What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

So many crappy teams... (1 Viewer)

Which of these teams is the crappiest?

  • Miami (1-6)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cleveland (1-5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tennessee (1-5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Oakland (1-5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Detroit (1-6)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Arizona (1-6)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Buffalo (2-5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Houston (2-4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Washington (2-5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green Bay (2-4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tampa Bay (2-4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • San Francisco (2-4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pittsburgh (2-4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • San Diego (4-2)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Despyzer

Lousy Attention Whore
I haven't seen one of these recently (I know you'll correct me if I'm wrong), but it sure seems like there are some pretty sorry teams out there. Which one is the worst?

*I included San Diego so Billy Ball Thornton could cast his vote.

 
Seriously, I was as big on the craptasticness of the Raiders, but the belt has been snatched away from them by the Cardinals. The next team to be the crappiest team will be whoever manages to lose to AZ.

-QG

 
miami is garbage.... they have all the tools to be a great team but they cant execute for anything........i think they are the crappiest because they dont see how they can excuse themselves for being 1-6

 
Seriously, I was as big on the craptasticness of the Raiders, but the belt has been snatched away from them by the Cardinals. The next team to be the crappiest team will be whoever manages to lose to AZ.-QG
Didn't 2-4 San Francisco already lose to Arizona?
 
I haven't seen one of these recently (I know you'll correct me if I'm wrong), but it sure seems like there are some pretty sorry teams out there. Which one is the worst?*I included San Diego so Billy Ball Thornton could cast his vote.
Gotta go with Oakland and that will be emphasized even more after they get slaughtered this week.
 
Surprised to see that SD and PIT both grabbed more votes than SF, GB, and DET combined.

What's the reasoning behind this? Blind hatred? Mockery of the poll?

 
Oakland (1-5) [ 60 ] ** [50.42%]Detroit (1-6) [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Interesting how so many of you got it right with Oakland and nobody got it right with Detriot, despite Oakland having the tougher schedule. I wonder why that is.

 
Code:
Oakland (1-5) 	 [ 60 ]	  ** [50.42%]Detroit (1-6) 	 [ 0 ] 	  ** [0.00%]
Interesting how so many of you got it right with Oakland and nobody got it right with Detriot, despite Oakland having the tougher schedule. I wonder why that is.
Are you sure Oakland had the tougher schedule? I think Detroit currently has the tiebreaker for opponents strength of schedule by .06 and the #1 pick. That's what a little birdy told me. I've done no research whatsoever to back this up. In fact for all i know the Clippers have the first pick.
 
Are you sure Oakland had the tougher schedule? I think Detroit currently has the tiebreaker for opponents strength of schedule by .06 and the #1 pick. That's what a little birdy told me. I've done no research whatsoever to back this up. In fact for all i know the Clippers have the first pick.
I didn't research it either. I just made an assumption based on the teams that they share a division with.Chargers > BearsBroncos > PackersChiefs > VikingsThe Raiders played the AFC North, while the Lions played the AFC EastRavens > PatriotsBengals </= JetsSteelers = BillsBrowns < DolphinsBoth teams played the NFC West, and the other two games were...Jets = CowboysTexans < FalconsSeems fairly even, but I think the Raiders had it a little tougher.
 
Are you sure Oakland had the tougher schedule? I think Detroit currently has the tiebreaker for opponents strength of schedule by .06 and the #1 pick. That's what a little birdy told me. I've done no research whatsoever to back this up. In fact for all i know the Clippers have the first pick.
I didn't research it either. I just made an assumption based on the teams that they share a division with.Chargers > BearsBroncos > PackersChiefs > VikingsThe Raiders played the AFC North, while the Lions played the AFC EastRavens > PatriotsBengals </= JetsSteelers = BillsBrowns < DolphinsBoth teams played the NFC West, and the other two games were...Jets = CowboysTexans < FalconsSeems fairly even, but I think the Raiders had it a little tougher.
I was at that Seahawks/Lions ####fest and now we know the 9-6 score was representative of the two teams true value. As a Seahawks fan from Detroit I can still say Seahawks>Lions though. That's pretty huge. :goodposting: + :D
 
Does the tie-breaker even matter when it comes to draft position? I thought they were using a coin flip again.

 
Code:
Oakland (1-5) 	 [ 60 ]	  ** [50.42%]Detroit (1-6) 	 [ 0 ] 	  ** [0.00%]
Interesting how so many of you got it right with Oakland and nobody got it right with Detriot, despite Oakland having the tougher schedule. I wonder why that is.
Are you sure Oakland had the tougher schedule? I think Detroit currently has the tiebreaker for opponents strength of schedule by .06 and the #1 pick. That's what a little birdy told me. I've done no research whatsoever to back this up. In fact for all i know the Clippers have the first pick.
Detroit has the tiebreaker because they had an easier schedule.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top