Snead, Landry, Fuller, Diggs or Sharpe to start? (1 Viewer)

[anak85]

Hi!

I need to start 2 of these five but am very undecided today. Snead is given I guess, but what about the rest?

 

[jungchen]

Depending on the format, my opinions might vary.

In PPR leagues I would have to decide between Sharpe, Diggs & Landry.

Standard scoring I might go 2 from Snead, Landry and Diggs.

Sharpe is unlikely to average 15+yds/catch but might catch 7-10 balls in a game where TEN might be forced to pass. On the other hand, Snead might only get 3-4 targets, but can turn them into 75yds and 1TD.

Landry & Diggs should see the most targets for their teams.

 

[anak85]

Depending on the format, my opinions might vary.

In PPR leagues I would have to decide between Sharpe, Diggs & Landry.

Standard scoring I might go 2 from Snead, Landry and Diggs.

Sharpe is unlikely to average 15+yds/catch but might catch 7-10 balls in a game where TEN might be forced to pass. On the other hand, Snead might only get 3-4 targets, but can turn them into 75yds and 1TD.

Landry & Diggs should see the most targets for their teams.

Thanks! We are using standard scoring. I am tending towards Snead and Landry. Only things going against that are the NE DEF and the two long journeys that Miami have these first two weeks.

German as well?

 

[jungchen]

From Luxembourg

Then go Diggs instead - Bradford might be forced to throw often to keep up with A-Rod and GB will prob. stack the box like TEN did last week.

 

[anak85]

From Luxembourg

Then go Diggs instead - Bradford might be forced to throw often to keep up with A-Rod and GB will prob. stack the box like TEN did last week.

That sounds like a good argument.

And I guess IF Miami has a chance of winning, it would be with Brady missing. That would mean more run / throw balance instead of chasing the score.

I guess I am down the road from you then in Aachen.

 

[jungchen]

pretty much, yes! 

For MIA to win it, to me it´s with great D# and running the ball.