt the harsh learning experience of hard knocks - NFL Game Time. Reggie is a WR, always has been. He has the speed & physical ability to make the cuts and get separation. First round talent who has not had the chance to show his true ability. He has the hands and experience to know what to do. He has the chemistry, timing and physical abilty to excel. All the pieces of the puzzle are there for him. Reggie is currently listed ahead of Wilford. This will only change to see Reggis pass Matt Jones too. Fred Taylor, Greg Jones & the RBBC group in Jax all offer different threats to the Defense allowing Reggie to get his job done!

OK... tear them up if you like.. I have confidence they will out perform their current ranking.
Thanks Birdie..As far as your statement "But did you consider the injury question applied to players who missed "the learning curve"? ", Im not really sure what you mean in terms of how this relates to my theory. Can you clarify?

As for your sleepers, I like Robinson too but did not include him because he is currently ranked in the top 35 according tot he VBD spreadsheet and is considered the #1 WR on his team.

Also, I agree that Williams has the potential but Im worried about the system he's in and whether he will get enough balls thrown his way. Certainly possible though.

 
WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy. I can't say it enough. Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year. Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done. It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories. I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point. He can get it done. But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz. His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers. Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now. I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams. Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL. Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon. This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy. I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year.
Right team, wrong sleeper. It will be Charles Rogers this year.
 
WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy.  I can't say it enough.  Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year.  Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done.  It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories.  I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point.  He can get it done.  But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz.  His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers.  Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now.  I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams.  Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL.  Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon.  This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy.  I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year.
Right team, wrong sleeper. It will be Charles Rogers this year.
I like Rogers a sleeper WR this year. I think he will be a good value pick in redraft leagues and a good/cheap WR to target in dynasty league
 
WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy. I can't say it enough. Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year. Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done. It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories. I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point. He can get it done. But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz. His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers. Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now. I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams. Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL. Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon. This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy. I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year
Good attitude. No matter how many times you are wrong, you will eventually be right.
From DraftSharks:
** Lions WR Mike Williams has been under heavy fire this offseason for reportedly oversleeping for practice, missing film sessions, and underperforming in workouts due to hamstring pulls. A recent report said Williams has been fined $400,000 going back to last season. He refutes this story and showed a reporter a line-item statement from the club with $60,443 in fines. As for his injury, Williams says he's 100% now and ready to make an impact. He's got a long way to go. Roy Williams and Corey Bradford are the starters, with Mike Furrey, Scottie Vines, and Charles Rogers all in the mix for the #3 spot. In fact, recent reports indicate Rogers has turned it around and wowed OC Mike Martz with his work ethic and deep speed. Williams, who's been running with the 3rd string, better be prepared because new HC Rod Marinelli will run one of the toughest training camps in the NFL.
 
The best sleeper WR for this year begins and ends with Reggie Williams. Can be had as a last round pick in redrafts and has a good shot to produce top 25 WR numbers.

As for reasons, others in the thread already gave them.

 
WR81 Mike Williams - I love this guy. I can't say it enough. Not only is he an enormous talent, but Detriot will be one of the most improved offenses this year. Guys I talk to laugh at me because they bring up Jon Kitna - no way can he get it done. It always amazes me how many fantasy football players have short memories. I remember in 2003 when Kitna had a breakout year with Cinci - leading to Chad Johnson and Peter Warrick both having career years to that point. He can get it done. But even more than that, you can't discount Mike Martz. His running games may be non-existent, but mark my words he will get the most out of the passing game and those talented receivers. Roy Williams will probably get the lion's share (I like him a lot too), but the #2 spot is cloudy right now. I know guys will be taking Corey Bradford, Charles Rogers, and perhaps even Scotty Vines before Williams. Then, in the 17th round when guys are packing it in, I will be paying a bag of rocks for one of the most talented WR's in the NFL. Now, there has been talk of Williams being cut, but thats nothing more than pre-preseason talk - you don't give up on a top 10 draft pick that soon. This may not be the year, but one of these years I will be proven right about this guy. I'll take a chance in round 17 that it's this year
Ok, so guys have been all over me about this Mike Williams pick. First, I dont listen to what people are saying in July about starting spots - especially the media. Second, the point of this is that Williams has more raw talent than any of those receivers besides Roy Williams. One of the things coaches do to motivate talented players is talk them down, or give starting jobs to less talented guys at the beginning of training camp. It happens every year. Bottom line, if and when Williams works his ### off and earns the playing time, he will emerge out of these guys because in my opinion he is more talented. Corey Bradford? Cmon. If this guy busts out and holds the #2 job all year, I will gladly eat crow pie. Like I said, it may not be this year, but when Williams finally wakes up he will become a monster.Good attitude. No matter how many times you are wrong, you will eventually be right.
From DraftSharks:
** Lions WR Mike Williams has been under heavy fire this offseason for reportedly oversleeping for practice, missing film sessions, and underperforming in workouts due to hamstring pulls.  A recent report said Williams has been fined $400,000 going back to last season.  He refutes this story and showed a reporter a line-item statement from the club with $60,443 in fines.  As for his injury, Williams says he's 100% now and ready to make an impact.  He's got a long way to go.  Roy Williams and Corey Bradford are the starters, with Mike Furrey, Scottie Vines, and Charles Rogers all in the mix for the #3 spot.  In fact, recent reports indicate Rogers has turned it around and wowed OC Mike Martz with his work ethic and deep speed.  Williams, who's been running with the 3rd string, better be prepared because new HC Rod Marinelli will run one of the toughest training camps in the NFL.
 
I really think two wideouts to consider are Charles Rogers and Matt jones. I am especially high on Rogers potential because of Martz system.

 
This was one of my two freelance articles - one made it the other didn't. I'm certain this is the one that didn't make it. Feedback is welcome.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before I get to the theory, I must preface it by noting my definition of sleeper. All of the players I am about to mention have had an average pre-season ranking of WR35 or greater and have gone on to finish in the top 15 WR's in terms of fantasy points in my league...

---

However, each one of these guys had this in common - none of them were considered the number one receivng target on their team going into the season.

---

The other thing they had in common is that most were on offenses that were considerably better than what was expected going into the season, or they were already on potent offenses. So, the concept is based on picking out players that are extremely talented, in great offensive situations, lurking in the shadows of the number two or three receiving spot and are being overlooked or have been written off all together.
CEO - First of all, congrats on your other article being published - hopefully next to mine :P Not wanting to sound detrimental - I'm probably missing the point (or turning it around) - but if a guy is ranked WR35 or greater and he's in a good offensive team isn't he automatically the second or third target?...

Or, I'm I just reading the causes & consequences "the other way around"? That being the number 2 or 3 target is not the conclusion / the variable that you are looking for in a WR sleeper but rather just a consequence of the situation the WR is in?
Thanks Jayman - congrats to you too.Im not sure I fully understand what youre asking but I'll take a stab at it. Some of these guys are #2's or 3's on offenses that turned out to be better than expected, meaning they werent considered to be really good offenses going into the year. Also, there are some good offenses where their #1 WR is not ranked in the top 35 such as San Diego, Tenessee & Atlanta (although two of these teams have stellar TE's I admit). The point is, a WR 35 or greater on a good offensive team doesnt necessarily mean he is the #2 or #3 guy. I think all the criteria needs to be met:

* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I hope this clarifies things although Im not sure it does..
Thanks for the feedback CEO... I think the "offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season" is really important in your analysis...Otherwise, I'll try and be clearer - as I think the "he's a #2 or #3 guy" bullet should be nullify...

You are quoting San Diego - which is a good example...

If both McCardell and Parker are listed at WR35 or above... and McCardell is the WR1 (I think we agree on that)... than, wouldn't you want to go for McCardell and not Parker in your draft? (granted that both can be picked late because they are "sleepers")... thus nullyfing the "he has to be a #2 or #3 guy - if you can have the #1 - why not pick him instead?
You make a good point - you could make the arguement that you could pick a #1 WR that meet these criteria, however I have found that #1 WR's who are talented WR's on good to great offenses (or will be better than expected) are few and far between and are not overlooked. Also, I think part of it too (and I failed to mention this in my article unfortunately) is that the 2 or 3 WR that is talented and has the chance to break out is playing with a chip on their shoulder. I beleive many very talented #2's carry this chip if you will. In my opinion this was the case with Galloway, Price, and perhaps a few others on my list. I base this on my knowledge of the players personality and things Ive heard about these players from various sources. So being considered "second best" if you will is part of the drive that causes these players to break out. Just my theory...
I have difficulty with this statement. This seems like far to subjective a criterion to measure on any definable scale.IMO This is right up there with the contract year theory, which fails to hold up under scrutiny.

There is far to much rhetoric and misinformation coming out from to many media sources to really know who may have a "chip on their shoulder". And if I am going to try and measure a players potential in camp from the media that is available then I would think reading about someone having chip on their shoulder is a far less attractive measuring stick than reading about someones work ethic, film room study, coachability etc.

For example: Everything I have read about Koren Robinson has been highly positive. Apparently he is practicing hard and working well with the new coaching staff (Childress called him the #1 WR on the team) and he is taking proactive steps to make sure he does not have any off-field distractions.

OTOH Take a guy like Chris Henry, arguably more talented than Koren, who is in an excellent offensive situation and I would argue has a massive chip on his shoulder. This is a guy who desperately needs to prove himself on the field. Yeah? Well that means bubkis if dude is locked up or simply to stupid to figure out how dire his situation is, and I think the latter is highly probably considering his track record.

Despite the lesser offensive firepower in Minnesota I will take Koren every time.

:2cents:

 
Also, I think part of it too (and I failed to mention this in my article unfortunately) is that the 2 or 3 WR that is talented and has the chance to break out is playing with a chip on their shoulder.
I have difficulty with this statement. This seems like far to subjective a criterion to measure on any definable scale.

IMO This is right up there with the contract year theory, which fails to hold up under scrutiny.
Yes it is subjective, but my point is that the reason I have singled out #2 or #3's is because they are more likely to be playing with a chip on their shoulder. This is only part of the criteria. Again, here is the criteria I use:* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I have consistently picked breakout WR's using this method. I usually select four or five guys that meet this criteria and one or two generally have broken out. If you have a more consistent method that is not so subjective and has produced proven results, by all means, tell me what it is.

Bottom line, the art of picking sleepers is very subjective.

 
Also, I think part of it too (and I failed to mention this in my article unfortunately) is that the 2 or 3 WR that is talented and has the chance to break out is playing with a chip on their shoulder.
I have difficulty with this statement. This seems like far to subjective a criterion to measure on any definable scale.

IMO This is right up there with the contract year theory, which fails to hold up under scrutiny.
Yes it is subjective, but my point is that the reason I have singled out #2 or #3's is because they are more likely to be playing with a chip on their shoulder. This is only part of the criteria. Again, here is the criteria I use:* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I have consistently picked breakout WR's using this method. I usually select four or five guys that meet this criteria and one or two generally have broken out. If you have a more consistent method that is not so subjective and has produced proven results, by all means, tell me what it is.

Bottom line, the art of picking sleepers is very subjective.
Forgive me for being piecemeal but as I mentioned the "chip on their shoulder" criteria is purely subjective and another one of your rules may not be able to be defined prior to the season either.
* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season
How can you know this before the season starts? If the offense isn't expected to be better then you lose out on a handful of teams that no one identified as being significantly improved, otherwise offensive improvement would be expected.Also how does one identify this?

The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance
I am not sure what your critera are for defining these things. Considering the number of low round draft picks who outperform the first round guys it looks like the guys who are getting paid to identify the talent haven't quite figured it out yet so I am not sure how I would be able to do a more consistent job. And I have another question regarding the WR you made identified in your first post. Did you pick any of them to breakout in more than one year? In other words was last year the only season you thought Donte' Stallworth would breakout or, like most of us, had you been thinking that would happen for 2-3 years? Not saying you did but it would certainly improve your chances of being right on a few of these guys if you did.

I think I am getting off topic. My point is that I simply do not see much here that helps consistiently identify breakout receivers. It would be just as effective to put the names of every #2 or #3 WR in the league into a hat and draw out five names. I bet a couple of them would break-out every year.

After all, and please don't take this the wrong way, if you throw enough s##t against the wall eventually something is going to stick.

As far as my own method goes, during the preseason it probably is not too different from yours but as I said previously I put more weight into reading about a particular players improvements in work ethic than you do. I don't put much weight into the notion that a player will be able to channel his inner rage into on-field production.

Also I know that typically one or two breakout receivers go undrafted every year in my league (Galloway in '05 and Muhammad in '04 are the most recent examples) so I try to grab one or two of the guys that get off to a fast start and hope I have the next Muhammad and not the next Travis Taylor.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like the idea behind the article, although I agree it's probably a little too subjective to be applicable for most people. For example:

WR36 Jerry Porter - ...I'm not sold on the Top-5 hype for Moss this year...

WR41 Samie Parker - ...Im not buying into the Gonzalez comeback hype...

WR89 Ashley Lelie - ...I'm not sold that Javon Walker will be coming back at full strength...

WR100 Rod Gardner - ...Honestly, Im not a big Driver fan...
So a major reason you like all these #2/3's is because you don't like the #1's ahead of them? I think the best piece of advice in your article is loading up on sleeper WR's in the later rounds. Odds are that you will have one of them perform much better than expected. I try to load up on players like these, rather than grabbing the veteran who consistently puts up mediocre numbers.

Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week? I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.

Also, when a player on the waiver wire starts putting up numbers, you can always free up roster spots by dropping these "busts" and take a chance on the free agent. Another owner might be reluctant to drop his "consistent" veteran for fear that the free agent is a flash in the pan. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, but with a roster full of "sleepers" you can always pick him up and find out.

 
Also, I think part of it too (and I failed to mention this in my article unfortunately) is that the 2 or 3 WR that is talented and has the chance to break out is playing with a chip on their shoulder.
I have difficulty with this statement.  This seems like far to subjective a criterion to measure on any definable scale.

IMO This is right up there with the contract year theory, which fails to hold up under scrutiny.
Yes it is subjective, but my point is that the reason I have singled out #2 or #3's is because they are more likely to be playing with a chip on their shoulder. This is only part of the criteria. Again, here is the criteria I use:* The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance

* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season

* The player is not considered the number one receiver on the team

* The player is being overlooked or has been written off, if you will

I have consistently picked breakout WR's using this method. I usually select four or five guys that meet this criteria and one or two generally have broken out. If you have a more consistent method that is not so subjective and has produced proven results, by all means, tell me what it is.

Bottom line, the art of picking sleepers is very subjective.
Forgive me for being piecemeal but as I mentioned the "chip on their shoulder" criteria is purely subjective and another one of your rules may not be able to be defined prior to the season either.
* The player is on a good offensive team or the offense will be much better than had been expected going into the season
How can you know this before the season starts? If the offense isn't expected to be better then you lose out on a handful of teams that no one identified as being significantly improved, otherwise offensive improvement would be expected.Also how does one identify this?

The player is very talented / has shown flashes of brilliance or dominance
I am not sure what your critera are for defining these things. Considering the number of low round draft picks who outperform the first round guys it looks like the guys who are getting paid to identify the talent haven't quite figured it out yet so I am not sure how I would be able to do a more consistent job. And I have another question regarding the WR you made identified in your first post. Did you pick any of them to breakout in more than one year? In other words was last year the only season you thought Donte' Stallworth would breakout or, like most of us, had you been thinking that would happen for 2-3 years? Not saying you did but it would certainly improve your chances of being right on a few of these guys if you did.

I think I am getting off topic. My point is that I simply do not see much here that helps consistiently identify breakout receivers. It would be just as effective to put the names of every #2 or #3 WR in the league into a hat and draw out five names. I bet a couple of them would break-out every year.

After all, and please don't take this the wrong way, if you throw enough s##t against the wall eventually something is going to stick.

As far as my own method goes, during the preseason it probably is not too different from yours but as I said previously I put more weight into reading about a particular players improvements in work ethic than you do. I don't put much weight into the notion that a player will be able to channel his inner rage into on-field production.

Also I know that typically one or two breakout receivers go undrafted every year in my league (Galloway in '05 and Muhammad in '04 are the most recent examples) so I try to grab one or two of the guys that get off to a fast start and hope I have the next Muhammad and not the next Travis Taylor.
Im not going to rehash eveything Ive said, I think Ive been pretty clear. There are no concrete definable rules in picking out sleepers. But if you follow these steps (I will break it down for you), chances are you will find a breakout WR:* Pick out the #2 or #3 WR's on each team

* Determine which ones are currently ranked outside the Top 35 WR's (this will eliminate some candidates)

* Determine which ones are on great offenses or the offense will be better than expected. Now this is subjective, but if you can't figure out for example that Drew Bledsoe is a major upgrade from Rob Johnson (Peerless Price example), you probably won't be able to pick out sleepers anyway. If you can't figure out that Jon Kitna and the addition of Mike Martz will significantly upgrade the Detriot offense (which is still flying under the radar based on where the DET skill players are being taken), you probably wont be able to pick out sleepers. By doing this step, you eliminate even more players

* Determine which of the remaining players has above average talent. This too is subjective. One of the remaining players here is Robert Ferguson for example. If you think he has supreme talent, you probably wont be able to pick sleepers. If you think Robert Ferguson is more talented than Mike Williams becasue he is ranked higher on the FBG cheatsheet, again, you probably wont be able to pick out sleepers.

* Once you've gone through these steps, you should be left with a handful of players (5 or 6) - again assuming you have some kind of eye for talent and have an idea of which offenses will be improved. It's really not that difficult to determine which offenses will be markedly improved or which guys have above average talent. Assuming you have this handful of guys left, it is my experience that one or two tend to break out.

Again, there is no exact science to picking sleepers. But Ive found that following these steps tends to produce them on a consistent basis.

 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week? I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week?  I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
Ferguson I understand, but using Roddy White as an example of what you're trying to convey, probably isn't a good example. Roddy White has plenty of potential, and if he had someone like Schaub throwing him the rock instead of Vick, he would make a great sleeper.
 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week?  I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
Ferguson I understand, but using Roddy White as an example of what you're trying to convey, probably isn't a good example. Roddy White has plenty of potential, and if he had someone like Schaub throwing him the rock instead of Vick, he would make a great sleeper.
White is eliminated becasue of the type of offense he is in, not because Vick is throwing to him. The offense is built around Vick's legs & the running game. I guess I incorrectly assumed when I said "good offenses", I meant good passing offenses. There won't be any WR breakouts happening in ATL.
 
There won't be any WR breakouts happening in ATL.
Unless Vick goes down. If Schaub is the QB, the offense philosopy changes, and White becomes hot to trot.
Perhaps, but rule #1 for me (at least for WR's) is never draft a player relying on injury to bust out. All sleepers I draft have the potential to excel without relying on someone else getting hurt.
 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week?  I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
Me too. The funny part is, the guys with all the "Fergusons" on their bench pride themselves on this. They think the real skill of fantasy football is knowing who will give you those consistent 5 point weeks, that it proves their superior fantasy football acumen by having these mediocre scorers sit on their bench all year. They'll use their "Fergusons" once or twice when their studs are on bye, and they'll still lose those weeks anyway because you can't replace a 15 point scorer with a 5 point scorer. And when you have a sleeper blow up and carry you through the playoffs, they call that "luck". I'm happy to let them go on thinking that way.

 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week?  I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
Me too. The funny part is, the guys with all the "Fergusons" on their bench pride themselves on this. They think the real skill of fantasy football is knowing who will give you those consistent 5 point weeks, that it proves their superior fantasy football acumen by having these mediocre scorers sit on their bench all year. They'll use their "Fergusons" once or twice when their studs are on bye, and they'll still lose those weeks anyway because you can't replace a 15 point scorer with a 5 point scorer. And when you have a sleeper blow up and carry you through the playoffs, they call that "luck". I'm happy to let them go on thinking that way.
All I can say is I hope none of the guys in my league are reading this thread.. ;)
 
Im not going to rehash eveything Ive said, I think Ive been pretty clear. There are no concrete definable rules in picking out sleepers. But if you follow these steps (I will break it down for you), chances are you will find a breakout WR:

* Pick out the #2 or #3 WR's on each team

* Determine which ones are currently ranked outside the Top 35 WR's (this will eliminate some candidates)

* Determine which ones are on great offenses or the offense will be better than expected. Now this is subjective, but if you can't figure out for example that Drew Bledsoe is a major upgrade from Rob Johnson (Peerless Price example), you probably won't be able to pick out sleepers anyway. If you can't figure out that Jon Kitna and the addition of Mike Martz will significantly upgrade the Detriot offense (which is still flying under the radar based on where the DET skill players are being taken), you probably wont be able to pick out sleepers. By doing this step, you eliminate even more players

* Determine which of the remaining players has above average talent. This too is subjective. One of the remaining players here is Robert Ferguson for example. If you think he has supreme talent, you probably wont be able to pick sleepers. If you think Robert Ferguson is more talented than Mike Williams becasue he is ranked higher on the FBG cheatsheet, again, you probably wont be able to pick out sleepers.

* Once you've gone through these steps, you should be left with a handful of players (5 or 6) - again assuming you have some kind of eye for talent and have an idea of which offenses will be improved. It's really not that difficult to determine which offenses will be markedly improved or which guys have above average talent. Assuming you have this handful of guys left, it is my experience that one or two tend to break out.

Again, there is no exact science to picking sleepers. But Ive found that following these steps tends to produce them on a consistent basis.
I get your point and I get the logic behind your point. It is not at all difficult to understand so don't feel the need to explain it again. I just disagree that it provides any advantage over sticking the names of #2 & #3 WRs in a hat and drawing them out randomly.For ##### & grins here are WRs all ranked 35th or higher (FBG ADP) and I would like to see you apply your criteria to them to identify the sleepers. Maybe we come up with similar results.

Koren Robinson

Matt Jones

Terry Glenn

Keyshawn Johnson

Braylon Edwards

Keenan McCardell

Ernest Wilford

Kevin Curtis

Eric Moulds

Antonio Bryant

Isaac Bruce

Mark Clayton

David Givens

Sinorice Moss

Joe Jurevicius

Brandon Lloyd

Santonio Holmes

Chad Jackson

Roddy White

Mike Williams

Amani Toomer

Troy Williamson

Charles Rogers

Antwaan Randle El

Ashley Lelie

Reggie Williams

Eric Parker

Brandon Stokley

Samie Parker

Greg Jennings

Michael Jenkins

Bobby Engram

Brandon Marshall

Greg Lewis

Using your criteria this is what I came up with*. Terry Glenn, Keyshawn Johnson, Kevin Curtis, Issac Bruce, Amani Toomer and Brandon Stokley.

(*Sinorice Moss, Chad Jackson & Santonio Holmes have been removed because they have not had opportunity to demonstrate talent or dominance at the NFL level.)

Honorable mention to: Brandon Lloyd, Antwan Randle El and Troy Williamson.

IMO your criteria eliminates everyone else. How do Samie Parker, Ashley Lelie & Mike Williams, who have all shown less than nothing at the NFL level make your list?

 
Not to stray from the topic, but seriously, who has ever won a FF championship because they had that "consistent" guy on their bench that put up 5 pts per week?  I'd much rather draft a handful of sleepers - sure, most of them will "bust" (but it's not really a busy because you didn't expect anything from them anyway), but with a little luck you'll have one of the ones that breaks out and becomes a consistent fantasy scorer.
Finally, someone who understands at least part of the artice. This, my friend is how championships are won. I laugh at guys that have the Fergusons or Roddy White's on their bench getting them 5 points per week. I feed on them.
Championships are won in a myriad of ways. This is but one.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top