So I'm working on a 37 man onslaught (1 Viewer)

[The Duff Man]

I am waiting for the ap to come out before I get back into this...

 

[shuke]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

 

[strykerpks]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

Hello, exactly!

Went to a home game in Kenosha a few years back and some drunk guy pulled the same ####. I walked out with like $350 after a simple Schaefer Subset busted him in the 2nd. ####in n00bs

 

[EYLive]

I can't put any more money into this. I'll jot for 45 minutes a day at most if you guys wanna run 8-10 liners for fun.

 

[Otis]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

Oh snap!

 

[Jayrod]

This thread makes me feel like some random shopper at the mall during a flash mob.

 

[Otis]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

Ignore him BC. This was solid work. The Cartesian set you employ the line 2 transition tells me you clearly have a sense of what you're doing here. Only constructive criticism I can offer, and maybe what shuke is complaining about, is the triple-8 progression to towards the 16 finish. I agree that was week.

Overall I'd say strong work and you've improved a lot over time; just make sure you finish strong too.

 

[joffer]

Is this about Artose Pinner?

 

[Buckychudd]

Most of you missed that I modified the Hendel approach in segment 14 and combined it with a reverse Lynchburg, This completely negates the Trinchland hypothesis of 1964.

 

[bostonfred]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

lol at this guy acting like an expert. Hey shuke if you want another shot at the champ I'll spot you a double niner again and this time I won't play anything but singles and doublets.

 

[John Bender]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

Ignore him BC. This was solid work. The Cartesian set you employ the line 2 transition tells me you clearly have a sense of what you're doing here. Only constructive criticism I can offer, and maybe what shuke is complaining about, is the triple-8 progression to towards the 16 finish. I agree that was week.

Overall I'd say strong work and you've improved a lot over time; just make sure you finish strong too.

Uh....seriously?

He's been working on this for years and still has an 8 hanging in his subset? Shuke is spot on here. You classically trained dolts who worship Aruzian and his like need to wake up to the changes that computer modeling has given us. The Markov Prime B would be laughed out of any serious Onslaught formation these days and that's confirmed by my computer model indicating the hanging 8 could have easily been advanced with a Bergen gambette.

Go back to Greenwood and report back when you figure out the 391 28 0 0 variation, rookie.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Didn't NeXT's Deep Onyx solve all onslaughts in the early 90s?

 

[tdoss]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

Ignore him BC. This was solid work. The Cartesian set you employ the line 2 transition tells me you clearly have a sense of what you're doing here. Only constructive criticism I can offer, and maybe what shuke is complaining about, is the triple-8 progression to towards the 16 finish. I agree that was week.

Overall I'd say strong work and you've improved a lot over time; just make sure you finish strong too.

Here we go again...I really didn't think he'd hook people with this nonsense and I'll be damned if I'm drug into again...I'll just say this and let you figure out what he was going for:

It's not sixteen...it's one-six.

Hoskinen finish (or the Finnish Finish...if you wanna get cute because of where he's from)...

 

[tdoss]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

If by a long time, you mean 90 seconds, then I believe you. What a load of #### this configuration is.

lol at this guy acting like an expert. Hey shuke if you want another shot at the champ I'll spot you a double niner again and this time I won't play anything but singles and doublets.

You'll never pull that off again...not even on Shuke.

 

[tdoss]

I can't put any more money into this. I'll jot for 45 minutes a day at most if you guys wanna run 8-10 liners for fun.

I got kinda burned out...especially when the internet jumped on board and now everyone is using the same gambits.

If you wanna play...just for fun...with no algorithmic aids...I'm down.

We playing on the app or old school email?

 

[Bucky86]

Damn kids

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

Didn't NeXT's Deep Onyx solve all onslaughts in the early 90s?

 

[Mr.Pack]

Most of you missed that I modified the Hendel approach in segment 14 and combined it with a reverse Lynchburg, This completely negates the Trinchland hypothesis of 1964.

Sorry, but that was no Reverse Lynchburg.

 

[Ilov80s]

Still have no idea what's going on here.

They are having MMF sex parties, Bob Sac covered that earlier.

 

[yellowdog]

Most of you missed that I modified the Hendel approach in segment 14 and combined it with a reverse Lynchburg, This completely negates the Trinchland hypothesis of 1964.

Sorry, but that was no Reverse Lynchburg.